GCHQ  – Photo by Defence Images

 

Earlier today we referred to a disturbing report in The Times about GCHQ targeting ‘anti-vaccine propaganda by hostile states (link) and said that this report, being paywalled, would receive our ‘From Behind the Paywall’ treatment. Here it is. The title and subtitle are programmatic: “GCHQ in cyberwar on anti-vaccine propaganda – Spies tackle disinformation linked to Russia” (link, paywalled). The authors are Lucy Fisher, Defence Editor and Chris Smyth, Whitehall Editor. 

They use various ‘sources’, nameless as always, sources which are located in ‘government’ and Whitehall. Here’s what can best be described as ‘official’ reason for this work – why now, and why we’re only now told about it is anybody’s guess …:

“The government regards tackling false information about inoculation as a rising priority as the prospect of a reliable vaccine against the coronavirus draws closer. A government source said: “GCHQ has been told to take out antivaxers online and on social media. There are ways they have used to monitor and disrupt terrorist propaganda.”

These tactics are understood to focus on taking down hostile state-linked content and disrupting the operations of the cyberactors responsible for it, including encrypting their data so they cannot access it and blocking their communications with each other. The British government confirmed in 2018 that it had an offensive cyberarsenal to take on Isis.” (link, paywalled)

The reason for this sudden interest is astonishing. It’s as if nothing must be allowed to disturb our ‘faith in vaccine’, especially not ‘Russia’. Here’s another ‘Whitehall source’, trying to reassure us peasants that GCHQ is ‘only’ after Russia, not us cranks:

“Russia is behind a high proportion of disinformation about the coronavirus, according to another Whitehall source who emphasised that GCHQ was able to gain permission to tackle disinformation that originated only from state adversaries. It is not legally permitted to disrupt online content written by ordinary citizens. “You wouldn’t get authorisation to go after cranks. People have a right to say batshit stuff online,” the source said.” (link, paywalled)

So it’s all good, innit – but the game is given away in this segment:

“Managing threats from hostile nations is one of GCHQ’s core missions. However, the ease with which it can tackle state-led disinformation varies depending on the geographic location of the servers on which that content is based. It is understood that Britain cannot attack websites based in the United States or the other Five Eyes nations — Australia, Canada and New Zealand — where it must instead defer to partner agencies.

Another option open to British officials is to contact servers and social media platforms directly to inform them that they are hosting hostile state propaganda. Robust free speech rights in America make it difficult to force companies to take action, however.

“The real problem is what you do about the social media platforms,” a British security source said. “All the stuff that’s out there legitimately. That’s much more difficult in the West. It is a civil liberties issue.” (link, paywalled)

Ah! It’s about ‘civil liberties’, is it? Hm …  I’m confident they’ll find a way even when they cannot rely on those helpful moderators of social media platforms or indeed their CEOs who have the power of removing tweets from President Trump because of ‘community rulz’. So we have the choice of being ‘cranks’ to whom nobody in the Westminster Cabal needs to listen – not that they’d stoop so low even as they use those social media themselves to ‘do’ politics! And there’s more – the Armed Forces are involved:

“In addition to GCHQ’s efforts, a secretive army unit specialising in information warfare is involved in countering fake narratives about the coronavirus.”

General Sir Nick Carter, the chief of the defence staff, has publicly confirmed that 77 Brigade is “helping to quash rumours about misinformation but also to counter disinformation”. The Berkshire-based unit, established in 2015, has been working with a rapid response team based in the Cabinet Office to tackle damaging narratives, including fake cures and conspiracy theories about the source of the virus.

Ben Wallace, the defence secretary, has also highlighted Russia’s role in mounting misinformation campaigns during the pandemic.” (link, paywalled)

Now we know why anything that doesn’t fit “The Narrative” about covid can be disregarded and discarded by the covid authorities as ‘fake’, as ‘conspiracy’. It’s because it’s instigated by Russia. After all, ‘they’ have proof – but do pay attention to the last sentence in this segment:

“The US State Department published a report this summer on Russian state disinformation and propaganda that identified numerous fake narratives about a coronavirus vaccine that had been sown by Kremlin-aligned proxies.

Russia was jointly accused this summer by Britain, the US and Canada of trying to hack western coronavirus vaccine research. Attempts were identified in Britain by the National Cyber Security Centre, an operational division of GCHQ, which had pre-emptively erected a digital shield around British pharmaceutical laboratories and research institutions. The Russian government denied the allegation.

British ministers have declared it “almost certain” that Russian actors tried to influence last year’s general election by amplifying online “illicitly acquired” documents on UK-US trade talks.” (link, paywalled)

Oh dear! So Putin didn’t want the socialist Corbyn in No10? Odd, that – a socialist government would surely have given him more influence here, no? This argument by ‘British Ministers’ – who after all won the election – is also strange because it either means they regret that they’d won, or that they hope to resurrect the ‘Russia’ cry in order to justify this latest state intrusion into what we can and cannot read, never mind write about . Note also that at last year’s GE there was no covid and thus there were no covid conspiracists around. Next, there’s a juicy little titibit:

“Last month Sir Mark Sedwill, the former cabinet secretary, confirmed that Britain had carried out covert attacks on Russian leaders and their interests. He told Times Radio: “We will use different techniques. We need to play to our strengths and focus our attention on their vulnerabilities.” (link, paywalled)

He would certainly know! The GCHQ brush-off comes as a matter of course:

“GCHQ declined to confirm or deny its involvement in an offensive cyber-operation tackling anti-vaccine disinformation.” (link, paywalled)

At the end of that article the authors give a summary of who all those baddies are. The very strange thing is that this was compiled by the US government, under President Trump who, according to the global MSM these past four years, was put in place thanks to Putin. I’ll quote it here so “we” know what to avoid, ok yah?

“The Kremlin’s army of conspiracy theorists – The US State Department has identified a series of websites and organisations aligned to the Kremlin pushing false narratives about coronavirus vaccines. — South Front: A disinformation website that focuses on military and security issues. In March it published an article headlined: “The fight for a cure: one gigantic western pharma rip-off.” It suggested that vaccines were unnecessary and were pushed for profit motives. Another said that vaccines could contain “a brain debilitating agent, or a gene that renders women infertile”. — News Front: Claims to provide an “alternative source of information” for western audiences. In March it posted an article claiming that Covid-19 vaccines were a fraud spearheaded by Bill Gates and “Big Pharma” and said it was “a matter of luck” for patients which substances were injected into them. — Geopolitica.ru: The Russian ultra-nationalist platform said in April that vaccines were a plot by Bill Gates and Microsoft to control humans by inserting microchips into them. —Source: Pillars of Russia’s Disinformation and Propaganda Ecosystem, a report by the US State Department’s global engagement centre, August 2020.” (link, paywalled)

I’ll finish by paraphrasing a quote by the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein who said that one must be silent about that whereof one cannot speak. Even if we wouldn’t go to those sites in the first place, by denying us the opportunity to read what we want government in the form of GCHQ is depriving us of information. When we can only read what government agencies permit us to see because of a one-sided focus on one ‘designated’ enemy while leaving aside another, much more pernicious one, we are forced to accept government propaganda willy-nilly. 

I couldn’t possibly comment on thoughts about a certain ‘benefactor’ perhaps having an interest in steering public discourse, nor about a certain country in whose interest it is to keep any thoughts about origins of covid and treatment of the same out of the public discourse. 

I do note in concluding that a certain former top Whitehall Mandarin has said in public that we’re actually doing the same as those bad Russians, only, of course, so much better …

 

 

Photo by Defence Images