When things go wrong, that’s when leadership is both tested and defined. Only weeks after innocent people were murdered in Westminster, we have again in Britain have had our way of life assaulted by Islamic killers. The aim of Islamic killers is clear, regardless of how it is sanitised by our politicians; Islam won’t tolerate freedom and we are attacked for being free.
It is written in every other page of the Koran, the persecution and punishment of the unbeliever. Some say these verses apply only to defence, but rarely do they describe (or even know) what it is that Islam defends itself from. It defends itself from disobedience to its rule. To clarify, our freedom is deemed an attack on Islam, and killing us for our defiance is deemed an act of defence.
The increasing terror attacks in the West, as well as the criminal acts such as child marriage or FGM, are the inevitable result of globalisation. When you shift huge populations to live in countries where their values and way of life will clash with the natives, enormous problems will result. When they have, it is globalisation that has been defended, because most of our politicians are dutifully on board.
The Islamic terror attacks are being presented to us as a battle of Good vs Evil. We will not however name who is good and who is evil, or why. We will not call it what it really is, a battle between freedom and a totalitarian supremacist religion. Instead, we have created a fantasy world where wesimply pretend that divisions are created not by the existence of different and incompatible ideologies, but by those who point the incompatibility or difference. We are all “one people” is the idea, and the murder and mayhem is brought about by a few bad eggs motivated by nothing in particular.
What is taking place right now is that an expansionist, political, totalitarian and supremacist faith, commanded to world domination, has met with the global destruction of borders. The result of this is obvious, large Muslim populations now live across the Western world, and with them has come Islam – a religion that won’t tolerate free expression, religious or philosophical freedom, and certainly not female freedom. As such, in the West it is now normal for people to whisper, keep their views to themselves, say nothing, or speak only positively about the Islamic master. Thousands upon thousands of girls have been raped by Muslims. Book-burnings in the street have been carried out by Muslims. Marches against free speech and demands for blasphemy punishments are now part of life in this age-old home of freedom.
Fear of Islam so dominates politics that our leaders are terrified to put a foot wrong. Their fear is almost visible. The lines they deliver are all the same – meaningless and evasive. No politician will name the driving force behind these killers, instead they indulge in the pantomime our complicit media dutifully places on the airwaves. All of it is devoted to one thing – sanitising Islam and keeping the borders open.
The standard public discourse is that the Manchester slaughter was an attack by bad people on good people, and not an attack by Muslims on non-Muslims. This is of course in tune with the open border ‘we are all alike’ utopian fantasy that our leaders are desperate to sell.
One example that stands out is the Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull who called it an “attack on young people everywhere”. It was not an attack on young people everywhere, it was an attack on free British youngsters enjoying the music and festivity of our beautiful Western culture. Donald Trump called the killer a “loser”. A loser? No, he’s not a loser President Trump, he is a jihadi, he is performing jihad. Is there nobody who will tell it like it is? Nobody who won’t indulge in this disguise of jihad?
When things go wrong, true leadership shows, and the British people have seen little of it. Instead they are being fed the same platitudes that keep the borders open and the people blind to the terrible realities that accompany the Islamic religion. A leader will face the truth, be honest with those they lead, and offer them the courage it takes to truly confront the challenges of this era-defining issue.
If I were the leader of UKIP, that is what I would offer. The people need an alternative to the platitudes. Those who are going to fight the influence of Islam to preserve ourfreedoms, will only do so by reviving a healthy dose of British patriotism and nationalism. We need to be pro-Britain in order to oppose that which threatens Britain. A leader must clarify what kind of Britain we seek to build, and affirm that we will defend thatBritain against all threats.
We will build borders, we will deport those who seek to harm us, we will deport rapists and jihadis and we’ll do it quickly. We’ll get rid of the Human Rights Act, and the ECHR, and pay no heed to a UN that puts the savagery of Saudi Arabia on a human rights board (who can take guidance from such a hypocritical body with zero principles?)
Speaking of Saudi Arabia, if the Saudis disapprove of our views on Islam, that’s unfortunate, but the British won’t be told what we can and cannot say in our country. The Saudis will just have to exercise some tolerance, won’t they?
I believe that unless tackled with tough measures, attacks in Britain will continue and escalate. Our politicians are wholly committed to the global project, across political parties. To take this on, to truly face this issue and to tell the truth, it will mean taking on the entire established internationalist order. It will mean defying and standing up to mainstream politics, mainstream media, unelected international bodies, and truly defending the people. This requires leadership, it requires guts, it requires the very opposite of ‘more of the same’. Thisissue needs radical thought, radical politics – it needs exactly the kind of party that UKIP ought to be.
Anne Marie Waters
Director Sharia Watch UK
Twitter: @AMDWaters
What a fabulously honest and well-written observational comment on what is happening today.
I’m so glad someone has the guts to say what we all want to say. Instead, what we are usually fed is the delusional mush from the Diane Abbott school of logical thinking, the woman who has made stupidity an art form.
Good for you Anne-Marie. You’ve probably got far more supporters than will respond to your prose, so keep it going, and stand for UKIP leader, post GE.
PS – on the subject of Diane Abbott – she is just such good value watching her on TV. Pure entertainment. Who else could respond to a serious question on her support for terrorists 34 years ago with a description of her hair style (twice) ? !! Genius.
Brilliant, this absolutely nails the issue. We need a new leader to set a new tone and direction and I believe you are the one to provide it Anne Marie.
Anne Marie,
I could not agree more aside from one point with regard to deportation; until our borders are secured they will simply come back.
As for UKIP our country needs you involved, either as leader or in support of someone who shares your views. The good people of UKIP need to find a way to oust Nuttall & Co. and soon. If I see a hint of a coup then my membership application will be on its way so that I may vote for the change.
As an aside then enemy across the Channel has gained support:
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10392/france-macron-islamists
If any of that is to be believed we are in for even more dangerous times.
This is what I calla LEADER. She cares about her country
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/05/26/polish-pm-eviscerates-european-elite-attack-european-culture/
While out leafleting for UKIP in North London at the last GE, I offered a leaflet to an elderly chap standing at the bus stop. His dissatisfaction was that the area was now a Muslim area. This may not be much of a surprise but he had to whisper this to me in a fearful suppressed way even though there was no one else within 100 yards. It troubled me that someone who was given freedom of speech as a birth right had to express themselves in such a manner. I am pleased that Anne Marie is speaking out she needs to have a top position in UKIP
Anne Marie has a website http://www.forbritain.uk and I checked it earlier and was greatly impressed.
She most definitely now is the leader that UKIP requires.
As a patron I will not be renewing my membership under the current leadership, but I will do if there is change at the top.
I tried to subscribe 1000 pounds to Ann Marie’s fund but failed and so I will go back again tomorrow and make sure that I succeed.
I wish her every good fortune and look forward to her leadership.
Great, Rob – I too subscribe a very much smaller amount when I can – she must have resources to fight with, whether it is within UKIP or not.
If nothing happens, post Election, I cannot stay loyal to UKIP for ever – I’m sure others think likewise (they certainly do on other Internet forums).
Fellow UKIPpers, I have just listened to the Podcast of Nuttall’s interview with Jon Gaunt yesterday discussing the terrorist incident and UKIPs answer to it.
I have to tell you all that as a Party Leader Nuttall is a midget among pygmies.
I give you a flavor.
Nuttall thinks the young man who bombed Manchester was “obviously warped”. UKIP is going to sort this out with 20,000 more police, ‘bolster’ security services, increase prison officers – radicalized in prisons blah blah.
“Islamic fundamentalism is a cancer, I was the first one to say it” I got slandered in the Press” blah blah.
To Jon Gaunt’s question are the family complicit (given what we know ) the answer was ” the family have got a lot of questions to answer” – followed by all the usual platitudes..”failure of communications” “Muslim community must step up to the plate” blah blah.
Do we need to intern the 700 jihadis who have come home? “I wouldn’t go down that line, there needs to be heightened surveillance and down the line we may need to tag them” blah blah.
Now we Limp painfully towards the question of why Anne Marie was ‘turned down’ (Gaunty’s words) , even though most UKIP members wanted her to stand.
“I don’t want to fight with Islam as a whole I want to fight with Islamic fundamentalists, there is a clear difference between the two. The vast majority of Muslims that live in our country are Law-abiding, peace loving and an asset to our economy and our culture. The problem is with a small number of Islamic fundamentalists living within those communities who need to be rooted out and need to be brought to justice.
The NEC met, we had a conversation and decided it wasn’t the right time”. (for Anne Marie, presumably).
Fellow Kippers, I give you our Leader – leading the fight against the naked take-over of our country by Islam. He is not fit for purpose – Anne Marie is – post GE if not before, if we are serious, HE MUST GO.
Well, after thinking about this for a few weeks, I’ve decided that this is what I want. I and I’m sure many others would like Anne Marie to be the leader of UKIP.
In fact if this could happen before the election, like this week, UKIP may actually have some very significant representation in government.
I wouldn’t normally suggest a change of leadership this close to an election, but in this case I really think it could work. I don’t suppose it’ll happen though. These days, politics is all about choosing the least worst option, I think the British people would love to have a positive choice available to them.
I’ll write another article soon to explain my reasoning (for what it’s worth).
Flyer, I think they would love a positive choice too. but organizationally this close to an election it would be extremely difficult to achieve imo – without a Leader willing to stand down.
However, there is something that could be done now, immediately, and that is to bring in Anne Marie as spokesperson on the Integration Policy, or whichever one encompasses banning Sharia etc. it would be completely sensible, UKIP’s membership would soar, andI believe votes would too, there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING FOR UKIP TO LOSE!
I don’t,think it will be done for two simple reasons
1) Paul Nuttall hasn’t the courage to defend what she will say, or the decision to bring her in. He is gutless – anything he has done about Islam is only a desperate attempt to salvage something from his leadership under pressure from members (those that are left).
2) Suzanne Evans is probably not willing to share the top spot, though I’m sure Peter Whittle would be.
If they had, and have, the interests of UKIP and Britain foremost, they would do it. But if we write to Head Office and ask, we will simply get a bland letter from,the Chairman. So how can we achieve this, if people want it? I want it, what do people think?
Flyer,
I agree with all you say here. I would love to see Anne Marie as our leader.
Dear Anne Marie, that is an excellent article, both in content and the way it is laid out with paragraphs not too long but long enough to encapsulate an idea. I am impressed that you not only have nerve, but are able to do public speaking apparently at length without notes or prompts, and literate too.
I don’t understand why I don’t see more of UKIP people such as yourself and Gerard Batten making statements that grab headlines. Are the media groups ignoring us even when we are controversial and talk about issues no-one else will address. Its a bit like trying to attract attention when marooned on a desert island.
As for the people who were killed in the recent outrage, I must be getting cynical because it seems to me that God takes all the ANGELS amongst ordinary folk before their time is due. It is a bit of a cruel God to do this before they have enjoyed a full life, and to leave the members of their families grieving for the loss for the rest of their lives. A compassionate God would not do this nor even allow the atrocity in the first place. It seems God has no interest in the well-being of humans but only as a source of angels to harvest when convenient.
Anthony,
I don’t really believe in any God, so I am not for having any God forced on me especially a violent one.
“it will mean taking on the entire established internationalist order”
If we want to call a spade a spade on the symptom (Islam) of our problems, then this must apply to the root of the problem (International Order) who make our politicians do their dirty work. We will only get serious change if a leader is prepared to expose this hidden hand, the man behind the curtain so to speak. If we keep our focus only on the symptom and allow the media and all the apparatus of government to determine the narrative, then nothing will change.
Thank you for this Anne Marie. I hope you read these comments. Do you realize how much heart you have put into people? This excellent piece was on Twitter yesterday on your For Britain site, and not only did many people say that if you were Leader of UKIP they would join, but some actually have, in the hope that you will be soon. (I might have mentioned that one needs to be a member of UKIP to vote in any future elections!)
If we care about our country, post election we have got to ensure that UKIP is put to the purpose for which it was founded and which is the reason that members have kept the faith. UKIP is the only Party that is not in thrall to the Globalist agenda, the only Party that cares about Britain and the interests of Britain and it’s people, and now, it needs, as you say, a Leader with courage and crucially, an intimate knowledge of what we are fighting. As they say, knowledge is power, and without it, we cannot truly understand and therefore put effective measures in place to beat back Islam.
No matter what happens in the General Election, we have to reshape UKIP into an efficient fighting force, with people who have the right skills in place to take UKIP forward. This necessarily means a clear out. I am not suggesting a night of the long knives, because for instance Suzanne Evans impressed me yesterday with the courage she showed in defending the Integration (for want of a better word) Policy – although she still needs, as most of us do, a better understanding of Islam.
But those holding UKIP back must go, the Chairman, the current Leader and we probably need a new NEC – no battle can be won unless everyone is fighting on the same side.
UKIP will not succeed as a single issue Party, we have plenty of able people to put in place a wide range of Policies, as we already have – but the attempted Islamisation of Britain is top of any agenda, and UKIP must grasp the nettle. No-one is more qualified in every way than Anne Marie to ensure UKIP does that, post the General Election, whatever happens. That she is able to do so depends on the will of UKIP members.
Anne Marie bangs the drum and UKIP’s present ‘leaders’ march behind her with the watered down version. Watered down but still the horse that’s led to Waters.
They don’t ignore what she says because she is correct and they have no counter argument. They don’t discuss what she says because, unlike Anne, they haven’t studied it, and they haven’t publicly debated it with opposing opinions and come out top.
They just don’t understand yet that the drummer leads, and they are no longer required.
From what I see they are marching in the opposite direction most of the time. Totally unfit for purpose.
They’re very reluctant to march to this beat, they wouldn’t be doing it by choice. Nuttall is particularly uncomfortable with it.
Yep…Unfit for purpose.
MEASURE FOR MEASURE
If it were in my gift then AnneMarie Waters would not just be standing for Parliament but she would also be part of any leading panel of UKIP spokespeople if not leading it. I can only thank the stars that AnneMarie is here to remind us of common sense truth and the nature of islam.
I have posted before about the enormous prescience of Shakespeare and his universality about human folly and political corruption in the above titled play.
We are living out the nightmare of Measure For Measure where the media lie to the people and government is a strong all powerful cartel it is personally dangerous to oppose. Our situation is stark – quite literally we have to face if not murder then ridicule, prosecution by the State, social ostracism, loss of jobs and income in opposing evil. Society will gain by these actions as eventually truth will win but at the cost of torn ruined lives. Even upto and including going to one’s grave condemned as a traitor but knowing only in your heart the truth.
Every year in Lewes Sussex on November 5th the good people of the town take the law into their own hands ( by ignoring all health and safety officials) and pay homage to the Protestant Martyrs of that town. Perhaps one day there will be another category of martyrs – killed effectively by a corrupt and desperate ruling class trying to serve both globalist profit and the one who is referred to as Prophet.
CLAUDIO Death is a fearful thing
ISABELLA And shamed life a hateful.
We are told over and over its nothing to do with Islam but we all know it must be SOMETHING to do with islam…
West need to stop giving in to Islamic law. Do you give them the finger, they will take the arm. Ban Sharia courts & halal, get strict over 18 years & non cousins wedding. Start eye point all the scientist wrong in the Islamic scriptures, in the way as done about Bible ??
Hey Anne Marie – XXXXX
Absolutely, Since Manchester, I won’t compromise anymore. I wouldn’t normally admit this, but I had an incident with a Muslim recently and I don’t normally see them where I live.
He was an adult with a big long beard, a nasty piece of work. He was on a skateboard, skating down a big hill and expecting people to jump out of his way and taking great delight. I’d been keeping an eye on him.
He came down that hill so fast and knocked a lady down as she walked out of a shop, then headed for my wife and I. I refused to move and sent him head over heels, he hit a parked car and I heard his bones crack. He’ll be very sore for a long time.
I wasn’t sure he was still alive, but he was and started screaming at me. All around people looked at me like I was a monster, because I was white, I was automatically in the wrong. I’ll put up with a lot from people for the sake of a quite life, but not when it involves my wife.
As I say, I wouldn’t normally talk about this, but I don’t care anymore. To hell with political correctness!
Hear, hear! I also had a run in with a group of Muslims about 18 months ago. Hubby and I live on a narrow boat and were moored up near a park one evening. I was in the kitchen washing up when I saw 3 kids on the towpath, two girls and a boy, all under about 10 years old. Indeed, the boy was probably no more than 6 or 7. He had in his hands a block of wood, about the size of 2 house bricks, which he was about to smash through our kitchen window. I called my husband who jumped off the boat and roared ‘P*** off’ then went after the kids’ parents. The boy was running towards his father when our dog jumped off the boat and ran after my husband. Said child started to run faster and, joy of joys, fell flat on it’s face! Hubby told the parents to keep said child under control and they pretended they didn’t understand although people on the next boat along had heard them speaking perfectly fluent English ten minutes earlier. At which point I yelled out “If you don’t understand then F*** OFF back to your own country”. Even I wasn’t going to be politically correct for something like that.
Flyer,
Good for you, but you should have smashed his head in.
Well done Flyer.
The religion of peace
“Islam is not the reason that people do bad things, people do bad things because they’re evil and they’re bad people.”
Statements such as this, uttered by Muslims after the latest atrocity, are adding insult to injury. They are insulting our intelligence. Of course it is everything to do with Islam, who do they think they are kidding?
The term “suicide bomber” is not accurate. The correct term is “shahid”, meaning “martyr”. They really believe that they are doing the will of Allah, and that they will be richly rewarded in paradise. Being killed while fighting for the cause of Islam is the only guaranteed way to enter paradise according to the Koran. It states:
“Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Qur´an: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.” Koran 9:111
We are being deceived, and this deception is deliberate. Any Muslim who has read the Koran will be familiar with this verse and numerous others like it which extol hatred and violence.
Where have all the investigative journalists gone? This is the biggest story of our time, and yet it is so hard to find the truth in the mainstream media. And where are the honest politicians? Their duty is to protect the nation, they have utterly failed.
References
‘Blame EVIL killer, not Islam’ British muslim CONDEMNS Manchester bomber Salman Abedi. A BRITISH Muslim has made an impassioned plea for unity while tearing apart the twisted ideology of Manchester bomber Salman Abedi.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/809504/Manchester-Bombing-BBC-Question-Time-British-muslim-Condemn-Mohammed-Ullah
Shahid and Shaheed (Arabic: شهيد šahīd, plural: شُهَدَاء šuhadāʾ ; female: šahīda) originates from the Quranic Arabic word meaning “witness” and is also used to denote a martyr.[1] It is used as a honorific for Muslims who have died fulfilling a religious commandment, especially those who die waging jihad, or historically in the military expansion of Islam. The act of martyrdom is istishhad.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shahid
The truth is that Muslam/Islam is not a religion of peace any more than Christianity is. Both are indivisible from politics in wishing to brainwash people and control them. Just like politics, the people are supposed to support the priests while accepting the doctrine and in exchange the priests will save you, or the planet, or offer you everlasting life beyond the grave, which is not in their power to give, nor prove it can be done.
And before the Christians start arguing they are peaceful, think of the two biggest World Wars and how Christians on both sides praying to the same God were killing each other while ignoring the First Commandment. Think of the Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland who were fighting a religious war for decades. Indeed the UK with its ‘Christian Values’ has been involved in almost every war in the World for centuries on the principle ‘Is this your war or can anyone join in?’
Ouch, Anthony, but I can see where you’re coming from, there is no getting away from the fact that many religions have been involved in war, and often been the cause of it. Is it as simple as the age old struggle against some people’s good being other people’s evil? I don’t know.
All I do know is that Islamic ideology isn’t my idea of freedom of the individual, and we are going to have to beat it back
It is the supreme tool of control, which is why the Globalists love it and intend to force us all to live under Sharia Law.
Dee – Antony knows exactly what he is saying.
As a Freemason once said to me: “Kings and Queens come and go, in the end there is only Freemasonry, we’ll always be here.”
They’re not so much secretive as just recluse; they live in their own world and why not.
I quite like them really.
Flyer, I quite like you too because you have generally good arguments about politics in general and in line with my own thoughts.
I was in a strange position when encouraged to join Freemasonry because maybe half the members profess to be Christians, while a fair proportion of the them and the population at large also do but do not really know what they are professing to believe.
I don’t support any religion, I think they are creations of man and do not speak for a God that might have created the Universe. Of course most of the religions have a mortal prophet who supposedly talked with God or was inspired by God to write down the Laws for the followers. Frankly I cannot believe that is true, I am agnostic.
Anyway most people I come into contact with are now polytheistic (have a multitude of Gods), there is the flat screen television in every living room they pay homage to, when not paying homage to their smart phone that give them a window on the World and beyond, and in the car there is now the Sat Nav God.
Wouldn’t the World be a better place if most of the religions purporting to have a path to God were swept away.
As far as I am aware the most prominent religion of peace (indeed if it is a religion) is Buddism. Interestingly it does not purport to be in contact with a supreme being, nor offer everlasting life.
Making out that Christianity and Islam are comparable is a Liberal deception. You could not find more different individuals than Jesus and Mohammed. Christianity took root because people were convinced by the eyewitnesses of the reality of the resurrection despite its improbability. For three centuries faith in Jesus grew all around Europe and the Middle East despite the persecution it brought on believers. Islam, on the other hand, was spread by force and conquest so that within 150 years of Mohammed there was a belt of Islamic empire from Kazakhstan all the way to Morocco and even Spain.
Liberals see Christianity as the main obstacle in the West to their utopia of a global world order where people are good obedient units shorn of their culture and history. They want religions to be relegated to the status of hobbies, so that whether you are Christian or Buddhist matters no more than whether you collect stamps or watch birds. Promoting Islam has been adopted by Liberals as their key weapon in putting down Christianity and they cannot look ahead to the obvious contradiction that Islam is even more hostile to Liberalism than to Christianity.
They want to put new “gods” in our heart – the idols of victim and identity politics. Liberal Atheism is a new religion that declares you are a morally good person if you hate the racist, the sexist, the islamophobe. It is a religion of self-righteousness, like that of the Pharisees who put Jesus to death for blasphemy. This religion has its own blasphemy code, known as political correctness. Liberals would not admit this in a million years, but it is increasingly being made into law in hate and diversity legislation.
We need to grow up and deal with religion like adults. Drop our religiophobia, or superstitious fear of broaching the subject of religion. UK immigration policy should recognize candidly that Muslims do not integrate into our culture and refuse entry to the mass of low-skilled Muslims.
Hugo in a way, but not a good way, it is the ‘religion of peace’. It’s the kind of peace that’s eternal, it’s the kind they wish upon us, their declared enemies.
It’s the kind of peace they prefer to bring to our children, women, and those who they deem to be weak and ineffectual, the one’s they think cannot or will not fight back.
Which is why if people vote for weak leadership of the kind that let them in in the first place, the kind that pander and enjoin us to be submissive, they will be voting for more of their kind of peace.
When an enemy declares war then war it is. The choice has been made for us by them. The only choice left for us is the choice between good and evil. The choice between victory and defeat.
Michael – Sense at last, let call a spade a spade and call it war.
Nobody wants war but if it has to be: win it.
The multicultural utopia of the left doesn’t and never will exist in a finite world where we compete for scarce resources.
You can only have in this world what you can either negotiate for or fight for. The time for negotiation is over.
Sadly any “negotiation” by our own government is better described by an alternative word: “capitulation”.