Yesterday saw three violent attacks in different parts of the globe by adherents of that one religion which we cannot talk about – the religion which is peaceful and lovely, according to their acolytes, and which has nothing at all to do, according to our politicians, with any such murderous violence anywhere.
These terrorist attacks in France, Tunisia and Kuwait yesterday, in the second week of the muslim holy month, Ramadan, cannot possibly be brushed under the carpet by our dear leaders, but they will soon be forgotten amidst the daily farce that is the propping-up of Greece on the one hand and our home-grown Lefty moaners about “Austerity” on the other.
We simply cannot be allowed by our rulers, by the Westminster ‘elite’, to talk about the one red thread connecting so many apparently disparate incidents in our country and elsewhere. Why does it not occur to them that Abraham Lincoln’s words about not being able to fool all people all the time still apply?
In his excellent post Richard Mott wrote about ‘The enemy within’. That enemy is not simply confined to some British would-be jihadis rushing to fight on the side of ISIS, the ‘organisation’ responsible for those three terrorist attacks in France, Tunisia and Kuwait.
It is well and truly aided and abetted by all those in Local and National government and the local and national MSM who have been busy to actually aid and abet that enemy while denying that such manifest enemy even exist.
I don’t need to mention Rotherham here, but what is truly disgusting is the fact that the National Crime Agency, getting involved only after the report by Professor Jay, has already found 300 possible suspects – something the South Yorkshire Police was apparently incapable of during the last decade, according to this report. And we’ve now learned that West Midlands Police withheld a report about abuse and grooming for five years – for political reasons!
Terrorism is not just about the bombing and maiming and decapitating of civilians, it is also about the destruction of innocent lives by other means such as sexual abuse.
It must now be plain for all to see that those who are sworn to protect us and our lives are not doing so.
Instead they attack those who try to protect innocent lives as racists. They have cowed a generation of civil servants into being silent for fear of losing their jobs. They have suppressed public discourse with the help of willing dupes in the MSM who smear and shout down everybody who dares rise their heads above the parapet and mention the fact that there is indeed a red thread connecting these acts of terrorism, here in our own country and across the world.
There is another word for those aiders and abetters: they are appeasers. Neville Chamberlain’s infamous piece of paper about ‘peace in our time’ has multiplied across our nation, from City Halls and Police Barracks to Westminster and the MSM.
So let us ask these appeasers why the PM of Tunisia is capable of closing 80 mosques where radical imams preach hate – see here – but this cannot be done here in our country?
Let us ask them if they are really content that our country is exporting jihadis, joining ISIS and perpetrating atrocities, suicide bombings and the killing of innocents?
Is that what “UK” now stands for internationally: exporter of terrorists? Is that what we should be proud of?
Why are our politicians too cowardly to do or even talk about that which politicians such as the Egyptian PM and the Tunisian PM are doing: taking the fight to the ISIS terrorists?
Above all – why are we still letting them get away with this?
Public discourse is what the public – that’s us! – talk about. So let’s take that discourse back from the appeasers, let’s name the problem without fear. We are not racists and bigots when we name the enemy within: Islam.
If muslim politicians can be brave and speak about this, then so can we.
More: we must be brave enough now to force those cowards, that well-protected Westminster elite, to talk and take action, now, before jihadi bombs go off in our towns and cities again!
(Cover picture from Liberty GB article)
We note that Cameron speaks of defending our values and so on but carefully avoids mentioning defending our country or territory.
‘So let us ask these appeasers why the PM of Tunisia is capable of closing 80 mosques where radical imams preach hate – see here – but this cannot be done here in our country?’
Don’t worry, the government has it in hand. Homophobia, since ISIL is Islamic and homophobic, is to be classified as extremism. To avoid the possibility of locking up Islamists, Islamophobia will also be a hate crime so that no Islamist can be locked up for homophobia, only white British people.
‘Terrorism is not just about the bombing and maiming and decapitating of civilians, it is also about the destruction of innocent lives by other means such as sexual abuse.’
It is a well established criticism of the West by leftists that we use rape as a weapon of war. They should start on Islam.
D Cameron this morning speaking on the Sousse massacre and IS generally: “this perversion of a great religion”. He doesn’t need to describe it as ‘great’ and he should not try to flatter the muslims of GB in this way. It simply reinforces their belief that everyone else is to blame when people from their community plot against us, train abroad as jihadists, commit terrorist attacks, flee abroad to join our enemies. The police are to blame, the media are to blame, Islamophobia is to blame, British culture and democracy are to blame, the Jews are to blame ….. Enough!
Islam is to blame for being the most twisted, aggressive, psychotic religion in world history – and there are a fair few contenders for that title.
It’s time they had a good look at themselves and saw the obvious correlation between a religion that preaches contempt for ‘infidels’ with encouragements to wipe them out, and the murderous behaviour of those who actually carry it out as a religious duty. They never seem to think that their religion needs a bit of reforming from its barbaric 7th century origins. They never seem to think.
Meanwhile, Cameron and all you pathetic apologists for Islam, if you haven’t the guts to say the truth about Islam, at least stop pretending that hatred and violence are not in its very DNA.
Go for it Pam!
I agree full heartedly with what you say, and even then you only said half of it.
But there is one thing you don`t mention and that is straight honest to goodness funk and what are they frightened of most?
Actually taking on Islam and meeting it head on.
They`ll solve everything by fudge and “negotiation”, relying on the apathy of the British sheeple.
It`s far more effective to brand so called Islamophobes as “Extremists” and fight them off, rather than facing the real enemy you describe.
I did go for it and sent an email to D Cameron at 10 Downing Street requesting him not to describe Islam as a ‘great religion’ or a ‘religion of peace’. I compared it to prime ministers during the Cold War trying to get away with describing the USSR as a model of democracy.
None did, of course, because they didn’t believe it and would have been regarded as fools if they did. I left Dave to work out how we regard his obsequious tosh.
What must be done immediately is to inform every member of the Muslim community that the time has come to remind them that they live in a country that asks those who live there to follow a Christian culture, our laws and our British way of life. What we are not are muslims who choose to denegrate anyone because they are not Muslim and claim that the Koran requires them to abuse and ultimately kill Christians or anyone who does not follow their dictats and sharia law. If British Muslims who live in this country are not prepared to follow our laws and culture and permit their children to be radicalised by murderous Immams in mosques all over the place, they should be requested to leave for a country that promotes their preferred way of life (and death).
The mosks are the command and control centres of glogal geehad. The aim of the koran is to dominate the world under shariea law. A good muslim is one who engages in geehad, according to the koran. All muslims are commanded to fight and destroy the non muslims.
PS using incorrect spelling to avoid being deleted from diskus moderating software
I can’t recall in which newspaper I read this, but if the following figures are true, then indeed we have a problem, not only with the ‘ROPers’, but also with the authorities which fail to see any problems at all, or deliberately ignore them, until it is too late.
…
“The polls taken in the aftermath of the 7/7 massacres showed that 20% of British Muslims sympathised with the terrorists, and 25% felt the bombings were justified. Among young Muslims this number goes up to 35%.”
“Five per cent of British Muslims tell pollsters they wouldn’t report a planned Islamic attack, 27% are against the deportation of Islamic hate preachers, and 37% believe British Jews are a legitimate target.”
“One third of British Muslims believe that Islamic apostates should be killed, 78% supported punishing the publishers of Mohammed cartoons, 40% want Sharia in the UK, 28% want Britain to be an Islamic state, while two-thirds think ‘honour’ violence is acceptable.”
“Their community also has strong ideas on family law as well: 51% believe a woman can’t marry an infidel, 49% don’t think a Muslim woman may marry without a guardian’s consent, and 52% feel a Muslim man may have up to four wives.”
…
None are so blind, as those that can see.
I remember those disturbing figures from post 7/7/05 surveys. More recently, the government itself is criticising a report by MPs into the ‘Trojan horse’ affair in Birmingham schools for playing down the threat posed by extremists. When that report came out, people knew it was a whitewash and now the government agrees!
We unknowingly eat a lot of Hallal foods in restaurants, large supermerkets etc, which, in the case of meat, requires the brutal slaughter of animals and, in all cases, sends 2.5% of the price of the product in “Zakat Tax” to support terrorism, such as occurred in Tunisia, France and Yemen.
Now you know, you can decide if you want to keep doing that.
We are not only at war with Islam, we are at war with our own government and media. It is mainly a war of words for now except for isolated incidents such as these, but once the enemy reaches critical mass it will be a different story. They are being added to every day by the influx of young males via Calais.
“Rivers of Blood” is indeed the likely outcome unless “our” government starts to take our side.
It’s about time politicians and the media stopped giving an air of respectability to these so called Islamic terrorist, a term which carries with it the opportunity for apologist to excuse their medieval behaviour by switching the blame back on us. They and we should started calling them what they actually are, a death cult.
Right now, a well-known Islamist terrorist is touring the country, stirring up people to attack the UK and murder its inhabitants, and he is allowed to do so.
Why is that, I wonder?
The enemy within is not Islam. There are religious nut jobs in most faiths. The enemy within is our inability to take fair and robust action against the perpetrators and their supporters. The reason for our reluctance to act is the contradiction at the heart of our “liberal” society. Too often human rights trump the needs of wider society and British culture. It is yet again the idea that minorities must be treated more fairly to avoid the accusation of discrimination. Our political leaders have become befuddled, lost the plot and unable to make sound judgements. This weakness is the enemy within.
I agree.
No the enemy is Islamic ideology. These ‘nut jobs’ do not just materialise out of thin air. This is very good article on responsibilities.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6059/atrocities-muslim-world
This is the summary of a judgement by the ECHR on sharia law:
Noting that the Welfare Party had pledged to set up a regime based on sharia law, the Court found that sharia was incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy as set forth in the Convention. It considered that “sharia, which faithfully reflects the dogmas and divine rules laid down by religion, is stable and invariable. Principles such as pluralism in the political sphere or the constant evolution of public freedoms have no place in it”. According to the Court, it was difficult to declare one’s respect for democracy and human rights while at the same time supporting a regime based on sharia, which clearly diverged from Convention values, particularly with regard to its criminal law and criminal procedure, its rules on the legal status of women and the way it intervened in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts.
A good article on the early days of Islam that draws extensively on referenced Islamic works and bographies of Muhammad written by an ex-Muslim.
http://web.archive.org/web/20150226062557/http://www.islam-watch.org:80/books/islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery.pdf
Then there is the fact that slavery is still legal under Islamic law:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/slavery_1.shtml
I would suggest you find the evidence to refute what is in those links before making statements along the lines of ‘Islam isn’t at fault’.
2nd attempt
No the enemy is Islamic ideology. These ‘nut jobs’ do not just materialise out of thin air. This is very good on responsibilities.
gatestoneinstitute.org/6059/atrocities-muslim-world
This is the summary of a judgement by the ECHR on sharia law:
Noting that the Welfare Party had pledged to set up a regime based on sharia law, the Court found that sharia was incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy as set forth in the Convention. It considered that “sharia, which faithfully reflects the dogmas and divine rules laid down by religion, is stable and invariable. Principles such as pluralism in the political sphere or the constant evolution of public freedoms have no place in it”. According to the Court, it was difficult to declare one’s respect for democracy and human rights while at the same time supporting a regime based on sharia, which clearly diverged from Convention values, particularly with regard to its criminal law and criminal procedure, its rules on the legal status of women and the way it intervened in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts.
Good on the early days of Islam that draws extensively on referenced Islamic works and bographies of Muhammad written by an ex-Muslim:
islam-watch.org/books/islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery.pdf
Then there is the fact that slavery is still legal under Islamic law:
bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/slavery_1.shtml
I would suggest you find the evidence to refute what is in those links before making statements along the lines of ‘Islam isn’t at fault’.
Wouldn’t Labour under Miliband have loved bringing in laws about ”Islamophobia”, as they also planned to do under Blair in the first five years of the century until 7/7/05 happened and they shut up. If anyone feels ‘phobic’ about Islam, they have every reason to feel so, and I am tired of hearing politicians pleading for tolerance for an intolerant religion. How about zero tolerance instead? Sweep away multiculturalism and demand that it’s our way or the highway.
A clear statement needs to be made that followers of Islam are on notice in this and other Western countries: integrate, show loyalty, or go. if you are a law-abiding Muslim who prefers to live in Britain under British law, show this by boycotting any form of Islamic dress. Boycott mosques where poison is preached and report those mosques to the authorities. Immediately report any signs, however small, that someone is trying to bully others into obeying strict Sharia law and expressing anti-British or pro-IS views. Ban demonstrations of Muslims threatening death to soldiers and non-muslims. Ban overt displays of faith, such as praying outside mosques or anywhere in public. Keep mosques under 24 hr surveillance inside and out. Ban shops, stalls, literature and online sites promoting Islam and anti-West views. Disperse communities that are no-go areas for British white people. Revoke the British passports of anyone who leaves the country to train as jihadists or join IS. Jail/deport those who try to return.
There are countless measures we can take that make it clear that trust has to be earned, not taken for granted. Those muslims who have already integrated and Westernised are OK to stay. Many others need to make a h**ll of an effort that they haven’t bothered making before now because of weak governments. Those who declare themselves unwilling to renounce anti-Western Islam should be deported to countries where their views are appreciated.
Let’s stop pussy footing around and being in denial. Izalm is at WAR
with democracy, whether Western governments believe it or not. There is
no such thing as a ‘moderate’ meeuslim. If there was how come there are no protests by these ‘moderates’ about the recent atrocities in Tunisia,
France and Kuwait? We have put up with the Marxist multiculti
hosreshtye for long enough. Time to tool up and rid our country of this
plague.
Let’s stop pussy footing around and being in denial. Isalm is at WAR
with democracy, whether Western governments believe it or not. There is
no such thing as a ‘moderate’ muslim. If there was how come there are no
protests by these ‘moderates’ about the recent atrocities in Tunisia,
France and Kuwait? We have put up with the Marxist multicultural
hosreshtye for long enough. Time to tool up and rid our country of this
plague.
You postulate a reason for authorities cover ups and lack of action.
Try the old RAF one
L M F
Lack of Moral Fibre
Never heard a proper definition, but I would starts with “guts” and “a predilection to deceit”
Please feel free to add to my understanding
SNAFU.
And of course FUBAR. We have to credit the Americans for both this and SNAFU, which they brought to Britain in the build-up to D-Day
I remember SNAFU, but didn`t recognise FUBAR,
However, looked it up,apart from your definition it was suggested it came from the German Furchtbar (Horrible or Frightening), quite appropriate anyway you define it
We are at war with Islam; they are just building up their numbers before the kickoff, with the total co-operation of Cameron & Co,
No that’s the thing, they are at war with us, that is clear, however our lily-livered government do not have the balls to declare war back… that’s the problem.
The first part of the Koran, written in Mecca is not a particularly controversial holy script…Something went terribly wrong when Mohammad ( pooh bear) reached Mecca..Allah, or for the more normal among you, Mohammad, became a raving psychopath…Now then, the ‘nice’ Muslims of the ‘Religion of Peace’ will quote the Medina surahs at you…the crackpot savages will quote parts from the Mecca half to support their insanity. Allah says in the Koran that the later verses take precedence over earlier ones…Thus kicking any idea that Islam is a warm fuzzy religion into a cocked hat, or at least a fez…
I am an atheist and don’t actually care what twaddle different religions believe in or what magic books they get their ideas from. As long as they don’t bother me with it, live and let live is my motto. Unfortunately, Islam doesn’t share that motto and too many of its adherents have the nerve to decide that I and the rest of humanity should live in submission to their particularly psychotic faith.
Increasingly in this, my own country, I have been affronted by Muslims complaining about our way of life, our morals and culture, our dogs, pigs, meat, foreign policy and democracy, as well as insisting on ignoring our laws whenever it suits them, plus women parading around in ridiculous head to toe clothing making it look as if females have no right to exist unless they nullify themselves and their individuality.
To add injury to insult, a fair number – and only one would be more than enough – are traitors in our midst, supporting homegrown and foreign terrorists in word, body and spirit.
Why do we continue ‘respecting’ a religion that is at best alien to our values and culture; and at worst is a present and continuing threat to us, the British people, our country and to our future generations? Why are we forced to put up with this?
And more..
2015.06.26 (Kobani, Syria) – Over one-hundred more civilians are butchered
when the Islamic State overrun a Kurdish town and go
‘house to house’.
2015.06.25 (Bakha Botan, Syria) – Twenty-three civilians, including women and
children, are rounded up and executed by caliphate
members.
2015.06.25 (Kobane, Syria) – Women and children are among fifteen Kurds
killed by an ISIS car bomb.
2015.06.24 (Tahtakoruk, China) – At least three defenders are killed when a
Muslim mob descends on a police checkpoint with knives
and bombs.
it seems my previous post is awaiting moderation (!)
here it is again:
Three co-ordinated attacks?
You can add another one too
Dozens of soldiers have been killed after Al-Shabaab overran an African Union base in Somalia, .
Thank you very much for that list!
And now let’s take another look at who is coming here, thanks to the EU and with our help, via the Mediterranean …
Three co-ordinated attacks?
You can add another one too
Dozens of soldiers have been killed after Al-Shabaab overran an African Union base in Somalia, according to witnesses.
People in the village of Lego, about 62 miles north-west of the capital Mogadishu, described intense fighting on Friday which left corpses strewn on the ground. Witnesses said there were as many as 50 bodies, some of which had been decapitated, but this could not be confirmed.
Alinur Mohamed, a local elder, said: “The fighting was the heaviest ever around this area. Al-Shabaab took full control of the base and killed many soldiers.”
The military outpost had been manned by about 100 Burundian soldiers, part of the 22,000-strong African Union Mission in Somalia (Amisom).
Residents said the dawn raid began when a suicide bomber drove a car loaded with explosives into the entrance of the base, before dozens of militants armed with machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades unleashed their assault.
Never mind.. Dave can send the Royal Navy to pick up more Somalis from the Med to import unchecked unverified, along with their baggage.
Excellent article