The real crime: Partygate at No 10, or when the police is wasting police time
Having read this morning’s papers I’ve reached ‘peak fury’, I’m incandescent! How ‘independent’ can the Gray Report on ‘Partygate’ be when we’re told today that, actually, the Met Police is now reading and presumably redacting the thing? And what price now the outcry in the MSM and the HoC that the report must not be redacted at all by bad, partying Johnson, only to have the civil service trade unions howl that the names of any Whitehall ‘employees’ must be redacted to protect them?
That Report, in case you wonder, still hasn’t been handed in to the PM. According to Westminster gossip it’s now expected next week. Of course, all that ‘redacting’ takes time, though Ms Tominey’s headline on her opinion piece in the DT inadvertently gives the game away: “This could be the moment the establishment finally takes down Boris Johnson” (paywalled link). Her piece was published yesterday evening so presumably she was ignorant of the staggering information that the civil service trade unions want names to be redacted. Nevertheless, her observation is troubling:
“[…] even if No 10 had a legitimate argument for keeping certain details out of the public eye, it risks being tainted by the stench of a suspected coverup. Westminster whispers about who has contributed to the report also served to fuel suspicions that the Civil Service is in no mood to cut Mr Johnson any slack.” (paywalled link)
But who is actually aiming to produce a cover-up? Apparently not the PM. All the gossiping emanating from No 10 this week, a.k.a. ‘hostile briefings by sources’, meant to show that Johnson is trying to save his formidable backside, hid the fact that it’s really about saving the skins of mandarins, from Mr Reynolds of BYOB fame to unnamed others. Ms Tominey writes:
“And what of the other officials in Downing Street? Some of them might have an interest in ensuring that Mr Johnson is the one who takes the flak from Partygate, not them.” (paywalled link)
Only ‘some’? Let’s make that ‘all’, shall we? This is staggering, especially since Ms Tominey seems to imply that it’s quite alright. I am puzzled if the current top mandarin, Mr Chase, from whom and about whom we’ve heard nothing, is one of those to be ‘saved’ or if he’ll be sacrificed to save the other mandarins.
There are other crossed wires: Labour demands that everything must be published, unredacted, that there must be no cover-up from No 10 while at the same time the trade unions are adamant that this must not happen:
“Civil service unions have called for names to be redacted from Sue Gray’s Partygate report as they warned that government employees must not be ‘hung out to dry’. Garry Graham, the deputy general secretary of trade union Prospect, said he hopes civil servants are not going to be ‘collateral damage’ as a result of party attendees being identified. The permanent secretary of the government’s legal department, Susannah McGibbon, was understood to be in charge of a group of lawyers looking over the report for anything that might cause problems to arise in the police probe.” (link)
Crikey. We have come to this: civil serpents must be protected from the consequences of their misbehaviour while the PM must go. It’s ‘Save Whitehall Mandarins’ and sacrifice the elected PM: un-effing-believable! I loved this gem dropped by Mr Graham: “The Prime Minister is the head of the Civil Service. He should have been leading by example.” (paywalled link) – indeed, but are civil serpents totally devoid of any independent thought? Do they not have their own moral compass? They keep bleating that they only ‘advise’, but are incapable of following their own advice – that’s stunning!
Meanwhile other Whitehall mandarins bleat that the government is paralysed because nobody is making any decisions as Johnson and No 10 are waiting for that Gray Report, with Johnson meeting MPs to negotiate about how he can remain in No 10 (link). So how paralysed is this government when we’re told at the same time that the MoD is in ‘very advanced talks’ about deploying ‘hundreds of troops’ to eastern Europe because of that Russian invasion (link, also paywalled link)?
Never mind: since the Westminster cabal wants to get rid of the PM, any hostile gossip is grist to the Westminster MSM mill. This paralysis will presumably go on because publication of the Report is now ‘expected to be delayed until next week’ because:
“Its findings were passed on to the Metropolitan Police at the weekend, prompting Dame Cressida Dick to launch a formal investigation into claims that lockdown laws were broken.” (link)
Funny, innit, that neither the PM nor we, the paying public, were informed at the weekend but had to wait until Ms Dick told a committee (!) of the Labour London Council (!) that her force was now investigating. Ms Dick did not deem it necessary to hold a press conference and tell the nation – why not? There’s now righteous fury about this ‘decision’ which, the DM alleges, will cost us about £1m of our money. Look at this:
“The so-called ‘Celebrity Squad’ has been tasked with investigating eight parties in a wide-ranging probe, which policing experts have estimated could cost in excess of £1million and take at least six months. Eight officers in the Special Enquiry Team, led by Commander Catherine Roper, have been assigned to the inquiry, with more officers and staff available if needed, the Daily Mail understands. She will report her findings to Deputy Assistant Commissioner Jane Connors.” (link)
A ‘celebrity squad’? What the flaming fluff is that? Just look at that brilliant chain of command – all wimmin! Clearly, investigating this heinous break of covid rulz is far more important than investigating actual crimes, especially knife crime in the metropolis. The DM has a long list of Met failures in their report (link). It’s worth reading (scroll down a bit) because it details how the police ‘protect’ us who pay them. “Value for money” it is not!
The Westminster establishment, MSM included, couldn’t have made it more clear: getting rid of the Brexit PM and getting Remain Starmer into No 10 has priority over everything. A ‘police investigation into Partygate’ is far more important than protecting the people from crimes. Where are the demands for independent inquiries into those scandalous police failures?
Have we now arrived at the final destination where a Common Purpose driven public service shamelessly and publicly demands to protect their own, when us peasants won’t be protected from actual crimes whereas ‘crimes’ like lockdown-rule breaking and ‘hate crimes’ are being pursued with the utmost vigour?
I hold no candle for the PM and his interfering wifey. However, the alternative – a Remain government led by Labour and Common Purpose – is far worse. So if the Tory MPs can clip his wings, if they can get him to scrap the NI rise (link) against Sunak’s wishes who has now been utterly domesticated by the Treasury mandarins, if they can force him to get rid of snakes in the grass, then perhaps we might get less of Peppa Pig and more of Brexit.
Hope springs eternal …
Amazing isn’t it, we can send armies (we don’t have) to a Russian border but we can’t stop a few ribs from crossing a channel. Am I missing something here?
To 2.53 post by Viv.
I always read posts by TGS. I follow the ideas he has, if not the grammar and similar. And if he likes the PM – well that’s up to him.
Attacking spelling and such following up with what is tantamount to abuse reminds me of the Brexit campaign – you are a racist, misoginist, nazi for wanting out. There are other views out there.
TG makes a refreshing change from the incessant ‘buffoon’, ‘mop-haired idiot’, style and overlong rants by TG’s stalker. .
Your mileage may be different.
BTW Viv posting, since the introduction of the over-intrusive cookie monster banners, is very difficult.
If I accept all the surveillance or don’t accept (!) all the surveillance, I still mostly cannot post.
Today I have been given one of four coloured seagull poohs to click on. Maybe that is progress (!!).
Biscotte. Sorry about the spelling, punctuation and whatever it is that one is supposed to do with capital letters. Blame a relay of secretaries since1958.( Always incredible and lovely. Several from Bond Street Bureau). Thanks for the encouragement, your comments have not been ignored. Apropos I believe that one activist of immence energy is as valuable as other skills, and in business you never waste talent or ideas or work or reliability or anything else . make use of everything. That’s organisation.That’s what I’ve come to think anyway.
The names of the people who attended any of the so called parties should be published. Why should civil servants be exempt from being prosecuted for disobeying Lock Down rules. The Civil Service unions should not be condoning law breaking. Sir Keir Starmer should be supporting a non redact report. I would not trust Labour to be in Government after its treatment of Dr. David Kelly and{Parliament support of the Been Act
I’m sorry Vivian for all these comments. However its imporant.
The large amounts needed by government/Bank o E are now excessive and not yet usable, So the collosal amounts that can found have to be considered. eg VAT for a couple of years, claw back of missused QE in Banks or opportunistic asset grabbing.The position of Tax in asset destruction as well as terrible moves made by previous bad legislation. The present grinding down of the people is killing for business but good for bureaucracy, politics, professions and other hangers institutions on etc.
No worries, TG!
I always read posts by TGS.
TG makes a refreshing change from the incessant ‘buffoon’, ‘mop-haired idiot’, style and overlong rants by TGs stalker. .
Your mileage may be different.
There is going to be high inflation. There are a few ways to calm things down, several to stop it and many, many ways of disguising it foolishly.. Above all else the foolish option of ignoring it, or kicking the can, must not happen.. I am afraid that we wlii take the advice off all the advisers hiding in the media. There are many unheard of answers but not from same old LSE. regurgitating old stuff.
Thing is, a strategy must be followed. Not , ‘ mandated ‘, nor, ignoring ( as politics will hope ), cause it’ll get worse. I have heard ridiculous beliefs of 5% , 7 %.. However the probable reality is not to be considered..
A few random thoughts of mine summarised: TPTB -and we -are in a race against time : they are trying behind the scenes to assemble a world biosecurity state before we all wake up; and they are busy on the quiet integrating our military capability-along with all our other now- fused Government functions- into the EU’s central control and command, turned on us citizens. The EU being a building block in the World Biosecurity State. Total concentration of power at the top, the elite owning everything including even the air we breathe and ourselves; hell on earth. And completely checkmating Brexit once the trap is finally sprung.
The Tory party is like Labour committed to this and surely will never reform; their party machinery would surely not allow it?
Labour is worse I have no doubt. and might get us there quicker than the Tories . but what can I say?
If we do somehow get out of this nightmare we need a clear view of how we are going to survive outside the system offered by TPTB; this would be in a decentralised fashion relying less on corporations. and using decentralised currencies. After some consideration I don’t think we should fall into the trap of seeing Bitcoin as the solution.
Sunak ‘utterly domesticated by the Treasury mandarins’.
As a globalist (ex-)banker (is anyone ever an ex-banker?) pushing the new CBDC agenda, I don’t think he needed domesticating. And that his name is foremost in the media as the shoe-in replacement, says it all.
Mark Steyn pointed out that all the events unearthed happened further back than the six month window within which charges can be brought. And he asked what crime, then, is the Met investigating. We haven’t been told, but it cannot be those parties. Has the Met been given new secret info about more recent transgressions? If so, what and by whom? I hold no regard for Cressida Dick, but her body language yesterday screamed that she was not liking ‘being made’ to do this.
He also featured a chap from a nondescript suburb, who was fined for a brief birthday visit to his garden by three friends. The police arrived within an hour. When his neighbour was burgled and had his car stolen it took the police NINE days to arrive. And with police on the gates to Downing Street, logging all who come and go, and one at the door of No.10, they managed to miss a party and cannot determine who was there.
I am not convinced that fearing Labour will save conservatism.
Is there nobody who can rid us of all this madness? Just as you think it can’t get any worse, it does. When are the centre right parties going to realise they are facing an open goal?
Lisa When are sufficient of those of a centre Right view of the world going to stop grumbling, stop their delusional view that somehow the Tories will chagne tack and join a centre Right party that is the question? They need members first to get them cracking and make them successful. I think you are a member of UKIP like I am so we are already doing our bit.
I’m sorry Jake, but I think you’re propping up a log jam called NEC.
With respect TG I really don’t recognise what you are implying regarding the NEC. NEC members are elected by the members. Importantly they have to uphold the articles of UKIPs legal company status. They can’t spend money they don’t have. They are not paid. Remember it was Nigel’s idea to set up the NEC to ensure members were represented at the top. When things went well in the party Nigel took the plaudits but the NEC was his go to scapegoat when things went wrong.
Jake….I’ve been banging on about this in response to TG Spokes for a couple of years now. He is of the opinion that the NEC of a party such as UKIP, acts against its members, whereas in fact the NEC is made of its members and are elected onto that body. The NEC is there to hold the leader to account and ensure that they do not overstep the mark. I was always a great supporter of Nigel Farage’ leadership of UKIP, and really felt that had he continued beyond 2016 he would have have eventually led the party to a major electoral breakthrough. However, I think it is true to say that he was never a great believer of the NEC because probably it put a block on some of his ambitions, but nevertheless went along with it The Brexit Party which espoused to electoral reform amongst other things did not have a membership when it was formed nor a governing body called an NEC or anything else and the party was governed by its two shareholders, which cannot be right. I take the view that a political party cannot have a policy on electoral reform and democracy whilst not being democratic itself and not allowing its supporters any say. Things have slightly changed in recent months because now the rebranded Reform UK do in fact offer a membership, but there is still a long way to go. However TGS has got a bee in his bonnet about NEC’s and committees, but these days I can’t be asked to argue with him.
Jake I may be speaking without the book, but I am with TGS on this one.
In that the very word Committee sends shivers down my spine, particularly when I was out on the road selling our products to a person who was apparently a buyer, who appeared to be quite intersted and sold on the products.
The meeting finally ending with the words or similar
“Thank you very much Mr.Turner, will you please leave me with all the details and I will discuss them with the Committee”
Rarely did I receive a favourable reply, that`s if they even bothered to reply.
I know the NEC is not quite that sort of Committee, but from my observations (from afar I will agree) I have always felt they had a stultifying effect on anybody who showed energy, initiative and enterprise, you mention “spending money they don`t have and they are not paid” and you imply by being required to uphold articles of UKIP`s legal company status” that that makes them individually personally responsible for debt.
You say they are all elected to represent the grass roots membership and presumably to inject the party with ideas and emphasis.
In view of your words, I cannot imagine how that fosters any/much spirit of enterprise and collectively automatic reaction to a leader who legitimately has only one objective and that in the case of UKIP always was a successful political REVOLUTION.
Revolution in my opinion requires a no holds barred, kitchen sink approach maximally funded.
When we sent a Commissioner as our share of the EU Commission hierarchy, he/she was required to drop his/her attachment to the native country they came from. Some of them really worked at making it hot for their own country, they were said to “have gone native”.
I would guess much the same reaction came from the NEC “FEAR campaign”(Yes! FEAR is used as an instrument throughout politics, in fact from your words it appears to be still operative now)
Leader of a party. You’ve persuaded someone to give money for your particularly idiotic set of manifesto-meaninglesses. You have money to waste. Why lose the ( top, little ) job. That’s as good as they’re ever going to get. They dare not even contemplate lookng for help.
‘idiotic set of manifesto promises’? Which particular ones had you in mind please?
Jake. The same ones every party has ( apple pie ) so they cannot be accused of ignoring voters.. Mind you, I don’t know about the Monster etc Party. Probably labeled right wing. by the left. I confess to a sneaking admiration.
Jake………a question, it was important I think to have had a top notch UKIP candidate standing in the Southend West by election, especially that particular by election where none of the main parties apart from the Conservative Party were standing. It could be a breakthrough opportunity. What is your take on this?
Colin If only UKIP had the luxury of having a wide range of candidates to choose from! We are starting from the ground up again and thus it will take time for people to give us their vote again. We are back in business though.
Roger. Sorry to hook up to TGs commentary but there wasn’t a reply button tagged to your comment.
UKIP is an unincorporated association which is normally defined as an organisation set up through an agreement between a group of people who come together for a reason other than to make a profit (for example, a voluntary group or a sports club). … Individual members are personally responsible for any debts and contractual obligations and thus the NEC members acted to protect themselves and the members against creating unmanageable debts. Do remember UKIP relied heavily on membership monies to fund its advancement not coporate or union sponsorhip like the establishment parties.
Whilst I go along with the supposition that in most circumstances committees can be counter productive I haven’t seen any evidence that the NEC acted as a constraining force restricting UKIPs progress. Most people would agree with you when you state;
‘Revolution in my opinion requires a no holds barred, kitchen sink approach maximally funded”, but in the absence of huge corporate, individual or union sponsorship I think it would be fair to suggest that were you on UKIPs NEC and PERSONALLY liable for the debts of the party you would act with great care and probity.
If I recall correctly UKIP membership briefly hit 50,000 in the run up to the referednum with its average in the period 2010 to 2015 being nearer 25,000. That membership money and its Sovereign Draw was essential income for UKIP and lets be honest it was Nigels MEP salary that kept him paying his bills not monies from UKIPs meagre income. UKIP has its excellent manifesto in place, no debt, is eager to recruit, train and run and support candidates anywhere in the UK. If just 20 people joined UKIP in every constituency of say 70,000 people that would mean approx 13,000 members (650 x 20) which would bring in £390,000 to further the promotion of the party and thus get them noticed and would also raise the prospect of the branch network re-establishing itself. If the branch network could be built up then that in itself would attract more members and gain more visibility which is what is needed.
Thanks Jake for the prompt reply, luckily there is a reply box appended to your missive.
I appreciate what you say about NEC member responsibility and obviously we must think of attitudes and forms of conduct, Pre and Post referendum.
Yes, Nigel instituted the system and then finding it didn`t suit his modus operandi,and with help of others proceeded to play ducks and drakes with the system.
Having heard your description of the methods of funding Labour and the Conservative parties, by big dollops of Union and Big Business donations, it seems obvious to me that UKIP as incorporated was never going to gather enough funds to both run and keep together the party, as on well oiled wheels and to be able to finance major national EFFECTIVE campaigns.
So Nigel did what Nigel had to do, he got in large private donations. I`ll take a bet they wouldn`t have allowed him to pass them on to be handed out at the whim of a committee.
From what I can tell, even though methods were dodgy, the result was overall a spectacular success.
But the system was the wrong system.
Now we come to “New UKIP”, apparently as you describe it, it`s virtually the same old system, yes you might eventually get to a subscription based Nation Wide entity……………..eventually ( maybe after a few years), but some day you are going to end up with another go-getter Nigel type who will want to turn your attention away from local school run and dustbin collection affairs and want to get rid of the whole present governing system and indeed walk upon the world stage and put the GREAT back into GREAT BRITAIN.
Poor b*gger I hope he doesn`t get as frustrated as Nigel obviously was.
The word “Jobsworth” comes to mind.
I`m sorry if UKIP are to recover the glory days, it must change NOW, the nation cannot afford to wait, we are in the last chance saloon NOW>
I wish UKIP well, but please leave local to the experts – the limp dems – they`ve got it well sewn up and red blood is needed BIG thinking, not wishy-washy
Roger. With respect. Nigel was not an overnight success. Nigel could only get the bigger backers onboard when, through the years of toil by the branch activists, UKIP was recognised as an electoral force able to win European and council seats. The bigger donors were nowhere to be seen until 2012. You have to get recognised and show electoral success before the big donors emerge who presumably in some way can see a return on their ‘investment’. UKIP had 15 years or so before anyone took any notice of it. What I am keen to point out is that there are tens of thousands of ex UKIP members who are now realising Doris is a phoney and that they should consider rejoining UKIP to fast track our way back into representing the views of the centre Right. The brand name is there it just needs promoting to get energetic and determined ‘can do’ people behind it to get it off the ground again. Yes, you are absolutely right time is short but I can’t see any other centre Right party making headway. The Reform Party is closer to business sponsorship money but we all know that they are fearful that success would mean the Tories losing marginal seats resulting in Labour in power. They appear to be in the business of attempting to reform the Tories not replace them.
Brexit is in danger
Without Brexit, Britain and its people are nothing.
Boris has a get out of goal card. Solve NI and tell the navy to dissuade a few trawlers.
‘Get out of goal’?? What does that mean…….I think you meant ‘get out of jail card’, but never mind. Boris Johnson (I won’t say buffoon as I don’t want upset Mr. Biscotte) is in fact the biggest threat to Brexit, in that he was behind the fudge concerning the Northern Ireland protocol, the unfair situation with regard to our territorial waters and fishing, and shafting British fishermen. Just like he is behind the decision not to stem the flow of illegal migrants across the English Channel, and expecting us to adhere to Covid 19 restrictions on our lives, whilst he swans around as if nothing is happening……
CH – If fixed as TG says, are you saying the things TG listed, would *not* get The PM out of his current bit of difficulty?
For me, *all* the party-goers should be identified, exposed, and ordered to pay at least double the std fine per transgression, out of their own pockets, then see if that quells things.
Otherwise, I’m guessing you are either a non native English speaker who cannot graciously ignore a spelling error, or without any law background would not have heard the term gaol, or perhaps just stalking TG our esteemed poster at every spelling opportunity?
In my job, many of us use tablets with predictive mode, dvorak keyboards, touchpads and overseas keyboards such as Norwegian. All have their keying probs.
Even Great and Mighty Viv (allegedly) once made a smelling error last century.
OED gaol, gaoler (dʒeɪl, ˈdʒeɪlə(r))
variant spellings of jail, jailer. In British official use the forms with G are still current; in literary and journalistic use both the G and the J forms are now admitted as correct; in the U.S. the J forms are standard.
Biscotte……in fact you are right about the ‘gaol’ bit and in hindsight that’s what TGS was probably talking/writing about. However there is no malice intended I can assure you of that, just a bit of fun that’s all, so don’t get too worked up about it old bean. I think TGS takes the banter in his stride and doesn’t take it too seriously, and I think it is true to say that TGS has been a UKIP candidate himself, despite his aversion to committees and so on and so forth. Besides which I have been on the receiving end of quite a lot of cutting banter in the past in both the police and in a ‘gaol’ when I was a Prison Officer, and more recently when I stood as a UKIP election candidate on five occasions. Its all part of life’s rich tapestry, and one has to have broad shoulders. Oh well, the ‘Stalker’ is now turning in. Goodnight old chap, keep your pecker up. Just one thing I did indeed drop the the Tardis theme and Henry II etc, so I am getting there……