Be afraid – be very afraid …
Just one glance at the front pages this morning (link) made me question again the mental attitudes prevailing in the Westminster MSM newsrooms. It’s not just the headlines for their leading articles – it’s the images they plaster across their papers.
Who really wants to see, first thing in the morning, yet another photo of that Scottish tennis player showing us how far he can open his gob? Or the long horse face of the now erstwhile Kiwi PM? To make sure we’ll get in the right mood there are also the screams about ‘lower taxes’ because allegedly inflation has run its course. Well, funny that: my grocery and energy bills tell me otherwise …
There are however some reports which do not bode well for our future. Firstly, there’s an ‘exclusive’ report in iNews, on Starmer who has attended the Schwab get-together in Davos. Put down whatever vessel you happen to hold before reading this:
“EU officials have welcomed Keir Starmer’s plans to rebuild ties with Brussels, saying the bloc is “aching” for a new relationship with the UK. Sir Keir, who has been mingling with business and political elites at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, has ruled out a return to the EU or the single market, but for many in Brussels, a change in government and tone would already be a huge improvement. Veteran MEP Guy Verhofstadt, the former European Parliament Brexit co-ordinator, said he looked forward to better relations with the UK.” (link, paywalled)
Yes – that’s the Verhofstadt as we all remember him. There’s more – keep this for the record (this and other emphases are mine:
“What the Western world needs now is to come together around precisely the areas Starmer mentions: science, technology, research, security, foreign affairs,” he said, adding that “the Conservatives’ cartoon version of Thatcherism isn’t helping”. However, he also warned that Britain’s departure from the EU had undermined their joint efforts. “The devil is not in the detail – the very idea of Brexit is unworkable,” he said. “As long as Starmer continues to rule out re-joining the single market and the EU itself, Britain will be poorer off, as is the EU.” (link, paywalled)
I’m always delighted to see that Mrs Thatcher is still alive inside the heads of Brussels, even after nearly 25 years since her resignation. We know Labour is heaving with what is now known as ‘Rejoiners’. Their performances in the HoC in regard to Brexit have not been forgotten! I’m certain that they’ll regard these utterances as marching orders for Starmer.
Just a the EU so NATO now regards itself as a body permitted tot ell member states what to do, using the latest ‘international’ puppet as spokesperson. The current one is, of course, the ukrainian PM – no, that’s not news, but look at the report in the DT under the headline:
“Germany must stop stalling Ukraine tanks deal, say Nato allies – Britain and US lead high-pressure campaign warning Berlin that Putin could gain upper hand if Kyiv doesn’t receive weaponry soon” (paywalled link).
It’s not just that NATO ‘allies’ are telling a member state what to do, there’s also the veiled ‘excuse’ that, should Russia win, it’s the fault of Germany. However, it gets worse:
“In an interview with German broadcaster ARD, Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine’s president, lost his temper when discussing Berlin’s hesitance. “In plain language: can you deliver Leopards or not?” he said. “Then hand them over!” (paywalled link)
Yes, he really said that, it’s in the top German paper ‘die Welt’ this morning as well. This quote is machine-translated:
“Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyi has criticized Germany’s hesitant act on the question of possible main battle tank deliveries to his country. […] Then he added: “In plain language, can you deliver leopards or not? Then give them to me!” (paywalled link, in German)
More knowledgeable people have pointed out that the USA has got loads of tanks, asking why they don’t ‘hand them over’ to Zelenski. The Times in their editorial makes this point:
“Olaf Scholz, the chancellor, has said he is willing to supply Leopards, but only on condition that the Americans promise to send over Abrams tanks, equally effective and available from the huge numbers now in storage. But Washington, too, has been evasive. Various excuses have been put forward: the Abrams uses a huge amount of fuel and would strain Ukrainian logistics; it will take time to train Ukrainian operators and deliver the tanks; modern communications and guidance systems, as well as specialised armour, would have to be stripped out first in case the tanks fell into Russians hand; and Congress, with the Republicans increasingly sceptical over more US help and fearful of US entanglement in another foreign war, has not signed off on the proposed help.” (link, paywalled)
It would of course be rude to wonder if the USA prefers to keep their tanks out of the Ukraine because they’re fit that they won’t look as good against Russian artillery as their propaganda makes out. That would undermine their military-industrial complex …
I also wonder if any of the great NATO strategists have pondered the question of what might happen in case of a Russian victory. According to their dogma, Putin’s tanks could then roll across the Northern European plains with nothing to stop them because all the precious NATO arms have been destroyed in Zelinski’s war. They surely cannot think of nuking Russia in such case – can they?
Well, as in big things like war and NATO, so in small things, like Brussels: does anyone believe that the EU won’t tell us what to do if Starmer creeps ever closer to Brussels? After all, one of the EU’s Big ‘Uns is in dire straits and Ms vdL needs money. Yesterday, millions took to the streets in France (link). Here’s The Times’ report:
“At least a million people joined marches across the country, with activists and police clashing in Paris and work stoppages hitting the public sector. The threat of further chaos has left the head of state facing what many commentators believe to be a pivotal moment in his presidency.” (link, paywalled)
The Dover-Calais ferry services were stopped as well (link). The French Trade Unions were delighted with the outcome and plan to repeat this on January 31st. They’ve also threatened to cut off electricity to ‘billionaires and lawmakers’ (link). No word from Brussels on this event as of yet.
Will Macron become the next ‘international star’ to resign, like Saint Jacinda in NZ? Here’s the rather interesting report in the DM where a bit further down in the article we read:
“Conspicuously absent from this global outpouring of Left-wing grief, however, was any proper understanding of the reasons behind her decision to step down.” (link).
Just so. I suggest you read this article in ‘spiked online’ which also looks at yon ‘Left-wing grief’. Of course, we all condemn the horrid comment posters who quipped that ‘when the going gets tough, female politicians flee and go into hiding’, don’t we!
That’s all I have for today. The cold snap will continue, sez the Met Office. As for politics and international politics: the outlook is decidedly arctic for western politicians. Keep on keeping warm and keep mistrusting politicians and their propaganda machinery. Have a good day.
Nice to see you back too Frederica.
Yes be afraid.
Yes I am , but in what order? I`m not sure could be all at once, or maybe some calamities are closer than other.
Whatever the list or order my greatest fear is Dishi`s Digital “Britcoin” or whatever name he ultimately comes up with
I do believe he is set to impose the image of China – total control of all from breakfast to bed time..
Then I don`t like the Covid legislation still being on the books, ready for renewed lockdowns and PASSPORTS
I want to see BLM dead and buried together with all the Diversity nonsense GONE, particularly the Enforcers.
I want to see the Northern Ireland protocol GONE
I want to see the GW man made Carbon lie fully exposed and COP26 suspended
I want to see the full story/Big lie fully exposed.
I want to see fracking start and our fully providing our own power i.e. not rely on purchasing from bandits
I want to see the full effects of Immigration explored, the country being FULL UP – for decades and little or no allocation of funds which has killed the NHS, Schools etc. due to accepting immigrants in biblical numbers. – not only must the chanel trips stop but all immigration reduced to what it was “tens of thousands” – if not temporarily NIL
Oh didn`t I mention the economy that Dishi trashed with his needless furlough scheme
Note/
Just saying – haven`t got a clue how to tackle it
Roger T. 8.05pm 20/1. Yes 100%. I also want all those.
To Frederica on 20/01/2023 at 3:44 pm:
I am frequently unable to reply directly to a comment. My comments just appear as a separate post as some may have noticed.
Why does the name Verhofstadt make me immediately think of the WW2 threat from Nazi Germany?
Also, has everyone conveniently forgotten that it was Russia that successfully defeated Napoleon, Germany in WW1 and Nazi Germany in WW2.
As for the comment about Thatcherism, it is a shame the con party don’t have any of it now.
As you say Viv, NATO apparently want us to be afraid, very afraid, that Putin’s tanks will roll all the way across Europe.
I’m afraid of NATO. It’s like memory Foam mattresses. It appears to make sense until you buy one and cripple yourself using it, and America gets rich selling low quality cheap foam by proxy. And the world is worse off. So screw NATO, and Good Old US of A business ideas like nato.
Pauline……….not quite fair. The Russians certainly defeated German armed forces on the Eastern front, but Britain, USA and Canada defeated German forces on the Western front/Second front. And of course it has to remembered that General Paton Commander in Chief of the 3rd US Army wanted to take Berlin before the Russians got there, but he was slapped down by Dwight Eisenhower who was Supreme Allied Commander (SHAEF). Whether or not he would have been able to pull it off if he had been given the go ahead is debatable. Lets say the result as to who won was a Score Draw.
I agree Colin. I did ‘over simplify’ to make my point.
Pauline…..except for the fact that Verhofstadt is Belgian, NOT German. Setting that aside he is indeed a horrible little man who whose aim in life is to make life as difficult as possible for Britain. And that utter fool Starmer, is just too thick to realise it.
Hope you are well and firing on all twelve cylinders – just don’t overdo it Gurl!
For info – the betting has remained the same for the last six to twelve months:-
Brexit UK to rejoin the EU as full member before 2026?
No 1/20; Yes 7/1
Note – *full member*
‘Tis 10 out of 12 cylinders firing – migraine will do that to one, leaving one feeling like a discarded wet cloth.
Seems that we still have far too many traitors in government:
https://www.gbnews.uk/politics/brexit-rebellion-grows-as-more-tories-set-to-side-with-labour-to-defeat-sunaks-plans-to-rip-up-eu-laws/424914
Time for restoration of a robust Treason and Sedition Law with severe penalties for those attempting to subjugate us to rule by a foreign entity. Of course it would also be useful in dealing with those such as Boris supporting world government.
I would agree, that also should include the rest of the Bliar and inc and we must stay out WEF UN WHO and every other FAR Left gathering
Politicians should be forced to hold a Referendum before signing agreements with foreign trash who are out to fill their own pockets
As you know the Swiss do hold referendums on all big issues. The Swiss give their people the information of an issue and let them decide. The British establishment deeply distrusts its people. After Brexit I don’t think the British establishment will trust us ever again. Let us come together and show them how much we distrust them by never, ever again voting for establishment parties nor buying the publications/subsciptions/licences of their shills the MSM.
I seem not to be able to comment in the box below as I have not commented for some time I guess I’m not now connected.
But I read this article yesterday that appears to explain exactly why we no longer have government that conforms to any semblance of democracy! They are certainly all in it together!!!!
https://thecritic.co.uk/on-british-chumocracy/
If Starmer is planning to take us back into the EU I suspect that Blair still has high hopes of being the EU President! It’s what he always wanted! Especially now he has cultivated the long greying hair and saturnine grin of the typical EU ‘patrician’!
It’s worse than that, Frederica. Blair appears to be angling to take over, not from Von de Lying but from Swab, Ming the Merciless (I do miss Steyn), at the WEF. There is a pretence of democracy at the EU and he is not universally liked there. But at the WEF Sicko- and Psycho-fest, being both he should be a shoe-in.
You beat me to it again Phil O, but great minds think alike.
Frederica at 3.49pm Bliar appears to be lining up to take over the WEF after Schwab goes, one way or other. He’s been cosying up to all the dreck in creation as his dream of world leader didn’t materialise as soon as he had hoped. We need to remove ourselves from all these crooked organisations if we have any chance of becoming a free country again. That will mean removing all the current politicians and starting afresh as Jake Bennett has advocated.
Welcome back Frederica! I find I have to click on the comment cursor then fill out the email and name bits and click on the save my name bit, then go back and click the comment cursor. In my case I still only get the top half of one line appearing to type into. Maybe that bit is due to my antiquated system.
Right. 1. We know Blair is pulling Starmer’s strings.
2. Whatever Starmer pretends, I think he is secretely delighted by all the strikes.
3. I would guess Blair has his eyes focused on being part of the global elite, rather than just the EU elite.
4. Starmer is probably planning no further forward than U.K. PM at this stage.
May I join Pauline and probably many others in welcoming you back Frederica – you have an unique way of exposing the truth and I believe we are approaching a point “when it might all be coming out”
For instance I am not an authority on Jacinda, but her resignation appears to me to be mighty sudden!
All I can say about her resignation speech is she talked about “kindness”
Does she mean in the sense “you`ve gotta be cruel to be kind”
Did she take that as her motivation and `permission` to introduce draconian rules and instructions that subdued (forbad) proper criticism and democratic discussion from both the Press and Grassroots New Zealanders? not only were the controls CRUEL in themselves, but their enactment by the authorities were often cruel in the extreme.
I know there were nasties associated with returning immigrants, but what stiil sticks in my craw is the vicious handling of the Christ Church protests, an “Enquiry” merely whitewashed and said the authorities could have `handled it better` – that doesn`t line up with the viciusness the NZ reporter on ID saw.
So when I say things are starting to “come out”, I`m sure the press must now tell the whole story and put responsibility ( and punishment) where it belongs on Jacinda and her fellow travellers for the introduction of Communist/Fascist agenda, trashing the NZ constitution and its economy with her WEF leanings/training?and connections
She and they must be fully exposed as a conspiracy of`wrong `uns`
So welcome back Frederica, sorry for the rant, but I think you are just the lady to help all of us in the exposure of all the wrong doing on many issues.
PS to Pauline, I too have problems answering comments to follow the previous person making them
That`s using iphone and ipad and also the print only shows half a character if you are lucky – no way you can read back or correct your comment.
However I have a lovely old steam driven lap top which seems to do the job no bother at all – well it is a bit of a fag waking it up, but it also allows me to read most `leads` like rumble and oddessy which iphones and pads don`t
I might try you method on a quick comment some time Pauline.
On the subject of the unelected oligarks in Brussels – on the one hand, if you believe Great Britain is no longer funding their lavish spending, then where is all their income coming from – neither Greece nor Iddaly have gone bust according to the silent media? On the other hand, where are all the funds we are dishing out like a drunken sailor, coming from? The united States has been printing money for years now and has been bust for a long time.
The whole house of cards finance industry is beyond wobbling.
Indeed Jake; too many closet remoaners, whatever flag they fly.
And some other news about the enemy within:
https://stopworldcontrol.com/vanguard/
In depth article about Ardern . As the author says, her government has been little different from most Western governments in the drive for more government power and drift to authoritarianism.
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/01/09/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-reprise/?fbclid=IwAR3E68ZWraxtSmK4lkbC-k7yIIfzO9fb_ppQxzzuyq1JJH75UJ64TGVlBZo
JB- it is a long read. As i made my way through it, the thought kept popping up that this piece, with some names changed could be GB.
As NZ is far off, i suppose it demonstrates the long arms of the Great Reset are everywhere.
We all know Brexit isn’t safe with Starmer but equally so it isn’t safe with the Tories.
Re Starmer etc. Innovation and growth do not exist in a vacuum.. Cafe pavement culture is the final fling of bankrupt countries. It can never be described as innovative, creative or growth. We still have a very very few industries existing on their last legs, that have escaped the landrush of foreign big firms looking for cheap or corrupt MP recommended markets. Starmer is just an example of what you get for a bargain basement barrister in the legal aid sphere. .
Hi t g s. Glad you are still around, even though I do not know what you mean here. What does your granny say?
I never know what TGS means, Pauline, but he seems to be on our side.
What was that Morecombe and Wise thing about playing all the right notes, but not necessarily in the right order?
TG Spokes……..Starmer certainly wasn’t any good when he was Director-General of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) which came about after the government (probably Labour) who decided in their wisdom to remove the power of the Police to decide whether or not to charge and prosecute offenders, unless the offence was a minor issue (summary offence). At a stroke the whole process became highly bureaucratic with everything done remotely over the telephone and sending evidence to the CPS office via teleprinter. And if you had a prisoner in custody and were denying them bail for court the following day and it was in the evening you were speaking to the duty prosecutor via the phone at their home address, it was a right old song and dance. There were many times I was racking up needless overtime waiting for a decision as to whether there was sufficient evidence to charge, completing the court papers which took hours to do, which resulted in me missing the last train home and having to spend the night at the police station. So, yes I have a lot to thank him for, not……