In Memoriam
So it has happened: The Queen died yesterday afternoon at Balmoral. It truly is the end of an era. The announcement of her death, the obituaries, dominate the news and the front pages of the media, not just here in the UK but across the world.
There are already photos galore of bunches of flowers laid at the gates to Windsor Castle and Holyrood Palace. There are photos of people having streamed down the mall to stand at the gates of Buckingham Palace. Two images from the first MSM editions yesterday evening will remain in my memory. One is that last photo of her, after she’d met and dispatched that new PM, How frail she looked, how tiny. The other is a photo of London’s black cabs, their ‘for hire’ lights lit, filling the Mall from side to side and end to end.
The first is a poignant symbol and reminder that the Queen has fulfilled the promise she gave to the people of Great Britain and what later became the Commonwealth: to serve and do her duty. How old-fashioned this now looks in the face of a modern, social-media driven culture where everybody can claim to be a victim, where the concept of ‘serving’ has become utterly foreign.
The second image stands for the generations of British people who lived during her reign, who knew in their hearts what the Queen stood for, who didn’t need social media, talking heads, politicians and other media celebrities to tell them how they felt and that therefore they must feel the same.
The outpourings from presidents and PMs across the world, suitably brief on social media, read more like another exercise of ‘MeToo’. There was one such however which I found moving. It came from the previous PM, Boris Johnson, and I quote it here for the record:
“Former prime minister Boris Johnson said: “This is our country’s saddest day. In the hearts of every one of us there is an ache at the passing of our Queen, a deep and personal sense of loss – far more intense, perhaps, than we expected. In these first grim moments since the news, I know that millions and millions of people have been pausing whatever they have been doing, to think about Queen Elizabeth, about the bright and shining light that has finally gone out. She seemed so timeless and so wonderful that I am afraid we had come to believe, like children, that she would just go on and on. Wave after wave of grief is rolling across the world, from Balmoral – where our thoughts are with all the royal family – and breaking far beyond this country and throughout that great Commonwealth of nations that she so cherished and which cherished her in return.” (paywalled link)
Death, the death of anyone, creates a pause, a break in the lives of those remaining – families, friends, and now in the life of our Nation. It is a moment for reflection, for collecting memories. It is not yet a time for demanding to turn to the future. Confirming the age-old saying that in the face of death we are all equal, the true end, the final drawing of a curtain, comes after the funeral. This applies to all who have buried members of their families and friends family members and applies equally to Queen Elizabeth II.
So let’s refrain for the time being from speculating about what the new reign of the new king, Charles III, will mean. Let’s instead permit ourselves to mourn for the death of this tiny lady, the towering figure who was there during all the important events afflicting our Nation. The permission, if needed, is given in this famous poem by John Donne:
“No man is an island entire of itself; every man
is a piece of the continent, a part of the main;
if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe
is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as
well as any manner of thy friends or of thine
own were; any man’s death diminishes me,
because I am involved in mankind.
And therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.”
That’s why we can mourn for the Queen even if most of us have never met her. However, I hold with the good tradition of a wake where we get together and remember with tears and above all with laughter, so I invite you to a virtual wake in the comment posts.
That ignorant Oaf Piers Morgan has apparently stated that Vladimir Putin who sent warm condolences to King Charles III should be told to stick them where the sun don’t shine. Piers Morgan is a despicable little twerp who offers absolutely nothing to the wellbeing of this country, and it is he who should be told to go where the sun don’t shine.
Agree completely Colin.
Not really an anecdote, just more a musing
I have always averred that I am not a “Citizen of the EU”, but a “subject of the Queen”
I thought “Do I move on now to being a Subject of King Charles?” even though I am not now suject to the EU anyway.
But then I thought on a bit.
I was born in 1935 so in fact I had been a Subject of George V, Edward VIII and George VI already
So I all I can say is “Good `ol Charlay!!!!” (from my music hall training)
Thanks for the invitation to the `Wake` Viv
Fortunately, I have not had chance to visit many in the past, so am not acquainted with the normal form of procedure.
But one for the passing of a person who has been at the pinnacle of power and who has handled the position in such an exemplary manner makes this unique.(I`m not saying HM hasn`t exhibited the odd human failings, but in this context they are not there to be taken into consideration – she did have a bit of a thing about the gee-gees in her eyes they often seemed to stand higher up in the pecking order than some humans)…………..(Oh! perhaps she was right!)
Few of us have had any direct contact with Her Majesty and I am no different, Although there was the occasion at the beginning of her reign in 1952 when I was one of a party of Cadets from HMS Conway lined up alongside a road close to Port Dinorwic in North Wales to witness the drive past in an open Bentley (?) of the new Queen and her Consort Prince Philip. We were in such close contact that one of our number was heard to say “look they`re both wearing makeup” – indeed they were with I believe an internal light shining on them
I hear from the Tele that part of King Charles procedure, will be to visit the nations of the United Kingdom during the next few days, as it were to introduce himself, sounds to me like he will be following his Mother footsteps all these years later.
One other anecdote perhaps I may be permitted to mention here, concerns the Queen`s (and our Nations`s) relationship with Empire and the Commonwealth which she fostered with all her might.(and shamefully not always by our government)
My Wife to be and her family were sent out to Rangoon in Burma, as part of the RAF military Mission to aid the creation of the newly independent Burmese airforce in 1952.
They lived in a government house.
One Day the family were listening to the Radio and the Mali walked in
Heather`s mother said to him “we are listening to details of the death of our King (King George VI), would you like to join us?”
He replied ” My King too memsab”
I`m sure there will still be many around the present Commonwealth, who might say the same thing
“My Queen too Memsab” or similar
In fact one of the interviewees last night on GB TV pointed out that “The Queen” is now so well known and regarded worldwide that is the only person Queen Elizabeth refers to. In fact one correspondent said she should be known as
Elizabeth the Great .
And why not??
Lovely anecdotes, Roger, thanks – and indeed, across the world people knew when one said ‘the Queen’ that there was only one person who could have been meant: Queen Elizabeth II, God bless her.
There is so much vapid talk these days of British values. Usually, rather than being an historical list of unspoken traits, taking the form of the values – current prejudices – the speaker wishes were so. But more powerful and always overlooked in building character and genuine shared values, is shared experience. My mother, often thought a Queen lookalike, died recently at 92. She experienced the horrors, and a family loss during the war, and I grew up in that shadow, in the ‘black and white’ years immediately after the war. Listening to the Queen, one always knew your personal history and perspective was her history. She knew what you knew, and valued what you valued. In my shire village I am still amongst people of that older nation, but viewed through the media prism (or is that prison?) that nation has gone. It is nowhere represented. They now promote values often rootless and quite alien to me, yet claim to represent my country. So the passing of the Queen is not just the loss of a beacon; it feels more like the tide washing away that final sandcastle on the beach.
That is very true, P O’S: She was one of us, i.e. your Mum’s generation and thus of us, the children because she was woven into the fabric of all our lives.
Just think of the decades of families’ traditions at Christmas when everybody watched the Queen’s speech – much as the metropolitan ‘elites’ scoffed and ridiculed it.
Here at Chateau Colliemum, it always was the big Christmas meal with all trimmings, then The Speech, and then out with the collies to ‘work it all off’ until it got too dark.
I think that the sneering of said ‘elite’ at such simple but poignant traditions has much to answer for when we look at the continuing degradation of our Nation.
I am so so sad and so are some of my American friends who considered her the leader of the mother ship. There’s no hope for Harry now, but that’s for another day.
“The Queen is dead, long live the King”, which we should all utter, expresses our constitution and not, as some fools suggest, support for Charles personally. We are a constitutional monarchy which is better than having Tony Blair or similar as president. Whatever our misgivings about Charles – I have many – The Queen is dead, long live the King.
I hope Harry will edit his forthcoming book to remove further slander.
Stout. You are quite right.
It IS our constitution we express when we say those words. So . . . . long live our constitutional monarchy !!
Misgivings about Charles 3 certainly but in what way can it be claimed that republics work better?
Once, a long time ago, I was only a few yards away from The Queen … It was on the occasion of her opening the Welsh Parliament, after that devolution vote which was so close that any retainer would’ve demanded a recount, if not a re-run had it been the Brexit vote.
Be that as it may – The Queen’s route took her right along the playing field close to where I lived. So I grabbed the two resident collies to stand and watch. After all, if a cat can look at the King, surely collies can look at the Queen?
Well, they disgraced me, or rather, the Big Dog (the one in my av) did. He freaked out whenever there were ‘inexplicable things’ in the sky above him. So there was this noiseless blimp hovering in the distance. He hadn’t noticed it, so all was well. But as soon as the Queen’s car approached, it came swopping down from that distance.
The Big Dog freaked out and pulled me back home, with all his might. He was big and strong and there was nothing I could do but let him have his way.
And the Queen, if she happened to look out of the window, might have seen me being dragged away, ignominiously, my back turned to her.
Thus my collies led to my utter disgrace in the face of the Queen …
Sorry, Ma’am, I really couldn’t help it …
I believe Viv, as a young child I saw her being driven past on Epsom Downs.
Perhaps going to the Derby?
My mother must have made a big effort to get us there to watch.
Yes, I can readily believe that your mother made a big effort to get you to a place where you could see the Queen drive by! I think the simple fact of seeing her with one’s own eyes, not through TV transmission, was important because it meant that she was ‘for real’, not just a moving picture or a photo in the papers. That’s why your mother made the effort, and that’s why I felt the urge to go and see her, just driving by. I could as well have stayed home and switched the telly on, but no – I felt I had to go.
Unfortunately, the Big Dog had other ideas, bless his little cotton socks …
A remarkable, sincere lady, who carried out her royal duty to the best of her ability.
Jake Bennett: Seconded.
An amazing character packed inside a tiny body. There was nothing of her, especially in the last few days and weeks, but she had such a steely character and she ran the royal family with a rod of iron.
She was determined to fulfil her duty right up to the end, pushing herself to receive an outgoing Prime Minister’s resignation and welcome an incoming Prime Minister just hours before her death. It must have been exhausting for her, but it was her duty and she wasn’t going to shirk it.
Since I became aware of royalty at a young age, she had been a constant presence and now her life has ended, that presence is no longer there. I hope King Charles is big enough to fill her enormous shoes.
Well said Debbie and Viv, dignified succinct and streets ahead of the emotional bordering on hystercal articles and comments in the main stream media
My earliest recollection is a magazine centre fold picture of the Queen pinned to my bedroom wall. I loved that women ever since.
Harryagain……’women’?…….