Agincourt – using the archers’ hand sign would be rude …
The ‘War of the Westminster Bubble Dwellers’ – predominantly the MSM ‘top pundits’, the Islington dinner socialists, the top Whitehall Mandarins and some renegade Tories – against the Johnson government is coming out into the open. When Johnson doesn’t present them with some new item on which to attack him, they create it.
Apparently, that spat about the Care Homes Scandal between Starmer and Johnson at PMQs yesterday wasn’t worth pursuing this morning after it became clear that Starmer was quoting out of context from a document based on advice from SAGE and PHE. But hey: ‘Starmer bashed BoJo – put him into No10’ is all we needed to know- but don’t look too hard at his shadow cabinet …!
There are reports about what people did yesterday as the Lockdown was ‘eased’ – there’s even a report by ‘writers’ in the DT about ‘Our First Day Out’ (link) – yes, really! Most went to work though, so of course, transport chiefs are advised to cut down on services:
“Passenger numbers on the London Underground were up by more than 7 per cent compared with last week, with the peak of the rush hour seeing commuters crammed into Tubes and buses. Rail and bus operators were told to consider shutting parts of the public transport system to prevent overcrowding. Government guidance issued yesterday urged operators to use the “full range of operational responses available” to prevent crowding, including telling passengers to “stay away or disperse”. (link, paywalled)
That is in tune with their advice to workers to walk or cycle. After all, ‘sunlight and fresh air’ can protect against CV-19, according to another SAGE expert (link). This is obviously not helpful for those who want to keep us indoors until Christmas.
There’s also the great news that the Swiss pharmaceutical giant Roche has developed a ‘100% accurate CV-19 test’, as ‘confirmed by PHE’s Porton Down lab’ (link). This was a ‘DT Exclusive’, so The Times copied and re-wrote the news, publishing it three hours later (link, paywalled), calling it a ‘game changer’. This is how the test works:
“The Elecsys laboratory-based test requires a blood sample to be taken by a health professional. Blood serums are obtained, to which reagents are added, and then examined in machines known as cobas e analysers, already widely installed in NHS labs across the country.” (link)
So ‘Our NHS’ has it all in hand, and while Germany has already ordered 5 million test kits, we – that is PHE – is ‘in talks’:
“The Telegraph understands that the Department of Health is in negotiations with the Swiss healthcare company Roche to buy millions of the kits. […] On Wednesday night, Roche said it stood ready to provide hundreds of thousands of laboratory-based tests to the NHS each week.” (link)
Let’s keep our fingers crossed that PHE doesn’t mess this up as they’ve messed up so many other things, like ordering PPE from Turkey. And look – isn’t Roche a private company? No NHS-developed test then, is it!
There are some interesting bits of news from ‘our friends’ across the Channel. While the Brusselocrats demand that the borders inside the EU be opened so that people can go on their summer holidays, there’s no consensus on face masks. It seems Spain aims to make wearing those masks in public ‘mandatory’ – lovely, that, during the hot summer days. Macron is dithering so nobody knows if you must wear these masks or not, but in Italy you must wear them on public transport and other enclosed spaces. The Nordic countries are equally divided (link, paywalled). So better pack face masks when travelling abroad, you never know …
Meanwhile, Brussels has stepped up to the mark, warning our government not to ‘discriminate’ against other than French travellers;
“A commission spokesman told the Telegraph: “If there was a member state that was discriminating and was not in line with EU legislation, the commission would intervene. People travelling from the same place could not be forced into quarantine on the basis of their nationality, the spokesman said. […] The commission can bring lawsuits which can ultimately lead to huge daily fines levied by the EU’s top court in Luxembourg. Despite Brexit, Britain remains subject to the European Court of Justice until the end of the transition period at the end of this year.” (link)
I’m sure all our Remainers will rejoice: better to kowtow to Brussels and ‘import’ more CV-19 through untested, non-quarantined travellers into this country than to keep our country just a bit more safe. We all know that this proposal by the government, allegedly starting on June 1st, is a massive horse that has long bolted as no quarantine had been imposed during the last three months. But it’s good to know that the Brusselocrats are still keeping their beady eyes on us, in the hope of squeezing us for some more money. It also takes our eyes away from the ongoing trade negotiations about which we hopefully can talk tomorrow.
Yesterday we wrote about that leaked Treasury document, on taxes to be raised and cuts to be imposed to pay for the debts incurred thanks to the Lockdown (here). As expected, there are articles on this issue in today’s broadsheets. The Times unsurprisingly gives their report an anti-Johnson slant, quoting ‘senior Tories’:
“Boris Johnson has been warned by senior Conservatives that he risks “entrenching” the impact of the coronavirus crisis if he raises taxes or cuts spending. […] One cabinet minister said that such an approach risked jeopardising growth and suggested that the additional borrowing should instead be treated like a wartime debt and repaid over decades.” (link, paywalled)
These Tories and our MSM pundits seem to regard this Treasury document as a factual government programme. Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, writing in the DT, puts his finger firmly on the actual issue. His introductory paragraph is a joy:
“There is a special place in Purgatory for Her Majesty’s Treasury. It came close to subversion during the Brexit drama. Its Covid-19 blueprint for fiscal retrenchment borders on macroeconomic insanity. The 10-page ‘policy package’ leaked to the Telegraph – hopefully for the purpose of discrediting it – is a sure-fire formula for structural damage and an economic depression.” (paywalled link)
I thought yesterday that their aim was to allow Labour to posture about ‘Toree Austeritee’, presenting themselves as saviours of the downtrodden public servants, mandarins included. Here is AEP’s analysis:
“Far from restraining the rise in the ratio of public debt to GDP, the Treasury plan would risk the very debt spiral so feared by its mandarins. It would almost certainly prove self-defeating even on its own terms – assuming that the fiscal torture did not lead to social revolt and the overthrow of free market capitalism before we ever got there.” (paywalled link)
Their warning about creating a situation akin to 1976 caught my eyes yesterday as well, so it’s gratifying to read AEP’s excellent destruction of it:
“Yet the Treasury has its own mind. It also has a Gothic imagination. The authors warn ministers that if they do not get a grip on public finances, we risk a “sovereign debt crisis” akin to 1976, when a British Chancellor had to go cap-in-hand to the International Monetary Fund. Where does one begin? Britain did not have a sovereign debt crisis in 1976. It did not even lose its AAA credit rating.” (paywalled link)
AEP’s further assessment of those Treasury arguments is spot on:
“Everybody has been hit by the same economic shock and everybody is throwing away the rule-book. The US is majestically splashing €4 trillion of fiscal stimulus – current and planned – and the Federal Reserve is mopping up T-bills and up junk bonds on the open market. Have the bond vigilantes recoiled at this insolent heresy? Has the dollar crashed? Of course not. Yet our Treasury is already itching to retrench, citing a budget deficit of £337bn in its “base case” and £516bn in an L-shaped slump.” (paywalled link)
What is it with these ‘worst case scenarios’ using that ‘500’ million (Ferguson) or billion (Treasury) number! Is it meant to scare us silly? AEP’s last paragraph though points to the actual reason this document was ‘leaked’ – and it’s not because of ‘the economy’:
“For whatever reason, somebody is trying to bounce the Chancellor into a destructive course of action. […] Treasury mandarins have a tighter grip over the department than at any time in recent history.” (paywalled link)
Indeed they do and they certainly want to keep it. However, we remember, do we not, that they have ‘expertise’, creating economical ‘scare scenarios’ ever since 2016. They’ve learned nothing, they are still at it. They were proved wrong then, so why should we take their current ‘scare scenario’ seriously when it’s becoming clear that this leak was driven by Mandarin party politics.
I leave you with a seminal quote from an article. I’m indebted for the link, again, to the ever more important Lockdown Sceptics. The author of that article, Ted Yarbrough, is looking at the reason government has given for the Lockdown (‘Protect you-know-what’), quoting from Johnson’s Sunday speech, writing (his emphasis):
“To translate, Britain has given up its freedom, at least temporarily, to bolster the NHS. The UK’s new “national religion” is more like a cult.” (link)
There follows a scathing, devastating analysis of the NHS and the government Lockdown paper. I urge you to read the whole thing. Keep his analysis in mind when the clappers-for-our-sacred-cow come out again this evening. Keep in mind that the Whitehall mandarins are in more or less open warfare against Johnson’s government, as that leaked Treasury document shows.
Keep also in mind that yesterday more of us were out and about than ‘our betters’ in the Westminster Bubble expected, so perhaps we’re not as frightened as they think. Perhaps we peasants outside the M25 haven’t lost that ‘Dunkirk Spirit’ yet.
Perhaps too many of us are now abandoning the MSM: not watching, not listening, not reading what their pundits are saying. Perhaps we’re seeing signs of a very quiet, very British way of giving that Agincourt hand sign to mandarins, pundits and those in government who’re in thrall to them. Keep it up and
KBO!
Photo by openroads.com 
I am coming to the conclusion, that at 75 I am at an age where I am unable to take part in this Nation any more. – Everything now, from morality to National planning is going down the pan at speed. – Add to that, our Nation being taken over by foreigners, and I’m ready for out now !
Flyer seems to be on the side of Bashing Boris. Who would he prefer to be in no. 10?
Unfortunately I’m past trusting any politician, they’re all singing from the same hymn sheet, more globalism, more UN, EU etc. The only difference between politicians is the propaganda that they use to get elected, this they soon forget if they are elected.
We support Boris because he’s promised to take us out of the EU, do you think he would if he didn’t have to? Currently Boris is talking tough on the Brexit transition period but what’s the betting that at the end of June, at the very last moment, an extension will be agreed due to unforeseen circumstance, the virus or something like that, he already seems happy to give Northern Ireland away.
Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. As usual though, the powers that be have made sure that we have no good choices, we’re always left trying to choose the least worst option. For now Boris is the least worst option but I don’t have to like him as well.
Thanks Viv for explaining where the 2 finger salute originated. All the more reason for giving it towards the EU !
These high level Tories that said the treasury advice was all wrong – a recipe for disaster – I thought they were sensible Tories warning AGAINST the treasury mandarin’s proposals. Isn’t it wonderful how the media can twist things.
This will wind you up, Boris is selling us out already.
“Post-Brexit Irish Sea border is coming!”
https://youtu.be/YtsSxXdpUow
Are they trying to subsume Ni into Ireland so they can get their sticky fingers on more of our territorial waters and all the fish?
Build a wall and make Ireland and the EU pay for it!
Good idea Michael.
Yes well, he did try to get round it. And I still do not understand this at all. It is not Britain imposing tariffs or other restrictions. It goes back to the original argument. If the EU want to put barriers on THEIR border let them. But they should keep off UK territory.
Concerning the 1976 currency crisis. This occupies one paragraph in Denis Healey the then Chancellor’s autobiography. He says sterling was being sold and he asked for standby credits of some billions of dollars. He had no difficulty since the lenders like the Bank of International Settlements felt sterling to be undervalued.
Not the whole story. Later in the year sterling came under selling pressure again and a conditional loan was eventually agreed with the IMF plus spending cuts. It turned out that the IMF loan, which was only half taken up in 1977 and soon repaid, would not have been needed if the Government’s own forecasts had not been overly pessimistic which had affected a market sentiment of ‘hysterical schoolgirls’. So a storm in a teacup. Healey notes how unreliable economic forecasts are and worse how unreliable the figures on what has already happened are as well. .
Anastasia Lin Oxford Union Address
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFqg8ZNtUlc
I lifted this address out of the Watts Up With That CCP virus update (link below) which highlights important developments. If you have the time the comments below reveal how it seems more and more probable that some people are, through their actions, intentionally having the effect of increasing the number of deaths and extending the length of the lockdown and with the help of the media and are also having the effect of opposing those attempting to reduce deaths and get the Western world back to work as quickly as possible.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/05/11/distributed-denial-of-hcq-to-covid-19-victims/
Perfectly in tune as always, Viv. Well before your last para, I was intending to write that I am going to continue self-isolating… from the MSM and the know-nothing politicians. With a few must-read exceptions, such as Sherelle Jacobs who has another excellent piece in today’s DT, they are equally unbearable and nugatory. The country will recover from the virus and, in the longer term, the lunatic lockdown, but I fear it will never recover from its MSM – evidence the Pavlovian clappers tonight.
I was about to say the same about Ms Jacobs’ article today, Mr O’P. The comments are always instructive. It becomes more and more evident that those people who want the lockdown to continue are remoaners in the main.
It reminds me of something I saw recently on YouTube – that those people most likely to ”dob in” neighbours are Democrats! I wonder if that is the case with remoaners too?
Thank you for this article today, Viv. Especially the last paragraph!
All three people I passed on the path across the park at the start of my evening walk barely paid even lip service to SD. One was a young man c.20, one was a man in his 30s, one was a woman in her 50s. No course diversion into the grass to avoid me (I was to one side) just passing me normally about 2 to 3 ft away. Sanity is prevailing slowly outside of the government.
Well MWT I would have detoured off the path. If they want to share all manner of viruses and bacteria let ’em. I’ve always objected to people invading my personal space. So I think you are wrong to talk of sanity prevailing. Bit like the guy delivering my meds this morning wanting to step close to me to put them inside my door, when there was a perfectly sensible option of putting them on top of the bin and stepping back for me to pick them up.
I wouldn’t call 2 to 3 ft invading my personal space just normal. Your immune system will get weakened if you hide from fellow humans. It’s our natural, powerful defence that will see off most viruses short of the Black Death and most bacteria and fungi so long as it is not compromised by extreme age, UHCs, immuno suppressants etc.
75 yrs with copd MWT. Yes I am ‘vulnerable’. I have always been long sighted too. Many of the intrusions into my personal space are by short sighted people. Now I regard 2ft as a bit too close for comfort. 3ft has always been o.k. and after all that is not far short of 2 meters.
Oh let’s stop quibbling.
Shutting down our economy is very worrying to all of us. Restrictions to our liberties is also very worrying.
Added to which, in my experience, some organisations have reacted in silly ways, if not actually self seeking, e.g. what my bank has done with the telephone banking service.
I got confused between feet, yards and meters! But anyway, I prefer to keep a distance and there are far more important things to worry about.
I generally get that feeling too – it’s almost like old-fashioned courtesy, stepping politely out of the way! More of it, I say!
You can tell the ‘others’ in the supermarkets, swathed in their masks, their eyes darting as if waiting for attack, flinching away as if from ye Blacke Deathe, with an expression (as far as can be made out) of stern, uncompromising virtue. It reminds me of the way sheep look – that strange mixture of arrogance and fear. (Not my words, but someone much cleverer than I.)
If you can find it – look up the incomparable Keith Waterhouse’s Q&A article on ”Ye Blacke Deathe”. Example:
Q: ”How do I knowe if I have ye Blacke Deathe?”
A: ”First ye turne blacke and then ye die-e”.
I don’t think Boris is going to stop illegal immigration either across the channel or from anywhere else, In fact if they can’t get here themselves, he’ll fly them here at our expense, COVID-19 or not.
“Boris Govt Makes Special Deal to Fly In Migrants from Greece Despite Pandemic”
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/05/11/boris-govt-makes-special-deal-fly-in-migrants-greece-despite-pandemic/
Meanwhile, increasingly, we indigenous Brits are getting discriminated against and attacked in our own country.
“Diane Abbott SLAMMED For Targeting White Brits”
https://youtu.be/aR0VkXk30-Q
I think we can forget about our government controlling immigration, it seems they can’t get enough of it, nothing will change until we take matters into our own hands.
It was already evident in the 1990s that the policy of government whether Tory or Labour was population replacement. At the time the media more or less banned discussion of it using the hoary old trick of saying that Enoch Powell’s speech made it unseemly. The people did not want to know. Everyone in the PTB expects to benefit. Far more recently Will Hutton said on television how wonderful it was to get imported nannies. Yeees. But always look on the bright side! With an ongoing slump there will be more pressure on the Government to make sure jobs go to Britons and the shining island in the sea may look less attractive to those from many other places. The worst hit economic sectors include hospitality which appears almost entirely staffed by foreigners in London anyway.