I’m sorry, that’s all I can say. I have just read the headlines in the newspaper today, Tuesday 1st September 2015, which predict “UK population to soar to 85m by 2080; migrants fuel rise in Britain double that of the whole EU …. England’s green and pleasant land will be a thing of the past if this does happen.”
Born in Britain in 2015, you are now 65 years old, and I can’t imagine what life is like for you in 2080. I’m just glad that I won’t be around to see it. I’ll be long gone by then, having been born in 1947. Yes, I’m just a few years older than you are – I’ll be 68 next month. The population now is around 65 million (8 million of them foreign-born) and that is already more than enough for a country of this size. The majority of people here think so, but our governments don’t listen to us.
I think my generation has had the best of it you know, and the last of it; by that I mean the Britain I was born into, which was battered and bruised after the Second World War but still ruled itself as an independent nation with a very strong sense of history, identity and pride. It wasn’t easy in the post-war years with rationing and privations. However, every kid in my working-class school knew exactly the calibre of the country to which they belonged, and which unquestionably belonged to THEM; and they knew what it had achieved. “We won the war in nineteen forty four!” was a favourite skipping-rope chant (historical accuracy being sacrificed a little in the cause of rhyme). We were unaware that the country our fathers, grandfathers and uncles had fought to save from enemy invasion was going to be invaded anyway.
On the horizon loomed the long-term consequences of the post-war mass immigration from the Commonwealth that had already begun, followed by our ill-advised membership of the European Union and the right it gave to 500 million people in the EU to come here in the name of the ‘free movement of people’.
The Commonwealth immigrants were a curiosity at first, especially their colourful clothes and houses. In drab 1950’s Britain, we had never seen the outside of a house painted pink or orange until people from the Indian sub-continent arrived. We thought curry smelt awful; they thought boiled cabbage smelt worse. But conflict and unease was on a small scale for a couple of decades. The incomers seemed to work hard, mind their own business and not meddle in ours. We had no feelings one way or another about their religion being Islam; we knew little about it.
However, by the 1980s we were hearing of Christian churches turned into mosques, the demand for halal meat in school dinners, the insistence on Multicultural curriculums, and lessons taught in Punjabi and Urdu. Hang on a minute, the natives thought – they did choose to come to Britain, and they did know we do things differently here, didn’t they, so why are they trying to turn our country into a little Pakistan? But if you asked reasonable questions like this, people of the political left came down on you like a ton of bricks, called you a racist and accused you of a terrible crime: Political Incorrectness. A primary school headmaster, Ray Honeywell, who dared to say that it was better for the children of immigrants to learn good English at school so they could integrate effectively in our society was berated, carpeted and forced out of his job. Mr Honeywell became a pariah in the world of education and was out of work for good.
Well, we went on for another couple of decades with no one daring to say anything much because Multiculturalism was like a religion that you couldn’t question. It only tailed off when unintegrated British-born Muslims started supporting anti-British terrorist organisations, blowing up people on public transport or beheading victims in London. Although the first-generation immigrants had come to live in this country voluntarily and seemed happy to stay here, some of their children or grandchildren hated us and sided with our enemies. Plot after plot to kill British people was uncovered, but no one in charge said that if they didn’t like it here, the terrorists and their supporters should go somewhere else. Maybe those Islamist terrorists won in the end and are running the UK by now as they threatened to. I do hope not, for your sake.
In 1973 I was 26 and had been living in a free, sovereign nation all my life. All that changed when a horrible PM called Heath signed us up to the European Economic Community without even asking us if we wanted to be in it. He promised that our freedom to make our own laws and decisions for Britain’s good would not be compromised. But he was lying and so were all the other politicians who kept insisting that our way of life wouldn’t alter. Nothing much did seem to happen at first – well, except for having to change all our money and our measurements, and let foreigners steal fish from seas that used to be ours, and we had to eat what the EEC told us we could eat because they didn’t like certain shapes of bananas, cucumbers, apples or other fruit. So everyone in Europe had to eat the same-shaped fruit and vegetables, and any shopkeeper in the UK who tried to sell it in pounds and ounces instead of kilos was fined or sent to prison.
More and more people began to wish that we could come out of the EEC. But even though we had different political parties with different policies, they all agreed with each other about the EEC: that it was a very good thing and we had to stay in, however bossy and annoying it became. They kept signing treaties named after foreign places, such as Maastricht and Lisbon which changed its name to the European Union and created a European Constitution. Every time a treaty was signed, the EU became stronger, more binding and harder to question. Now its goal was to bring about “ever closer political union” with every country using the same money that the EU had invented and all of them obeying the same laws that had been decided in the EU headquarters in Brussels and every national government passing those laws even if the people in the different countries didn’t like them or want them. The next step planned was to create a United States of Europe.
The law that we in Britain especially disliked was the one about free movement of people. This was because more migrants wanted to come to the UK than any other country in Europe and the government, led by a terrible PM called Blair, even encouraged more to come, just to infuriate those who were worried about it. The EU allowed several quite poor countries to join, which meant that hundreds of thousands more economic migrants could come here year after year until it became millions. There aren’t enough jobs, houses or places in schools or hospitals for our own people. More migrants have arrived in ten years than had previously come in hundreds of years of our history and there is nothing we can do to stop them because we have to obey the treaties our Prime Ministers signed. They are still flocking in legally and illegally every day. There are even people from outside Europe squatting on the French coast trying to break into our country, angry that we won’t let them in. We are under siege.
Next year or the year after, there will be a referendum that allows us to vote on whether we want to stay in the EU or leave. We have an awful PM called Cameron who is doing everything he can to make us stay in the EU even though it’s destroying our country. I’m going to vote to leave the EU for your sake. I hope that most British people do the same. If they do, it might preserve the British birthright for you and your generation. If they don’t, I’m sorry.
I am also 60yrs in a few months. The writer is perfectly correct about the Lies of the Majority of Politicians. But I have to say, just like now, the Media played a huge part in making sure we voted yes to go into a Common Market. It spun all the advantages, and it did a great job on fear mongering. One such claim was we could face food shortages should world wild famine strike the world. Well in reality the same would apply today. Those grains, and everything else would not arrive in the shops should the “World” which includes tiny Europe become short of food for whatever reason. We are the 4th Largest Economy in the whole World. Who would not want to trade with us. Yes the EU would throw a hissy fit at first and try to make initial trade deals difficult, but in reality THEY NEED out trade more than we need theirs. They will fall over backwards to trade with us. The EU have tried to same hissy fit with Russia, with America on its side over the Ukraine. Whether you agree with it or not for whatever reason, the EU’S Bully boys tactic didn’t work. Our Membership to this very Corrupt EU should end. You would never allow another household to make all the decisions affecting your own household. So why would a country lay down to the same. Finnaly, every British Politician has in one way or another tried to change it. How on earth will weak Cameron change his own underpants never mind the Perverted EU. As per the writer feels, our country’s people never threw the towel in. Get a grip of yourselves. Don’t allow the loud minority to dictate to us, as they now do. Grow Balls or whatever you want, be be heard, be heard soon or it will be too late.
interesting piece pam and its quite amazing how this country has changed in those years especially the last 20, lets hope and prey that we still have a future after 2017.
Well, I THOUGHT this posted but I don’t see it so I’ll try again. This is not about immigration per se, but it is about undermining a free society. This is not hypothetical, it is real, it is happening, there is no ‘what if’ involved. Here is part of it. I can’t imagine there is not a similar effort in the U.K, so I thought. It’s called the Blue Zone Project.
———————
Consider a series of Blue Zone “check lists” for citizens produced by the initiative. The “Bedroom Checklist,” for example, under “direction,” tells participants to “start making changes to your bedroom environment based on the recommendations given.” Those recommendations cover everything from your mattress and the “optimal” thermostat temperature to what you may have or not have in your bedroom — no phones, screens, or digital alarm clocks, for instance. “Use the bedroom only for sleep and sex,” the checklist adds. Talk about government in the bedroom!
A separate “Home Checklist,” meanwhile, urges Blue Zones targets to weigh themselves daily, buy a dog, get rid of all TVs except one, ditch the TV remote, replace power tools with hand tools, buy a bike, use a helmet, disconnect the garage door opener, sit on the floor instead of furniture, and much more. All of that is supposed to help people burn more calories and become healthier.
———————
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/21521-us-communities-targeted-for-blue-zone-social-engineering?tmpl=component&print=1
This is being enacted in the schools with the connivance of health insurers, an ‘unexpected’ consequence of Obamacare. And yes, Blue Zone has it’s own very innocuous website.
http://www.bluezones.com/
Pamela, beautifully done. I wanted to show you this – it’s not about refugees per se so is off topic. It is about another effort to undermine a free society via children in schools. It’s alive and well here in the U.S. and perhaps there is something similar in the U.K. Here, it is called The Blue Zone.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/21521-us-communities-targeted-for-blue-zone-social-engineering?tmpl=component&print=1
They have their own website that looks perfectly innocuous (don’t they all?)
https://www.bluezones.com/
It is being implemented here with the help of the health insurance companies – an ‘unexpected’ consequence of Obamacare.
I have children and grandchildren, and have suggested a fallback plan if the Eu and the UK Government fiddle or steal the referendum result, by hook, or more probably, by crook/s.
Emigrate, to Canada, New Zealand or Australia. Where my Grandfather was born, and Great Grandfather became a citizen.
The future must be in their hands and in their control, and dependent on their skills, ingenuity and ability.
Not on the whims of impractical, pie in the sky, bitter, twisted dreamers of nightmares, hell bent on controlling and dominating people, of superior intellect and merit.
My prediction:
Unless we get of the EU then those next 65 years will see a civil war in the UK.
Maybe even a world war unless the likes of Obama stop pandering to Islam.
I don’t understand how a civil war in the UK could come about. The populace is unarmed.
Interestingly, this piece concludes that the referendum next year will return a Yes vote.
How do you make that out? The author will be voting to leave the EU, as will I, and hopes ‘most British people do the same’. Which doesn’t mean ‘the referendum will return a Yes vote’ at all.
I think that Pam, like so many others suspect that millions of younger people in Britain will vote to remain in the European Union. Not because they like being in the EU, but because they fear the unknown and may even be comfortable with the status quo, as all their lives they’ve been in it.
To many in their busy lives setting up home and trying to make a life for themselves are unconcerned with matters they assume others should be dealing with, unaware that their complacancy will destroy their own country.
Many of the “newcomers” also have no sense of Britishness so why would they vote to be independent from the EU either?
In the past you as an individual had responsibility to care for yourself and made sure others around you were cared for, especially family members. Family bonds and communities were very strong through the generations. The individual was involved in society and structures that bound British institutions and communites together. Now the individual has gladly given that role and responsibility to the State and its institutions. That State hungry for power has given away your birthright to a foreign power (EU) but retains all the trappings of power, leaving the individual impotent to stop it.
This new breed of “individual” nurtured since the 1950’s, neither care nor are aware what is done in their name as they have been trained like a drone to have a “Hive mind” to no longer be individuals, content in watching X factor and soaps and other mindless trash on TV to occupy their empty heads. They see themselves as part of a collective group controlled and often dependent on the State, regulated by the European Union. They expect the State to do the job that once they as an individual were duty bound and expected to have done without thinking and have been rewarded in return with deserved contempt and sought no consent when it was required, when it sold their birthright in 1972.
I will also be voting to leave the European Union, but I suspect it is already too late for Britain now and long before 2080 will be broken up into regions of the EU. The people around then will neither care what the fuss was about as they will all be propagandised in the schools, colleges and universities, by the media and our politicians of “what a wonderful place the EU is” and rewrite history to enforce that dogma with the practise of erasing the very words England, Britain and United Kingdom from the maps and those history books.
History is often written by the victor. Will the EU be rewriting our history in 2080? I suspect it will be.
Interestingly, mailbiter, you don’t seem to understand the meaning of ‘if’, which is used to introduce a conditional clause meaning “in the event that”.
Therefore, my piece does not conclude anything at all, but expresses two possibilities while clearly hoping for one particular outcome – Brexit.
What I certainly do conclude from your petty little post is that you are an ignoramus with limited knowledge of language, and poor reading skills.
Excellent inspired letter to a future that, pray God, will not come to pass.
We must break free – this is awful, and the prospects are worse.
Splendid piece of work, Pam!
Thank you. I have no grandchildren, but I have a step-grandchild born last year. I was thinking of him when I wrote the ‘letter’.
Pam, it isn’t going to happen. Your grandson will look back and wonder why you worried. And he’ll be proud of you for working to stop it happening.
Sorry I missed your wonderful letter when it first came out!
I remember all you write about – I only missed a mention of Maggie Thatcher, especially her comments on Maastricht here (the long version):
Thank you, colliemum, for your kind remark and this wonderful video of Maggie at the height of her powers. I do wish she had acted on her instincts that the Eurocrats were untrustworthy and scheming and got us out of it while she could. I also wish she had not agreed to the building of the Channel Tunnel.
I feel ambivalent about Mrs Thatcher and that’s probably why I didn’t mention her.
You’re very welcome!
Regarding Mrs Thatcher: I know what you mean, I was not that keen on her, especially not in the early 1980s. Mind you, I wasn’t that much into politics at all during that time.
However, looking back, especially on that particular speech (which I of course didn’t watch when it happened), my admiration has been growing year by year.
Also note the brilliant interjections by Norman Tebbit and Tony Benn from ‘the other side’. Weren’t they all articulate and erudite, and polite? Nothing at all like the current bunch on both sides of the House – John Rees Mogg perhaps being the only one coming close.
Seconded.
Thirded??