Sir,
Am I alone in wondering if COVID 19 is part of a Globalist Plan to create a World government? Draconian laws foisted upon populations without proper democratic scrutiny suggest, to me, a concerted project to exert total control over many unsuspecting people.
The introduction of Covid vaccines and possibly mandatory requirement for all to receive it alarms me, especially as the manufacturers insist upon immunity from prosecution in the event of side effects. A lack of total confidence in their product? Plus my fear the vaccines could contain ingredients which cause personality changes.
Does anyone remember articles published in the press some years ago, about 2004 I think, highlighting scientific advances in the use of easily administered but nearly non detectable substances which could when imbibed by a lot of people e.g. via a reservoir render them docile and compliant to suggestions with which they would normally disagree? Outlandish thoughts? Well, there are reports that the Chinese Army is carrying out trials on its troops with personality changing drugs which reduce or eliminate fear.
Britain with its NHS could be the perfect laboratory for experimenting on large numbers of people with personality changing drugs. Provided free at point of use and no delays due to costs which could inhibit many in other countries Britain would be the ideal test bed.
I would add that I have no scientific training but a check on the Web to read about Ethical issues in Neuroscience, and there are many journals dealing with this subject has added fuel to my concerns.
Respectfully, Ernie Blaber
~~~ OOO ~~~
Sir,
Another gloomy report by Sky News this morning claiming a “no deal” Brexit could add £4 billion annually to the cost of our food imported from the EU. Typically, Sky News carefully avoids mentioning that Brexit will save us at least £12 billion+/annum for ever in nett payments to the EU’s budgets. They also ignore the fact that we can import cheaper food from outside the EU, thus avoiding taxpayers money adding to the vast fortune the EEC/EU has cost us since 1973.
For example, UK nett payments to EU budgets, currently costs us a total of over £300 billion making the UK poorer and our EU competitors economically stronger at UK taxpayer’s expense. Hence the EU’s terror that we will be a “competitor” after Brexit.
Also, being in the EU could currently be costing the UK over £190 billion/year. Adding the assumed annual costs after correcting to present day values indicates our EU membership could have currently cost our economy well over £11 trillion!
In addition, when we joined the EEC in 1973 our balance of payments, (BOP), in trade with the EEC was approximately zero. However, when we joined the EEC/EU it took over complete control of UK trade. The result is a massive deficit in our BOP with the EU, currently costing us well over £2 trillion. Is it any wonder that they are insisting on “level playing fields” and control over our laws so that they can maintain the UK’s position as a “cash cow” for their products? Significantly, over the same period the UK’s BOP with the rest of the world is in surplus. Perhaps a good omen for the future, ignored by the pro-EU pundits!
Furthermore, the EU is demanding that they are entitled to carry on fishing under the terms of the EU’s CFP after Brexit as our territorial waters still contain their fish. Considering that the CFP must have already cost the UK fishing industry about £100 billion the EU’s greed and malevolence is stupefying.
Hopefully, Brexit will also relieve UK taxpayers from providing the second largest portion of the EU’s €750 billion covid fund, a €1.25 trillion liability in the EU’s financial mechanisms and the €30+ trillion EU pensions liability. It is incredulous that politicians and others, still moaning about Brexit, are willing to throw away many more billions of UK taxpayers money to the EU.
It is clear that the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties should never, ever, be in government again.
Respectfully, J Wraith
~~~ OOO ~~~
Sir,
To be clear on who has been contravening international law. As seen below, the EU has been doing exactly that – by demanding that we must follow regulations set by them, rather than by our own Parliament. Article 2(1)–(5) from the UN Charter states that:
1. The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members and 2. All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfil in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.
So the EU is failing to act in good faith, by contravening the UN Charter – plus Clause 38 (sovereignty) of the Withdrawal Agreement – by trying to coerce the UK into subjugation.
The Vienna Convention also stipulates what a Treaty is, ie Under Article 53:
“A treaty is not an agreement to change or diminish the internal constitution of signatory states nor to affect the democratic rights of their peoples and parliaments. Therefore the European Treaties – including the UK’s signing of the Accession Treaty in 1972 – are not treaties as defined in international law.”
EU rulers would no doubt argue that the Vienna Convention does not apply to them, because the EU is not a nation state – even though it sets out to have a single currency, fiscal and political union, a foreign policy and its own military.
That seems to be the EU excuse for attempting to bully the UK into submission, to sign a binding agreement with no unilateral escape clause. Who would ever vote to join such an organisation and why is no one taking the EU to the International Court?
Respectfully, Roger J. Arthur
Globalist Plan:
Indeed you are not alone Ernie. One only needs to search out the plans of Gates, the WEF and the UN. It’s almost as if “1984” and “Brave New World” are being used as manuals for government.
It is not just Covid either; the Great Global Warming Scam is being used to oppress us and oppression will soon turn to control once we are wholly dependent on the various electric devices which may be turned off at will if we don’t toe the government line.
I seriously doubt that there is, and will not be, the generating capacity to supply all the new electric vehicles and electric home heating now being forced on us. Of course that will not matter if the Gates’ and their mates manage the huge reduction in population that they demand…
RJA Yeah well. Let’s just get out, fully out, of the bloody thing. If they want to start international legal arguments then we’ll answer them – or not as the case may be.
Biscotte – think I prefer the term United Kingdom. It reminds us we have 4 nations under a monarch. Great Britain sounds too much like wanting to strut on the world stage. Same applies to Boris’ favourite ‘Global Britain’.
I just want to be a citizen of a Sovereign Nation, this one.
J Wraith. Yes it really is amazing that Sky News can still make these ridiculous claims. Food, in particular will be cheaper if we are genuinely free of EU. And that is rather fundamental insn’t it.
Ernie Blaber. You are not alone. Mind bending drugs are not even new. Nazi crack troops were dosed up on something along those lines I believe.
Our NHS is almost certainly a very useful tool if there is such a global conspiracy because as you point out there is no legal redress here for harmful drug administration. USA is better in that respect.
Also, as Vernon Coleman has pointed out for years our G.Ps are no longer ethical people listening to patients and doing their best to restore them to health. The way the NHS works is that it is a bureaucratic machine designed to pump us full of more and more pharmaceutical products.
It seems counter intuitive to think of the communist Chinese Government working hand in hand with huge capitalist pharmaceutical firms but with their being other Global organisations in the mix it does make sense.
On the bright side ( and there are not too many of those about!) we may find that the ninety-per-cent of profligate spenders who populate our country will come to realise that they should perhaps be a little more cautious how, where and when they spend their money.(should they have any left).
We may find that there could be a surfeit of tank-like four x fours returned to the loan companies from families who cou,d easily have managed with the small car which I have been using for the last six years,……..and which they pay ‘an arm and a leg for’ per month.
The signs however are not good….I am told on good authority that McDonalds have enjoyed queues and queues of our ‘starving populace’ waiting for hours to consume cardboard French fries and Charlie Chaplin boot-like ‘beef’ burgers at prices beyond that which my ‘pension’ will justify.
But….time will tell….the ‘mystery-man they call Rishi Sunak, the Asian Father Christmas……….who appeared as if by faery-Magic just in time to break into the last few quid we had secreted away, only to spray it confetti-like to every criminal claiming to be a ‘small business man’, all of whom ably assisted him to pilfer the Treasury (aided and abetted by HRMC) will probably find new ways to dish out further ‘goodies’ to foreign criminals….(tear them away from their Scam-arranged computer systems……) so they can build their enormous Holiday Homes in their preferred ‘ country of birth’…..mainly Pakistan……..
He and Boris perform like children let loose in a Christmas toy-shop, but of course their world-view of money is slightly different from millions of ORDINARY hard-working Brits……..they have just never lived.
The Premiership to Boris is simply a diversion from his spoilt-brat approach to his ‘life’…..which applies also to Sunak…..and MOST of those in our Parliament replete with their free ten-grand from the mug Taxpayers.
So endeth the lesson!
EB:-
– Globalist Plan – OK, but who is the coordinator?
– ”The perfect laboratory for experimenting on large numbers of people”
Why bother with drugs in reservoirs? See book by Maj William E Mayer – Brainwashing-The Ultimate Weapon. And in our case, hidden in plain sight.
JW:-
You are preaching to the converted.
Monies are just some of the reasons for the Referendum Result.
RA:-
I’m sure you are right about the legalities.
But if you look at the judiciary in the uS re voting fraud – nothing to see here, spurious petition, case dismissed, move along. And it is no different in uk (not yet Great Britain).