Part 1 was published here yesterday
Driving into town this week was, for the most part, quite pleasant. The town seemed to be quietly recovering from the virus restrictions and people were once again walking around in pairs or small groups, often walking the dog too.
St Mary on the Wold benefits from being within 20 miles of three what were once ‘market towns’ but are now anything but. Local industry has almost died out and no one can seem to remember when the last cattle market was held, but nevertheless we convince ourselves that the towns, like the air conditioned view from our cars, are just as we would like to think they are. The reality is somewhat different. Decades of neglect of the infrastructure, coupled with the decline in industry and local jobs and the never-ending demand for more ‘executive style detached’ homes built in their hundreds to accommodate the flight from the cities, has led to overcrowded roads, poor maintenance and severely strained public services.
While all in the garden was lovely and the weather tranquil this was fine. People either overlooked, or more likely refused to notice, that much of the town centre was decaying, dirty and tired, with people for whatever reason often aggressively begging and sleeping on the streets, that due to high rents and associated business costs, large retail and often well-established family stores were closing. “It’s the internet,” people said. “High Streets are a thing of the past, we are a service industry economy now, we need to attract ‘high quality’ leisure accommodation and desirable leisure activities.” And so it went on, anyone suggesting that selling, by so many outlets, expensive coffee and scones to hundreds of thousands of international visitors may cause problems had their objections overruled. “The visitors are never going to stop coming here, we are the jewel in the tourism crown,” except of course they did stop coming and the jewel turned out to be paste.
There have been several seismic events this century (how strange it seems to be writing that, how time flies when you are enjoying yourself). 9/11 was commemorated this week and in years to come, as far as the UK is concerned, 23/3/20 will be another one. Scared witless by a combination of ‘expert’ predictions that many at the time suggested might be flawed, and the combined might of the MSM wanting to put pressure on Boris, the whole country got behind another brilliant marketing slogan ‘Save the NHS’. So England, at least, came to an emergency stop. Not since their driving test had so many people stopped so quickly on the command of one person. It must be said that while most people were behind the decision, not all were happy with the restrictions, the methodology or the reasons behind it. But hey ‘deniers’, as they were soon called by the press, this is only temporary and hasn’t Dishi Rishi told you that all is well and the government has your backs? What they meant was the chosen, including public servants and teachers were being well looked after, and all the debts of the NHS written off while unnoticed small businesses and many self-employed enjoyed few if any benefits as they worried about redundancy or financial disaster.
Services and companies started to fall apart as, conditioned by expert marketing, the country – well most of it – accepted the restrictions, watched in anguish as older people died and countless others of whatever age suddenly found their treatment postponed or cancelled. Business owners counted the escalating cost as their livelihoods disappeared. None of this is new of course, a walk through our town today shows struggling retailers, small and large shops, closed never to re-open. The hospitality sector which was showing, as Norman Lamont (resurrected in the media this week) once said, the green shoots of recovery, has suddenly this week been hit by a ‘double whammy’ and another ‘black swan’ event of more restrictions.
“The ‘R’ factor is going up,” screamed the headlines. Local ‘lockdowns’ competed in the media with the mask controversy, social distancing, heavy handed or non-existent policing of supposedly illegal events, ‘we want action, we want action’ write and shout the pundits, all experts on psychology, immunisation, virology, statistics and public health issues, all with all the answers from the safety of the office at home, the TV or radio studio.
“What are you going to do Boris?” was the unheard question with various ministers and scientists popping up in the media trying to get the attention of a public, 52% of whom according to one poll is so terrified by the lack of clarity and doubt planted in their minds by the media that the virus health and safety is their main concern. “For goodness sake ‘nanny’ please save us. Tell us what to do.” And so they have. Apparently after a decisive and bad-tempered exchange and yet again media-driven panic, a new raft of restrictions has been ordained. In Birmingham, England’s second city, the dictat came, not as you would have expected by Secretary of State Matt Hancock, but read out by the Mayor of Birmingham. In earlier times the Mayor would have read out the ‘act’ flanked by the Chief Constable and other notable figures, if the amount of anger brewing in many communities over these latest restrictions and fear-mongering by the media continues, that may well be a sight we will see again, particularly in Birmingham as this now affects 1.7 million people who from Tuesday, for some reason, will not be able among other things to associate or visit neighbours.
As I write there are sensational headlines of ‘England on the brink’, ‘the virus is spreading’ and England – note not the United Kingdom – is losing control. The Prime Minister is now talking about a carrot and stick approach to enforcement as it slowly seems to be dawning on the political bubble that they are indeed in danger of losing control and not only of the virus. Covid marshals without any power to enforce anything are to be introduced on the streets, recruited and paid for by local government on salary plus expenses of £31,000 a year, the very local government that Grant Shapps was complaining about earlier this month which has already misused and wasted thousands on Covid traffic and safety schemes which in many places are now abandoned.
You could not make it up, or the fact that Boris is considering not only a curfew but starting a national snitch line for people to report their neighbours for what they see as infringements, presumably the schools will encourage children to do the same, there are historical precedents as many eastern Europeans will tell you.
It’s amazing how far this media styled modern-day Churchill wants more and more enforcement for our own health and safety, as long as somebody else takes responsibility. As an admirer of Churchill is this where his authoritarian streak comes from? Did he get the idea from a Churchill speech prior to the first post war election, when he warned that socialists will always need some kind of ‘gestapo’ to keep order? The way things are going that could prove to be a prescient warning from the past.
Boris needs to heed, in my view, that eventually the public will demand accountability for not only the draconian attack on civil liberties but the coming economic devastation caused in part by a government that looks indecisive and incompetent, and compared to other countries despite all the talk about British soft power and influence, the handling of the virus emergency, the failure of policing, not to mention the testing and the world beating NHS track and trace system failures, has shown to the world at large that we are no longer as good or as competent as both they and we have been told we were.
Nothing has changed since the end of Feb..at that time.:-
We knew everyone was going to get it ( Like flu ) sooner or later ( in the world ). The vaccine belief is ridiculous.
All we get from news, rulers,etc is crap.
We are now about a third of the way through , and we have already lost huge amounts of firesale value. We have lost ( Thrown away ) The family silver.. Much of the worlds regard is dissipated.
Our leaders still do not, or cannot , understand. Everyone is going to get it . Or Be exposed and not get it . Death? It’s an oldies monopoly. Inconvenience? That’s life.As for threat to the normal age working population. . In the 20th century we just survived meazles in bed with the curtains drawn. etc. . ( 99.99 % survived ) No difference.
I’m tired and I’m going back to bed The rest of what I was going to say is obvious anyway now.
Yes hindsight is a jolly fine thing.
We won’t be able to judge how well the covid situation has been handled for another five years at least.
It’s just Boris’ bad luck to get a triple whammy, Brexit, covid and a dodgy economic situation.
It’s bound to end badly, but in my view, whatever the governments actions, we are looking at a depression when the furlough ends.
People need to get back to their offices, working from home is a bad idea, it engenders evil precedents. After all, if you can work from home for £30,000/year, someone from India will eagerly do the same job for £5,000. Or less.
The shopkeepers jobs have disappeared, so can virtually any one else’s.
Only the brickie, carpenter, plumber and electrician are safe.
For now anyway. This is the career you want to put your kids into, university is a stupid idea.
This why the establishment is so hell fire bent on broadband everywhere, so they can export your job, not so you can play video games.
We are witnessing the deliberate destruction of the UK economy.
If Johnson delivers a clean Brexit via no-deal and no payments to the EU (apart from pension obligations) then I will be reasonably happy and can forgive his Corona shambles. After that, he can be thrown under a bus for all I care.
Yet even pension payments are not necessary. The EU only are really responsible for EU pensions, not us and in previous years the EU deducted up to 13.75% of EU employees salaries into an EU Pension Fund to provide for them.
That fund is soon (or maybe has been by now) to be disbanded and all new pensions will be funded as ‘non-contributory’ ie: from EU and our UK citizens taxes instead. Recent MEPs elected have had a choice to move over to that scheme for some years and the UK has not asked for any of that EU Pension Fund back, to help with future pension payments agreed by the UK estimated to carry on into the 2060s.
We were told it was the ‘moral’ thing to do, but it is not often mentioned that we are not only agreeing to fund the pensions of UK EU employees and UK MEPs, approx. 7% of all EU employees and EU MEPs, but will fund an average amount of the pension bill as we pay it now, based on an average of what we have contributed annually in the last few years of our membership and contributions. This average was expected to be about 25% of all EU pensions, when I last read about it.
I wonder if this will be adjusted when other countries join, or whether anyone has thought to ask?
That said I agree that getting as clean a Brexit as possible has to be our priority. If only Boris s would/could go for WTO and no payments still, it is after all what we voted for in the referendum before soft Brexits and WAs were inserted into the delay tactics. If Boris wants to be loved and remembered well, perhaps it isn’t too late…if so please consider it Boris.
There are 3.8 million WASPI and Backto60 women who would appreciate coming before EU bureaucrats and MEPs and also everyone else in the UK now looking at having both reduced and later pensions.
Jane. We WASPIs are hoping that the judicial review ruling appeal judgement to be announced at 1030 tomorrow will be in our favour. The UK state pension is one of the lowest in the developed world…but it is the only source of income for many.Thousands of us never had equality in the work place but our state pension age has been raised without adequate notice or time to make alternative arrangements. My former MP, the flip flopping Sarah Wollaston, toed the party line to vote for an increase in age of its receipt justifying that action by stating, ‘There is no money’. The DWP maladministration and incompetence in telling us was appalling. I am hopping mad that there could be money for the EU staff to retire in luxury but men and women in the UK have to work until 66 for their pathetic dues.
Ceri. Yes my pension date was moved twice and that 2nd 18 months extension almost upsets me more than the first 4+ years although both are despicable and because of my circumstances, illness and private income insurance running out at 60 because I didn’t know the date had changed, affected me greatly. But somehow with the 2nd one they decided to add on another 18 months delay for only a 1 years pension age increase from 65 to 66, which has no logic at all.
When I last looked the EU lot get their pensions from 62, or sooner if they want.
It is now just gone 12 but radio hasn’t mentioned the judgement yet I’ll look it up, in some ways not knowing though leaves hope!. It has occurred to me lately that there is an argument for hordes of WASPI age women to travel to France and get on boats claiming asylum, if only for the publicity value. They could add a few years to their ages too, instead of deducting them, if dishonest enough to do so (I’m not suggesting anything!) and all suddenly be 68 plus ie: retirement age immediately!
Plus then have the possibility of four star hotels, meals, heating, pocket money and no need for tv licenses too!
Do you read John Ward’s ‘The Slog’ online, he has been writing about the WASPI age pension age changes for some time fighting on our behalf?
There are also online several HofL’s speeches relating to when the government went back on the changes to the SERPs spouses pensions in 1995’ish too, without giving sufficient notice, which speak out about out the maladministration and bad systems, computers etc. at that time and how those changes were overturned. Those speaking I think in 2001 state that nothing like that would happen again, I wonder why more was not made of this ‘promise’ in our case. I won’t provide links, as presumably they need to be checked on here before adding my comment if I do, but both should be able to be found by searching online. Best wishes for your situation.
Jane. I should have made clear that I only meant Britain’s obligations for our EU diplomats, clerical and MEPs not other EU pensions
Thank you Jake and I assumed that was the case. I just didn’t know if you knew how many pensions we were agreeing to and as it has not been widely publicised, I saw mentioning it as a way to get that better known. I hadn’t even planned to make it a WASPI issue, until I got to the end and it seemed relevant that pensions here should come first.
Yes Jake Bennett. That is about right. We need a ‘clean’ Brexit. We also need to be able to ‘Defend the Realm’ (primarily from the EU).
Tackling immigration – come on in Nigel – can come after.