Bonfire Night: now a thing of the past
Well – there won’t be any bonfires or fireworks tonight, and rightly so! Why should we celebrate the failure of the Gunpowder Plot to blow up the House of Lords at the opening of Parliament in 1605 when our current politicians have successfully destroyed parliamentary democracy in our nation, with the help of unelected bureaucrats and the MSM!
When looking at the Lockdown vote in the HoC yesterday it must finally dawn even on a fervent supporter of lockdown that our parliamentary democracy is finished, that it’s over, done away with. There was no parliamentary opposition scrutinising government. There were only a handful of Tory MPs questioning the already discredited government Lockdown policies.
Sir John Redwood had a terse report yesterday evening in his Diary (link). Lockdown Sceptics’ Newsletter this morning has the fitting title ‘The Betrayal of Britain’ . They name those who voted against the Lockdown government:
“Just 39 MPs voted against the lockdown. 34 were Tory rebels voting against the Government. Here is the Roll of Honour: Adam Afriyie, Steve Baker (teller), Peter Bone, Sir Graham Brady, Steve Brine, Sir Christopher Chope, Philip Davies, Jonathan Djanogly, Jackie Doyle-Price, Richard Drax, Sir Iain Duncan Smith, Marcus Fysh, Chris Green, James Grundy, Mark Harper, Gordon Henderson, Philip Hollobone (teller), David Jones, Tim Loughton, Craig Mackinlay, Stephen McPartland, Esther McVey, Huw Merriman, Anne Marie Morris, Sir Mike Penning, John Redwood, Andrew Rosindell, Henry Smith, Sir Desmond Swayne, Sir Robert Syms, Derek Thomas, Sir Charles Walker, Craig Whittaker, William Wragg. – There were also four DUP MPs: Paul Girvan, Carla Lockhart, Ian Paisley and Sammy Wilson. And one independent: Julian Lewis.” (link)
It was a crushing defeat – for common sense, for proper science, for democracy and ultimately for liberty. This vote demonstrated that we are now ruled by a cabal of unelected, shadowy ‘senior sources’ who pull the strings of the departmental ministers, the ones who regurgitate whatever latest inanity they’re told to spew forth. I’ll not name names – we’ve seen them disporting themselves on telly and in the papers for most of the year.
Then there are their not-so shadowy but equally unelected willing helpers in the MSM. They have been acting as opposition to the government since the start of this pandemic, pushing for lockdowns, instilling fear – it’s all documented. The frightening aspect to this is that they are all following the same script, with a tiny bit of leeway allowed to dissenting voices: ‘the peasants must be seen to have been allowed to have their puny say’. In this way can these forces, the MSM and their helpful masters, claim to ‘have won’: who dares complain when there’s an overwhelming majority! This is democratic, isn’t it!
What use is ‘freedom of expression’ when commercial tech entities can suppress dissenting voices because of nebulous ‘community rules’? What use is ‘freedom of the press’ when valid criticism is simply not published? When those who are occasionally being criticised – with good cause, with well-documented example after example of wrong-doing – simply push ahead with their agenda, unmoved?
While the election fight in the US is still ongoing I’ll refrain from thinking out loud what the eventual outcome means for us here in the UK. I’ll only say that the Fourth Estate, once lauded as necessary corrective to the power of the Executive, has taken on the role of political opposition in the absence of a true political opposition.
When I saw the following remarks by Toby Young in yesterday’s Lockdown Sceptics Newsletter, I wondered if we ourselves are allowed to play the role of useful idiots, permitted to have ‘our say’ here and there, because the actual powers know that we’re toothless:
“No one in Downing Street – or, rather, the Quad (Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak, Michael Gove and Matt Hancock), since they’re making all the big political calls – is pretending the data hasn’t been deliberately skewed to create a rationale for Lockdown 2.0 […] (link)
They know, their handlers in Whitehall know, the ‘science editors’ in the MSM know, the ‘opposition politicians’ know – and still they press ahead, unmoved. I found Toby’s concluding observation in that segment significant as well:
“One final point: this isn’t a case of SAGE pulling the strings, browbeating Boris and co into doing their bidding via its envoys Witless and Unbalanced. Rather, the CMO and the CSO are doing the bidding of the Quad, slavishly pumping out propaganda in order to justify Lockdown 2.0. Dom has the two dupes by the short and curlies. They love the power and the spotlight and will say anything, even if it’s transparent balls, to keep it. They’re also worried about the coming reckoning, with lawsuits, etc. heading down the pike, so they want to be able to say, “We were just following orders, your Honour.” (link)
If Toby is right – and why wouldn’t he be, his sources are as good as those quoted in the MSM – then we should ask why it is that the elected PM is acting against the welfare of our country, with the tacit support of the MSM which have abandoned their self-proclaimed role as scrutinisers and gleefully taken on that of ‘opposition’.
We might perhaps ask if the globalists, the ‘leaders’ of Davos and Bilderberg, are now finally dropping their benevolent masks, aiming to achieve their ‘Great Reset’. We might however also wonder if they are actually dupes as well, the famous ‘useful idiots’ we remember from that other ‘Reset’ a century ago.
It is always instructive to note what or who isn’t being talked about, what isn’t reported in the MSM. So I wonder why it is that the one big player on the international scene has vanished from the news pages: China – poised to rush in, to fill the political and economic vacuum created by covid and by the ongoing destruction of the democratic process which the MSM have created.
Meanwhile the Brexit trade negotiations are still ongoing. The EU deadline is the 16th of November. I’ll look at that Brussels theatre production tomorrow, noting in passing that it’s very convenient that, thanks to Lockdown, no demos can take place in case of a BJ sell-out.
As we’re now all back in Lockdown prison, I ask again: why should we commemorate the ‘Saving of Parliament’ from the Gunpowder Plot when Parliament itself has self-destructed in front of our eyes?
Instead of the now forbidden bonfires we should perhaps light a candle, in the privacy of our homes – to mourn the passing of our democratic system and the death of the ’Mother of Parliaments’. Still – tomorrow is another day, as Scarlett O’Hara said, so we better
KBO
have you read Sage has said it made several mistakes which they knew about before forcing the uk into lockdown. It seems the numbers were about 25% of there 4000 deaths a day but did they bother to tell this at the same time ? NO they just wanted to cause more harm
A little addendum to a post yesterday in which I pointed out that I had seen a report that Nigel’s new party wasn’t just a one trip pony for Brexit and possibly the TVs licence as was suggested. But that he had embraced the Great Barrington proposition for I believe the herd principle.
I had some positive reaction on here but perhaps you will be interested in a conversation I had this afternoon
I am ostensibly on holiday in Scotland today promised to be brilliant, so we planned to spend the day away walking in the Glens and take our lunch with us.
We were early, so we walked before lunch, but eventually sat down on a log and ate our bananas.
Along came a man and his dog, great big haversack and obviously knitted out for the real stuff, as he confirmed he had already come from a long distance North of us and he mentioned a small town in Aberdeenshire,
We got talking, of course the conversation got round to Covid.?
Oh he and his family had already had it in December, well it wasn’t called Covid then, the doctor said it was just another unknown nasty virus.
He also said many in the area had had it at the same time and yes there were deaths mainly he thought amongst elderly in Care homes.
Both he and his wife had had it and one of his children.All had recovered, his was in the form of dry coughing that was pretty incessant, it felt as though there was something “there” on his chest but it just wouldn’t budge, until after some days he did start to get gunge up
Both he and his wife have been tested for antibodies , but only she showed them, he didn’t know anything about immunity.
We discussed the handling of the Chinese disease in general and he was concerned as we are on here and would you believe it he mentioned the Great Barrington project as being the answer.
Incidentally asked about Independence, he said in view of the fact that Scotland couldn’t contemplate going it alone financially and for this reason he was revising his opinion.i answered that I could never see how Nicola could sell the concept of achieving independence and then immediately giving it away again to the EU.
Glad I looked back and read you Roger Turner!
SO There are some sensible people left, even in Scotland. Debbie is right we mustn’t let the ‘b’s’ grind us down.
Meanwhile, across the pond, STILL the corruption goes on.
And where are all the Human Rights lawyers when we need them. Surely the curtailment of our civil liberties and freedoms right across the board both here in the UK and across Europe must be against the various sections of that Act. I’ve heard not a dickie bird about these infringements from those normally over zealous people. However if it the curtailment of our civil liberties had been for something else, they would have been crawling all over the issue and making political capital out of it until the cows come home.
Similar thoughts went through my mind Viv. November 5th. No point in blowing up Houses of Parliament. What should we blow up? No.10? The whole of Whitehall? Test and trace centres? Hancock, Whittle and Vallance? No there are just too many of them. We can’t win.
Nil desperandum illegitemii, Pauline.
Don’t show off Debbie. ‘THEY’ prevented me doing Latin. Forced stupid French down my throat instead!
Err . . ‘Don’t despair . . what?’ THEY are illegitimate? Or is it we have to resort to illegitimate means?
Ah, I’ll try googling illegitemii !!
P.S. Uh huh. BASTA**S, methinks. Agreed.
Don’t let them grind you down Pauline.
I thought I’d post this article from Rebel News about the US elections. This is frightening stuff, it appears that not only is democracy dead in Britain but in the US and the rest of the Western world.
Out and out election fraud and Trump must fight this for the good of us all, he’s the only person standing in the way of the Great Reset.
“There’s a whole lot of malarkey going on with election results | Ezra Levant explains”
https://youtu.be/YMlQseDgnIw
Flyer, I haven’t been able to access Ezra Levant’s You Tube broadcast, so I may be saying the same as him, but maybe not.
When Trump beat Hillary Clinton in 2016 the result was announced the following day. But now it is two days since the election day on Tuesday and votes by mail are still being counted. We are told that votes by mail posted before Wednesday are still arriving now. Yesterday the BBC6 news said most of these votes by mail would probably be for Joe Biden.
But how on earth could the BBC know that? Could it be that these late votes have been postmarked before Wednesday but sent in after Tuesday? When the people sending them would know by then how many votes Joe Biden needed to overtake Donald Trump?
Very Fishy isn’t it Ralph Prothero.
Ralph, almost exactly as you say, there is a whistleblower that claims that votes turned up and they were ordered to back date them.
This isn’t a Biden win it is a coup d’etat, so much for democracy, it seems that our western countries have been turned into third world banana republics.
Indubitably that was election fraud! Looking at the two screens showing the results not only did Trump not get any votes from the last ballots counted but the other three runners didn’t score any further votes either!!! From the extra 138k votes to think that not one would go to another candidate without some kind of manipulation, is highly unlikely!
Voting fraud is now widespread everywhere. Since South Thanet when ballot boxes went missing for four hours and Craig McKinley subsequently won the seat against Nigel Farage who had been pretty much favourite to win, we have learned to expect nothing less than fraud in every ballot.
If ‘they’ had realised we would all vote ‘leave’ they would have most assuredly rigged the Brexit vote!
I hope Trump will give it all he’s got to turn over the stones that these slugs are hiding under. The Devil named ‘corruption’ must somehow be exorcised!
Frederica, if as you say all the last votes – one hundred and thirty eight thousand altogether – went to Biden, and none to Trump or the other three candidates, then that is very odd.
How good it would be able to disagree with this article but my opinion is the same.
The first two paragraphs say it all.
There is a little apprehension in repeating myself over, seems like trolling but it is not.
We must have radical change!
Some say “If you do this you will have the same problem” or “If you support that there will still be corruption”
Without meaning to be abusive it sounds a bit like whining, another excuse for a modified status quo.
We must try and ‘DO’ something!
There is no doubt now in my mind that Party Politics is a spent; a system conceived when there was no emancipation of the people. Now in the 21st century we think we are free but we find we are not.
A Reformation is needed.
We abdicated our responsibilities, is it surprising that we are no longer controlling or managing our governance. Like candy from a child our sovereignty has been taken away from us.
Whose fault is that?
It is the fault of those with a vested interest, inanely supported by those who are frightened of change.
Yes fear again is the enemy.
To dismiss alternative ideas such as standing up for your rights under Common Law or setting up Citizen Assemblies where a corrupt system can be swept aside, or indeed pursuing Localism, because you are frightened it might have the same risks, is to my mind, short sighted, unimaginative and frankly ludicrous.
When pioneers ‘Went West’ they took huge risks and leaps of faith that they could make a better life for themselves. We need to do the same.
Kim …”standing up for your rights under Common Law…” etc
I have been thinking on the same lines as to how we can fight back. Now I find UK Column is doing a podcast “Dissidents Guide to the Constitution” in about 5 parts. I’ve now listened to the first two and they are very good, very helpful to people like me who don’t have a legal brain. At the end I will share what I’ve learnt on this forum.
As the political climate now stands hear in the UK. I predict we are heading for strong resistance from the people, I can hear the political ruberlings of civil war and we need a new . political party to reinstate Democracy.
I stand by my comments
Mike there are several new parties that have been formed in recent times, just waiting in the wings to topple the existing mainstream parties at the ballot box, starting with the local elections next year. To name but a few, the Heritage Party led by David Kurten, Reclaim led by Laurence Fox, SDP (not sure who leads them), and The Brexit Party/Reform UK (that is if they ever get their act together). So we are spoilt for choice and therefore no excuse to be giving/lending votes to Conservative/Labour/Liberal Democrat, who have not served the citizens of this country well. They need to be replaced and very soon.
We have one, Mike. It’s called Reform UK.
I don’t know if the problem is just one of people being afraid of change. Many will have experienced change in their lives and many times, certainly in our governance change tends to be negative, albeit tinged occasionally with free stuff. How many times have we heard “just in it for themselves, once they’re elected they ignore us” etc. etc. and then they will vote the same next time or switch between the same old suspects and make the same complaints again (and again).
Repetition is a powerful convincer and I think people are just convinced that the present system is all there is. I think the problem is in instilling confidence that an alternative system will work. Part of that is in understanding how the alternative systems work, and there I profess I just don’t know myself. How does it provide a viable alternative?
Jim R. A few thoughts:-
The fixed term parliament act should be abolished. The whips in the House should be illegal (don’t know how that could be enforced). That electoral commission thing should be curtailed or abolished. Party Central Offices need some sort of overhaul/investigation.
‘Alternative’ Parties need encouragement, not stamping on.
Alternative’ Parties need to find some way of working together, not standing against each other.
Unfortunately it tends to come down to FUNDING.
But just putting obstacles in the way of new Parties is, in itself, an infringement of our liberties.
All valid points Pauline but pertaining to the present party system even as modified by your suggestions, and Kim seems to reject this.
I do not understand how standing up for your common law rights is an alternative to national government under the party system, how localism is an alternative to national government or how citizens assemblies are an alternative to councillors with their permanent departments. I just don’t see how any of that negates the party system or what the actual advantages are. Nothing to do with fear just lack of understanding hence lack of enthusiasm until this is gained.
To me the most important point you make is co-operation between the small/new parties if not amalgamation, and until this happens they will stay relatively uninfluential.
Citizen Assemblies again. Yawn.
No better than the people / organiations you want replaced.
Read respones to your post yesterday.
You have missed the point! I am saying we must end the stranglehold of the LibLabCon Party. The Party Politics we have endured is not working for ordinary people. Change is desperately needed.
And you Yawn! All I can say is that it is you that needs to re-read the comments and consider your rudeness and irrelevancy in a sincere debate of the future alternatives.