After reading this Gatestone article I sent the following letter to my Constituency MP (Lab):
Dear xxx,
Have you read the Koran – all of it? Or the hadith or sira? Have you educated yourself about Islam?
As you are the MP for my Constituency, I would like you to read the attached Gatestone Institute article and tell me what MPs, including you, are doing about the blatant Islamisation of our country. I never hear questions about it being asked in the House of Commons, despite the fact that it is the most important issue for today, tomorrow and far into the future. Are MPs blind, deaf and dumb or just incredibly cowardly?
The writer of the article is perfectly correct when she says that the growth of so-called right-wing groups is entirely the result of the political establishment’s failure. I used to be a lab/lib idiot myself in the distant past, but now I long to see the success of a party – any opposition party – that will stand up for British people in their own country and abolish sharia courts, halal slaughter, child marriage, FGM, ‘honour crimes’, wife-beating under sharia, marital rape under sharia, sexism within sharia, misogynistic treatment of females under sharia, government and ‘charity’ funding for organisations that promote islam and, most shocking of all, the systematic grooming, drugging and rape of young British girls by racist muslim gangs that have been swept under the carpet by the authorities for decades, and are still going on.
I am well aware that some of these sickening outrages are crimes under BRITISH law, but it appears that Muslims get away with breaking British law while the police and other authorities look the other way. It seems the police obey orders from above to ignore sexual crimes committed against British girls and women by Muslims for the sake of some illusory ‘community cohesion’. This is wicked injustice and will not be forgiven.
Why does the government pander to Islamic aggression and allow their flouting of the law to go unpunished? Why, if someone criticises Islam, which is a hateful, anti-semitic and anti-non-Muslim ideology, are they arrested by the Thought Police and punished for so-called hate speech? Why is “Islamophobia” (an entirely bogus term) stamped on, while Islamania is allowed to flourish? Why are people such as Robert Spencer and Martin Sellner, who want to address audiences in the UK who want to hear them, banned and deported in utter defiance of the precious concept of Free Speech, a vital component of Democracy? Please do not attempt to fob me off with PC multicultural diversity integration ROP claptrap. I stopped believing in that false propaganda years ago, along with millions of others who are not blind, deaf, dumb or stupid.
Does the political establishment intend to stand back and watch while Islamaniacs further their plans to add the UK to the 50 or so countries that were brutally conquered or Islamised into dhimmitude over the last 1400 years? It is not good enough to spout idiocies about what a tolerant country we are. Intolerable things are happening which deserve zero tolerance, the same as domestic brutality.
Perhaps those at the top are just biding their time, perfecting an ingenious stratagem to halt this country’s slide into a future nightmare Islamic tyranny by halting the excessive Muslim birthrate and strictly enforcing exclusively British law on every citizen equally and without exception. If so, I think they should begin now, before it’s too late.
I am 70 years old and glad that I’m near the end of my life because I have never seen this beloved country in such a bad way and hurtling towards an even worse future. All of you in the mainstream parties are to blame, so fixated on your own ideologies and careers that you resemble the pathetic appeasers of the 1930s who tried to ignore Churchill’s warning of an evil ideology that aimed for a 1000-year Reich in Europe. The Nazis lasted about 20 years; Islam, a political ideology akin to Nazism but much more dangerous, has been rampaging through countries for 1400 years and by 2070 will have more followers than any other ‘religion’ in the world. Convert, dhimmify or die: these are the three choices given to victims when Islam gets the whip hand.
Regards, Pamela Preedy
Pam has most of this right, there is no doubt that a religion which is demonstrably full of hate towards its non adherents, and practices ways and means to remove them is not one I could espouse to anyone. The problem is that it is impossible to broach or discuss this issue with anyone in a sensible manner unless they are UKIP or a serving or former serviceman/woman who has real life experience. I am late with my comments but UKIP is toxic in the eyes of many especially the young who see and mix with others of that religion and do not understand the darker motives of some of their persuasion.
Tacitus talks of verbal bullets and a “multi-pronged approach”, so may I suggest the following as an opening shot. The mural which is at the centre of the Corbyn/anti-semitism row has clearly offended many members of the Jewish faith as has Corbyn’s attitude towards it. The erection/painting of the mural (ie it’s content) – is, in light of subsequent events, clearly in breach of the UK’s current ‘hate’ laws. If offended members of the Jewish faith – including the prominent Jewish Peer and reviewer of anti-terrorist legislation Lord Carlile – will not complain to the Police about this blatant hate, then UKIP should. Do we want mile-high hate posted on our cities’ walls? The artist concerned would then be interviewed and the public would learn if the protests against the mural and Corbyn were, in law, warranted. If the Establishment are desirous of respect and diversity in the UK they should act now. If not they should expect the likely consequences of overlooking such serious breaches of the law. After all, we are assured that the Met Police are employing a multitude of officers in detecting ‘hate crimes’; If they can’t detect and deal with one the size of a house then I fear that London is lost.
I agree wholeheartedly with the contents of this letter. I intended to give it a 5 star rating but I was not quite deft enough on the mouse and it ended up showing as a 2 and I was unable to alter it. So anyway it’s a 5 from me.
In what way, Tacitus, is recognising loss of free speech as a crucial issue “narrowing UKIP’s appeal” ? Is there not something of the dog in a manger about a political party that stubbornly refuses to talk about public concerns because TR or AMW have both made it an issue?
Its to address it in a smart way, not try to bludgeon everyone over the head with a blunt instrument. We need a multi-pronged approach. Like the left, which operates through Socialist Worker, the Labour Party, the Charities, the Unions, the Libdems, the Greens, we need to have different organisations serving different purposes. UKIP should be about winning success at the ballot box. Other organisations can be about focused campaigning on particular issues. Don’t you find it frustrating shouting into the dark? Do you think anyone is listening to you? Without political power, you will achieve nothing. So the question is how to get power, not how to make yourself feel better by getting something off your chest. We have allowed our enemies to win by allowing ourselves to be boxed into the same corner the BNP used to inhabit and that is toxic to the people we need to win over, i.e. 15% of the population. We need to get up to 15% to be taken seriously again and at the moment we are down at 1%.
Electorally there is some sort of logic to Labour being anti-Semitic. Corbyn may say he wants to root it out, but who believes him? He has associated with some seriously dodgy characters. The Hamas Charter calls for the killing of Jews who hide behind rocks and trees – it quotes from a Hadith.
Unfortunately all too many otherwise decent people have fallen for this deceit. How can UKIP reverse this massive brainwashing of the population?
I try to persuade the lefties who I encounter, but they cannot listen. The situation is serious.
Further pondering the situation that Labour is in:
It seems impossible that they can continue as a single party, both appeasing Islam and at the same time claiming to support Human Rights and equality. If the latter part are true to their principles, they are going to have to split away from the appeasers. If so, is there anything that outsiders (UKIP or anybody – I don’t care who) can do to assist this process? Or is it a case of leaving Labour supporters to come to the obvious conclusion in their own time?
Hugo. Very interesting. Your knowledge regarding this is obviously much greater than mine. Is there any possibility that you, or anybody else for that matter, could write an article giving greater detail of this division within the Labour party?
Peter, unfortunately the Labour mentality is somewhat mysterious to me. I do have frequent conversations with a few Labour voters, however it proves to be really hard to pin them down to properly discussing anything in any depth. They are great at diversionary tactics when they really have no satisfactory answer. Whataboutery – “what about…”
I was somewhat surprised recently when one of my interlocutors agreed that freedom of expression should include the freedom to offend. We were discussing the case of the man convicted of a so-called “hate crime” who taught a dog to do a Nazi salute. It was clearly intended as a joke to tease his girlfriend. This legislation of hate speech was introduced by Blair. The Labour voter seemed to have no sense of guilt that his own actions, namely voting for Blair, had any connection with the destruction of this important principle.
I suppose this is highlighting a feature of leftie “thinking”. They seem to absolve themselves from any responsibility for the outcomes of their own actions. They remind me of a 3 year old, who drops their ice-cream, and then blames the nearest adult – “look what you made me do!”
There is a long, hard struggle ahead, to re-assert some basic principles which were established a long time ago, but which are eroding and crumbling away. Without the solid bedrock of these principles, then civilisation itself will collapse.
Hugo. Thank you for your reply.
I was born in a West Yorkshire industrial town in 1946 and will be 72 (although still relatively youthful I hope) later this year. I am of the lower working class, if indeed there is such a class, and both my parents were traditional Labour voters all their lives. But I am quite certain that were they still alive today neither of them would recognise what the Labour party has become.
Perhaps strangely I have never been a Labour supporter and in my younger days I was inclined towards the Conservatives although definitely not these days. Unfortunately I live in a north London constituency with one of the highest percentage of Labour voters in the country and the demographics are such that I can’t see that situation changing in my lifetime. I won’t say that I despair but I’m certainly not happy.
Peter, the Labour party abandoned their traditional voters many years ago. Taking them for granted, because of the assumption that they had nowhere else to go. Decent, real, caring people like Gillian Duffy, who worked hard for her community. Abandoned and belittled by Gordon Brown.
I am sorry that Labour has become what it is today.
Guys, you have to be more wily and think in a more connected way. Think IRA and Sinn Fein, bullet and the ballot box. There are other people around who can shoot the bullets. UKIP exists to be a threat at the ballot box. If you just repeat what TR or AMW are saying then what is the point, you can never be successful at the ballot box. UKIP won almost the same number of votes at the last GE as the BNP won in 2010. UKIPs appeal has to be broadened, not narrowed. You are too honest, too straightforward, and are losing as a result.
So you’re saying that UKIP should have a paramilitary wing?
I am talking metaphorically of course. Verbal bullets.
UKIP’s continuing purpose as things stand hangs entirely on the efficacy of the ballot box in influencing government policy. It may have a nominal effect on which party is returned to power; it may decide a referendum; but does it actually now make any difference to the policies pursued by government – whatever its political stripe?
Up until recently I would have said the jury was out. I think it has now returned – and the verdict is unfortunately not in favour of democracy anymore, as an effective pillar of liberty, security and prosperity.
If the major political parties with any presence in Westminster have withdrawn their consent from the expressed will of the people on Brexit, they will have excused themselves from their democratic obligations in other respects, and the power of the franchise is now almost certainly null and void in terms of the ballot box.
If this is true of a straightforward referendum ballot on a single issue – that the result has been systematically and determinedly undermined – then there is no longer any hope that UKIP, even if it did win parliamentary seats, would have any effect on the steamroller of establishment power.
When freedom of speech itself is being curtailed; when a massive, chilling cloak of propaganda has been cast over any hopes of having a free discussion of the issues facing this nation; then liberty, that pillar of national sovereignty, security and prosperity, will needs be served by other means
Well said, Stuart
Great letter Panmelia. Very well said.
One of the most moving things I have heard is Tommy Robinson reading Martin Sellner’s speech from his prison.
As soon as we say to ourselves ” Oh, I shouldn’t say that, should I ?”, we jave surrendered free speech.
I do hope those on this site who wanted Sellner banned from speaking the YI have heard or read the speech on Gates of Vienna and will reconsider their opinion.
Last year I pre-paid for an advertisement to be published in a local newspaper in this area (NES). The content was agreed by the paper’s sales office. Controversial, , but nothing libellous or defamatory, Simply highlighting the danger posed to society as a whole by the ‘The Project’ published by the Muslim Brotherhood! Advert was ‘pulled’ by the Paper’s Editor at the eleventh hour! When challenged by me he said ‘ Racist, and religiously intolerant!! My MP, said only ‘he would not have ‘named’ the Mayor of London. I’d also repeated the BBC Panorama programme which reported that a significant minority of Muslims in Britain, one million, supported the terrorist attacks in Europe.
I am of the opinion, that if Muslim’s wilfully refuse to integrate into our society, and choose to try and impose upon their host’s an ideology and culture which is alien to their adopted country. They should consider moving to one of the fifty countries in the World which shares their manner of dress, attitude to women, and religious intolerance. Australia has an expression ‘Fit In or Go’ Some Brits use a more vulgar one ‘ Fit in or … Off!. I subscribe to both!
Ernie, the newspaper editors appear to be too scared to publish the uncomfortable truth. Also Amoree has not had her Halal article published either. I do not think any of my letters to the regional paper regarding Islam were published, although they did publish around 80% of my EU related letters. It shows the importance of alternative media. Unfortunately that is under attack now too. The censorship is reminiscent of 1930s Germany – that did not end well.
Pam, excellent letter; I hope many of our(!) MPs receive several copies in their mail.
To all who have commented: Many thanks for your interest and love! In response to questions asked: No, I have not received an answer from the MP, not even the courtesy acknowledgement she usually emails prior to a later, fuller response. Perhaps one of her snowflake lackeys looked at the message I sent and swooned in PC shock with a finger firmly on the delete button. This MP does appear on the list of Labour Friends of Israel Supporters, for what it’s worth. Maybe it’s a self-protective strategy in view of the growing anger about Labour anti-Semitism, but it doesn’t mean she will criticise islam openly and honestly. Personally, I think one has to choose which side you’re on and stick with it in such an irreconcilable situation as the islamic hatred of Jews everywhere and of Israel in particular.
I agree that the Gates of Vienna is a good site and so is the Gatestone Institute based in New York (see article). I can understand the despair of those who think “What’s the Point?” and that we have been sold down the river by those bunkering off to New Zealand. I left Ukip on the day Bolton was elected and joined Anne Marie Waters’ For Britain party as soon as she announced its founding. It took nearly 6 months for the Electoral Commission to register FB as a party and now they’re quibbling over the trident logo, but members knew there would be much foot-dragging. We are patient and NEVER afraid to say what we think and know about the depredations of too many muslims in this country. Anne Marie is not interested in applying pressure for a change in attitudes in the mainstream parties; she knows it won’t happen. She has declared her intention to win enough votes to replace those now in Westminster with people who truly represent the majority of the British people. It’s a big ask, but peaceful revolutionary change can happen: think of the UK and the USA in 2016.
The more people who join The For Britain Movement, the more chance it has of success.
” not even the courtesy acknowledgement”
Those courtesy emails are usually generated automatically by their email software. It is worth checking your trash folder in case it has gone there. Also check that your sent email was actually sent, rather than lingering in your drafts folder. Apologies if teaching to suck eggs!
Ah, now I see. I thought it was quite a good letter to write to a MP but then comes the advertising pitch. ” The more people who join The For Britain Movement, the more chance it has of success.”
What a pearl of wisdom. It couldn’t possibly apply to Ukip too? Nah.
At the time Gerard Batten is doing his best to rebuild the party how helpful it is to hear from those who boldly ran away when Bolton appeared. Not
Henry Bolton didn’t just ‘appear’. He was elected as the most popular candidate, at least among the votes that were counted. He then said AMW and her supporters wanted to turn UKIP into the UK Nazi Party. As far as anyone then knew he would be UKIP’s leader for years. AMW and anyone who had voted for her who had any self-respect had little choice but to resign. Would you keep paying membership fees to a party whose leader thinks you are a Nazi?
Keith, I did renew my subscription under Henry Bolton even though I loathed the man from the moment he threatened legal action to stop AMW standing as a candidate. That was several weeks before he came out with the nazi /racist nonsense along with Farage.
But I have been political for a long time and not inclined to switch horses over a set-back. I know how suddenly things can turn in the political arena and I knew Ukip had the depth to carry on if it wanted to. And the reaction to the reality of the Bolton affair was a magnificent show of heart from a party that had been written off.
I wrote in these columns urging people not to resign despite Bolton. A political party shows its quality in resilience among other things.
Why do we keep getting posts here from ex members who proudly proclaim their “For Britain” membership”. It is because they do not like to seeing their former comrades actually turning around the party’s run of bad luck and showing it’s far from dead.
I can suggest other reasons why they continue to post here, but I want to move on. Which is something I wish they would do. Pronto
You ask why we’re getting posts from ex-members who’re now ‘For Britain’.
Well, unlike ‘For Britain’, UKIP Daily is not a ‘members only’ zone, and we do like debates, preferring not to turn into an echo chamber.
I assume that the ‘For Britain’ proponents posting here might have had enough of preaching to the choir on their ‘members only’ zone. It looks as if it’s far more interesting for them to give their equivalent of ‘dawa’ to us benighted Kippers.
I’ve certainly had enough of them preaching on here so I won’t be bothering with this site anymore.
Thank you, Keith, for pointing out the obvious truths about the situation with Bolton that Farranger seems unable to grasp. As a matter of fact, when Ukip rightly got rid of its third dud leader in a row, I thought there was some hope for it after all: Gerard Batten as a leader prepared to be honest about islam might ask Anne Marie to rejoin the party and work together. But Gerard isn’t going to be leader, he has drawn his horns in on islam and he ruled out AMW rejoining the party even if she had wanted to. So that was that.
There was no ‘advertising pitch’ in the letter to the MP reproduced here and sending it to ukipdaily was an afterthought. It was in my comment written to the first dozen or so respondents that I mentioned For Britain because some of them seemed discontented with Ukip’s and other contributors’ approach of “It’s not the right time [to tackle the islamic issue]”. As AMW has consistently pointed out, “It never will be the right time for Ukip to tackle this issue”.
Plus, I prefer her leadership to that of any of the candidates that Ukip is likely to serve up in the next leadership election.
Good morning Farranger
It seems to me that the AMW Roadshow, as I tend to think of it, has been using this site as a platform and recruiting ground ever since they broke away from UKIP. They come across as totally intolerant of anyone who doesn’t agree with them – a dictatorship in other words – and it is for this reason they will NEVER get my vote in an election.
Kind regards.
Brenda, that’s nonsense. I really don’t know to what extent For Britain members contribute to ukipdaily to recruit or otherwise, because I stopped visiting the site on a daily basis as I used to before Bolton the Libidinous Mole was elected. AMW is not a dictator, nor is For Britain a dictatorship. She speaks on the phone and writes personal messages to members thanking them for suggestions and support which they have offered freely because they agree with her. Further debate about whether islam is a threat to this country is pointless. We look for ways to change that situation democratically and peacefully before it is too late.
Pam – They say the pen is mightier than the sword (laptop in my case), but sometimes the sword is the only way. So, I haven’t given up I’m just changing my tactics.
If were to resist Islam in our country, there would be riots of ever increasing violence until it descended into outright war, this would drag on for years or decades. Brtitain’s cities would be like Beirut or eventually much worse, look at Syria if you want to see our future.
Far better to acknowledge this now and plan accordingly, get it dealt with as quickly as possible.
I’m done talking me, I’ve had enough of the rhetoric, when people wake up and are ready to do something, I’m coming home.
Pam, many thanks for such a well-expressed letter. I am 78 and feel exactly as you do. We cannot put right any of the wrongs we see in England unless we first clearout the political caste that has caused them. We owe this to the next generation. Ours has let them down by continuously voting for the same spineless and treacherous greasy pole climbers.
Pam. I am 71 and you have expressed my thoughts exactly and even more than that you have put them into words far better than I ever could. Congratulations and my heartfelt thanks.
But what do you expect when so many of the commentators on even this site are absolutely terrified of facing up to the issue of Islam? One particular commentator who is in our age group is forever saying that the time isn’t right. Give me strength!
And even worse, there are those who continue to idolise yesterday’s man Farage who won’t acknowledge that the issue of Islam even exists.
PeterUST I am the same age as yourself and I have to agree that the time isn’t right. It was right say 20 years ago or as I would have preferred in 1989 when there was open support in this country for the murder of Salman Rushdie as a result of Khomeini’s fatwa. The issue of Islam and Islamic institutions in this country should have been investigated then and the true nature of Islam exposed.
The present phase of the 1400 year old general jihad now being waged in Britain is well under way so the time to make up for lost ground and confront Islam is now.
JimR. I’m not sure whether it is you who has misunderstood me or if it is me who has misunderstood you.
When I said that the time isn’t right, those were not my words but the words of another commentator who meant them in the sense not that it is too late, but quite the opposite, that the time for openly facing up to the issue of Islam is not the present but some unspecified point in the future. And this commentator is 70.
Is it any wonder that we are getting absolutely nowhere?
PeterUST. I understood you precisely, I am sorry that my reply has seemed to confuse you, apologies. What I wished to convey was that I considered there were only two time era’s acceptable for facing up to Islam – in the past or now, the. present. We can’t do anything about the past, that opportunity has gone so the time is now, not the future.
“the time isn’t right”!!! In a few short years the time will be past when we have a hope of doing anything about it except to start shooting to defend ourselves.
I was furious on reading the news about the production of our new passports to find they are to be produced largely in France by a company in which the French Government is invested. EU procurement regulations were cited as the reason for this.
I was even more furious, however, to discover that France, Germany Spain and Italy all failed to use the eu procurement process for their own passports, citing concerns over ‘national security’. Presumably, yet another case of our civil servants gold-plating eu regulations. A libdem MP gloatingly announced that the UK could have retained its blue passport instead of replacing it by the hated red one.
I am sure we will all agree with you but it is off topic which is the Islamisation of Britain and the West in general.
I think it’s disgusting and pathetic that only 5 people have commented on this to date.
Kippers, get out from your (golf club) bunkers, and WAKE UP. You can moan all you like about BBC being obsessed with Putin, but too many of you are blinkered with BREXIT.
Rob,
I agree that this important subject deserves far more attention but dealing with it effectively requires our full detachment from the EU. Putin is a sideshow, likely seized upon with little or no real evidence as a welcome distraction from May’s abject failure on the Brexit front. That failure is a good indicator of what we might expect in her attitude to the ongoing Islamification. After all she presided over mass illegal immigration as Home secretary…
Thank you Pam. You describe so very well how many of us feel. I’m afraid my MP is a Muslim in a very Conservative seat. My main opposition to ‘free movement’ is aimed more at the non-European immigrants who are rewarded with EU citizenship from any country they can gain entry to, before moving on to their country of choice. Hundreds of thousands on our non-EU immigrants have arrived here in this way from Sweden, that very troubled/troubling country, in particular.
I’m tempted to send an edited copy of that letter to my local MP, but as my local MP happens to be Jess Phillips, I will probably end up in a police cell charged with ‘hate speech’! 😮
On ‘free movement’, after I read the excellent book “2030: Your Childrens Future In Islamic Britain” I realised that the free movement of EU citizens (mostly those looking for work) wasn’t the problem; the big problem was the ‘free movement’ of people from the ‘rest of the world’, and in particular Pakistan, that the Labour party had instigated back in 1997. The Conservative government since 2010 has had plenty of opportunity to correct this dreadful act, but has failed to do anything about it. There may be little we can do regarding free movement of EU citizens, but there is everything that can be done to restrict immigration from the rest of the world. The Conservatives failure to do so shows they are just following the same hidden agenda that Labour follow.
There is often a price to pay for speaking the truth. We seem to be experiencing The Coudenhove Kalergi Plan in action.
There’s no ‘seem’ about this, we ARE experiencing it.
Well said Pam!
If think this is a bigger problem than Brexit and I voted out.
People need to read and support sites like http://gatesofvienna.net
There will be civil war in Europe very shortly; it seems that the EU don’t want to acknowledge this.
Gates of Vienna is a good site. There is much useful info there, well worth a visit.
Blocked by “Sky Broadband Shield”; unfortunately I have no control over the connection where I am staying for the next week or so. The enemy of free speech has tentacles everywhere.
On my list for when I get home…
Yes, I support them. Each quarter they have a fund raising week to help cover their costs!
You are right Michael, war is coming, but when? Erdogan has invaded parts of Syria on the pretext of fighting Kurdish “terrorists” (who were allied with us against ISIS)
The EU response? Have another $2+ billion , to help with “OUR” migrant problem, and we’ll keep open your bid to join the EU. Blackmail springs to mind.
Nato response? None that I can see. (Turkey is a NATO member which I think should cease)
Now he is calling for the Organization of the Islamic Conference to collectively raise an army of 5 million, plus air and sea forces with a budget of $126+billion to wipe out Israel-totally.
EU response? none that I can see yet, but probably along the lines of “Islamophobia on Twitter is getting out of hand, need to crack down on it”.
Nato eh um ah.
Unlikely? Maybe I don’t know but the fact that Erdogan is openly saying it should be cause for great alarm, and if it comes to pass do you think it will stop there and not continue on to Europe? Are we seeing the first steps of the great kinetic Jihad in Europe?
Quite right jimR. This is a link to a report on today’s Westmonster site about eight boat-loads of illegals landing on Lesbos from Turkey in 24 hours. So much for the billions the eu has shovelled in Erdogan’s direction:
https://www.westmonster.com/300-migrants-land-on-greek-island-in-last-24-hours/ – eight boats in the last 24 hours apparently from Turkey
A wonderful piece of writing. I’d happily send it to my MP (who’s pro-Brexit but also a May supporter) but what’s the point? I think we’re on our own now. No-one in any of the three political parties with MPs is going to do anything to support us, or even listen to us.
“but what’s the point?”
The point is that they will have been told the truth. If they subsequently pretend ignorance we will know that they lie.
For example see how Corbyn is being found out with his support of an anti-Semitic painting. It turns out that Labour was warned about it over a year ago:
http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/labour-party-brushed-formal-complaint-over-corbyn-support-antisemitic-painting-208306818
Exactly right Hugo. Do it and do it repeatedly and by as many people as can be persuaded also to do so. He/she may be fully committed to Islam or may be like the vast majority, totally ignorant of the implications embedded in Islam or they may just have their own agenda. Whether or not you get a reply, or even an acknowledgement doesn’t matter. If the first it gives notice that there is resistance to the spread of Islam and the dilution of our laws by Sharia, and it may make the second actually look into it. If it’s the third then notice has been given that they are being watched.
I know the reply I would have from my local MP for Thanet – he has already accused me of being racist when I wrote him to him regarding immigration during the transition period.
In which case you know that he/she doesn’t have a coherent argument in rebuttal, the label (slur) word attached to you is just one of many used to stop discussion. Challenge him/her to prove what he/she has accused you of. Grind him/her down until you get a reasonable response, or more likely none but keep grinding away. The stakes in this game could not be higher.
Well said Pam.
In the unlikely event that the MP sends a reply, could you let us know what they say?
Is your MP a member of Labour Friends of Israel? There is a list of them here:
http://www.lfi.org.uk/in-parliament/
Those Labour MPs who are standing up to the anti-Semitism within Labour are deserving of respect.
Pam, been a long time, nice to hear from you.
I think the truth is that after decades of treason and betrayal, our politicians have sold us so far down the river that they’ve gone too far to stop, there’s no easy way to go back.
Enoch Powell was right, this is going to end in a bloodbath, I’ve resigned myself to this, that’s why I’ve given up writing.
I think The Powers That Be are expecting trouble, senior Goldman Sachs people and Barack Obama have all been checking out New Zealand lately, no doubt planning to join the hordes of other billionaires currently building bunkers there.
Something must be in the air, the rats are deserting the sinking ship very rapidly now, something is getting ready to pop.
Nice letter all the same but I wouldn’t hold your breath waiting for a constructive response.
I despair when I hear/read sentiments like “too late now” and similar. I will never give up my heritage, and my descendants and country and their future. You are absolutely right about the bloodbath and not because Enoch Powell predicted it (his Rivers of Blood speech was actually a well reasoned presentation and not a racist outburst) but because it is explicitly stated so in the Koran and the hadiths, unless you as a Christian or Jew wish to live in constant humiliation as a dhimmi, the only other choices for anyone is to submit or die. It will come but I want to make my voice heard as much as possible until that time.
I will have to join Dad’s army when the time comes; it’s not far away now.
I have Muslims mention 2020!
Me too Capt.Mainwaring, I’m behind you Sir. The real point of my reply was that to go about like Pte. Frazer does two things. It tends to discourage anyone who may be awakening to the dangers of Islam and it also encourages those who would impose it.
This from Brigadier S.K. Malik’s “The Quranic Concept of War”
“To instill terror into the hearts of the enemy is essential in the ultimate analysis to dislocate his faith. An invincible faith is immune to terror. A weak faith offers inroads to terror”
Stephen Coughlin’s “Catastrophic Failure:Blindfolding America in the face of Jihad” discusses this,
“In the Quranic Concept of War Malik emphasised the importance of laying the groundwork for successful military operations. He explained this preparatory stage as a ‘dislocation of faith’ in the target nation’s sense of security and in the capability of it’s leaders to defend it’s territory. The inability of the target population’s leadership to protect it’s citizens in the face of a terror campaign signals the beginning of kinetic operations in earnest. At some point dawah transitions to jihad”.
There is no doubt in my mind that this dawah is well underway and I don’t know when it will transition. Malik’s book as far as I am aware was written about 50 years ago so he would at that time have been unaware what allies he would have in post-modernism and political correctness and the rest, the traitors within.
Until then Capt. Mainwaring, lets find some cold steel, they don’t like it up ’em do they?
Yes it’s all been done before hasn’t it. Sun Tzu’s The Art of War is another good reference, I’ve written about it and as far as I can see, I wasn’t far wrong.
‘The European Islamic Union and “The Art of War”’
https://independencedaily.co.uk/european-islamic-union-art-war/
Beautiful, Pam! I love you x