Plymouth

 

I suppose it was inevitable: the mass shooting in Plymouth is the main news. At the moment there are only tentative attempts to look for culprits other than the murderer but some MSM reports raise some unintended questions relating to the police, our gun-licensing system and to the anti-social media.

We’re told that the murderer had his licence revoked in December last year and reinstated last month. How was that possible? Well, the Police Watchdog, the IOPC, is investigating but the first ‘explanations’ are already coming to light:

“[The shotgun] was legally owned but the licence had been revoked in December, following an allegation of assault two months earlier. The police’s decision to return the licence and weapon last month will be the subject of an IOPC inquiry.” (link, paywalled)

Before we look at this in more detail, here are some numbers to provide a perspective which inevitably raises more questions, not least about keeping things in perspective. We find that:

“As of September 2020, the force has 3,273 police officers, 323 special constables, 206 police community support officers(PCSO), 915 police support volunteers (PSV), and 2,167 staff.” (link)

Yes, it’s a large area and yes, forces are stretched and yes, “we” must save money which is needed elsewhere, for example looking after and housing all those illegal migrants, mustn’t we. Now see these other numbers and marvel:

“There are around 1.4 million licensed shotguns in England and Wales, and 546,000 shotgun licence holders. The fee for a five-year licence is £80 – £16 per year. This is not the true cost because the fee is subsidised by the taxpayer.” (paywalled link)

Remind me – how many people are currently living in the UK, officially? Are 546,000 licence holders too huge a number for the UK police forces to handle? Here’s more:

“A senior police source said firearms licence departments were stretched in their ability to check on owners, especially in a force area like Devon and Cornwall with a huge number of shotguns, let alone rifles and glocks. “The resources are not there to regularly and proactively visit every single firearms licence holder. There are simply not enough staff to do that because of the sheer number of licences,” he said.” (paywalled link)

No indeed – staff is stretched and they cannot possibly visit ‘regularly and proactively’ every licence holder, not when, according to a report in a local paper from 2018, there were “In total, 11,224 valid firearm licences in Devon and Cornwall covered an average of 3.2 guns each.” (link). I assume it’s one licence per gun, so that would reduce the number of licence holders to about 4,000 – correct me if I’m wrong. That looks a bit more manageable.

Why though was it possible for the Devon and Cornwall Police to revoke that licence in December and reinstate it last month, given their stretched resources? What had changed? Why did the murderer get that licence in the first place – he was only 22 years old and did not live on a farm? Firstly, see this:

“Jake Davison, 22, killed his mother and four members of the public before turning the gun on himself in Plymouth days after relatives appealed to mental health services for help, it was claimed.” (link, paywalled)

I’ll just note that relatives appealed in vain to mental health services – a service stretched to bursting point before covid and now practically inaccessible. I’ll also note that there have been many mass murderers going on a ‘killing spree’ who were reported to have mental health issues. We were always told that ‘the system’ was ‘unable to cope’.

‘Modern mental health care’ now takes place in ‘the community’ as the big mental health hospitals were closed – see e.g. here. There are always calls for more money for those mental health community services. Who runs them? The good old NHS … ! There’s more, and grim as this issue is one really must ask if the authorities are actually living in the real world when we read:

“[…] it emerged that Davison’s shotgun certificate and a shotgun were returned to him in early July. They had been removed by police in December following an assault allegation made two months earlier. He is believed to have escaped charges and gone on an anger management course.” (link, paywalled)

No charges and an ‘anger management course’, was it? So it wasn’t about ‘mental health’ but about assault allegations, was it? We’re not yet told who decided that the murderer was ‘safe’ and that his licence and gun could be returned. However, we should ask who runs such ‘anger management course’ and how good and effective they really are. Of course it would be utterly inappropriate to wonder if such courses actually do what it says on the tin or if they’re just a box-ticking exercise by the authorities needing to show that they’re ‘doing something’. 

But wait – there’s another entity which is ‘doing something’, pointing fingers at the antisocial media. We’re told that the murderer was a ‘woman-hating misogynist’, an ‘Incel’, and that:

“Members of the “involuntary celibate” movement, young men who are hostile to women because they are unable to attract them sexually, flocked to Davison’s YouTube channel before it was removed yesterday. The Centre for Countering Digital Hate warned his videos had been used as a “rallying point” for incel extremists and the shooting would help galvanise their movement.” (link, paywalled)

Who or what is this ‘Centre for Countering Digital Hate’? Here’s the wiki entry – yes, I know: ‘wiki’, ain’t that trustworthy, but I didn’t want to go to their official site and be ‘counted’. The entry makes astonishing reading indeed – do have a look and note especially this: “The CCDH has targeted neo-Nazis and anti-vaccine advocates”. That would be a wide-enough field, given the incessant propaganda against those horrible anti-vaxxers.

Now they’ve jumped on the ‘misogynist’ bandwagon. What the CCDH  chief executive, Imran Ahmed, has to say in his opinion piece in the Times is quite astonishing:

“The technology that turns lonely men into misogynistic radicals is the social media algorithm, which itself is the result of Big Tech’s overriding commitment to deeper engagement, regardless of the cost. […] This unofficial mantra has shaped the online architecture we find all around us. It helped forge a familiar path that begins with teenagers engaging with hateful content on social media, and increasingly ends with violence and murder.” (link, paywalled)

Ah! So it’s about removing ‘hateful content’, with a self-appointed watchdog, affiliated with Labour, determining what is and isn’t ‘hateful’. But – where are the CCDH’s campaigns against ‘hate’ directed at e.g. ‘transphobes’? Where are their campaigns to stop the campaigns to encourage children to become ‘trans’, with all the medical horrors that implies? Where are their campaigns against pornography, especially that involving children? Isn’t that hateful? Where are their campaigns to remove content propagating islamic terrorism from social media? Are only ‘neo-nazis’ as defined by the Left, are only ‘antivaxxers’ and now ‘misogynists’ the ‘enemy of the people’? 

Btw – isn’t it wonderful that neither this latest, self-appointed watchdog nor the MSM and indeed the police are mentioning the state of our country, or the mental health and other health services, all broken now thanks to covid? Perhaps it’s uncouth of me to ask … but I do wish to know how this anger management course was run during lockdown – after all, this is how the murderer got his licence and shotgun back. 

And surely, we should ask why it is that the authorities do not trust us one inch – ‘proactively and regularly checking of firearms licence holders’, remember? – but seem to trust their own, i.e. those who run ‘anger management courses’ and tick the proper boxes. Something is very wrong in our country.

 

KBO!

 

Photo by Lawrie Cate