Beware the fat criminal bears lurking in the woods

 

In my little neck of the woods we have sunshine today and temperatures are predicted to rise into the low 20ºC. Taken with yesterday’s weather, it’s a veritable heatwave! I’m sure our glorious MSM will tell us all about it tomorrow. Today they’re doing as if they’re serious purveyors of ‘news’: “Newspaper headlines: ‘Threat to quit ECHR’ and ‘mortgage price war’” (link).

Leaving the ECHR? That should definitely stop the dinghies from coming and make the dastardly immigration lawyers shake in their boots! Sorry, I don’t think this’ll happen. It’ll be deemed too complicated, too controversial, and against the new deity: DEI – that’s diversity, equity and inclusion. Funny, isn’t it, how suddenly leaving the ECHR is an issue, never mind being talked about in the MSM, when this ought to’ve been done years ago. 

Meanwhile, because there are no other news, the old issue of ‘teh elderly’ costing too much has surfaced yet again. According to a report in The Times:

“State pensions to cost more than education, policing and defence combined – An ageing population and guaranteed annual increases are leaving Britain with a huge retirement bill” (link, paywalled)

Are the British pensioners not dying off fast enough? Have the decades of  ‘imports’ of young males not have any effect on the age statistics? Shouldn’t they have filled those pension pots during those decades? What happened? Those who claim yon immigrants cost the state more than they provide with work cannot possibly be correct – that would be racist. 

I cannot recall any outcries about the gold-plated pensions handed out, for years, to mandarins, other public serpents, MPs and NHS ‘CEOs’. Shouldn’t a cut there alleviate the state’s burden? Or is this the usual attempt from TPTB to create ‘acceptance’ for somehow reducing the amount the state pensions will have to rise, always calculated in September? 

Furthermore, nobody in those plush chatting circles of the Westminster swamp wonders how come that state pensioners seem to be untouched by the cost-of-living crisis which has affected so many – from train drivers to nurses, NHS consultants and civil serpents – that they were ‘forced’ to go on strikes. ‘Tis a veritable financial wonder! Perhaps treasury mandarins ought to ask some of those elderly for financial advice?

There was one wonderful Silly Season ‘story’ published yesterday which I kept on file. Yesterday I only had time and space to rant about the ‘water traumatised poor refugees’. I’m sure you’ll forgive me for producing it today. It is a brilliant example for the terrible patriarchy, providing evidence for ‘unconscious bias’, transferred even to innocent animals – not that author and comment posters seem to have noticed.

Under the headline “Fugitive bear ‘Hank the Tank’ caught after 21 break-ins” The Times writes about a black bear in the USA, and in the text there’s a photo which can only be described as ‘fat shaming’. Clearly, this bear could only be male – oh the sexism! As if there are no big female animals! It turns out this was a bear mom, with three cubs, and a proper crime family they were:

“Their mother and at least two other adult bears are believed to have been responsible for more than 150 incidents in the region straddling Nevada and northern California. At one break-in in Tahoe Keys last year, an animal smashed a window and squeezed through a small gap to enter the home while residents were there. The animal fled into the woods when police arrived.” (link, paywalled)

Yep – criminals they were, and now that they’ve been caught they’re going to ‘prison’ and will be ‘rehabilitated’. Firstly, mummy bear and her three cubs will be undergoing medical tests at an animal sanctuary. Then there’ll be a further relocation and rehabilitation:

“Officials plan to rehome the cubs at a wildlife rescue facility in Sonoma County, California, “in hopes they can discontinue the negative behaviours they learnt from the sow and can be returned to the wild”.” (link, paywalled)

See – ‘bad parenting’ even occurs amongst wild animals! I wonder why it is that our ‘authorities’ aren’t separating ‘human cubs’ from their criminal mums, to teach them to ‘discontinue the negative behaviour’ they’ve learned from mum. Perhaps such rehabilitation works for bear cubs because they don’t have or use smartphones …

Given the ubiquitous ignorance here and clearly in the USA, I’m not even going to point out that this bear was so huge because bears do eat as much as possible during summer and early autumn, to obtain sufficient fat reserves to see them through the winter hibernation. I wonder why no ‘expert’ has pointed this out.

That’s all I have for today. “We” don’t need to know anything about bears or indeed the environment: “we” are engaged only in saving the planet, virtue-signalling our commitment by supporting Net Zero. Have a good day.