Don’t forget the wolves …
Let’s have a change from politics, just this once. Let’s talk about something that matters (or should matter) to everyone who lives in these islands. We’ve got a bit of a hoo-haa*) going on in the village at the moment, a campaign against a wildlife regeneration project. This must be something of a first: people usually campaign for Nature, not against it.
Just over the hill to the north of Coney Weston lies the remnants of Knettishall Heath, part of the heathland which in the 17th century ran from just north of Sapiston all the way to the Norfolk border. You can still trace our local settlement history in the way villages cluster around the edges of that heath, their agriculture reaching out into the more fertile clay banks left after the Ice Age by the huge Bytham river. That river created the landscape we know today, its foaming glacier run-off laying down skeins of clay, silt and sandbanks all along our valley.
Nowadays we grow irrigated wheat or forced carrots and asparagus on the sandy banks, but before the coming of plastic sheeting and electric pumps they were common land, only good enough for the peasants to use as rough grazing and to gather the gorse for their bread ovens. Then, with improvements in agriculture the land became too valuable to leave to the poor so it was enclosed, ploughed and improved until it became indistinguishable from the fields around it.
Iron Age man would have farmed those sandy heaths, burning down the encroaching trees and gorse and brambles, every few years setting fire to a different piece to create a patchwork of vegetation so his sheep and goats could flourish. And as the human population increased so did the numbers of livestock, growing until the pressure of grazing kept the heathlands almost entirely bare of trees and scrub. Nightjars nested among the heather, sand lizards flourished, woodlarks and skylarks took advantage of the edges of woodland and heath, with the mad-eyed stone curlew scampering on patches of bare and broken sandy ground. From the woodlands rooted in the clay around the edges came the predators, kestrels and merlin, owls and bats and buzzards, taking advantage of the open spaces. Rabbits nibbled the vegetation down to a thin carpet. That heathland landscape was never natural, but it was not exactly farmed either: it was gardened with love and care, nurtured to yield a sustainable contribution to the farming economy.
Then things changed, farming practices changed, populations changed. The cities grew and our countryside was neglected. First the sheep went, then the rabbits, then the smallholder with his fag-hooks and saws and flaming torches. Then we saw a neglected heathland landscape in the process of regeneration: first the brambles moved in; then on the light soil the birches; on any clay patches the sycamore sprang up in its millions, carpets of bright green seedlings battling each other to reach the light. In thirty years the grass and heather was confined to shrinking patches. No curlew, few nightjars, few lizards and larks. On the sand there were birch trees, some already rotting from the bracket fungus that kills them all in the end. On the clay lay gloomy carpets of smothering fallen sycamore leaves, the sycamore trees desperately trying to suppress the young oak trees which over hundreds of years would slowly replace them.
What of the future? Come back in five hundred years and you’d find a lot of oak trees in the mix, native trees that nourish and shelter a thousand species from owls to ichneumon wasps. In a thousand years there would be a few small-leaved lime among the dominant oaks and in five thousand years England will look like it did before the Iron Age: a lime forest. Unless you’d forgotten the wolves.
Among those great forests will be open patches, places where wind and fire and disease have temporarily halted the march of the trees. On those patches there will be pockets of different ecologies, grass or heath or fen. In those little pockets will be the rare animals and insects and birds that cannot survive under the canopy. England will house a rich flora and fauna but it will be squeezed into those temporary patches of open ground. There will be a lot of it overall, but compared to the forests it will be tiny.
Did I mention the wolves? You’ll need wolves because otherwise the deer will browse the forest to destruction, wreck the ecology, leave the soil bare and open to the winter rains so that it washes away, leaving the bedrock chalk bare and barren. We killed the last wolf in 1390. And before you started the experiment, did you manage to kill all the crayfish which are wiping out our fish? Did you kill the invasive weeds that threaten to choke our rivers, rotting in stinking masses that destroy all life? Did you cull the muntjacs which devour our rare native orchids?
To keep England productive and beautiful and to protect our wildlife we need gardeners, experts who understand how this patch of earth works. If we want to re-establish the ecology we live among, the ecology that mankind is part of: we can’t afford to forget the wolves or the crayfish or the invasive weeds. You can’t do this sort of thing on the fly or by gut feeling, you need to study, you need to be trained. We need, in short, experts. Be honest now, you had forgotten the wolves.
Which brings me to the hoo-haa.
Suffolk Wildlife Trust now runs Knettishall. In a few short years they’ve transformed the management. The big fences have gone except round the edges, with a network of footpaths established outside the heart of the heath, allowing dog walkers (some of them very reluctant to use a leash) to let their pets run where they won’t destroy the wildlife. Browsing ponies keep the seedling birches down. But this was not enough. Like a neglected garden the Heath needed weeding.
We’ve watched Knettishall degrade as heathland for over forty years, watched the birches spread like weeds, seen the pine plantation grow black and barren on the northern edge, seen hawthorn and blackthorn scrub take over the heather and pink-grassed open spaces. It was too far gone for natural methods to repair the damage on any reasonable timescale so in came the machines, chainsaws, JCBs, the heavy hand of civilisation brought in to address its own failings. The work is done now, great swathes of weed trees ground down to mulch, over-rich soil scraped back to reveal the impoverished sand and the seeds which need that sand to re-establish themselves. Exmoor ponies and the local deer can now keep the heath open, a haven for wildlife. Yes, it’s being gardened, but we have no choice if we want to preserve heathland and the wildlife that depends on it. It’s garden or let the weeds win.
Why the hoo-haa? Because people see something for the first time and think that that is how it should be. If you have only known the Heath for ten or twenty or thirty years, and if you haven’t studied at least a little ecology, naturally you can only see change from what you believe is the ‘natural’ state. You want to hold on to the situation now, forgetting that a landscape is dynamic, not static, and sometimes change has to be managed. “Now” is not necessarily the optimum, and in the case of the Heath “now” was so far from the optimum that drastic measures had to be taken. A landscape has a history and if we neglect that history then it is easy to make very destructive mistakes.
Adam was a gardener. That, if we want to share our lives on this over-crowded island with a rich mix of plants and wildlife, must be our profession too.
There is, however, a threat to Adam and all lovers of the countryside and the soil, a political threat. HMG has decreed that Norfolk and Suffolk take 250,000 dwellings by 2030. You can’t garden on concrete and asphalt.
~~~ *** ~~~
*) Hoo-haa Cambridge dictionary: an occasion when there is too much interest in or discussion about something that is not important.
I watched yesterday a video of Jordan Peterson being interviewed on the subject of Equality of Outcome. Having explained himself the interviewer turned to her other guest who cheerfully admitted to having the exact opposite opinion and vouchsafed she had contributed to the Blair equality legislation. She evinced no embarassement at being sat beside a scholar who had just eviscerated her philosophical position and appeared only delighted with herself and her importance and so I think I can predict that whatever you all hope to change in government policy on any subject at all you now know it ain’t about you, it’s about them.
Restricting new house builds to local need only still is UKIP’s policy. We have also pioneered the idea of local authority grants to renovate redundant houses for affordable rent, which a few far-sighted local councils are now taking on board (not that they’ll admit that it was our idea). But the elephant in the room which no-one at Westminster wants to talk about, is the number of new builds being bought up (sometimes off-plan before they even go on the market), by ‘buy to let’ speculators; who are often very rich people with large property portfolios living in overseas countries such as China and Russia. The UK property market is in effect being used as an internationally tradeable currency, one which gives very high returns. No other country in the world allows its housing market to be used in this way and nor should we.
ALL immigration needs to be halted. WE’RE FULL UP!
Wow Harry Again. For once you are right – immigration.
Harry Again……..do you know Harry old chap, this is the most sensible thing you have said. Keep it up……….
Indeed, 250,000 dwellings which are only needed because of it along with the trashing of our culture and country in so many other ways. Now the invader is outbreeding us and will take over all too soon unless we are rid of them. At the very least any further immigration by Muslims must cease.
Nobody much mentions the UN Global Compact for Migration which will open the floodgates. This will kick in soon presumably? A little Christmas present from TMay in 2018 I believe it was, a time bomb. The very opposite of what we need. And make the most of being still able to criticise it , you wontfotr much longer I predict
99% of the UK countryside is “artificial”. ie managed.
The few “natural” bits are like what they are due to soil and climate.
So, if you want “natural” you have to let let nature take it’scourse having first eliminated alien species.
it’shard to know what is alien and what is not.
eg We have had lots of “maiden” trees imported from Eastern Europe. ( Much cheaper than our own nurserymen) They have proved to be an ecological disaster plus lots of disease has been imported with them.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1311722/eu-news-brexit-news-tree-disease-xylella-fastidiosa-defra-imports
https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/trees-woods-and-wildlife/tree-pests-and-diseases/key-tree-pests-and-diseases/
The MP in Thetford is Ms Truss. She’s very keen on development. More houses, high land prices for farmers with a few hectares near town and villages. Our MP is a bit occupied with other thing at the moment (he’s Health Secretary) but like the rest of the Suffolk Cons he’s very quiet about housing development.
Things could be worse – we could be like Newmarket where the town desperately needs some more housing but the proposed site – near the A14 so good communications to shopping centres etc – is opposed because it might ruin the ambience of that raffish, rather seedy town.
Hapless Hancock rents a house from a local landowner related to a Master of the Queens Horse. Before the 2015 election a Newmarket stud owner donated £50,000 to the local Cons. Dido Harding is on the Jockey Club committee. We are ruled by horses.
If you need a starter home in Newmarket I suggest that you don’t hold your breath.
JF
John Redwood in his diary did a bit about a similar problem in Wokingham – a few months back. You may be able to find it scrolling back on his blog. I believe he did raise it in HoC. Who knows he may have caused some improvement to our wonderful government’s policy.
Good luck Julian.
Given that the UK population is expanding by the equivalent of one major city each year due to immigration, you can bet that we’ll be loosing a lot more heath land and much else besides, mass immigration means the destruction of our country as we’ve known it.
Good point about the wolves, few people realise just what engines of destruction deer are, most think of them as wide eyed Bambi’s of Walt Disney fame, they need culling but then again deer aren’t the current problem are they.
Oh but not the white Christian ones please.
It’s crazy to build 250,000 houses on virgin land when there are still lots of unloved wastelands and derelict houses in neglected towns and cities all over the country. We don’t more housing on green fields; we need a more dispersed population and urban regeneration.
More or less what I was thinking Anna.
Surely there are brown field sites in the ‘red wall constituencies’.
I know Knettishall well during my days of visiting old WW2 airfields in East Anglia. Formerly RAF Knettishall then taken over by USAAF which became Station 136. However going back to the article’s point, the preservation of our green and pleasant land and prevent the wholesale destruction of our precious green belt, is just another reason to get shot of this ruddy awful fake Conservative government that we have in power right now. They have put forward proposals to make it easier for developers to build houses wherever they like which will reduce the involvement of those who live local to these developments. And they have put forward proposals so that developers have an incentive to develop green sites over and above brown field sites, which should in fact be the other way round. All this feeds into one of the biggest problems facing this country at the moment and that is continued mass immigration, which the Conservatives have done diddly squat about since coming to power in 2010. The building of houses should be based solely upon local housing need, and most not to satisfy a government target, and they should be doing everything in their power to stem the cause of population growth which is mass immigration. Also the Conservatives have been reluctant to enforce Section 106 Town and Country Planning Act which was designed to force the developer to pay for infrastructure costs ie roads, school, doctor surgeries etc. Instead the ratepayer has to pick up the tab because they don’t want to put off the developer. This was a big UKIP policy at one time, which needs to be taken up by Reform UK. The government have never asked the indigenous population of this country whether they want mass immigration, want the social fabric of this country changed forever, or indeed whether they want their countryside and agricultural land built over to satisfy the whim of politicians who do not have the interests of the citizens of this country at heart. Johnson out………..
Well Julian, I think the Chilterns are the chalk hills you are talking about. Presumably Norfolk and Suffolk are east of the Watford Gap. (Don’t know what ’caused’ the Watford Gap but never mind.)
250,000 dwellings! I’m really sorry for you and angry too.
Surely there is a better ‘solution’ than that. A better place to build. That is if we really want to ‘plan’ i.e. IMPOSE ‘building MORE DWELLINGS’ onto our so called democracy.
A ‘very destructive mistake’ just about sums it up. Also ‘over crowded island’.
Rather than impose a planned solution, wouldn’t it be better to let matters take their own course – let free enterprise decide where to build. Or something like that anyway. I don’t pretend to have all the answers.
Colin’s comment made at 2.12pm seems very relevant. They have apparently encouraged building on green land. They have not enforced the law that developers pay for infrastructure. Etc. etc.etc.
I remember now it was something to do with Boris’ manifesto promises. Somehow I rather doubt that ‘keeping a promise to build houses’ will save him’.