I guess we have all neglected a pan on the cooker for a few minutes too long and had to deal with the mess when it has boiled over. Inevitably a mess is always the result when a problem is not dealt with promptly. We are now witnessing the inevitable result of the Merkel government not only neglecting to deal with the issue of illegal immigrants (I refuse to use the PC term “asylum seekers” which, by UNHCR Asylum Procedures Directive definition they generally are not) but actively encouraging them whilst suppressing the German people who dare to speak out.
This morning, Friday 30th December, the Daily Express, with the headline “Germany at Boiling Point” reported on the known occurrence of 921 (an incomplete figure) recorded attacks on “refugee camps”: the pan has already started to boil over. Of course the Merkel government still plans to carry on importing ever more numbers of Muslim invaders regardless of the opposition of the native Germans.
Merkel might be one of the more ardent supporters of free movement and suppression of free speech but she is not alone. The unwarranted prosecution of Geert Wilders and others and, at least in the UK, the allowing of Muslims to spew forth their hatred of us for years confirms the lack of any fair balance. Some of us have experienced that hatred at a local level which is never reported, so no-one can say how widespread it is. On the other hand similar utterances by a native Brit may well lead to prosecution.
A summary of European “hate speech” laws may be found here.
Today I also read (in the Daily Mail) of yet another court case being brought in an attempt to frustrate our clean exit from the EU by four immigrants:
“These are ordinary working men and women who have decided to make their futures in the UK and wish the UK to be their permanent home. One has mixed nationality, one is a non-EEA national but married to an EEA national. We are trying to highlight the various types of people who will be left in a state of limbo following our withdrawal from the EU.”
How can it be right that four immigrants are being allowed to subvert democracy in a move to oppose what 17.4 million native Brits voted for? If the government does not oppose this, bringing in some emergency legislation as necessary, then at least we know whose side they really support. Allowing Gina Miller to oppose us through the courts was bad enough; how much worse can it get before that pan really boils over?
Sadly such events are becoming commonplace so perhaps do not attract the outrage which they deserve.
My recent visit to the UK, which I wrote about some weeks ago (see “Letters to the Editor”), expressing surprise at how deep the invader is now entrenched, convinced me that preventing further immigration by such people is not enough. We now are in a position where large areas of our country need to be recovered from those who would subject us to the rule of Islam. That of course is an extremely difficult task which government will not even admit to, let alone face up to. However, owing to large differences in reproduction rates and ongoing uncontrolled immigration, dealing with it becomes more urgent by the day.
So what can be done about it? First of all government must accept that the problem is Islam, whose followers have been urged, and continue to be urged, to overcome the “infidel” and force him to accept their ways. Never mind that their ways are rooted in an ideology centuries old and wholly incompatible with our own ways and religions; that is their objective, reinforced by their attendance at the mosque and being required to learn their religious texts verbatim.
Some might suggest that Islam should become a proscribed religion and that the mosques be seized and demolished. However that would simply drive it underground; better that it is visible. Such action is also reminiscent of Orwell’s “Thought Police” and “Ministry of Truth”; organisations far worse than the comparatively benign evil of the BBC. Be careful what you wish for.
Others might suggest that the ghettos be eliminated so that they would have to mix with native Brits In the hope that they might change. How that would be done without kicking off a civil war is questionable and perhaps the time will come when their living in the various ghettos might be an advantage to us.
One thing that must be done is to restore policing of those ghettos. Anyone who is familiar with them is surely also familiar with the rejection of our own laws, often made visible by their attitude to traffic law and verbal abuse, particularly among the young. For too long they have been let do as they please; I even had a friend who sat on the West Yorkshire Police Authority and resigned in disgust following the failure prosecute many of the Muslim rioters in Bradford.
Policing should include searches of the mosques and any other suspected properties for terrorists’ materials and weapons. That is a huge task in an area comprising of several hundred houses, schools, shops and a mosque or two. Certainly the police don’t have the numbers to do it and even the military would be stretched in areas like Bradford, Halifax, Rochdale, Oldham and other former cotton and woollen towns. I’m not so familiar with the likes of Birmingham, Leicester and the like but suspect the issue would be the same. It would not surprise me if there were already significant caches of weapons in such areas; the attacks that we have already experienced suggest that is the case.
Clearly based on present performance such measures are likely to be rejected by government so the problem will be allowed to grow and fester. Probably the only workable solution is selective repatriation over a period of years. Of course they will resist but at least that festering problem would gradually be reduced in scale. I wouldn’t mind giving them some financial help such as assisted passages and limited short term help to resettle in their own countries. That would be far better and probably cheaper than the destruction of their native countries practised by Blair, Bush, Cameron and Obama.
Having written this perhaps my analogy with a pan boiling over should be changed; we native Brits are generally a tolerant people but maybe what we really have is a pressure cooker and an explosion will result unless our wishes expressed in the Referendum are respected. I suspect, as more information comes out about the real intent of the EU, that support for leaving might be significantly greater than it was those few months ago. However, whatever the level of support, we still need to overcome the inertia of our own government. UKIP faces an enormous challenge.
“Probably the only workable solution is selective repatriation over a period of years.”
If H@l@l was banned, not only the disgusting slaughter, but also the import of so called ‘religiously slaughtered’ food, then I think you might find that the repatriation would take off faster than the proverbial f@rt in plimsolls’!!
Guys,
Thanks for your interest and your many comments. I’m off to sleep soon but look forward to reading them all (and responding as necessary) in the morning. Enjoy the rest of your day over there.
David, thanks for a good article. The first step is to discontinue the government (taxpayers’) funding for the Muslim Council and similar institutes, and close them down. That would be the first shot across the bows, signalling that islam is not a welcome or approved religious ideology in this country. No more mosques to be built and the ones suspected of subversion closed. No more workplace or college prayer rooms for muslims, and no official notice taken of their religious holidays or rituals. No halal meat, the production of which contravenes our humane slaughter laws, allowed in this country. The immediate cessation and outlawing of all sharia courts. The forbidding of brides or grooms being brought from homeland countries. The abolition of the burkha and all other forms of islamic dress. The closing down of madrassas and islamic faith schools, all children to attend ordinary unsegregated schools. No segregation of the sexes in public places. Draconian punishments for unBritish practices such as FGM, forced marriage, and guaranteed whole life sentences for ‘honour’ murders.
Those who wanted to return to an islamic country because of these restrictions could apply for assistance to go. Those who were prepared to accept that islam’s days of trying to run the show were over could stay and practice their religion privately and quietly. Those who committed criminal or terrorist acts in protest to be forcibly deported or locked up for life. Internment of suspects would be a good start.
What is there to fear in terms of retribution? The deathmongers are already running amok in Europe and constantly threatening us. islam must be put back in its box, banished to the countries that are already islamic because no one fully succeeded in halting islam’s bloody spread the first time round.
Panmelia,
Although I find myself agreeing with you with regards to Islam, you would have to ban all faith schools and segregation ie: Jewish schools, catholic schools, church schools etc. Also, what about Kosher meat as well as that is not stunned either and what about Jewish circumcision of baby boys, does this not also go against our own practices.
I know the above are not threatening to kill us but what goes for one would really have to be for all, I myself would not have a problem with banning the lot as I do not believe in any religious practices being forced on individuals, but there would be an uproar and I can think of no way round it.
You have to face facts and realize that not all muslims are bloodthirsty nutters who follow these absurd brainwashing rituals, it would probably be a case of punishing the majority to get rid of a minority.
DD, I wouldn’t be too sure of that ‘minority’. Surveys after 9/11 and 7/7/05 showed a worryingly high number of muslims not condemning those attacks and far too many approving of them. Just because they’re not participating now, it doesn’t mean they wouldn’t heed the call to jihadi action at some crucial point.
Besides, no one would be ‘punished’ in any significant way: they’d just be made to fit in with our way of life, or go home, which is what should have happened from the beginning if we hadn’t had such weak and blind politicians over the last half century. Those asses are to blame for the fix we’re in now.
By weakening the grip of islam on its hapless followers in this country, we might even cause some to free themselves from its mind control.
One thing is for sure: with a growing muslim population and extremist islam being preached everywhere, it’s come to the point of take milder action now or face bloody conflict in the future.
Panmelia,
Believe me when I say I would dearly like to see all the mosques pulled down, but I just cannot see that happening unless for some awful reason there was a civil war between us and them. The way I see it is, that it is the men who are the problem with the way they view things, the young women who are born here and go to normal schools seem to be breaking free of this ‘female chatel’ religion.
You cannot deny that a lot of them go on to have good careers and forge a life of freedom for themselves, hopefully they will then pass that on to their own children. Therefore, in the future it depends how their menfolk behave and it is with them we definitely have a problem with at the present. They have all got to be taught to obey the rules and mores of this country without exception, and at least the government is making a start by preventing any further voter fraud, but this should be just the beginning. And yes, we do need to prevent any more coming in but that goes for other ethnic minorities as well.
On the topic of banning indoctrinating schools of whatever faith, yes that is desirable, but the islamic ones are at the head of the queue as the most dangerous, as has been demonstrated in actual cases not long ago.
The barbaric practice of cutting flesh from defenceless babies and children (child abuse in my book) is indefensible and the Jews should have a really good look at themselves regarding this, as well as their inhumane slaughter of animals. However, the Jewish people are not a threat to our continued existence as a nation and as a people, so it’s a waste of time and effort addressing side issues. Focus on the problem that literally grows bigger every day.
WHY would it have to be ‘What goes for one goes for all’?? This is OUR country, WE decide what goes and what our laws are, what is or isn’t acceptable. We reign supreme in our own land, and if we don’t, who the hell will? Answer: Anyone who wants to take it over and run it their way! That’s why we fought two ruinous wars in the last century – to prevent invasion and takeover. At the moment, the PTB are allowing a slow motion invasion of an alien, hostile culture into our land and threatening US when we protest against it!
We need to carry on restoring majority rule and put minorities back in their place of like it, lump it or leave the country. We didn’t ask them to come and we don’t care if they go; in fact, a wholesale exodus of committed anti-West muslims would be hugely welcomed.
Panmelia,
Yet again I do agree with you, but do the indigenous people of this country reign supreme? I have grave doubts about that, we seem absolutely powerless, the PTB as you say are taking no notice what so ever. They really need to be forced to sit up and take notice or be brought down by the people themselves, this is where UKIP should be coming to the fore. We could bring this government down if we went about it in the right way, but I am not sure there is the will and the know how in the higher echelons of the party to actually do it.
Good article, but let’s be realistic. There is no way these invaders are going to leave, this invasion has been planned. Our politicians will do nothing to address the issue, to think they will is dreaming.
Things will get worse until we have cases of Brits, like the Christians in the Middle East being beheaded and burned alive, it’s already happened: remember Lee Rigby.
The best thing we can do is prepare for the fight to come, as much as I support UKIP, we’ve moved past political solutions. Unfortunately, if we rely on UKIP or any other political party to address this problem, we’ll loose our country and probably our children will have to leave, loose their lives or be converted to Islam.
Time to face reality!
Oh Ajax, read the Koran! No matter how moderate a Muslim, when Sharia Law takes over they, as Muslims, will have to obey or be subject to the same punishment as infidels.
There are many people of many different ethnic origins I would be happy to have covering my back when fighting Islam, but it wouldn’t be a Muslim, moderate or otherwise. Only proven apostates would do.
Dee, there have been ethnic massacres all over globe throughout history, by all races, this current vogue for blaming Mohammedanism for everything is a fad, & a decoy off of the real nature of the foreign immigration threat, which is ethnicity.
Ajax why will you not concede that no other (so-called) religion followed to the letter orders its followers to kill the infidel wherever you find him.
Yes there have been many other massacres worldwide but this is usually tribe oriented and we in the West have Nations not tribes, and for the most part have moved on since the Second World War. Granted different ethnicities in this country already fight each other, but Muslims have systematically killed Christians and opposing Muslims right across the Middle East, and this is current.
Dee, a nation not based primarily on a tribe is a nation that has a very short future, which usually involves merely waiting to be taken over by another tribe displacing it. The modern nation states are merely legal territorial expressions of tribality in essence.
I didn’t say Mohammedanism isn’t a threat, it is, but it’s not the central one facing us from the foreign invasion of the 2nd & 3rd World into the 1st.
Probably where we differ then, Ajax, is that I have nothing against those of any ethnicity that subscribe to the British rule of law and all that goes with that. Many people of all ethnic origins fought with us to help us gain freedom for values all of us hold and, whatever our skin colour, did not wish to surrender.
Islam is different, it is a very dangerous ruthless political system wrapped in a disguising cloak of religion, very cleverly done because he who has decreed the laws of Islam is apparently above the law, unchallengeable because he is supposedly a higher being or deity.
All ethnicities must surrender to these laws or be killed, which act of killing will supposedly bring great glory to those who obey this supposed scripture. Nothing could be more dangerous to us all.
@Dee – Yes we disagree, & you are profoundly wrong in this. Saying that you have no problem with mass foreign migration as long as they “become us”, is dangerously ignorant of the nature of the human condition & what’s going on here for the reasons I detail in my other posts on this thread, which you’ve either just walked right past heedless of because you can’t be bothered to actually consider challenges to your preconceived views, or they went over your head; & waffle about (non-existent) “values” which the foreigners should subscribe to, & “they helped us gain our freedom” (I presume you mean in the Referendum?), is just Liblabcon/Cultural Marxist Newspeak, which you’re just parroting thoughtlessly from having been fed it so many times thru the MSM.
#1. They’re not going to turn into an ersatz forms of us by adopting our “values” (what are “our values” exactly Dee – what does that Cultural Marxist term actually mean in practical English?), because they’re not us, & the vast majority of them don’t want to be something they’re not – they’re are quite content to be who they actually are.
#2. I personally know Asiatics living here who campaigned to leave the eu, but at the same time are against UKIP, & when discussing with them where the difference lies, they’ve told me its because they wanted to stop migration from East Europe but not India (i.e. they want to limit access to the economic watering hole that is the U.K. to their own people back in India & stop others), & these are nice people who’ve lived here for almost 1/2 a century.
There’s nothing wrong with this position intrinsically, it’s tribalism which is quite natural to the human condition, but it belies the fundamental flaw in your thinking in this dangerous area.
Tribalism is inherently part of the human condition Dee, deny it, & you deny the human condition; & and to build a society ideologically on that artificial foundation & you invite disaster, as happened in those other conflicts I cited in another post here.
Dee- Ajax does have a point. I’ve been around this world more times than I can remember and I can assure you that there is no shortage of people that blame us for their woes. I refuse to acknowledge such grievances and I’ve had enough of others denigrating my race.
Look at what happened to Zimbabwe when Mugabe threw the white farmers of their land; the country became an economic disaster. Zimbabwe went from prosperous Rhodesia to just another Third World hell hole called Zimbabwe and I’m sure they blame us for their woes. I’ve often met wandering white farmers from Zimbabwe, bitter at loosing their life’s work and wandering aimlessly.
Islam is our most imminent danger, as our government, has allowed a hostile and probably increasingly armed invader into our country in ridiculous numbers. Muslims are organised and dedicated to their quest to dominate us. However, many of the illegal immigrants pouring into Europe are from all over African and Asia, just opportunists. I’m sure Black lives Matter and others will become an ever increasing problem.
The bottom line: multiculturalism always was a contrived lie made up to suit the globalists objectives.
You’re right though Dee, we’ll probably have to deal with the Muslims first.
@flyer – When the Shona leader Mugabe took possession of Rhodesia (handed to him by an American President), he used all the Marxist hogwash rhetoric about “shared values”, “rule of law” & the “irrelevance of skin colour” (i.e. ethnic identity) that Dee is spouting off. Look where it led for the Rhodesians ultimately, … & it could have been even worse than this potentially, they’re lucky they got out with their lives.
Ajax, I never said I had no problem with mass immigration, ‘as long as they become us’ – don’t be so silly! All I am saying is that there are people who have settled here and who are happy to live their way of life while adhering to British Law and not seeking to enforce their religion or way of life on us. While not ideal, these are people we have to accept are already here and are not a current danger.
Regarding Muslims, it will be very difficult to remove Muslims born and settled here, but it would be perfectly possible, if the Government had the will, to make their lives a lot less comfortable by insisting on the following of British Law (I read today that the Government has said that multiple wives can collect benefits, which is appalling). We are not even attempting to put our foot down, which makes me despair. Also anyone leaving for Syria should never be allowed back. So much we could do, but there is no will from Government, and I can see none in the future.
Regarding your Asians who want to bring their people in, that can be dealt with by a very strict immigration policy – but again, no will from Government.
Perhaps I put what I said very badly, as you completely failed to understand me and in fact seem to have a completely different assessment – I never mentioned British values as I have no idea what they are, but I do know that we need to repatriate British Law and enforce it,
There are some,things I would love to do which aren’t possible, but there is one thing we absolutely must do, and fight for every day we breathe, and that is, as Flyer says, deal with and eradicate Islamisation in Britain.
THE MIGHTY WASP NATION
December 1941 the Imperial Japanese Navy spring a surprise attack on the United States with the intention of preventing their intervention into the consolidation of Japanese hegemony in East Asia/ Australasia and also a demonstration to the US and the British Empire/Commonwealth that the Japanese Armed Forces cannot be beaten.
42 months later the USAAF drops the first atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima obliging the Japs for the first time in their history to surrender unconditionally. This was achieved from scratch as the United States was unprepared for a great pacific war. The aircraft carriers, battleships, planes, trained personnel,armaments factories, resources, research, scientific inventions etc etc had to be all conjured up. Every single ethnic japanese in the United States was imprisoned over 100,000 of them together with other enemy aliens. No-one was spared.
This is the immense talent of the WASPs. And by the way 1944/45 the Imperial Japanese 14th Army numbering 400,000 men and support staff was destroyed in battle by British and loyalist Indian forces in Burma in their greatest ever military defeat. The British forces were outnumbered but were determined to avenge the humiliation of Singapore by the japanese ( and by a gutless lefty liberal commanding officer unfit to be remembered here.).
Sadly we are nowhere near boiling point in the UK nor the USA. Sadly we must wait till Sweden is burning to the ground ( I kid you not) and sharia law operating openly in Malmo is condemning native swedish children to a fate as bad as death itself – though the evil bbc will be covering it all up as best as poss. So we may have ten more years to wait at the worst.
PREPARE NOW FOR THE BOILING POINT! Abandon for example Bradford, Oldham, and maybe Blackburn as they will be majority non white in a few years and the poor whites left there can expect no mercy when boiling point comes. this is happening now in part – white flight from Leicester and Birmingham is massive and ongoing and suburban parts of Staffordshire, Leicestershire, Derbyshire, etc are all seeing house building and population shifts.
What a tragedy! Can we avoid this at such a late moment or are we doomed to a civil war version of Tara Tara Tara ( japanese codename for attack on Pearl Harbour)?
At the moment one must doubt UKIP will even mention much of the above.
Someone said in these columns that UKIP must proclaim integration. Job done?
What happens when the media (quite reasonably) asks how thia is to be achieved? As soon as anything is suggested the screaming will start. It’s a minefield for the ‘aspiring to be respectable’.
Of course it will because those in power don’t want integration and nor do those being asked to integrate. The first want a divided society they can rule as drones. The second do nicely out of the leading role granted to those claiming discrimination plus they can import their own preferred way of life. Who can blame them?
The tag ‘minority group’ is as valuable as a free bus and train pass. I too want my tag!
The only answer is generous repatriation settlements. Where is the money to come from? Errrm. Now is there not a nice little £10bn a year or so fund for foreign aid? How about that money?
How many would accept the voluntary terms? It does not require a large number. The mere fact of people leaving would signal the fact that Britain is no longer open to watch its way of life disappear. The political message would be vast.
What is absolutely certain is that the prospect of ‘integration’ will be dangled in front of the public to reassure us and that IT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN given our current trajectory! In fact as time goes on and the number of the ‘unintegrated’ grows so will their power and disincentive to bother. Yes?
If anyone says that repatriation grants are unthinkable and unBritish may one remind that the Heath government introduced them for very limited circumstances but established the fact that in principle they are acceptable.
Mike, beautifully summed up. If, just if the Syrian conflict is as resolved as anything in the ME is ever resolved in a tribal system, could we not also add that as an incentive to offer repatriation money from,the foreign aid budget? Of course the fly in the ointment is why would anyone want to move from what is a lovely little earner sitting on your backside in the UK, trousering large amounts for breeding and doing nothing else, all expenses found.
I would like to see the benefits system overhauled as well so that there was a graduated scale of child benefit, possibly generous for the first child, less for the second and ending after three children. It might stop working people from having children and I know we need them, but they don’t anyway, in the main, have more than three. I think we need in UKIP to promote an overall package policy where Sharia Law/Courts are not compatible with British values so are dismantled, the same with full face covering, multiple wives FGM – all of which do not fall within British Law and are discriminatory. So let’s make it easy for our Leaders – none of that is really contentious it is upholding rights etc, and let’s make it less comfortable for our unwanted guests, with the added incentive of money to rebuild your homeland (o.k. Ha ha) but it’s a message from UKIP that we will take back control.
I know Mike, in our dreams…but let’s keep hammering away on the off-chance.
In the end ideas rule. The core of the political task is to make it unacceptable as an idea to destroy our way of life rather than its being a ‘progressive’ scheme which no right-thinking person could oppose.
UKIP under its current leadership will probably try to sell a solution based on minor changes to the status quo. Since the big parties will soon be dangling the same things in words but not deeds it will be outflanked.
The societal danger is ethnicity, religion is a side-issue.
You’ve said this before Ajax, but the funny thing is that I don’t find Hindus a threat; ditto the Sikhs, Jews, Buddhists, Christians, Shintoists, Jainists, Zoroastrians, ancestor-worshippers, voodooists, cargo-culters, Scientologists, Moonies, pagans and atheists. These believers/non-believers could belong to any ethnic group, it doesn’t matter which: they’re not hell-bent on making everyone submit to ‘allah’, grovel on the ground and believe in their twisted, inhuman religion on pain of death.
On this benighted planet, religion is NEVER a side-issue. It should be, now we’re in the post-Darwin scientific 21st century. Unfortunately, that malevolent meme, the ideology of islam has become an even worse threat than the fascist and communist ideologies of the last century and everyone knows how hard they had to be fought. When are we in the West going to start fighting islam, or even admitting it’s our biggest problem?
Not you, obviously.
Hindus massacred our small colonial population, down to the last woman & child they could lay their hands on during the Indian Mutiny. The Irish community in Ulster that produced terrorism against us from 1969-1994 killing 3000+ people is Christian (so were the Serbian troops in the Bosnia War in the 1990’s who massacred Bosnian Mohammedans). Buddhists are currently murdering Rohingya people in Burma. The people who committed the Rape of Nanking were Shintoists.
Ethnicity is the danger with mass foreign migration, religion is a side-issue.
My reply is above, Ajax, I couldn’t have clicked reply hard enough!
No Ajax.
Boko Haram in Africa, The Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan, ISIS in the Middle East, The Chechens in the Russian Federation etc. are all examples of Islamist groups of different ethnicities.
But they are all as one in their barbaric demands for the establishment of the undemocratic, totalitarian, theocratic political system that is the Islamic Caliphate; and they all proclaim, as their absolute authority, the ancient verses of The Holy Qur’an.
HK – Please see my reply above to Panmelia.
You people are all deluding yourselves if you think that the only threat from foreign mass migration into Albion comes from the Mohammedan religion.