Russia
Express
Since Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, there have been multiple accusations of atrocities committed by his soldiers – and today’s sickening report provides horrifying new evidence.
War crimes including the rape and torture of children have been committed in Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine since the start of Vladimir Putin’s war, the head of a United Nations-mandated investigation body said on Friday. Ukraine and its Western allies accuse Russian soldiers of a litany of rights abuses since the February 24 invasion, although Moscow dismisses the allegations as a smear campaign.
Erik Mose, who heads the Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine, told the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva: “Based on the evidence gathered by the Commission, it has concluded that war crimes have been committed in Ukraine.”
He did not specify who was to blame – but the commission has focused on areas previously occupied by Russian forces including Kyiv, Chernihiv, Kharkiv and Sumy.
Commission investigators, which was created by the UNHRC in March, visited 27 places and interviewed more than 150 victims and witnesses.
They uncovered evidence of a large number of executions including bodies with tied hands, slit throats and gunshot wounds to the head, Mose said.
Independent
Vladimir Putin’s dramatic new threat to deploy nuclear weapons must be taken seriously, the European Union’s foreign policy chief has warned.
The world is at a “dangerous moment”, with the Russian president having been “pushed into a corner” as a result of his failing war in Ukraine, Josep Borrell said.
Following a huge counterattack in Ukraine’s northeast, which saw the fleeing Russian army leaving thousands of kilometres of hard-won gains, Mr Putin took the drastic step of announcing a partial mobilisation of civilians in his first address to the nation since launching his invasion seven months ago.
Sparking fears of a descent into apocalyptic nuclear war, the Russian leader accused the West of “nuclear blackmail” and said Moscow was ready to use “all the means at our disposal”, adding: “I’m not bluffing.”
Speaking to the BBC as a week of intense discussion of the war at the United Nations general assembly in New York came to a close, the EU’s foreign policy chief warned on Saturday: “When people say it is not a bluff, you have to take them seriously.”
Sun
RUSSIANS who plan on returning to the Kremlin state to fight for the Butcher of Mariupol have been warned not to come back to the EU.
“There is no return for those who go,” vowed Eerik-Niiles Kross, an Estonian politician, and former chief of intelligence as he told of how “crimes against peace is a criminal offence under Estonian law.”
He said Estonian residents who chose to fight for the Kremlin will be immediately “banned” but if Russians living in Estonia decide to resist Putin’s draft they will have “all legal protection and will not let Russia to force anyone.”
Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and Poland, have also decided to ban Russian tourists while the EU halted all flights from Russia to member nations.
Huge queues are reported in the south Russian boarder, and some have even ditched their cars as the flee Putin’s draft, which is thought to drag around 300,000 Russians into Putin’s evil invasion of Ukraine.
ITV News
Russia has insisted it had “no choice” but to take military action in Ukraine, in a speech to the United Nations General Assembly.
The power defended its actions in Ukraine, following days of denunciation at the high profile diplomatic gathering.
Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov sought to shift focus away from Moscow’s actions.
In a speech claiming that the US and its allies— not Russia, as the West maintains— are aggressively undermining the international system that the UN represents.
Invoking history ranging from the US war in Iraq in the early 2000s to the 20th-century Cold War, Lavrov portrayed the US as a bully.
He told delegates the US tries to afford itself “the sacred right to act with impunity wherever and wherever they want” and can’t accept a world where others also advance their national interests.
Tax
Mail
Liz Truss is planning even more tax cuts as the new PM says she is ‘unapologetic’ after her Chancellor’s mini-Budget sparked panic among markets and her critics.
Reforms to income tax, pension pots, and child benefits are reportedly being drawn up Treasury officials as the PM makes a bid to unleash a ‘decade of dynamism’.
She defended Friday’s Budget against criticism of tax cuts for higher earners, declaring in The Mail on Sunday that she was in pursuit of a ‘low-tax nation rich in opportunity’, despite the nervous reaction that also came from some of her own backbenchers.
In his striking announcement to the Commons, Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng scrapped the top 45p rate of tax and cut 1p from the basic rate in the biggest package of tax cuts by a British Government for half a century.
And 2023’s full Budget could see 1.6million savers benefit from a review of the lifetime and annual pension saving allowances, The Sunday Telegraph reported.
ITV News
Prime Minister Liz Truss has vowed to “usher in a decade of dynamism” as she hints of more tax cuts to come.
It comes as Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng said the new administration’s tax cuts were just the “first step towards igniting growth” as the pair were forced to defend their controversial measures.
Using more than £70 billion of increased borrowing, Mr Kwarteng announced the biggest programme of tax cuts for 50 years, including abolishing the top rate of income tax for the highest earners.
The £45 billion tax-slashing package was met with alarm by leading economists, some Conservative MPs and financial markets – with the pound tumbling to fresh 37-year lows.
Economists predict sterling could plunge to parity with the US dollar by the end of the year.
Analysis of the mini-budget by the Resolution Foundation said “only the very richest households in Britain” will see their incomes grow as a result of the government’s programme of tax cuts.
The wealthiest 5% will see their incomes grow by 2% next year (2023/24), while the other 95% of the population will get poorer as the cost of living crisis continues, according to the think tank’s number-crunching.
Evening Standard
Prime Minister Liz Truss has vowed to “usher in a decade of dynamism” while Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng said their tax cuts were just the “first step towards igniting growth” as the pair were forced to defend the controversial measures.
Using more than £70 billion of increased borrowing, Mr Kwarteng announced the biggest programme of tax cuts for 50 years, including abolishing the top rate of income tax for the highest earners.
The £45 billion tax-slashing package was met with alarm by leading economists, some Conservative MPs and financial markets – with the pound tumbling to fresh 37-year lows.
Economists predict sterling could plunge to parity with the US dollar by the end of the year due to the raft of new measures.
Migrants
Mail
Liz Truss is planning to increase migrant numbers to Britain by loosening immigration rules as part of her mission to boost economic growth.
The Prime Minister is facing resistance from her cabinet colleagues to a move that would see labour shortages plugged by allowing businesses to recruit more overseas workers.
Suella Braverman, the Home Secretary, Kemi Badenoch, the Trade Secretary, and Jacob Rees-Mogg, the Business Secretary, are hesitant to give their backing, the Sunday Times reported.
It is understood that Nadhim Zahawi, the Cabinet Office minister, who chaired a meeting on the proposals, is also in favour along with Ranil Jayawardena, the Environment Secretary, and Kwasi Kwarteng, the Chancellor.
Businesses have been frustrated that the visa system for skilled work has not been responsive enough to shortages they have experienced and Ms Truss has faced industry demands for more migrant workers.
Ms Truss has insisted she is ‘unapologetic’ in ‘focusing relentlessly on economic growth’, even if that means implementing unpopular policies.
Sun
MANY thousands more immigrants will be let into Britain under Liz Truss’ dash for growth plans.
The PM and Home Office are planning to massively liberalise routes to allow foreign workers to move to the UK.
They are expected to extend the number of jobs on the list of shortage occupations – making it easier for foreigners in these roles to come here.
The seasonal workers scheme which lets fruit pickers come to Britain is expected to be expanded.
The current cap of 40,000 is expected to be lifted and the six month time limit extended.
Businesses across Britain have been struggling with a massive labour shortage since Covid.
Pubs and restaurants have slashed hours and even closed down because they have not been able to recruit.
UK Hospitality say record staff shortages are costing the industry £21billion in lost business and £5bn in lost tax.
Times
Liz Truss is facing her first cabinet row as she prepares to increase immigration to boost economic growth.
The prime minister is pushing for wide-ranging reform of Britain’s visa system to tackle acute labour shortages and attract the best talent from across the world.
In the coming weeks she intends to raise the cap on seasonal agricultural workers and make changes to the shortage occupations list, which will allow key sectors to recruit more overseas staff.
Truss has told colleagues that she is keen to recruit overseas broadband engineers to support the government’s pledge to make full-fibre broadband available to 85 per cent of UK homes by 2025.
Guardian
Plans to recruit nurses from Nepal to help plug shortages in the NHS will expose workers to an “unacceptable risk” of exploitation and should be halted until safeguards are in place, labour experts have warned.
The UK has been accused of pressing ahead with a hiring spree despite concerns about abusive practices by Nepali recruitment agencies, which are notorious for charging illegal fees that leave workers saddled with debt.
The government-to-government deal, signed last month despite Nepal’s status on the World Health Organization’s recruitment “red list”, will begin with an initial pilot involving about 100 recruits but could see thousands of nurses and other healthcare workers move to the UK from Nepal over the next few years.
The Department of Health has hailed the scheme as an “ethical” initiative that will allow for “managed” recruitment to plug UK shortages. A memorandum of understanding says workers should not be charged fees and that recruitment will be overseen by a Nepali government-run “implementation unit”.
Education
Telegraph
The Government is “seriously” looking at the expansion of grammar schools, the Education Secretary has said.
Kit Malthouse, who took over as Education Secretary this month, reaffirmed Liz Truss’s leadership campaign commitment to explore lifting a 24-year ban on establishing new selective schools.
“The PM made it clear during [the] leadership contest that she wanted to see work on grammar schools, fundamentally because there is a desire from parents in some parts of the country to have them,” he told The Yorkshire Post.
“We’re about parental choice, everyone needs to be able to make a choice for their kids.
“So we’re looking at that policy seriously and looking at areas that have it or indeed grammar schools that want to expand is something she has asked us to do.
Fracking
Express
Under the 1934 Petroleum Production Act, all oil and gas deposits are owned by the King in his official capacity as “the Crown” which means people cannot financially benefit from shale gas deposits from their property.
A former energy minister has told Liz Truss that if she wants people to accept fracking in their communities then she needs to change the law to give them a share of the profits. Tory grandee Sir Michael Fallon told Express.co.uk that he “tried for a year to get fracking to work” but warned that property rights had made it “impossible”.
Sir Michael, who is also a former Defence Secretary, spoke to Express.co.uk ahead of new Business Secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg confirming that the Government plans to issue 100 licences for shale gas extraction.
During his statement in the Commons he was besieged by both Tory backbenchers and opposition MPs over demands over whether he would stick with the principle of local consent which has been a major stumbling block for fracking.
Independent
Liz Truss’s claims gas from fracking could flow in six months has been called into doubt – with one company estimating it could take as long as 18 months.
The government lifted the ban on fracking on Thursday, despite warnings from climate campaigners and geologists.
Ms Truss is hoping the move will help make the UK more self-sufficient for energy, but campaigners have warned it would do little to alleviate the huge bills Britons currently face.
And the fracking industry has said the planning and environmental permit process would need to be sped up and earthquake limits relaxed for their investment to make sense.
Firms need both environmental and planning permits to start fracking, as well licences, Health and Safety Executive scrutiny and consent from the Business Department, according to the UK Onshore Oil and Gas (UKOOG) industry body.
The UKOOG said the planning and environmental permits took the most time, with previous applications taking in excess of 50 weeks – not including appeals.
Solar power
Mail
An £18billion plan to harness solar and wind power in the Sahara and use it to supply electricity to Britain could dramatically slash household bills, it was claimed last night.
Whitehall officials are poring over an extraordinary plan to install almost 12 million solar panels and 530 wind turbines across a vast expanse of desert in Morocco and then transfer the power they generate to the UK via the world’s longest undersea electricity cable.
The Xlinks project, which is chaired by former Tesco boss Sir Dave Lewis, claims it could power more than seven million homes by 2030, supplying an astonishing eight per cent of Britain’s energy needs.
A study by energy company Octopus, which has invested in the scheme, shows that the project would result in a sizable cut in household bills. It is believed the project would deliver electricity at about half the rate of that produced by nuclear power plants.
Xlinks has been granted permission to build a huge solar panel and adjacent wind farm across a 370- square-mile expanse of terrain in Morocco’s Guelmim-Oued Noun region.
Strikes
Express
Strikes at two of Britain’s biggest ports could prevent some stores from restocking popular goods in the run-up to Christmas, experts have warned.
Dockers at Felixstowe are set to walk out for eight days from Tuesday in an ongoing pay row. More than 1,900 workers at the Suffolk port went on strike last month, also for eight days, after calling for a 10 percent pay rise.
It follows action by more than 550 dockers at the Port of Liverpool, who began a two-week strike last Tuesday. Both walkouts come amid soaring inflation, with fears they could lead to gaps on shelves.
This will hit retailers already struggling with cash-flow problems as a result of soaring costs and low consumer confidence. And in another blow, rail workers are expected to strike again on October 1, 5 and 8, which may impact customers visiting shops.
As Felixstowe handles 48 per cent of the UK’s imported goods the disruption could mean less choice in electronic items or toys.
Wines may also be harder to find, as nearly five million litres a week go through the port. Wholesaler Mark Lansley, of Broadland Drinks, in Norfolk, said his company has brought in bulk orders earlier than normal to meet demand at Christmas
Mirror
Trade unions are joining forces to legally challenge Liz Truss’s “hostile” crackdown on workers’ rights.
Eleven unions are preparing court action over moves to restrict the freedom to strike, in a move signalling a bruising winter of conflict between workers and the new PM.
Unions say new laws which allow bosses to bring in agency workers to replace striking staff are illegal in UK and international law.
The TUC, co-ordinating the fight, vows to “throw the kitchen sink” at the PM’s pledge to restrict industrial action and roll back protections on working hours, sick pay and workplace safety.
General secretary Frances O’Grady has warned Ms Truss not to become the “P&O PM”, a reference to the sacking of 800 ferry workers and their replacement with agency staff earlier this year.
Unions backing the action include the transport workers’ RMT, general union GMB, train drivers’ Aslef, civil servants’ unions FDA and PCS and teachers’ National Education Union.
Health union Unison and headteachers’ union NASUWT are considering separate legal actions against what they say is “anti-worker” proposed legislation.
Nostradamus
Mail
Book sales about the astrologer Nostradamus have soared since the Queen died, as people have suggested the French prophet predicted her death more than 450 years ago.
Nostradamus has previously been hailed for predicting the Great Fire of London, Hitler’s rise to power and the wars that hit Europe.
Since the Queen’s death on September 8, book sales of Mario Reading’s Nostradamus: The Complete Prophecies for the Future have risen dramatically.
In the week prior to Her Majesty’s death, the book sold just five copies but by the week ending September 17 almost 8,000 copies had been sold pushing it to the top of the paperback charts, The Sunday Times reported.
Within the book, that was first published in 2006, Reading interprets one quatrain as ‘Queen Elizabeth II will die, circa 22, at the age of around 96’.
The increased popularity is thought to have grown since the extracts went viral on social media.
Prior to the Queen’s death, there were suggestions that Nostradamus had even predicted the war in Ukraine, with vague suggestions that France might even face a threat from the east.
Times
The Queen’s death caught many by surprise but not, it seems, the French astrologer Nostradamus, who died more than 450 years ago.
A book of interpretations of his supposed prophecies has shot to the top of the Sunday Times bestsellers list for apparently predicting the monarch’s demise.
Nostradamus: The Complete Prophecies for the Future, by Mario Reading, has topped the general paperbacks chart after selling almost 8,000 copies in the week ending on September 17. It sold just five copies the week before the Queen’s death. In the book, published in 2006, Reading “interprets” the writings of the seer.
Nostradamus’s most famous book, Les Prophéties, consists of 942 poetic quatrains that allegedly predict events.
Kwarteng, the Treasury, and Mrs O’Leary either have no real conception of what overpopulation relative to resources is actually like to live with for ordinary people, or they simply do not care.
They understand I’m sure but just want to convince us that our country and the world are overpopulated in order to justify the mass murder required to satisfy the UN Agendas. Invaders from alien cultures / religions are particularly welcome.
“Liz Truss is planning to increase migrant numbers…”
Too many unproductive ones have been allowed in already. Far better to cut their benefits and force them into work rather than invite more. How about retraining native Brits too who are on the dole?
Jack Thomas 4.16pm. It makes me furious that we continue to house and feed the illegal immigrants in the lap of luxury.
Liz really must do something about that – soon.
Note well. Erik Mose ‘did not specify who was to blame’.
Atrocities:-
Express- He did not specify who was to blame (Russians by default?)
IndLeft- HRussian President in a corner as a result of his failing war
(Give it a couple of weeks or so then we will see fur and feathers fly).
I did not realise Kalashnikov make drones. Seen the footage – nasty.
Migrants:-
Bring ’em all in. (we can afford to put them in hotels at no cost).
Tax:-
But no removal of the 5 pct tax imposed by common market on heating fuel and so on, introduced by one term mp G Kynock. (credit where it is due and it would remove a tax for thousands, maybe millions).
Fracking:-
gas from fracking could flow in six months (or more likely not ever – only I hope, I am wrong).
Solar power:-
From N Africa? (don’t mention a bridge from England to Northern Ireland).
Any ship in weather trouble could drop an anchor and . . . In British N Sea, from memory a trawler in trouble, pulled a six inch steel pipeline sideways 400 to 800 yards with its anchor some years ago.
If you only knew the problems with TransAtlantic telephone cables, and submariner detection cables North of the Shetlands. Touch them at your peril. . . . . And terrorism?
Nostradamus:-
HarryFArmidamus gets a reprint fee.
Biscotte. I was woried about the immigrants. But note that these are Lawfull immigrants not the illegal invasion across the channel.
PB- you are right. I was thinking of the ‘students’, ‘short term visas’ and such, that just ‘disappear’ at the end of their term here.
Truss “is planning to increase migrant numbers to Britain by loosening immigration rules as part of her mission to boost economic growth. Businesses have been frustrated that the visa system for skilled work has not been responsive enough to shortages.”
Yes, I heard there is a desperate shortage of Albanian drug dealers and suppliers of slave labour, but the Navy and RNLI are doing all they can to help.
And far from importing Nepali nurses, shouldn’t the government be looking at how Nepal has managed to produce such a surplus of nurses that they can afford to see hundreds emigrate without damaging their own health needs. Slaps forehead.
Tax, A).as seen by the worker, B)..as seen by the boss, C) as seen by the external observer, D)…as seen by the impartial observer looking thru the overall benefits and disadvantages in total.
This is huge simplification But in general. E)
A) ” I don’t mind It says in tnat box and in my bank statement that I get. £xxxx. And they pay a bit for a pensions etc. That’s fine. I’d like more but. realistically. !”…
B) PAYE Hides the size the government takes. So it doesnt matter to me Tax + wages is what he costs me. Tax or wages thats what he costs. OK. But NHS ( Contributions – euphemistically ) is different. It is a tax that accepts that by employing him you are USING him and they charging you for the pleasure. They are blaming you, the boss. AND YOU MUST AGREE. As thouh you had used up a bit of his health, or may be a bit of his earning future potential.
C)…Onlooker. ” Its a contract
,get on with it. What’s it got to do with me? What are the assumptions.? what are the implications ?.Isthere an assumption that the state in its confiscation of tax has assumed responsibilities ( Having already assumed then taken suthorities )
So far so good.Companies and other organisations, were then joined by workers, professions, political, Drug Dealers and other organisations and started competing and testing their powers and rights.
And politics are not used to being expected to timely earn their keep And appear to actively refuse. And the EU and ECHR undermines everything.
Electricity from the Sahara Desert ……….WOW!!!!!!!
Has anybody told Lizz? didn`t I hear something about her new policy of producing our own power from our own resources within this little island and never again being at the present scandalous position of being beholden to others that can, not only control its price, but also its availability………………and talking of availability, I suppose the sun doesn`t shine at night and wind is not guaranteed 24/7 nor 24/7/365 in the Sahara anyway!
I suppose the value to this nation is in the` illusion ` that being created offshore, energy supplied does not count toweards our nonsense targets of zero carbon emissions. It doesn`t need me to explain those manufacture and production emissions are created `elsewhere`, do not minimise `world` zero carbon efforts, but what is important to maintain the illusion is `not in our backyard`
I know within the present day scale of things £18 billion doesn`t sound an awful lot of money and as normal in these sort of circles it is not wise to quote a relevant figure, but only to provide a `reasonable` sum (i.e. one that does not frighten the horses (C.Serpents) enough to kill the project stone dead) (how do you think HS2 got from £25 billion to over £100 billion it is presently or the 2012 London Olympics from an initial £4 billion to £9 billion or the Scottish Parliament from £4million to £40 million NB figures not guaranteed accurate ? but you get my drift)
Then there`s the whole principle of who will provide that sort of capital, will most of it be spent offshore and contribute little to our GDP or limit what is available for other onshore more vital projects at this present time of crisis and national need? Will the manufacture of all those Photo Voltaic panels and other equipment go to those nasty Chinese who so persecute their own Muslim citizens, what about the continued use of rare earth and sea mineral deposits and their depletion
or
most of all, I would think would be the danger of destruction from marauding bands of Islamic terrorists.
No wonderful idea……. maybe!………………like the new airport in the Thames, or the bridge or tunnel from Ireland to Scotland or, my favourite forming a barrier from Norway to Scotland and another from Cornwall to France and reclaiming the North Sea and Channel (that one should also satisfy the Remoaners who would have a visible long term objective, but not highly necessary, in the national interest – not just now!)
In the 1950 ‘s Israil made the desert bloom. I went to a conference about it in London. Therefore it must be true. Then Egypt and Palestinians destroyed it. I have no idea why. I think they lost the war but regained the Negev. Maybe Arabs prefer deserts, camels and goats. I dunno. But then I am told the Sahara is returnable to a pre industrial farming after goats and nomads condition. But not by any predatory International corporation.
1950s t g s? Perhaps that was B.C. !!
Now I really feel old.
Don’t worry about it Thomas. I was thinking of your Tardis.!!
I believe I saw a programme a few years ago on Al Jazeera which showed a very interesting “greening” of a section of the Sahara Desert, maybe starting from the Dakar end of things.
I think where there`s a will there`s a way.
Perhaps it`s not in every native`s interest to appear too successful, nobody to feel sorry for them, you know being so needy and downtroden.
(Should I be washing out my mouth with soap?)
I seem to remember the desert was sprayed with a ‘bitumastic’ style black stuff (tech term). It allowed water droplets down through it, but stopped water vapour evaporating from under the sand. It was a bp project as I recall.
Yes 1950s PB. (Pre-Baxter!).
That could well work, but the system must basically get moisture, at night, down to the roots of trees. And. Allowing Oases etc to spread naturally, without destructive Nomads, goats , and ignorant farming.
As I understand it ( due to scarcity of proper info ), defending the vast Negeve which was still a fragile system, was illogical, against the incursions of Armies, Nomads and goats moving in stopped any sign of resistance in the area.
But I am far from being expert. Is there one please. ? However it does seem to me that all these deserted or desert areas are Islam dominated. Has cause and effect got anything to do with this ? or is it pure circumstance. or ability to survive ?
Hardly Biscotte. I was born Oct. 1944.
While I`m `at it` (authorship that is)
To return to yesterday`s news (Thursday/Friday/Saturday actually),
I made a comment about Rachel Reeve`s (and Labour`s generally) reaction to Kwasi`s mini non budget.
I pointed out that she did agree with Kwasi/Truss and presumably other commentators in their analysis of the malaise that has affected the British economy for so many past years.
Namely (as I wrote) “the economy has been held in a straight jacket organised by the Treasury and supported in every way by timid or idealogical interference so this nation has underperformed virtually as an inherent feature over many years”
meaning ………..we have rarely had an even `satisfactory` GDP result and shortfall has been covered by borrowing, albeit at rock bottom rates, nevertheless I`m sure all will agree, not the atmosphere to foster enterprise, initiative and growth and at the bottom of it has been “Gordon Brown/Blair economics” (whatever they are, but characterised by “STANDSTILL and FUDGE” and particularly don`t get OUT OF STEP with the ENEMY the EU.)
I pointed out Reeve`s only argument with Kwasi was that he didn`t intend to tackle it the` Labour way ` (whatever that might be – but bound to be another enormous shake at least of the O`Donnell/Corbyn Magic Money tree) (Oh! Boris has already done that anyway)
I have been thinking since, that both of them will agree the Nation is in a pretty grim financial hole, in fact probably at crisis point.
Isn`t it now time for her to realise this, also to realise that Labour is not going to be in a position to put their nostra into effect for at least two years and it might be better “IN THE INTERESTS of the NATION” to say.
“Right even though we don`t think it is fair to `our` section of voters, nevertheless in the interests of the Nation at this critical juncture, we will do our best to help in whatever way we can.
We will endeavour not to obstruct initiative, particularly in the creation of enterprise areas,
We will support a suspension of Carbon Extinction legislation and ensure that we will never again be dependent for our enerergy from sources outside our control,
We will contribute to an `export or die` policy, authorising our embassies world wide to act as salesmen and chase orders, particularly from the Commonwealth,
We will support further reductions to 15% of overseas corporation tax to ensure there is a maximum inflo of overseas investment
And finally we will deter Unions from bolloxing the whole effort by striking at ports in particular,”
Oh! and they might suspend their remain campaign and other aspects of Wokeism that is anathema to the social cohesion that this spirit of “all in it together” will require.
In fact this is the most important of all, as without it surely everything will fail.
NB the Cons will have to mend their ways too, undertaking legitimate sufferers will be adequately “looked after”, without that also everything will fail also.
“Goodwill is not just for Christmas” it has to be worked at all the year round and be APPARENT for all deeds not just words!
Roger Turner.12.24pm. Electricity from the Sahara. Underwater cables. Yes it sounds totally mad doesn’t it.
Just possible the cables could cross the Med, thus powering Spain or France, I suppose.
And there is more sun and wind in the Sahara than further north. No good to us though.
There may be oild under the Sahara if they drill deep enough. And who knows what minerals may be there.
I noticed when the Daily Sceptic published that map of CO2 greening the world the Sahara had definitely not been improved.
And Roger at 6.04pm 25/9. The most important thing Labour could do is stop the Unions bolloxing our nation.
Endless “growth” as favoured by the Tories is not feasible.
We live in a world where most resources are fixed, It’s getting harder and harder to find and extract them.
Migration. Interesting that the migrants/descendants of migrants in government are the ones in favour of having more of them. No wonder we can’t rid ourselves of the dinghy people.
People NOT to trusted.
Nostradamus is bit like the bible, there are so many prophesies that some are bound to come true.
Even worse, it’s regularly updated to remove previous errors.
Nostradamus’ quatrains are like a literary Rorschach test; you can read into them anything you want to see. It is said he had to write in code so as not to run foul of the authorities, which was handy for him. So for a long time, for example, people were saying he predicted Hitler, by referring to the rise of Hister; they fail to point out that Hister was the name of the Danube back then.
Unlike our very own Nostradarmitage whose predictions are mostly clear. Clear nonsense. Or as he says: “so many prophesies that some are bound to come true.”
Nostradamus is not regularly updated. He is regularly retranslated and reinterpreted by folk wanting to make an easy ‘buck’ from the gullible.
Ecologist Kenneth Watt declared: “By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate…that there won’t be any more crude oil.” Now where did I read that again earlier today?
Scientific American estimated lead, zinc, tin, gold, and silver would be gone before 1990, and humanity would totally run out of copper shortly after 2000.
Malthus predicted in 1798 that living standards would be undermined by population growth. Luckily we had the industrial revolution and the rise of fossil fuels. And we must not forget Ehrlich’s 1968 tome, The Population Bomb: “hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death” in the 1970s.” Fair dos to him, he later adjusted it to the 1980s… and then the 2000s.
Others, too, predicted the world was going to run out of food by 2000. Yet grain production increases year on year on a trajectory almost as straight a line as naturally occurring CO2. And oil was going to run out, yet there are more known reserves now than we have extracted.
In 2019 the BBC, exquisitely tuned to any and every scare they can conjure, ran with: “What Happens when we run out of food?” ‘When’ not ‘If’, you notice. Condescendingly as always, they helpfully told us what any reasonably educated person would already know: “Long term starvation can affect people’s height, leading to stunting in populations who have lived through famine and severe food shortages.” Well I never.
A site called The World Counts currently says: “World population too big to feed by 2050” and has a clock counting down, yes to the second, the next 27 years. You cannot make this stuff up.
H.A. Growth by comparison with other economies. E.g. produce more of our own energy and food instead of importing them. Manufacture more of our necessities instead of importing them (e.g. from China).
As for Nostradarmus being regularly updated – well kettle calling pot black springs to mind.
Many hospitality and domestic staff need little or no training and if people are unwilling to take a job they should not receive benefits. It looks like we’re back to square one with nobody engaging brain. We don’t need more immigration, we need to get people who are here legally into the jobs that are available or into training. We need grammar schools now with a complete overhaul of education from infants up. It’s not rocket science.
Indeed Lisa but either those in government are too thick to comprehend or don’t want to.