Nobody should be terribly surprised at Theresa May’s capitulation to Brussels. As I have been saying since she was ‘elected’ leader, it was a disastrous mistake for the Tories to choose a Remainer.
May is a centrist machine politician with no meaningful political philosophy. As she demonstrated when she was Home Secretary she was quite willing to stand by and do nothing whilst an innocent man (me!) was sent to prison. Put another way, she does not share the core values of our society, one of which is justice.
I respectfully agree with Vivian Evans – Mrs May’s a housetrained idiot, no offence intended. She never engaged in the intellectual battle over EU membership and has not mastered the arguments since becoming PM. Not being the sharpest knife in the box she would have difficulty grasping them in any event.
She cannot grasp that you do not need to pay for access to a market with which you have a massive trade deficit. She does understand that the EU’s share of world GDP and population is falling – the EU now has a smaller GDP than the Commonwealth. Economically illiterate, she is simply unaware that NAFTA is a far larger and more important market than the EU.
More than that, she was clearly spooked by the failed attempt to assassinate her at the Palace of Westminster in March. Of course I understand that assassination attempts can be irritating – been there, done that. The last thing you do however is cave in to the country whose intelligence service has just tried to have you murdered. It only encourages them.
The Germans have been murdering or trying to murder leaders in order to get their way since the 19th century. Russia is still recovering from the assassination of Tsar Alexander II. German involvement in that is so sensitive it has to be kept from the Russian people even now, just as we are concealing the Abwehr’s involvement in the failed assassination attempts on Winston Churchill.
The government are concealing the truth over the failed Parsons Green terrorist attack, which was co-ordinated by German intelligence and was obviously linked to the Florence speech. EU negotiators even put back the next round, correctly anticipating that May would cave in to German pressure.
Allowing an 18 year old asylum-seeker (always assuming that the rozzers have got the right man, which is never guaranteed) to determine government policy with a bomb in a bucket is reducing Downing St to an international laughing stock. Every chancery in Europe must know what Parsons Green was all about, but they’re too frightened of the Germans to talk. The Germans used to be good making people talk – now they’re good at making them stay silent.
The trial will be the usual farce – it will be interesting to see who will be more nervous about the jury finding out the truth, the defence, the prosecution or the judge. One group of people who will not be finding out the truth about Parsons Green is the Intelligence and Security Committee.
Carefully chosen for their intelligence illiteracy, no offence intended, they haven’t a hope of getting anywhere near the truth. To link the Parsons Green attack to Brexit requires brains. You have to connect dots, something MPs are incapable of. What’s worse, they won’t take advice from people who are!
The Intelligence Committee only takes account of intelligence from official sources. Since all our official agencies report to the Cabinet Office they will be waiting a long time for the truth.
Whilst the Cabinet Office are right to despise MPs for their low intellects, with respect, they are wrong to treat them with contempt. We live in a democracy. It is not right that our elected representatives, however dumb they might be, are kept in the dark.
The good news about Florence is that BoJo and May clearly cut a deal. If she went with the Norway option she’d be out, but the Norway option is what the EU want. They are desperate to keep dumping their goods and labour on us.
Although Theresa May has run up the white flag of surrender, she hasn’t run it up the flagpole far enough to appease the EU. It’s as if Chamberlain had only offered our community partner Adolf Hitler half of the Sudetenland.
The talks are therefore doomed to fail. May still wants permanent tariff-free access to the so-called single market (why?) and the EU won’t agree. The EU will also want ECJ judgements to be binding in respect of EU Citizens, permanently, i.e. will want to ram European laws down our throats after Brexit.
All May is offering is what’s in the Withdrawal Bill, i.e. ECJ judgements will be persuasive authority only, in the same category as the US Supreme Court. Anything else and she’d be out in weeks.
Happily she’s likely to be out within months. The Tory Right may be intelligence-illiterate, but they’re not going to put up with this nonsense for much longer. It’s sad, but May’s nerves are clearly shot. She’s like a horse who pulls up at the first fence. I am not saying that she should be turned into glue, or sold to Macdonalds for hamburgers, but it’s time for the old nag to be put out to grass, again no offence intended.
The Cabinet Secretary, another old nag, also opposed to Brexit, will go with her. Brexit has no credibility for so long as Sir Jeremy Heywood continues to run the government.
Hammond will be the third member of the Remoaner triumvirate who will have to go. He’s in big trouble any event, as he was minister when his officials, acting on Cabinet Office orders, destroyed no fewer than three vital pieces of evidence in my case. Hammond was not consulted – he didn’t run the Ministry of Defence after all, he was just the Secretary of State. However under the Crichel Down Doctrine he is politically responsible for crimes committed by his officials.
Still hiding behind anonymity I see, Mr Bav! Are you actually in favour of Brexit? You come across, with respect, as someone who swallows official lies quite readily.
I see one lie you’ve swallowed, which appeared in media accounts of my trial, is that I claimed that a device was in a hospital: firstly I never made any positive claims at all, I was merely passing on intelligence passed to me, which is why the recordings of what I had actually said had to be wiped before I could be prosecuted.
Secondly, the proposed ground zero was near a hospital, not in it, using radioactive emissions from the hospital to mask the emissions from the device itself.
The idea that anyone would place a nuclear device IN a hospital was obviously absurd. None of the media organisations pedalling this drivel ever checked the facts with me. Gordon Duff, ex-CIA, later confirmed that two nuclear devices HAD been present, citing US government and IAEA sources. MI6 are also aware that two devices were present, but are sitting on the intel.
I am not the only one who has publicly commented on the German DVD – the respected journalist Christopher Story FRSA, known to many Brexiteers, did so, and was murdered for his pains. The subject is also taught by my former American Military University colleague Dr Paul Medhurst on his counter-intelligence course.
I am certainly not alone in asserting that the DVD sabotaged the Kursk and my claim that she was carrying four nuclear weapons is now supported by a nuclear expert involved in her recovery.
With respect, I wasn’t aware that you WERE arguing with me – you have simply resorted to ad hominem attacks and abuse. I haven’t seen any rational analysis from you, no offence intended.
I wouldn’t waste my time talking to the Met over Parsons Green. Like you, with respect, they are in the grip of a dangerous obsession that terrorist attacks are carried out by individuals or organisations with a grievance. The Met’s Counter-Terrorism Command is intelligence-illiterate and unaware of the DVD. It’s aware of GO2, but thinks it’s British, not German. The Met have very poor record of working with outside consultants, one reason why they never worked out who was controlling the Provisional IRA. To the very end they thought the controllers were Irish and that the organisation was largely funded by NORAID. They were very easy for the Germans to fool.
Actually Michael , you have rumbled me, I am actually Heinrich Von Bavaria, the bastard son of Martin Bormann, and I was kept frozen in a a cryogenic time-capsule in the Illuminati Castle of the New World Order until Theresa May (Theresa Von Maybach) , ordered my dis-internment so I could collaborate with the lizard -men of the Knights of St Bejeezus, a little known Freemasonry sect led by Prince Philip and Tony Blair (but I’m sure you knew this) to ensure that we would stay in the clutches of the EU for evermore. Our underground headquarters (based 200 feet beneath Trump Tower) are guarded by The Elders of Zion. Yes, you guessed it, it was the Jews all along….
Perhaps we could have your name ‘Mr Bav’? I know trolls like you, with respect, like to hide behind anonymity, but why should you?
As it happens I have debunked the idea that extra-terrestrials have visited Earth in my book Spyhunter.
It seems that I have touched a raw nerve re the Germans – if so, tough. German intelligence was no more shut down in 1945 than it was in 1918. Get used to it.
The intelligence briefing for MOD in 2012 was qualified and professional in tone, which is why MOD civil servants had to wipe two tape recordings and destroy five pages of contemporaneous notes before sending for the rozzers. They dare not let the jury hear what I had actually said.
My conviction by a tampered-with jury was worthless. We now know which juror was tampered with, by whom, and how he was able to corrupt the jury, using a distorted account of the indecent images conviction, which the CPS were unwilling to put before the jury, and rightly so, since it was obtained with fabricated evidence.
It rested on two pieces of computer equipment which had neither my fingerprints nor DNA on them. One was a Dell laptop. In December 2016 Dell confirmed to a computer expert instructed by my solicitors that the serial number of the hard drive used to convict me was not that of my computer. How long do you think conviction is going to last, ‘Mr Bav’?
I cannot help the fact that have not analysed terrorism as a phenomenon and have allowed yourself to become obsessed by the motives of the terrorist who left the IED on the train, without considering the motives of those who planned and ordered the attack.
With great respect your views of the Parsons Green terrorist attack simply are not rational. Very few obsessive beliefs are.
Do you still claim that a (unknown to anyone but you) German intelligence organisation stole a nuclear warhead (one of four …) from a sunken Russian submarine and hid it in a London hospital ? . Do you…. Really?
You wasted the police and security services time then and are doing it now regarding Parsons Green. I would suggest you keep your crazy ideas to yourself. if you publish nonsense like that and pester the authorities you will likely be lifted again. I’m not wasting any more of my time arguing with you.
Both Hugo and Grammy are sharing a fundamentally flawed assumption with respect, which is that Islamic terrorism is driven by Islam. It isn’t, which is why Al Qaeda targeted America rather than Israel.
The motives of the individual terrorist, who 9 times out of 10 will not have decided to launch a particular attack, are irrelevant, as are his beliefs.
Take the IRA – individual terrorists may have been Irish nationalists, but the organisation’s targeting and overall strategy were determined by its German controllers, who included Otto Skorzeny, who set up the Provisionals.
Of course in order to achieve its objectives the sponsoring state stays deep. Buying your IED ingredients online is the perfect cover.
Why would you expect transparency from intelligence agencies Hugo? There has never been a transparent intelligence agency and ours report to the Cabinet Office in any event. They will never tell the truth about GO2 or the DVD. They’re still hiding the truth about the Easter Rebellion, intended by German Intelligence as a diversion from the Western Front, for heaven’s sake!
So far as I am aware Grenfell Tower was in flames before the first Fire Brigade attendance. The story that there was a small fire in one flat was cooked up later. Had there been such an attendance they would have seen broken windows and been aware that the fire was not contained. They would have organised an evacuation.
I doubt you’ll find a reference to an earlier attendance in the media in the first 24 hours. The first engine on the scene sent for back-up straightaway, because the building was already in flames.
It is important, Hugo, with respect, not to attach too much weight to official pronouncements!
For Julian Flood’s benefit if he wants to read nonsense he should take the Guardian.
“Both Hugo and Grammy are sharing a fundamentally flawed assumption with respect, which is that Islamic terrorism is driven by Islam. It isn’t, which is why Al Qaeda targeted America rather than Israel.”
Where is your evidence? Give a reference or a link or a quote please.
Non-Muslims have been murdered in the name of Islam long before modern Israel existed.
Muslim terrorists operate in parts of the world which are nothing to do with Israel, or Germany. Islam has been murdering infidels long before Germany even existed.
After the 9/11 attack, The Warren Report, the collapse of WTC7 and the fact that over 50% of the American people don’t believe it was caused by “those men”, I am wary of believing anything. When I read that the passports of some of the “culprits” for 9/11 were found on the ground after the explosions, the mind just boggles. The Pentagon attack just adds to the “mystery”.
Oh well, back to Enid Blyton.
I have no idea whether the contentions here are true. What is true is the fact that a lot of apparently anti-government activity is manipulated by the state to provoke illegality and discredit it. Nothing new here but most of the population appear to have a bizarre idea about the rulers being decent coves. So articles like this are valuable and should be published to get people thinking.
Quite bonkers.
Indeed. Insulting and inflammatory to the Germans too. Barking mad.
Actually Grummy the idea that Parsons Green happened in isolation from world events is potty, with respect. You are obviously struggling to grasp the concept that terrorism is a state-sponsored phenomenon. Until you do, you won’t be able to work out the motive for a terrorist attack. Like the rozzers you will obsess on the terrorist who was caught. I’m using stronger language than I normally would in responding, but your comments with respect verge on the abusive.
The rozzers of course have failed to catch the guy who drove the terrorist to Wimbledon – it’s highly unlikely that he got on a bus or a tram with an unstable IED! The problems of having terrorists drive themselves to an attack was shown at Westminster Bridge, when the nervous terrorist lost control of his vehicle. The rozzers of course assume that because he hit people they were the target. The target was waiting at the House of Commons, the gates to which had conveniently been opened.
I entirely agree with Hugo about the silliness of replacing non-flammable refrigerants and installing flammable cladding, mainly to save on energy.
However a fridge fire would have been contained. Because the ISIS bomb-making cell were storing IEDs or TATP the windows must have blown out, spreading the fire.
The fridge-fire scenario, in short, does not fit the facts. ISIS terrorists normally ignore the religious calendar, as did Al Qaeda. In any event it is a mistake, with respect, to assume that ISIS were allocating the targets. These would be allocated by the sponsoring state, in this case the Federal Republic of Germany, which is not Islamic and is not concerned with religious holidays.
The evidence remains on intelligence files and will stay there. There is no chance of the authorities coming clean on this one – they can’t even give an accurate death toll.
Michael, I’m sorry if I appeared abusive. I merely wanted to share with you that your theories sounded potty. To me, at any rate. Doesn’t mean they’re wrong, of course, but some evidence would help me to decide.
Why must ideological Islamic terrorism be State-sponsored? Why cannot individual believers in the teachings of the Koran simply decide to use readily available weapons to kill kuffar in the expectation of eternal paradise as a reward?
I do hope you return to this page to share some more of your insights with us, and I do not mean this sarcastically.
“Why must ideological Islamic terrorism be State-sponsored? Why cannot individual believers in the teachings of the Koran simply decide to use readily available weapons to kill kuffar in the expectation of eternal paradise as a reward?”
Indeed.
It is the instructions in the Koran which are at the root of the attacks, whatever the other details or variations of the attacks may be.
“kill them wherever you find them” and other similar instructions are in the Koran.
A determined attacker can make use of readily available items such as knives and vehicles. See how much carnage was created in Nice with just a lorry.
Even if all websites with bomb making instructions were shut down, which may be an impossible task, it would not stop attacks from happening. Persuading Muslims to give up on Islam is the only way to stop Jihad attacks.
“I entirely agree with Hugo about the silliness of replacing non-flammable refrigerants and installing flammable cladding, mainly to save on energy.
However a fridge fire would have been contained. Because the ISIS bomb-making cell were storing IEDs or TATP the windows must have blown out, spreading the fire.”
You are making quite a few assumptions. The fire brigade had put out the fridge fire, and packing up to leave, when they saw the flames leaping up the cladding/insulation. Even if there had been an explosion (was there?), that could be easily explained by a butane/air mixture.
Yes somehow the fire integrity between the inside and the outside of the flat had been breached. The original fire break concept had evidently stopped working – evidenced by the fire from the cladding/insulation breaking INTO the flats higher up the building. Even supposing there had been a bomb on the 4th floor, how on earth would it have any effect on the 20th?
A simpler explanation might be (my speculation) that fire break material, almost certainly asbestos, was removed and not properly replaced with anything suitable. Grenfell Tower was constructed in 1972. I work in a building of similar age. At considerable expense the internal fire break asbestos panels are being removed, and replaced by Rockwool panels, a sandwich construction, with two hard outer layers, Rockwool in the middle, and the outer painted with intumescent paint. I have seen these panels and spoken with the people installing them. However they confirmed to me that you would not use Rockwool on external systems, because if even a small leakage of rain gets in, before long the whole thing is soaking wet. Hence the attraction of closed cell plastic foam Celotex RS5000. Water does not soak into it.
Michael, please make use of Occam’s razor. You are just making wild and unsupported claims, with zero evidence to back them up, and where simpler explanations are available.
May didn’t direct the Parson Green attack, Dee. It was probably sanctioned by S, the Director of GO2. S used to be a double agent inside MI6. The idea of the attack was to put pressure on Theresa May in advance of her Florence speech. The EU want to keep us trapped inside the single market. Remember Germany has a £45 billion trade surplus with us.
The key is understanding that terrorism is state-sponsored.
Thanks Michael!
Why on earth would an immigrant setting off a terrorist attack persuade anyone to stay in the EU?
I would have thought, if anything, it would make us more determined to leave, in order to get back full control of immigration.
Michael, your logic appears to be flawed, and you do not provide any links to any evidence backing up your extraordinary claims.
You may or may not be correct, however you have to be able to back up your claims. Otherwise you will be dismissed as a fruitcake, and that seriously harms the reputation of UKIP.
So which state do you say sponsored Parsons Green Mr Bav? Italy? Slovenia perhaps? Never look at the motives of individual terrorists – they are just the foot ‘soldiers’. There is no chance of the press picking it up – all mention of GO2 has been suppressed by the press for 72 years. This is too hot a topic for the press. They dare not even review my book – they’re simply frightened by it.
Perhaps it was aliens from Planet Zorg? I understand they were a tad hacked off when Aiden Pownesland tried to mine one of their asteroids in the galaxy of Wibble and decided to attack?
Instead of using their highly advanced technology and their disintegrator rays they decided instead to hire a rather thick foreigner and told him how to make a bomb out of a tub of toothpaste and processed cheese.
Their cunning plan was foiled. However we should be on our guard….
Dear Editor,
While Mr Shrimpton’s articles may add much to the gaiety of nations, is it appropriate to publish them on a serious political blog? Perhaps a pointer to his writings on other more… what shall we say… off the wall blogs would be appropriate if it is felt his views are relevant.
JF
Careful Grummy, they’ll be drafting you on to the Intelligence and Security Committee next!
ALL terrorist organisations are state-sponsored. ISIS was set up by and reports to the covert German DVD. ISIS targeting in the UK is normally determined by the DVD’s London operation, GO2, in accordance with German strategic objectives.
The terrorists who carry out the attacks are usually given their targets, typically through a cut-out. In the case of Parsons Greens the instructions were probably quite specific.
There was a lull in ISIS activity in London following the loss of their bomb-making facility in Grenfell Tower. It’s noticeable that this was a small, home-brewed device, consistent with the loss of their bomb factory.
In all the time I’ve been visiting UKIPD, I don’t think I’ve ever agreed with Mr Bav (see comment below) but in this case I feel a degree of alignment. What you say sounds potty.
Any chance you could offer any evidence to back up your rather bold assertions?
He’s was convicted in 2014 for falsely reporting that Germany was planning a nuclear attack on the 2012 Summer Olympics.
He’s also on the sex offenders register.
Get this nutcase off of here
“There was a lull in ISIS activity in London following the loss of their bomb-making facility in Grenfell Tower.”
Michael, you make some quite extraordinary claims, where is your evidence? Can you provide a link please?
I would suggest that the victims of the Grenfell tragedy are victims of the green agenda.
Firstly non-flammable HCFC refrigerants were replaced by flammable butane gas. In close proximity with hot components and potential electrical sparks or overheated motor windings in the compressor. There are plenty of examples of fridges bursting into flames in the homes of perfectly decent, native Brits.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1210334/Alert-new-wave-exploding-fridges-caused-environmentally-friendly-coolant.html
The flammable cladding and Celotex RS5000 insulator allowed the fire to spread between apartments. This was installed to make the building more eco friendly.
Note that the RS5000 had been certified for buildings higher than 18 metres. Very unusual for this type of foamed plastic. “Has been tested to BS 8414-2:2005, meets the requirements in BR 135 and the first PIR insulation suitable for rainscreen cladding applications above 18 metres in height”
https://www.celotex.co.uk/products/rs5000
The pause in attacks can be very easily explained because we are currently in a set of three consecutive sacred months. See Koran 9:5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_calendar
The Parsons Green attack appears to have been done hurriedly, and therefore without waiting for the next non-sacred month. The police should have detained him if they had suspicions, rather than just arresting him and letting him go.
http://www.ukipdaily.com/pattern-jihad-attacks/
http://www.ukipdaily.com/pattern-jihad-attacks-part-2/
When garbage like this is posted, don’t be surprised when the press pick it up and mock UKIP.
To claim the Parsons Green attack was led by German Intelligence is absurd.
Definitely the glue option. The hamburger would be indigestible
Abwehr attempts on Churchill’s life are quite common knowledge.
I think you overegg the picture.
Italy is close to bankruptcy and the AfD are about to get much stronger – prob the second party in the Bundestag. This is excellent news.
May has to go – she is a wet nelly ( sum total of the scouse I have learnt).
Liblabcon are a collective disgrace many MPs seem to be prima facie guilty of High Treason.
A L’Outrance!!!
Anybody able to help me here? I’m puzzled by the content of this article, so I must be missing something major.
Parsons Green a German plot? Is this a metaphor, and if so I’m not sure I see the basis for it.
In fact, I read the article election and thought … Whaaaat?
I’m pretty open-minded, but I’m just not able to get my head around what this post is suggesting.
Sorry, don’t know where ‘election’ came from. Didn’t spot autocorrect having a mind of its own here!
I agree, Grummy. Please, if possible, explain, Michael. Why would any terrorist attack be useful to May – or, has a lightbulb gone on in my brain – is it to keep us in with the Europol lot, and the EU arrest warrant Stuff? Is that it?
Re Mrs Dismay: I prefer the glue or hamburger options for the old nag. Why should she graze peacefully while the rest of us put up with daily torment on several fronts?
Thank you Michael; hopefully you can continue to try and open the eyes of those who call the believers conspiracy theorists before it is too late.