Obfuscating by claiming ‘transparency’ – according to Hancock

 

Hancock, as expected, took to the airwaves yesterday to defend himself against Cummings’ accusation of having lied about testing all elderly patients before they were being discharged from NHS hospitals during the first lockdown last year. It is an incontrovertible fact that these patients, sent back to care homes, died in huge numbers. BJ, allegedly, was outraged when he learned about this. He was at that time in hospital himself.

Hancock’s first ‘refutation’ was in a statement to the HoGhosts. He told the handful of MPs present that it was all untrue and then said: “Every day since I began working on the response to the pandemic I have got up each morning and asked, ‘What must I do to protect life?’, then telling the MPs that “We followed the clinical advice on the appropriate way forward” (paywalled link). There it is again: a covid emperor hiding behind ‘science’, so this and anything else cannot possibly have been his fault.

As an example of unmitigated self-serving twaddle it is without compare. It got worse in his press conference later that afternoon:

“Matt Hancock yesterday admitted that it “wasn’t possible” to test elderly hospital patients discharged into care homes for coronavirus as he sought to defend himself against allegations that he lied. […] Hancock said that his “recollection” of events differed from Cummings’s and said he only promised colleagues that he would “build testing capacity” so all patients could be tested. […] “Because we didn’t have the testing capacity at the start of the pandemic, it wasn’t possible. What I am very proud of is we built that testing capacity, but it took time.” (link, paywalled)

What beautiful example of weaselling out: ‘I only promised’, ‘I didn’t mean it because I couldn’t have meant it’. So Hancock is pure as the driven snow especially since he did what he did to ‘protect life’.  It is insufferable that the Westminster Blob, this cabal of politicians, civil serpents and MSM, are turning their lockdown decisions into yet another political game of finger-pointing and self-serving declarations of ‘it wasn’t me, guv’.

Moreover, the statement of yet another ‘health’ figurehead shows the direction which any inquiry will take. If there’s someone to blame it will be us, the people. Government and NHS are innocent:

“At the same press conference, Dr Jenny Harries, chief executive of UK Health Security Agency, suggested that outbreaks in care homes could be more to do with staff spreading the virus than hospital discharges. She said: “If you look at the death rates, and bearing in mind the evidence we found from the fact that the discharge from hospitals was actually a very, very tiny proportional cause of cases, what has had a huge impact is the testing, the regular testing of staff and residents.” (paywalled link)

Yes, well – didn’t Hancock just say that there weren’t any tests yet at that time? It is, after all, his ‘defence’. Here’s what he said to the MSM:

“In fact, one of the critical things we did was set the 100,000 target back then to make sure we built that testing capacity and it was very effective in doing so. And then we were able to introduce the policy of testing everybody before going into care homes, but we could only do that once we had the testing capacity which I had to build, because we didn’t have it in this country from the start. We started with a capacity of less than 2,000 in March last year and got to 100,000 tests a day. And we set all of this out at the time in public documents. It’s all a matter of public record.’ (link)

When did “we” get to ‘100,000 tests a day’? Don’t expect to get an answer – not from the covid government, not from the MSM where nobody seems to be able to investigate this ‘public record’ because we’re now in the accustomed territory of ‘Cummings – bad’ so nothing he said should be believed.

Next, here’s how BJ went to help his covid co-emperor. Warning: put your mug or cup or glass down before reading what BJ told the press when visiting a Colchester Hospital yesterday:

“[Johnson] said the situation in care homes – where more than 40,000 deaths were linked to Covid – was ‘tragic’, but added: ‘We did everything we could to protect the NHS and to protect care homes as well. I think it’s important for us to focus on what really matters to the people of this country. […] What people want us to get on with is delivering the road map and trying – cautiously – to take our country forward through what has been one of the most difficult periods that I think anybody can remember.’ (link)

Oh – it was ‘a tragedy’, was it? But let’s please not talk about it because “we” all want to get to that promised Freedom Day! Something is a tragedy when it’s unavoidable. I think this ‘tragedy’ was eminently avoidable, not just because some twerp promised something he knew couldn’t be delivered – those 100,000 tests – but because the whole covid government was blinded by the SAGE models and the fear driving Cummings to demand that everything be locked down. 

Note the hint by BJ that Freedom Day on June 21st might not happen. It’s the same play with numbers we’ve become so used to. This time it’s that Indian variant, albeit there’s a shamefaced statement that hospital numbers remain flat and an admission by Ms Harries, that ‘health chief’ helping Hancock yesterday, that this rise might be due to more testing and isn’t translating into more hospitalisations and deaths (link, paywalled).

This doesn’t matter, not when Hancock went into his ‘protecting life’ mode, telling the MSM that:

“it was too early now to say… whether we can take the full step four on June 21″, but stressed that he was “desperately” keen to do so if it is safe. “We will make a formal assessment ahead of June 14 as to what step we can take on the 21st, and in that we will be both driven by the data, we will be advised on and guided by the science, and we will be fully transparent both with this House and with the public in those decisions,” (paywalled link)

I wonder if the muzzle- wearing mice who’ve already booked their summer holidays, will rise up in anger when their dreams are thwarted again by the covid emperors who will again take ‘advice’ from and be ‘guided by the science’. I’m not holding my breath though.

We can make an educated guess as to where this is going when we see that the arch modeller, proven wrong so many times, is back in business:

“Prof Neil Ferguson […] warned that the Indian variant was now “the dominant strain” in the UK and said full reopening on June 21 hangs in the balance”.” (paywalled link)

How very predictable! Our freedom hangs even more ‘in the balance’ because, just in time, PHE has found another ‘variant of concern’:

“On Thursday, PHE placed a variant under investigation, with 109 cases detected in the UK of a strain first identified in Thailand, although officials stressed there is no evidence that it causes more severe disease or evades vaccines.” (paywalled link)

Gawd, yes – let’s keep the scaremongering going, let’s keep being concerned, let’s wait for two weeks to see if the latest variant is ‘dangerous. And then another ‘variant’ will be found so we must wait another two weeks – and another – and another, right into the autumn when the NHS will again become ‘overwhelmed.

The ‘end of lockdown’ isn’t going to happen as long as that lot is in power, and never mind their being ever so ‘transparent’ with their models and numbers. Meanwhile, let’s weep crocodile tears about the care home ‘tragedy’, let’s not mention the increasing tragedy, the real tragedy, of avoidable cancer deaths thanks to the covid politics. 

Why is there no intrepid MSM ‘journalist’ asking Hancock how he has protected those lives! Are they as dispensable as the lives of the elderly? 

 

KBO!

 

 

Photo by eviloars