Why? Why would you join a club knowing in advance the consequential effect it would have on your personal relationships, family life, and business? Why would you choose a club that will result in receiving insults, grief and angry interchanges? Why would you join a club where the name tag ‘racist’ or ‘bigot’ is immediately seen in the pound sign adorning your lapel? Why bother when you just want to live and let live, mind your own business and respect other people’s property as you expect them to respect yours?
Many reasons, but one was Charlie Hebdo. I felt sick that day. Sick at the state of the human condition. Sick at the actions of murderous jihadis in Paris, at the cowardly actions and inactions of the ‘Free Press’ and at the lies and crimes of the political classes that continue to undermine Britain, its security, peacefulness, and culture. In modern parlance, I was radicalised. PREVENT needn’t bother wasting their time with me though because this kind of radicalised is good, it is British, and it is honourable.
I felt the sickness later in the year too. Over one hundred souls lost to Islamic murderers in Paris again. On the Monday after I witnessed my culture, my society, my country and so many of my neighbours and friends once again capitulate to a weak repressive and barbaric ideology being enforced through the execution of particular concert goers, draughtsmen, and Jews from France, Theresa May, the then Home Secretary, stood across the dispatch box from Sarah Champion her Labour Shadow. As the amoral media class exhibited their smug gutless faux-sorrow over the television screens and radio channels about the events in Paris, Theresa May updated the House on the Child Sexual Abuse scandal in Rotherham and the actions taken by the government in response. She and Ms Champion managed to do so without an utterance of the words ‘Islam’, ‘Muslim’ or ‘Pakistani”, which, considering the contents of the Jay and Casey reports, took some linguistic design.
The catalysts to join UKIP were initially my son Joshua who had joined a year before me and secondly, the result of the 2015 General Election and the promise of a Referendum on the EU. I attended my first UKIP branch meeting as a member, in July 2015.
There was only one political vehicle I could have associated myself with. The LibLabCon is corrupted. Those parties are generationally corrupted, rotting from inside through nepotism and favouritism saved solely by the nature of our Parliamentary electoral system and the inertia and volume of parasites who can continue to fund their parasitical existence through incumbency. The Green Party is also corrupted. Corrupted by hubris, belief, unquestioning self-righteousness and lack of scepticism – they are also misguided on how burning hydrocarbons remains a primary necessity for continuing human improvement. I saw UKIP as the only political vehicle to join in the quest to return sovereignty of our nation to where it rightfully resides – with its people – a necessary first step without which the country would continue to fail and fall. Whether it was corrupted did not matter to me then – it was a means to a righteous end. It matters to me now.
I had a need. A drive to do whatever I could to achieve what I deemed necessary to protect that which it is each generation’s duty to protect – the rights and liberty forged for us over centuries by generations of Britons. Of course, we needed to leave the EU to do our duty and preserve for future generations of Britons that which we are so privileged to have been bequeathed! All equal under one law. That law derived from our history, from natural law, common law, a law of precedent. That sculpted since the Bill of Rights. That which has been defiled by a sequence of actions by political actors who gave away what was not theirs to give, who gave away that which they indeed also had a duty not to give.
Numerous events had influenced the development of my political views – too many to name. The Salman Rushdie fatwa. The behaviour in reaction to a book was not something I could comprehend, and I lived in areas of West Yorkshire with high Muslim populations. People died and people wanted to kill. I was very young and it didn’t fit with my upbringing, at all. It was an alien response, a repulsive one. Running a business and having children to feed whilst wondering why the government are getting such a huge chunk and ‘watering’ the wall with it – these things shape your political outlook. The politicised and substandard education delivered by the state to my sons. 9/11, 7/7, the banking crash 2008 – so many events – so many bad decisions.
Those who wish to destroy the nation state, who reject cultural preservation, continuity and evolution and who favour a fast track cultural, social revolution through large government social engineering, uncontrolled mass immigration, large corporations and large welfare states are represented by excellent orators. And it was beholden on as many ordinary people as possible to get out to where people live and talk to them about the basics of democracy and accountability, and explain to them why we, we British alone, should be arbiters of who determines Law. So I did. In public meetings and in the street. So did many others, not all from UKIP. Thousands took to the task in the face of an onslaught of propaganda and opposition from a political class, a hostile and fear-stoking media and the academic classes in schools and universities. The outcome was fantastic. A battle won, the first rung on the long ladder.
But what of UKIP now? What role has it to play?
My drive is only emboldened by the result of the referendum. Is UKIP going to be the political vehicle that continues to climb the ladder toward liberty and a return to national order from EU chaos?
The structural political problems in the UK have not gone away with a vote to leave the EU. We are not out of the EU for starters. Our national debt clock is approaching £2 Trillion and rising, and nobody talks about it. There is no incentive to save with perma-low interest rates. The value of the currency has been undermined through inflation, quantitative easing, and other verbosely obfuscated mechanisms to mask state theft. Our borders are porous, our social services stretched, our schools are full, and there are far too many people for the country to sustain. This all without mentioning the social cancers of cultural Marxism, postmodernist thought, and Political Correctness.
Who has a plan for Britain, and can I get behind it? Will it be UKIP? Or is UKIP an irrelevance, like a Betamax, to be superseded by the next political vehicle which will have the strategy to wrest power away from the LibLabCon.
I have observed the candidates in the forthcoming leadership election. Two candidates, in my view, are worthy of consideration as a leader in these historically significant times. Each has their particular attributes that have attracted my attention, and each has an understanding of the geopolitical realities of our time and the fragility of peace, civil society and liberty. The other five candidates have demonstrated knowledge; skills and experience in many ways, but each of those five have also demonstrated to me that they do not fully understand what the country needs of the next UKIP leader, or what the future purpose of UKIP should be.
Panmelia,
Don’t quote me but I seem to remember it was JRE that used this crude phrase at the Dagenham hustings, he is very much against any young girls being checked. I could not make out at the time why he did not find this a revolting and repugnant crime as most decent human beings would, but even when discussing it with him he seems to be ‘blind’ to it, in fact, he said he has some friends in New Zealand who are not muslims but they do this vile violation also. I would go as far as to say that in view of what he said and his lack of defense in trying to stop it, that he may well have no problem with it at all, that is one of the reasons I could never vote for him.
I think like someone has said he lives in his own little bubble protected from some of the realities of what life is like for most ordinary folk, I for one feel it is very difficult to penetrate this false World he lives in and therefore find him out of touch.
I know there will probably be many on here who will disagree with what I have said, but I have seen him in action many times and can only speak as I find. As sincere and clever as he may come across I cannot help thinking that this leadership contest is all about him and very much his little ‘hobby’, as he has the money and time to throw at it.
Finally, his form of DD will not wash with the public because it will take too much work for them to get things done, they are all to busy putting food on the table and keeping their heads just above water. Therefore, his supporters need to get real and face the facts, it would be a disaster if he became leader as most of the public would not be able to stomach him or his madcap idea of DD.
DD,
I can not let those comments stand unchallenged.
If you don’t like John, fine. If you find his plans ‘madcap’, fine, if you consider him a bubble dwelling insincere hobbyist, fine, and you may see no future in Direct Democracy – again fine. But the suggestion that JRE is OK with FGM or blind to it is ridiculous and insulting beyond reason. As ridiculous as the suggestion that the state should be empowered to inspect girls genitals – the point which JRE was reinforcing at the hustings.
The only positive constructive assistance I received from the Party in the June GE (save the stoic work of local campaigners and online activists) was from John Rees Evans and his skilled team. I am fully aware of how abhorrent JRE finds the practice of FGM, or any other form of child abuse or violence against innocents, as do all right thinking people!
James Dalton
James,
Firstly, I did not say I don’t like him for a start, what I said was I was perplexed by his reaction to how we try to stop or at least prosecute those responsible for FGM. Were you there at the hustings I am talking about when he said he has some friends in New Zealand who actually do this to their children, if indeed you were not there do you not find this comment even remotely bizarre under the circumstances? What sort of person would have friends like that?! I don’t think once I had found that out I would remain their friends for very long, plus, how do they get away with it over there should he not have reported them to the police? I wish I had asked him those questions when speaking with him but to be honest I was totally overwhelmed by his reactions and what he said about FGM.
Unless you were present at the hustings and with me as I was with someone else at the time with JRE discussing this, so if he can remember he will vouch for me what was actually said, then you cannot dispute what I have said. What I heard and what was said is the absolute truth but you and others can make of it what you wish, I only can speak for myself and along with the other things I have mentioned his apparent views on FGM and how we deal with it are not in tune with mine. But obviously he is entitled to his point of view but so am I.
Having said all that I am sure he and his team were as helpful and supportive to you during your campaign as many others have said. But I stand by what I said, to the ordinary man in the street he may well come across as a bit ‘odd or eccentric’, and not living the sort of life they are familiar with, also if he comes out with comments like I have just mentioned then what are they to make of him? You cannot say you find FGM abhorrent and then say you have friends who do it, for goodness sake it does not make sense!
DD
No I was not involved in your conversation. This abhorrent imported practice/crime is quite rightly an issue that is the cause of anger. With a direct democracy platform, this anger can be channeled into constructive practical policy, scrutinised and developed by all our members to address the problem on behalf of the girls who will doubtless suffer in the future if we do nothing.
With respect to JRE’s position on the issue as you describe above, I do intend to seek clarification from him and should I receive such, I will share it with you.
James
Thanks for that James, I am beginning to wonder if I heard him right that evening, but others there must have heard him say it too. To say I was shocked to the core is an understatement but I am prepared to be corrected if I misunderstood him at the time.
@ DD
I don’t wonder that you were shocked at JRE’s response. What’s for sure is that whoever in New Zealand is perpetrating this abomination, they are of an ethnic minority, if not muslims. Who could stand to be friends with such after that admission? It beggars belief.
I have found that a lot of British men have a ‘blind and deaf spot’ when it comes to FGM. They don’t want to think about it, hear about it, or speak about it. This is very much on a par with the men in the primitive countries where FGM is common practice. It’s ‘women’s stuff’ and they don’t want to know, despite the atrocity being carried out for the men’s sexual pleasure and the elimination of the women’s. Moral cowards all.
The foolish women are so brainwashed by their culture, they arrange for it to be carried out on their daughters despite knowing the pain and shock of the betrayal, followed by a lifetime of sexual and gynaecological and obstetric danger and misery. The hags who carry it out for money are unspeakable sadists.
That this goes on in our civilised country, all ignored and unpunished is more than I can bear. For this neglect alone, all the politicians since 1985 deserve to be accused of being colluders in sexual abuse, torture and GBH. They all have blood on their hands. They should all resign in shame.
Panmelia,
Could not agree more, but JRE has daughters, he only has to imagine it happening to them but like Jane Collins he knows it will not, that is why she made that ridiculous slur on AMW’s. If she did not know that AMW’s has no children then she is thicker than I thought, it was a nasty attack IMO, when AMW;s is thinking about other peoples daughters and Jane Collins is only thinking of her own.
I know why don’t we all ignore it and pretend it does not happen as it will not affect our children, we hope. Same seems to go for Halal as well, let’s just pretend it is not happening and all will be well.
Peoples ignorance and acceptance of these unacceptable practices never cease to amaze me, I am going to a general barbie later today and I asked the lady there if there was any likelihood of Halal meat being served, she replied that as most of it is from Waitrose is was unlikely. But I am not sure about that as I think you need to check the labels, she then said that some of the meat is coming from a Greek butcher and more likely to have had Christian prayers said over it, to which I replied I am not bothered about the prayers said, it is the method of slaughter that matters. She did not reply to that so I presume she may think I am being difficult.
I am not here to Libby just give my opinion on James excellent article. I agree with everything he says and have seem some of the ugly attacks you have received from the left.
My view is the next leader needs vision, detail, and a plan to radically reform not just Ukip but UK politics as a whole. Because of that I am voting JRE but wish all candidates the best of luck.
When AMW entered the race for leadership, there was a surge in membership applications, if I remember correctly.
Since that surge there have been numerous attempts at denying AMW eligibility.
There have also been many interpretations of the rules of eligibility to vote in the leadership election.
Exactly what are you people frightened of?
My response to your excellent article is that we should all have hope. Surely the history of this country can furnish us with all the hope we should need. I empathise with you James but as long there are people like you there is hope, and you are not alone. Right now, to my mind, radical is not radical enough, controversial is not controversial enough. We need a revolution of ideas, it can get no worse, and they are taking the complete…p… Yes there are two obvious choices and either will do, with respect to them as individuals.
I implore anyone reading these comments not to select a ‘same old same old’ candidate, you know what I mean. Without radical, drive, vision and vitality we will be a Sunday Lunch Club.
Panmelia I did not reply to your missive about Jane Collins as it was not really based on fact it was your interpretation and view on what took place.
The integration agenda which was ludicrous and a shame on this party was under discussion at the hustings. Jane merely said that the insitutions such as the NHS and the Police already had the powers to investigate reported FGM and prosecute etc. Rather than the suggested looking up girls skirts as suggested in the ridiculous document that she also explained as the spokesperson on home affairs, she had not been consulted on, had any knowledge of until it was published.
In a rebuttle AMW came back at her on a point which made no sense and looked to be a rebuttle for rebuttle sake. Jane then said, yes loudly, that as the mothers of daughters, she would be appalled at the thought if them being examined in this way.
I ask this question, apart from turning up at Tommy Robinson lead rallies, shouting on a bench into a microphone that Islam is evil, etc then dropping th emike and buggering off to get her train home, just what of any campaigning has AMW actually done? what has she done in Manchester, or Sunderland where she appeared for a few minutes and then left. Did she arrange the attendence with the local Ukip branch ? doubt it, did she piaise with the local Ukip brnach to attend, meet them afterwards to discuss a campaign, or ask them if they were aware of her presence and ask them what she could do to help? Doubt it.
So the Culture of Islam is not compatible with ours, Islam is evil? no shot sherlock…question, just what are your solutions…internment, mass repatriation, bulldozing mosques ? what? I see nothing, other than shouting and having to txt members an hour before your launch meeting where the venue is as it has to be in secret…the future of Ukip!!!! Mark my words if this lady os elected, over 50% of the membership will retire….branches will disappear, regional committees will go…never to be recovered and fatal…..
Oh dear, Panmelia’s “missive” touched a nerve then.
Personally, I thought it raised some pertinent questions to be put to a candidate veering towards the quisling end of the spectrum of views regarding Islam.
To use a term more commonly associated with Snowflakes, I can’t help sensing that you’ve been “triggered”!
Stephen – what’s wrong with Tommy Robinson?
I do k now that AMW has made many videos, that she arranged a day for UKIP members to meet with ex-Muslims – unsurprisingly you had to apply via her website – as well as attending Hustings and presumably doing her day job. She and John R-E seem to have both done a lot of work via social media – it is, like it or not, the way forward in many ways.
As to the future of UKIP meetings being in secret – it may be that emboldened by lack of action by our interim Leader following the YI cancellation, that will be the way forward regardless of who is Leader.
As you also know, Anne Marie has said many times that the way to de-Islamize the future is via applying British Law – which hasn’t been properly applied for years. David Kurten wants to eliminate Cultural Marxism, as we all do – but he hasn’t said how he will achieve this either.
Jack Russell mentions that threats to retire such as you have made have been met with replies that were too robust, in his opinion, so I will just say that if AMW wins, which is most unlikely, and many do retire, I wish them all a happy, healthy retirement. New members will replace them, I am confident.
@ Stephen Place
No, it wasn’t MY interpretation at all, it was an account of an item on a ‘Politics’ web page. I’m not good with links, so I had to condense what was written to fit in a post on ‘UKIP United’. Many questions were unanswered.
Here are some questions to help clarify the situation:
1) Are you trying to say that ‘Looking up girls’ skirts’ is a quote from a UKIP policy document that she doesn’t agree with, or was it Jane herself who coined this rather lewd and inappropriate phrase?
2) What was AMW’s rebuttal that ‘made no sense’?
3) Why did Jane say loudly that as the mother of daughters, she would be appalled at the thought of them being examined in this way; did she really think that HER daughters would be examined for FGM, or was she sympathising with ethnic minority mothers who could actually be the lawbreaking instigators of FGM on their daughters and would be frightened about this being revealed?
4) Why is Jane appalled at the thought of a health check by professionals to safeguard girls, or to expose their attackers, but not appalled by the thought of thousands of girls being sexually assaulted in this way despite 32 years of it being illegal in the UK?
5) Do you think Jane has got her priorities wrong? To help you decide, I suggest you read Sean’s 9.51pm post of yesterday; and mine today at 12.58pm.
Panmelia,
David Coburn also used the awful phrase “looking up girls skirts”, to me this is a terrible derogatory and flippant remark for such a serious debate. Not only that, it belittles small female children IMO as it makes trying to stop FGM sound as if it will be done by some sort of amateurish perverts.
I would like JRE, David Coburn and Jane Collins to say that even if we prevented one young girl from going through this complete atrocity by doing a proper medical check done by medical staff in the most sensitive way possible, that it is wrong to do so.
I find their anger and indignation most strange as my anger and revolution is with the people (often the so called caring parents) in doing or allowing this procedure to continue. I also think that most of the MEP’s (mostly the ones at the hustings) were also cross that they said they were not consulted about this policy going into the manifesto, as it went in quite late from what I remember. But surely it was up to them to go and find out as Paul Nuttall is also an MEP and they must have talked about the campaign together, or are we to believe that they all went off doing their own thing, which would possibly explain why it was so badly organised at times.
Sorry should read revulsion not revolution. I get quite worked up about this subject.
So who is the other possible leader?
Well, it certainly isn’t Jane Collins, a candidate who says seriously stupid things. Yesterday, on Stephen Place’s ukipdaily page optimistically entitled ‘UKIP United’, I recounted an incident that occurred between AMW and Jane Collins and asked to be corrected if I had reported it incorrectly. No one has challenged my account, not Stephen Place or Jane or her champion Rob McWhirter.
So I can only assume from what she said in front of AMW that Jane is reluctant to take any action to check if girls have undergone illegal FGM, which she describes as ‘Looking up girls’ skirts’. OR, she is so PC that she believes if health professionals are given permission to check ethnic minority girls for FGM, it will mean that her daughter will have to have it done too, to avoid ‘discrimination’. I’m assuming that her daughter is white majority British, a child who has never been at any risk of genital mutilation. Another explanation (from Sean) is that Jane Collins was trying to highlight the fact that AMW has no children; in other words, doing an Andrea Leadsom.
Whichever way you look at it, Jane came out with some pretty odd things. I can make no sense of it at all and expected a rebuttal, but so far – nothing.
Perhaps she overlooked the fact that the 2 laws passed against FGM since 1985 were passed specifically to protect ethnic minority girls, especially muslims, from being butchered by their loving relatives. The laws are completely irrelevant to civilised majority Britons and their daughters. Of course, they are irrelevant to the minorities who carry out the barbaric practice too, because they completely ignore them without any prosecution or punishment.
@Panmelia
Just something I learned recently from a nurse friend of mine is that a checkbox data entry field is already built into most medical database software here in the UK to record whether a woman has undergone FGM or not. So the data is being collected but no prosecutions have been forthcoming as we all know. I can’t confirm though whether this note taking is done for young girls or just older women. I didn’t fancy going into detail on this gruesome subject as you can imagine.
No, Sean, it’s a very unpleasant, disturbing subject to talk about, but nowhere near as terrible as the sight and sound of a little girl betrayed by the people she thought she could trust, being held down and butchered in the most sensitive, intimate part of her body. I heard those screams on a documentary over 30 years ago and have never forgotten them. It took place in a foreign country and I had no idea that ignorant 3rd world immigrants had brought it here. To discover the truth was sickening.
It is of little use for medical staff to record in a tick box what has already been done; what we need are preventative measures to ensure that no perverted sadist in this country dare lay a finger on an innocent girl in order to make money or to conform with a practice that outrageously violates her human rights.
There are laws: put them into practice. There are punishments: make them severe enough to be a deterrent. There are regular health checks: an untouched girl must remain that way or else; a mutilated girl’s condition must be rigorously investigated and arrests made. There are safeguards: take any girl at risk into care before she is subjected to violence. There are warnings: do this and your whole family will be deported.
It’s time to take every measure to stamp this abomination out in the UK and we need to be ruthless, not half-hearted. An FGM-free UK could be a beacon and an example to the whole world that barbarity against women must not be tolerated in the 21st century. So far, the UN has been useless in this respect as it is in most others.
Fully agree that, despite her actual size, AMW stands head and shoulders above the rest. I found Douglas Murray’s superb “the Strange Death of Europe” to be a terrifying read, and all the while my hopes for AMW to lead the country’s fight-back was the only thought to keep up my morale. Without her I can see nobody pushing effectively against the creeping islamisation that is destroying our culture.
Can anybody please tell me the actual cut-off date for member eligibility to vote? it will determine the size of the wager I place on her upcoming victory.
Thanks
The cut off date is 23rd June according to the email sent by Piers Wauchope on the 11th July.It says-Eligibility to vote for the UKIP leadership
I have been asked to clarify who may vote in the leadership election. The short answer is only those members in good standing who were members on June 23, 2017.
The relevant wording of Article 7.8 of the party’s constitution is:
7.8 Any contested election for the leadership shall be decided by a simple majority of the votes cast. Those eligible to vote shall be members “in good standing” of the Party on the date when the election is called, subject always to the restrictions on voting set out in the final paragraph of Article 4.1.2 above.
What the New World Order will look like:
https://youtu.be/Htxxhz0rvtE
Swedish Documentary On Failed Immigration (crazy!).
https://youtu.be/z7mLP5ioBQs
Our new leader must be outspoken and have fire in their belly. Nigel came in to politics because of his strong conviction that the UK must regain its independence. AMW has a similar passion. She is driven to do something, not be someone.
She is up for the fight of a clean Brexit,’draining the swamp’ and she wants one law for all. She is bold enough to point out that multiculturalism isn’t working and that unless immigration is brought under control we will lose everything we love about our tolerant and fair country. Our enemies are gathering strength and Brexit will be watered down unless UKIP fights hard. She is the candidate that has the vision and is a true and inspirational leader.
I am disgusted that much of the hostile press coverage against her has been from some of our own MEPs and key personalities.
Under Nuttall and Whittle UKIP ran a disastrous campaign in Stoke, launched a calamitous integration plan and led us into a dismal 1.8% of the vote lacking any strategy in the GE 2017. Let us leave that failed track record behind and reposition UKIP as the party that speaks out against political correctness and is not afraid that someone somewhere may be offended by our message.
The Marmite candidate is the one for me.
James, you are one of many stars in UKIP. Sadly, stardom is absent at Leadership level at the moment. You must be so proud of your son – mine thinks I have senile dementia! He is not a political animal and hates all equally, so I forgive him!
I do think this election, as I said yesterday, has been an education to us all, especially given recent events. The coming election will ascertain whether UKIP will be an irrelevance or not.
I see only one candidate worthy of my trust – only one that has been willing to join the people who at present have no voice. Only one who has, for some time, known what it was to stand on a soapbox in the face of vicious opposition, because she sees the need to stand up and be counted, and to lead the way. She is head and shoulders above all the others – most of whom in my humble opinion will turn out like Mr Nuttall did – unable to face the media with confidence in the message, when faced with sneering opposition and worse.
That there has been a concerted and shocking campaign against her from those Establishment figures within UKIP is something we should all think about. You only get flak when you are on target – and Anne Marie has been shot at continually. She is undaunted, and I love her for that.
If Charlie Hebdo concerns you, as it did me, then there’s only one candidate that can be relied on, and that would be Anne Mary Waters.
Superb, James.
Problem with burning hydrocarbons, but not the place to be arguing that one.
Faced with the follies and failings, the leftist aganda and alien threats to our survival, we somehow have to get through to the electorate what needs to be done.
It has to be different, radical, attention-grabbing and attractive of mass suppport.
It’s nationalist economic policies, more fairness and more equality.
Our determination to preserve our own culture should be taken as read. The real battle for UKIP is the Tories and ‘libertarianism’, or the people and unity.
Quercus when are you going to substantiate your claims that I am not a member of UKIP and that I am not even resident in the UK?
You lied about me and I want you to apologise
Possibly when you disprove it but given your own style CK possibly not.
Quercus why should anyone believe anything you post here as you effectively admit you are a liar?
Because I’m not, CK. Assuming you’re not either, I’ve clearly made an error of identity. It’s a mistake, not a lie, and in view of your general attitude on here not an apologising matter.
There’s a big difference between robust opinion and relentless aggression, and your lack of respect for all the other candidates is irksome to say the least.
There are so very few of us. We should be airing our differences with a view to keeping the Party together and not entertaining casual readers or the MSM with fratricidal antics.
CK and Q,
Now now children, stop bickering or you will both have to go to bed early.
A good candidate for leader of UKIP should have the answers to all your questions, put very frankly Mister Dalton. The nearest we have is AMW and if she is elected there will be a transformational element to the national political conversation. We will blow the bloody doors off!
UKIP is divided weak and close to bankruptcy/insolvency and the blame for this has to go to everybody in power in the last 12 months viz nuttall,james,whittle, s evans, bickley, crowther, oakden, etc. Also the 16 MEPs elected by being members of UKIP and not on their own individual merits with their refusal to contribute to HQ running costs from their generous salaries.
I am an optimist – seriously – either UKIP is a leading force in the coming National Crusade or some other party will emerge. Whatever happens it will be messy and we face many years of toil blood sweat and tears but all those who take part in whatever form will be able to sleep at night.
The nightmares will come to the enemies of our country; wicked people.
I am expecting the collective failure of the metropolitan elite in London and the ensuing chaos will decide our fate. The media, the professional political class, and academia* will all be found wanting.
* I am not referring to science, engineering, medicine.
Have a look at these then:
https://youtu.be/02FE0j0RSCQ
https://youtu.be/34TCwe2q9o8
https://youtu.be/wWsuKbeg50E
https://youtu.be/hw5u883ypg4
https://youtu.be/Gw3DYxTeqYY
https://youtu.be/TKVD8EderxA
https://youtu.be/3CP4Aqyz3Sw
https://youtu.be/SjeNkse02UU
https://youtu.be/llk5A6IqXFo
And I could go on, it’s beyond comprehension that our government doesn’t know.