It is interesting to look back at times when the press seemed to get things in proportion. I am thinking back to when you would never see anything written by the press writing off vast sectors of their readership as being far-right. However, this seems to be de rigueur these days when deriding anyone with a thought just a smidgeon outside the range of those deemed acceptable by the authorities.
I wonder what the journalists who trot out such bunk think of themselves? Do they feel soiled and cowardly? What has someone like Tommy got to do with Hitler and the Nazis (sorry, National Socialists), because that is the obviously intended but entirely erroneous meaning of such comments. The positive that comes from their regaling us with this drivel is that it eventually destroys the credibility of the pen-pushers.
The global campaign to free Tommy Robinson and the signing by over half a million people of the petition calling for his release is a reflection of the waning hold that the narrative has over the people. But where do we go from here? The law can still bite and the momentum is not entirely with us. If you get outside your own circle and ask who has heard of Tommy, the numbers are significant but not overwhelming. So, whilst his brave efforts have carried us forward this far, we still have work to do, including getting less aware, less committed folk to join the caravan.
The issues arising from the imposition of the narrative in all its forms requires judicious action which skirts the hair-trigger law-enforcement response to perceived “hate” crimes, but which is still effective in dealing with that which confronts us. We have to think through how to deal with these pernicious threats in our semi-democratic New UK. Dealing with them does not just include defensive responses to hang on to what we have achieved as a culture but must also include offensive action which skirts the PC searchlights and legal bloodhounds.
The greatest crime in Islam is to leave it and the greatest Jihad is that fought against the apostates, not that against infidels. After Muhammad died in 632, Abu Bakr the first Caliph and the father of Muhammad’s child-bride Aisha (hence the propensity for targeting young infidel girls by the Muslim rape-gangs) did not immediately attack the Byzantines and the Sassanids.
Abu Bakr first dealt with the back-sliding local tribes who became apostates after the death of Muhammad and spent the years 632-634 putting them to the sword in the Ridda (Apostasy) Wars, and only then did the Arabs go on the offensive against the infidel. Fast forward to today, and you may recall that Osama Bin Laden began his war on the West because the Saud’s were allowing infidel forces to remain in the kingdom and were thus viewed by him as apostates, the worst of criminals.
In the UK today, the apostates are targeted for attack, but not yet killed wholesale – as they are in countries across the Muslim world, in eight of which it is a capital offense. How long before that is the case here, or in other European countries? It does not have to even be on the statute books to be enforced. Go ask Nissar Hussain who was beaten on camera in Bradford, and who was interviewed recently by Tommy, as well as other apostates across Britain also now in hiding and under police protection. Is this the land in which you wish to live? If not, what is to be done?
Let us take the threat on, head on. Address their worst “crime”, freedom of conscience, which to us is the basis of all western civilisation since Luther and on which the modern democratic world was built. If we shirk this confrontation, we lose our civilisation, our freedoms and our self-respect. Is that what you want? Will you rise, join the marches and donate your cash now to defend your family in the future? This is where we are, so what will you do?
Tommy is the canary in the mine, warning us in time to wrest back our freedoms and drive on from here to even greater liberties – not just for us but for the 1.6 billion Muslims living under the genocidal threat to kill them if they have the nerve to call time on advocacy for the panoply of medieval laws.
The Legalise Apostasy campaign has been devised to attack those nations that continue to kill, threaten and punish Muslims who wish to leave Islam and also to take legal action against all advocates in this country of the Sharia’s call to execute apostates. In this way we discredit Islam forever, forcing it on the back foot and eventually destroying its ability to hold on to its unwilling victims.
The Sharia calls for genocide as defined by Article 2 of the 1948 Genocide Convention, as all its major law schools demonstrate “specific intent” and “conscious desire” to “destroy” the “victim” religious group, apostates from Islam.
Further to this, if this government allows the Sharia to extend its tentacles into our legal apparatus, it will be in breach of Article 3 through its “inaction” by not protecting apostates and allowing the Sharia’s “incitement” against them, equating to government “complicity in genocide”.
The Legalise Apostasy campaign includes a petition to fight the genocidists. Let us take on our opponents on ground of our choosing and be inspired by a noble cause whilst attacking the bully-boy apostate-killers. Check out the Legalise Apostasy website, sign the petition and start freeing apostates from the murderous Sharia regimes in which they cower today and see off the Sharia-shills in this great nation.
Legalise apostasy and we can hope for better days – if we attempt this but fail, it cannot be said we did not try before an alternative route is chosen, as it will be.
(hence the propensity for targeting young infidel girls by the Muslim rape-gangs) – Not really, islam teaches to take ‘right hand possessions’ SLAVES from non muslims.
Quote from Debbie’s news round up today: “Mr Javid, who is not a practising Muslim, but comes from a Muslim family.”
Some clarity, perhaps from Mr Javid himself, on what it means to be a “non-practising Muslim” might help this debate.
By “non-practising” does he mean that he doesn’t do his daily prayers, visit the mosque, or observe various Muslim customs such as fasting? Is he a ‘Muslim-In-Name-Only’, who doesn’t agree with the religion, but because he was ‘born Muslim’ feels he has no choice but to claim to be a Muslim? If apostasy was legalised, would he be happy to renounce his religion?
After reading ‘Gearge’s quote below, it is sadly more likely that despite being a ‘non-practising’ Muslim, he is happy to keep the ‘Muslim’ label, because of the obvious benefits and privileges associated with that label.
I have asked this (rhetorical) question before: if apostasy wasn’t punishable by death, would more Muslims renounce their religion to live a more peaceful life? I was born into a Christian family, but after realising religion was all a load of nonsense (my opinion), I became an atheist through my own choice, however I didn’t have the threat of a death sentence hanging over me, unlike those born into ‘Islam’ who have no choice on the matter.
I am absolutely behind this initiative. It not only challenges the Sharia Law dealing with Apostates but will also be an appropriate and acceptable vehicle to bring publicity to the archaic behaviour supported by Sharia Law. I would presume that it was your intention to allow this issue to spearhead a greater understanding of the incompatibility of Sharia Law with Western Democracies.
There can be no reasonable or rational objection to your idea. The concept is both straight forward and brilliant. Has it been tried before? If so then now is the time to get it right. Hopefully this will lead to other reforms of Islam or a denouncement of the religion. The Legalise Apostasy campaign should be promoted by all.
Kim, thanks for the support. You are exactly right about the single focus on apostasy. It is the tip of our spear in the effort to eviscerate the threat. Focus is everything, and the killing of apostates is their worst crime and is undeniable on their part as all their law schools agree on this. The Sharia is the foundation of the faith, so the Home Secretary can take a hike and meet some apostates – which he won’t, we’ve tried. I am trying to make the apostasy issue the line in the sand. With the Sharia comes the killing of apostates, and any given day that they try to introduce it we should hit the streets, head towards Westminster and literally throw the bums out. I’ll be there, guaranteed, and if they shoot me down, so be it.
Hi Kim, you can check out the campaign at http://www.legaliseapostasy.com – the government petition is having to be re-written to get through the gatekeepers.
Sajid Javid MP, Home Secretary, has just made a speech today in which he said:—
“…. Islam is a wonderful peaceful religion shared by a billion people world-wide”.
I wonder how he substantiates that statement? Can someone please ask him to publicly prove his claim.
He Sajid Javid MP, home secretary also said something which intimated he was not going to reduce immigration to the tens of thousands, one of the manifesto style aims of PM T May, not that PM T May ever did much in that direction either.
Never understood why UKIP worries about policies, none of the other parties do,
eg Labour’s recent last election manifesto on leaving the EU was soon given the creative ambiguity treatment.
These people need to understand that after the list of atrocities grows so long that even the dumbest lefty wakes, they may be facing corporate manslaughter charges . Then the boot will be on the other foot.
I found it less than peaceful on my way to work on 7/7. My wife thought I was dead for an hour. In fact I hadn’t heard any bomb go off.
I will be in Whitehall for Tommy on June 9th at 3pm with friends.
We need many people to turn up.
The full spectrum of Sharia / Islamic Law needs to be proscribed. If it upsets them then so be it. We just need to be prepared to deal with it, not pussyfoot around for fear of further upsetting them as happened in the Bradford riots all those years ago, and continues today. That requires the readiness of the military, not our PC police; the army needs to be strengthened to a level appropriate to deal with that threat.
We have not faced such a serious threat since WW2; as then the same resolve of ourselves and government is needed to save our country.
Jack, you are right about proscribing it, however, the apostasy issue is the same in all the law schools and it was the West beginning to allow choice in religion – without being burned at the stake – that set us on the road to having all the freedoms we enjoy now – it is the scaffolding on which liberty was built. If we can focus on this issue by attacking the 8 countries at the UN that “legally” kill apostates and demand that all UK Imam’s, Islamic lawyers and community “leaders” agree to reform of these laws, we take the battle to them. Believe me, they will run from this. You can check out the website now, http://www.legaliseapostasy.com where all the materials and arguments are contained. The government petition may take a few more days to be allowed, but everything else is now on-line. Thanks for your interest.
Thanks, I’ll keep an eye open for your petition. It is a start and the government response will be interesting; I suspect that it might identify them as the real enemy within, something which many still need to acknowledge.