Enjoying a beautiful day …
The obligatory look at the print editions’ front pages provides us with an insight into how the papers’ chief editors view their ‘audience’: “Newspaper headlines: ‘Braverman pushes PM’ and ‘brothers in arms'” (link): the posh and/or more intellectual readers of the broadsheets are meant to worry about being racists and thus disagree with Ms Braverman’s and the Tories’ “immigration” bill. There’s no real difference between ‘right’ and ‘left’. The red tops are divided between ‘left’ and ‘right’, with the lefties going for a heartwarming story about some marathon runner, the righties screaming about Starmer’s proposal to tinker with election laws.
At the time of writing, Remain Central is leading their online edition with a truly ra-ra report on Ms Braverman. Under the incendiary headline “Britons will forget how to work, says Suella Braverman” (link, paywalled) we read (all emphases are mine):
“The government must reduce immigration before the next election because Britain has become too “dependent” on foreign labour, Suella Braverman will say in a warning shot to cabinet colleagues blocking proposals to reduce numbers. In a speech on Monday, the home secretary will say there is “no good reason” why British workers cannot be trained to fill shortages in sectors such as lorry drivers and butchers. She will warn that Britain risks “forgetting how to do things for ourselves” if net annual migration remains at hundreds of thousands.” (link,paywalled)
This, right there, means that mass immigration creates what can only be described as ‘institutionalised helplessness’. How else can one describe it when Ms Braverman says that “we” risk forgetting how to do things for ourselves. Me, I’d rather say that our reliance on migrant workers, for decades, has made us helpless.
Moreover, Ms Braverman’s description doesn’t address the decades-long addiction of Brits to living on bennies and thus doesn’t address the ‘reason’ certain politicians and industrialists give for the ‘need’ to ‘import labour’. After all, haven’t we been told that “we” need all those migrants to do the work Brits won’t do or are too unqualified to do?
Furthermore, isn’t the underlying ‘reason’ for mass immigration our wonderful system of bennies which apparently cannot be touched, or can only be attacked when it applies to OAPs? Shouldn’t the migrants coming here for years have provided us with some of those ‘qualified’ workers by now?
When will ministers and politicians stop telling us that all those migrants are providing us with services we need and are contributing to the GDP rather than inflicting costs on the budget? Where are reports about the true cost of this mass migration, about the lack of infrastructure from schools to medical services to housing?
I am so sick of the ongoing refusal of the Westminster clique, MSM editors included, to actually address this ever increasing problem. I am so sick of the prevailing MSM and Westminster attitude of crying ‘racist’ whenever someone tries to look at this problem dispassionately.
Furthermore, I recall their snobbish attitude towards those ‘imported’ workers when they actually work. I’ll never forget the wail of a well-dressed ‘lady’ in a BBC audience about Brexit who meaningly asked who’d serve her at ‘Pret’ if EU workers – cheap workers, you understand – were prevented from coming here.
I leave you with a wonderful contradiction regarding the ‘cost-of-living’ crisis. The National Farmers’ Union warned that higher food prices ‘are here to stay’, because of high prices for gas caused by yon war (link, paywalled) while right next to that article there’s a report on Mr Grant Shapps claiming that “Energy bills should fall within six weeks”:
“The energy secretary acknowledged that while wholesale prices were returning to “normal” levels, households had yet to see that reflected in their bills. Shapps said households should start to see the fall in wholesale prices affect their bills this summer.” (link, paywalled).
Well, I believe that when I see it! However, let me draw your attention to the play with numbers – see this:
“The government has been spending billions of pounds on an energy price guarantee that caps the typical bill at £2,500 a year, but falling energy prices have led to predictions that Ofgem’s price cap — at present £3,280 — will fall to about £2,000 from July.” (link, paywalled)
Why is the wholesale price per therm, now at 76p, not reducing the bills to where they were two years ago? Where’s Labour demanding the Big Gas companies reduce their bills in order to benefit ‘the poor, hardworking families’?
Have the mighty minds in the Treasury calculated that it’s cheaper for the Exchequer to hand out some bennies for ‘poor households’ rather than demand the government twist some arms in order to make those handouts unnecessary, because they ‘earn’ VAT on those high energy prices? After all, one doesn’t even need a calculator to appreciate that VAT on a low price is less than VAT on a high price …
That’s all I have for today. The ‘news’ presented to us this morning are as disappointing as always. However, it’s a beautiful morning in my neck of the woods, cheering me up no end. I hope it’s the same for you. Have a good day.
One obvious first step would be to mae sure that working age people who were living on benefits were paid less than the minimum wage.- much less.
Steven Woolfe, now the Director of the Centre for Migration & Economic Prosperity, gave these figures on GBN recently:
504,000 legal migration applications were accepted in year to June 2022.
20,605 were rejected but only 21 (not a typo – twenty one) have been deported.
105,000 have bypassed the system entirely, under direct settlement provision from places like Hong Kong.
500,000 (approx.) students have brought 136,000 dependents; who knew this was even a thing? Isn’t University where you get away from your family?
260,000 legal workers have brought 150,000 dependents.
Oh, and there’s the channel (not including the backs of lorries): 59,000 and rising.
That is well over 1.5m in total.
He gave no provenance for any, but my guess is that they are all well below true rates.
So, bad as the Dinghy Deluge is, it so small compared with the flood through every other avenue that a cynic might think focussing on it is deliberate misdirection. Or as we know it: Squirrels.
He added that England is now the most densely populated country in Europe, having overtaken the Netherlands, which itself is evicting farmers to build mass housing. Anyone would think there was a plan here.
All this immigration stuff.
I see a mtg with Maharaja Ritchie and the Tramp Zolonski is going on today.
I guess the discussion is about augmenting free aid (of whatever is left) of GB military equipment, which of course we don’t have the money to replace.
Perhaps there could be a win-win here. We provide Ukraine with military age men to help them fight the Russians. Ukraine gets an army and GB deports a couple of million illegals. What’s not to like?
The adverse effects of rapid immigration have been known for years – by all of us who see and suffer its effects. But our elites, the Treasury in particular, have disregarded them in pursuit of macro-economic goals and have created a ponzi scheme which they cannot get out of. For example, universities are completely dependent on the income from foreign students and so the right to bring dependents is part of incentivising them to come here. Braverman’s attempt to limit the stay of foreign students and their dependents has been overruled by Hunt and Keegan to prevent, I suspect, the calamity of universities going bankrupt. The news is dressed up differently and covered with a sticking plaster of a concession on master’s degree students getting a slightly reduced concession over dependents. This is an example of the elite’s view that a cure would be worse than the disease. Worse for whom though? Media studies lecturers obviously as their employers go under but the Treasury et al fear what would happen if the number of university places, which absorb around 50% of school leavers, was suddenly reduced by dozens of insolvent universities.
The UK economy is a collection of ponzi scheme all of which have unpalatable solutions and our elites are probably genuinely out of their depth now. The only certainty in all this is that the various captains will not go down with the ship; they’ll be the first into the lifeboats. Only if we below decks mutiny can this be changed but that requires leadership of which, alas, there is none.
Maybe there is a leader out there but they look at the lethargy and obsequious servility of the majority of the indigenous British people and think they would be flogging a dead horse trying to rouse them into action.
Jake……somehow I doubt it. There is not one politician out there that I take seriously now. Not even Nigel Farage who just goes through the motions on a Radio/TV Channel whose viewing figures are near rock bottom. Looks like I will will be spoiling ballot papers on a regular basis like I did at the local elections a weeks or so ago. No party and no politician is worthy of my vote. And as for Suella Braverman today talking at a Conservative Party meeting of controlling immigration, well that is just laughable. After 13 years of government the unconservative Conservative Party has done bugger all about that, and pretty much everything else of any importance. She like Farage is just playing to a select and limited audience, whilst the rest of us, what they say just goes over our heads and no longer registers. It is just one big whatever…..
The Tories have ‘cunning plan’.
“Britons will forget how to work, says Suella Braverman” !
What absolute bollocks from an individual who has possibly never done an honest day’s work in her life.
Historical Annual Inflation Rates from 1956
https://www.inflationtool.com/rates/uk
Looking at the last ‘big’ inflation at end of the 1970s – Lady Thatcher took several years to get it down – see for yourself. And she took the unpopular steps to fix it – cant see that happening today / tomorrow.
One has to be delusional to believe our current left wing / Labour(?) Party can fix it before the election next year.