“If Voting Made a Difference, They Wouldn’t Let Us Do It”

 

 

Well, there we are: another five years of Macron. He was the clear winner, gaining 58.55% of the vote. Madame Le Pen only received 41.45%. Predictably, the election result was the main theme for our broadsheets. The editors of the semi-broadsheet “i” seem to think that the shenanigans of the Tory ‘rebels’ were more newsworthy – who cares if they ’join forces’ to get rid of BJ after next week’s local elections? Two Red Tops mention the ‘cost-of-living crisis’, with the DM’s paper editors going for ‘HRT Crisis Putting Lives in Danger’. Oh dear. You can find the compilation of the paper editions’ headlines in the usual place here.

First, let’s take a look at the bare stats:

“The Interior Ministry reported a turnout of 71.99%, one of the lowest turnouts in French runoffs. The turnout dropped lower only in 1969 when 68.9% of the voters showed up at polling stations. About 8.6% of the counted ballots in the latest vote were empty or mismarked.” (link)

It is what it is, there’s no point in calculating ‘what-ifs’ based on those stats. The French electorate has spoken and the Frogs will have to live with the consequences. Next, here’s what Macron told his supporters (my emphasis):

“Standing before the Eiffel Tower after arriving to the strains of Beethoven’s Ode to Joy – the European Union anthem – Mr Macron promised to do his “duty” to unite France. “Many of our compatriots voted for me not out of support for my ideas but to block those of the extreme Right,” he told a crowd of thousands waving French and EU flags. Close to tears, he said: “I am everyone’s president” before telling those who abstained or voted for Ms Le Pen that he understood their anger. He told voters: “I know how much I owe to you, thank you.” (paywalled link)

Here’s the rendition of Macron’s speech in The Times, perhaps a bit less emotional but also quoting Macron’s main point (my emphasis):

“Macron acknowledged his debt to voters, mainly from the left, who had heeded calls to back him in the run-off to block Le Pen’s election. “Many of our compatriots voted for me not out of support for my ideas but to block those of the far right,” he said. “I want to thank them and I know that I have a duty towards them in the years to come.” (link, paywalled)

Rounding up the election reports are the ‘congratulations’ from our ‘leaders’, here and in the EU, ‘by twitter’, the sign of contemporary ‘statecraft’:

“[…] mainstream politicians and European leaders voiced relief at the rejection of a candidate who had promised authoritarian government by referendum at home, upheaval in Europe and alliance with Russia. Boris Johnson, whose relationship with Macron is tense, quickly tweeted congratulations, adding: “France is one of our closest and most important allies.” Olaf Scholz, the German chancellor, congratulated the fiercely pro-EU president, adding: “Your constituents also sent a strong commitment to Europe today.” (link, paywalled)

If we needed more confirmation for the iron grip on our necks which the establishment exerts, here as well as in France, the EU and NATO, the editors of The Times are outspoken:

“Europe, Nato and the French establishment will be much relieved. A victory by Marine Le Pen would have been disastrous for the concerted efforts of the western alliance to show solidarity in the face of President Putin’s aggression. It would have called into question France’s commitment to the European Union. Ms Le Pen withdrew her threat to pull France out of the EU, but her proposals on immigration, on French exceptionalism and on dismantling many of the reforms Mr Macron had pushed through would have made her an extremely difficult partner for other EU leaders and also for any American president. France’s diplomats, business leaders and civil servants would have struggled to adjust to her nationalist, populist and isolationist policies.” (link, paywalled)

Yes, the French voters were mindful of the difficulties a victory for Mme Le Pen would’ve had for all those French civil serpents! They were mindful of ‘that war’ in the Ukraine and thus voted ‘against Putin’. They voted so that poor Pres Biden wouldn’t have to deal with more ‘difficulties’. They voted for more immigration, for more EU … phew, the champagne in all those ‘corridors of power’ must have been flowing in veritable streams!

There’s just one point which I’ve emphasised in the quotes above: the attitude of the international power elites is only concerned with labels, not with ideological realities. By now most people have at least an inkling that the Ukrainian government is, let’s say it politely, ‘far right’ or ‘extreme right’. The various Nazi emblems on the various flags and uniforms of Ukrainian soldiers can no longer be hidden. The reports from ‘ancient times’ about neonazis in the Ukrainian government are denied, are forgotten. 

So how come that there’s this relief that the good old Frogs voted ‘to block those on the far right’? After all, isn’t the international establishment, be it led by Macron, be it led by our PM, the US president or the German Chancellor, supporting the Ukrainian regime which is clearly much further to the Right than Mme Le Pen?

Isn’t this schizophrenic attitude indicative of something else, something far more dangerous, namely that the old labels of Right and Left do not matter any longer? These labels are clearly nought but PR slogans to be used at will, for the best political effect in elections., but no longer indicate deep political differences.

Elections have now become a ‘democratic theatre’, to occupy the minds of us peasants, to make us feel good, to make us feel that we ‘have a say’ in the fate of our nations . Only, this fate is no longer determined by those we happen to vote for but by faceless, unaccountable people in back rooms who are able to pay for the best PR specialists.

Moreover, this election result shows yet again that voters have been trained to vote for ‘personalities’ who ‘do well on TV’, from our own PM to Macron to Mr ‘e. It shows that a ‘performer’, be it this wannabe Napoleon, be it our clownish PM, will win through, thanks to PR and spin, regardless. of the reality of voters’ lives.

Therefore, I don’t think those ‘Tory rebels’ will have a chance. Nor will the “Gray Report” have much of an effect, even though one Whitehall ‘source’ told the Times that it was so ‘damning’ that Johnson would have to go (link, paywalled). So far, we’re lucky that Starmer is anything but a TV ‘performer’, but who knows: perhaps the international PR machinery will polish him sufficiently should Johnson deviate from that ‘marche’ of ‘war against Putin’.

Once the whole edifice of ‘security’ and prosperity’ comes crashing down it will be too late for voters, in France or here. I wonder though how our MSM here in Blighty will spin their cry for ‘regime change’ when we all are going to be faced with more inflation, more war, and more EU. Will they advise us to go through the motions, to play the role the masters have allocated us and vote ‘for the next great politician’? 

Should you now feel a bit nauseated and despondent – never mind, you’ll get over it!  Once all we can do is count the pennies left in our wallets we’ll stop worrying about politics and be happy …