It seems to be a common thread running through the history of the world’s greatest tyrants that in order to facilitate their rise to power, they know how to capitalise upon false promises to disaffected people, promises that were in no way practical or sustainable.
Lenin and later Stalin, promised the poor equality and a classless society, that all would be equal and share prosperity. Adolf Hitler promised to revoke the Treaty of Versailles. Many Germans blamed this treaty for the post World War 1 depression that had overtaken Germany and we all know where the Weimar economy ended up.
Both Stalin and Hitler aimed to unite Europe under either Communism or under a Nazi, Fascist state. Today we have the European Union openly and increasingly desperately trying to achieve the same goal.
The European Union has propagated the myth of a prosperous and united Europe, music to the ears of the disaffected, particularly the hordes of so called refugees and economic migrants piling up on our shores. It doesn’t matter that in reality our economies can never sustainably support these people, they will support the European Union.
It was increasing authoritarianism that led to Communism becoming unpopular and of course Hitler did his best to avoid this by being fairly totalitarian from the start. The populace began to see through the utopian lies and became increasingly difficult to control. The regimes became desperate to maintain power and the noble ideas with which they started gave way to totalitarianism.
Today as the European Union’s promises become exposed as lies, the economic and social flaws in its make-up are becoming increasingly obvious. Banks are on the brink of collapse. The political, rather than sound economic construct of the Euro, has been the cause of much polarisation and misery, our women and children are being gang-raped and sexually exploited by hostile invaders. People are waking up though, at last.
As for Adolf Hitler, I don’t think I even need to write about his achievements; we all know millions died. This is what happens when people begin to realise what lies behind the empty, false promises – people die as desperate regimes cling to power and the realisation sets in that it was just about the craving for power right from the start.
Over the last couple of years as our country has supposedly tried to negotiate a Brexit agreement, the true colours of the European Union have become ever more apparent and the mask has slipped. The EU has tried to punish Britain for wanting to leave its clutches, it has demanded extortionate amounts of money, and refused to relinquish political and economic control.
In short, the European Union has shown itself to be the anti-democratic, power-crazed collection of dictators that it always has been and our government is populated with its quislings.
As the European Union falls apart politically and economically and certain of its member countries wake up and start to resist, we can see that the promises that it made are no more realistic, but are just as empty and false as those of either Stalin or Hitler. Unfortunately, though, this is where things get really dangerous.
In an article in Geopolitical Weekly entitled “The European Union, Nationalism and the Crisis of Europe” , George Friedman discusses the economic and political folly of the European Union. The article finishes off by asking:
“But if Europe is not exceptional and is in trouble, what comes next? The history of Europe should give us no comfort.”
Well Europe is in trouble, although the controlled mainstream media will scarcely admit it. Now the EU has given up all pretence and is growing increasingly desperate to have its own army, as well as its existing EUROGENDFOR.
Our quisling government seems determined to keep us shackled one way or another to the European Union and is still making plans to integrate our armed forces. If we can’t achieve a clean break from the European Union now, perhaps the question we should really be asking is:
How many lives will it cost this time?
We may also wonder about our recently-acquired citizens, particularly those of the Religion of Peace. Which side will they be fighting on? I think in our hearts we already know the answer to this.
In the first two world wars, they were fought over borders; I’m fairly sure that this time around it will be fought on our streets. Given the signing of the United Nations Global Compact on Migration, it may soon be illegal to discuss this, but the explosion into violence will come nevertheless.
Totalitarianism then is already well established in our country, something that always comes along when the false promises are exposed as the lies that they are. A Totalitarianism that has been ushered in via the veil of Political Correctness or thought-control by any other name and finally the United Nations is preparing to put the final nail in the coffin of our right to free speech. Free speech cannot be allowed, this why our government, the EU and the UN are so desperate to control the Internet.
As Mark Twain declared: “History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes.” Well, history is certainly rhyming now.
flyer,
I agree entirely.
They say the first victim of all regimes are the children, this is true for the EU too. Our children have been brainwashed into unswerving flag waving support for it. Yet, when our young people are questioned about the EU, it policies, its history, and more importantly, its failings, they know nothing about it and deny the evidence before their eyes. I remember the Erasmus programme when I was a student. At the time I was truly naive, and assumed it was a student share scheme. Now I can see it was a deliberate ‘long game’ strategy to create an EU identity among the University educated. This strategy clearly has worked.
I envisage three possible EU collapse scenarios (not in any particular order):
1. The EU will likely start a war with Russia, probably when it tries to annex Georgia. The Germans (still) want to annex the Caucuses, again like Hitler, for fuel reasons. This is probably why there is the push for the EU Army. The EU already led a coup in Ukraine, its follows they would do this in the other ex-soviet countries too. Hence the need for a military, as they can no longer rely on NATO.
2. Europe will collapse economically, to survive it would need full fiscal and political union. I suspect a new EU Treaty is on the way soon, and probably won’t go public until after Brexit is decided. The plan is the UK will be trapped in Mays deal during the Treaty change, then we pick up the tab again with no say. If the UK is not in the lifeboat but still hanging on the lifeboat davit, we will go under with it, and it won’t be pretty. I suspect the Euro-fanatic Remainers will bear the brunt of public anger.
3. A European civil war as a result of EU balkanization. The Communists deliberated mixed different groups to destroy national identities, as we saw from Yugoslavia, it had a fatal result. I suspect Merkel’s ‘new Europeans’ will bring this about, the tactics are already being used that they employed against the Serbs. The EU are repeating what the Communists tried (and failed) to do.
JL
John – depressing isn’t it. Brainwashed acolytes are what so many EU supporters are, I don’t live in the UK but EU supporters globally never cease to tell me how terrible Brexit is. So many of these people, when I talk to them don’t seem to be able to do anything more than repeat soundbites from the mainstream media and their fellow fanatics, none of them seem to have the intellect to make their own critical decision: I find this frightening.
I have no idea which of your three scenarios will come to pass, maybe more than one, whatever happens it won’t be good. That the European Union is a thoroughly evil entity, I have no doubt, unfortunately the United Nations seems ever more ready to replace it, this is going to be a long fight.
It’s good this website has changed its name so that nobody can confuse this article and many others by the author as being representative of UKIP.
Oh I don’t know, maybe UKIP would still be a political force to be reckoned with.
It seems that Nigel Farage agrees with me as well.
“Angela Merkel PISSED After Nigel Farage EXPOSES her Globalist Agenda”
https://youtu.be/7Fg-8XC4JLo
Great speech by Nigel!
Ukip is why we got a referendum….. oh how your memory and realisation of the only Leave Party has disappeared.
“The populace began to see through the utopian lies and became increasingly difficult to control.”
In the modern UK context the referendum result showed that British voters were against the majority of MPs in all the mainstream parties by quite a wide margin and these MPs would have known just how wide the real margin must have been given that they used every dirty trick in the book to skew results in their favour and still lost.
Once those who pretend to represent us start realising that they’re losing their ability to control us, once we stop jumping through their hoops and doing their tricks it’s time for sterner stuff.
Amber Rudd with a whip anyone?
Our opponents love to label us ‘alt right’ but what does it mean? My understanding is much the same as appears in the comments below i.e. that the terms ‘left’ and ‘right’ in their original meaning refer to socialists who belong to different factions but are all socialists. (I.e. communists, Marxists etc.)
However, unlike the fake conservatives and the (slightly) more honest labourites we at UKIP don’t fit the communist mould. We are capitalists.
So why don’t they call us capitalists as they did back in the good old cold war days when everyone knew who the commies and the capitalists where?
Well that might just stop the people who are in favour of the free market voting Conservative for starters.
Time we started calling ourselves capitalists perhaps? Just a thought.
It’s useful to read what such RIGHT-wing dictators actually said about their socialistic ideas.
Hitler, so beloved of Lloyd George, said: “We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national.”
Franco: This was a more aristocratic revolution that “called for a social revolution to create a national syndicalist economy that creates national syndicates of both employees and employers to mutually organize and control the economic activity, agrarian reform, industrial expansion, and respect for private property with the exception of nationalizing credit facilities to prevent capitalist usury.” Under Franco, the Falange abandoned its original anti-capitalist tendencies, declaring the ideology to be fully compatible with capitalism.
(Sounds like the EU?)
Mussolini believed that no well-ordered society could ever want the people to be sovereign (yes really) and that there had to be a” world’s social revolution that will be followed by a more equitable distribution of the earth’s riches” said – “You cannot get rid of me because I am and always will be a socialist.” and about the people, “When they have learnt to obey, they will believe what I tell them.”
Hmm, sounds familiar.. a bit Lefty really
And dear old Heinrich Himmler, who ran the SS, said “In the course of history periods of capitalism and socialism alternate with one another; capitalism is the unnatural, socialism the natural economic system…The National Socialists and the Red Front have the SAME aspirations. ”
And what of our own toffy-nosed elitist blackshirt Mosely with his variety of “3rd-way” who wanted to see a militarised One-Nation-Europe and founder of the “European” newspaper (now the New European)? : oh let’s see …”I am not, and never have been, a man of the right. My position was on the left and is now in the centre of politics. Letter to The Times (26 April, 1968)
Brexiteeers should by historical precedent be calling the Remainers extreme right-wing fascists, not the other way around.
Good comments, very interesting. Left or Right, Hitler couldn’t seem to make up his mind, I have a simpler way of thinking of this: politician’s will tell the populace anything they think the people want to hear to get them and keep them in power. Power is always the goal, nothing else matters to them, behind their smiles, reassurances, smart suites and weasel words, these politicians are worse than dodgy used car salesmen, worse in fact, a lot more malicious.
Yes, how the modern-day utopian socialists like Grieve, Ummuna, osborne, Clegg, Lucas, Clarke, Bercow, Brown etc etc think they can stand there thinking they could ever be “trusted” with the interests of anything when they effectively constitute a collaborationist pro-facist mentality and clearly hate the ordinary man and woman – especially if they are working class – is only further proof of the dangerous levels they are happy to stoop to – read the BBC with its gross hypocrisy, or Mr Kinnock who wanted to abolish the Lords entirely, but now takes a huge stipend. They are the representatives of an attitude that thousands of brave tommies went to lose their lives to prevent, many of them furthermore from families who refused to fight the Nazi and Fascist menace.
The terms Right and Left were coined in revolutionary Europe over 200 years ago to denote wings of revolutionary thought either more or less hierarchical (R)/egalitarian(L). After the French Revolution in 1789 The National Assembly was replaced in 1791 by an assembly comprising entirely new members, namely “Innovators” who sat on the left, “moderates” who gathered in the centre, while the “conscientious defenders of the constitution” found themselves sitting on the right, where the defenders of the Ancien Regime had previously gathered (before the “Terreur”. In this idea of “left and Right” with shades between, more “reactionary” forces to the Right and “revolutionary” ones to the Left, however, the terms “left” and “right” were not used to refer to political ideology, but only to seating in the legislature. It was after the revolutions of 1848 and the Paris Commune of 1871 – and the advent of Marx – that the terminology was continued during the French Third Republic, to denote ideological leanings of an elitist romantic utopian type.
This created the distinction of “Left and Right” by instituting a political chamber that – rather than being composed of Government and Opposition (in the Westminster tradition of the “Adversarial” system – instituted one that distinguished merely between its own revolutionary factions. Hitler, Mussolini, and Franco are considered ‘far-right’ but are actually variants of Socialism – the Right wing of State totalitarian socialism rather than the Left.
This has nothing to do with conservatism or patriotism, and is the opposite of free-trading internationalism. It is what Edmund Burke warned so clearly of when the Tories started turning socialist.
Today the EU has continued the European romantic utopian fallacy and wants to impose it by any means, fair or foul, that’s fascism.
“How many lives will it cost this time?”
Probably millions but perhaps it could be resolved by the premature deaths of a few hundred. I often wonder what might have happened if some brave souls had rendered Hitler and his cronies incapable.
Just a thought.
Jack – it’s amazing, particularly in hindsight, just how many of the world’s problems and conflicts could have been nipped in the bud with a box or two of bullets.
When the migrant crisis started, if we’d just strafed the first couple of boats coming across the Med, it would have stopped the whole thing in its tracks for maybe a hundred quid, instead of the ongoing cost of countless billions and we’d have saved the lives of the many thousands of people that drowned in exchange for approximately fifty to a hundred lives.
This is too simple and not the way that the world works, it’s obviously not what the Powers That Be want and so the stream of migrants and tyrannical dictators will never stop unless we stop it ourselves.
So much for bleeding heart Liberalism!
EUSSR is a perfectly valid title. Hence the shock and horror.
Incidently the remainers of Russia and Germany paid the price. But not before they had a jolly good life.
What a shame that this ‘explanation’ will be read only by the converted ! I thought it was positive, absolute and unarguable, and I Thank the writer for this worthwhile offering !
Soviet Union or European Union, it seems there isn’t much difference. Here’s a shocking video that illustrates this article perfectly.
“UK To Jail Viewers Of “Far-Right Propaganda” | Amber Rudd”
https://youtu.be/bnIaLoSlFWg
Rather than Far Right, I think it means just mildly Right, Brexiteer or just not agreeing with Big Brother’s narrative. Far Right is a very subjective term, we live in frightening times.