They can’t wait to get electioneering!

 

On a soggy morning after a soggy night the ‘news’ in our glorious MSM this morning are equally soggy. Firstly, here’s the customary look at the printed front pages: “Newspaper headlines: Petrol car ban delay and Starmer ‘to reject EU plan’.“ (link). It’s only ‘iNews’ which went with the EU theme. BBC staff provides us with a handysummary:

“The i says Sir Keir is set to rule out any bid for the UK to join a revamped EU. A plan has emerged from France and Germany for four tiers of integration, including associate membership for some nations, which could include the UK. But the paper says Sir Keir will reject that, partly because of the electoral danger of appearing to revert to type as anti-Brexit.” (link)

Keep note of the dropped clanger, that this Starmer ‘plan’ was meant as a blatant piece of electioneering – something arch-remainers will hope we will have forgotten next year.

However, I wonder why all those former Brussels ‘correspondents’ who warbled about Starmer’s plans for ‘making Brexit work’ and his visit to Macron didn’t mention this EU ‘plan’. It surely cannot have been a deep state secret until this Macron visit where that particular cat was apparently let out of the bag! It was sweetened with a ringing, or rather: clanging endorsement by Macron, as the DT reports:

“Emmanuel Macron believes Sir Keir Starmer has the “moral authority” to be prime minister, a senior French source familiar with the pair’s private meeting in Paris on Tuesday has told The Telegraph. The French president was impressed that the Labour leader did not make demands on issues such as Brexit or migration during the rare meeting of a national leader with the head of a foreign nation’s political opposition.” (paywalled link)

That ‘endorsement’ will surely make former Red Wall voters stream back to Labour! But there’s more – keep this for the record (my emphasis):

“Mr Macron’s comments came as French and German ministers unveiled a proposal for the UK to take up “associate membership” of the European Union. Under the plans for a four-tier EU, the UK would return to the single market, contribute to the bloc’s budget and be governed by the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg.” (paywalled link)

And when were Starmer’s ‘election gurus’ going to tell us that we’d have to pay for his attempt to become PM by ‘contributing to the EU budget’?  Meanwhile, there’s another nice little scandal brewing in the Labour Party:

“Diane Abbott accuses Keir Starmer of trying to end her parliamentary career – Left-wing MP posts social media statement in which she says she ‘will not get a fair hearing’ over anti-Semitism allegations.” (paywalled link)

My heart bleeds … not! Surely, after 36 years in the HoC it’s time for her to retire and make place for ‘Youth’? She is, after all, one of the despised ‘boomer generation’, a generation which, according to the combined wisdom of MSM and political pundits, ought to hang their head in shame and creep out of politics a.s.a.p.

The other piece of electioneering news comes from the PM. After all, it’s not as if some of the gentlefolk on the opposite side of the green benches have forgotten about the pending GE. Sunak is proposing to ‘slash Net Zero’ policies – here’s the DM’s headline summarising it:

“Rishi’s bonfire of costly green pledges: ‘Pragmatic’ PM Sunak to DITCH the 2030 ban on new petrol and diesel cars and slow the phasing out of gas boilers – but still plans to hit Net Zero by 2050 – In a dramatic policy shift, Sunak could also slow the plashing out of gas boilers “ (link)

Well, that sounds nice but I’ll believe it when I see it! However, The Times, in a bid to look non-partisan, has apparently spoken to some Green Tory MPs:

“The plans were criticised by some Conservative MPs last night. They said that “resiling” from green pledges could cost the party at the next election.” (link, paywalled)

How tone-deaf are these particular Tory MPs! As tone-deaf as Starmer ‘advisers’ still trying to shoehorn a Remain policy into their election programme …

I leave you with one piece about yon Brand affair. The collective of ‘comedians-turned-politicians’ have had their outcry, warning us about not prejudging, that everyone is innocent until proven guilty and wailing how horrible youtube is to ‘demonetarise’ poor Russell – something they never take notice of when it happens to others. There’s a piece in Unherd however which took the proverbial biscuit for outrageous exculpation. If you must, you can read it under the headline “The Noughties enabled Russell Brand – In a culture of viciousness, he was adored” (link).

I’ll only point out that the Noughties were the decade of an untrammelled Labour government where the foundations were laid for all the ills we’re now plagued with. Do we want a repeat performance of that vicious decade or will a ‘moral’ Starmer disallow it? Hm ….

That’s all I have for today. Perhaps someone should ask Ms Diane A. about her comment to yon Brand affaire … Have a good day.