Written by Ann Farmer
It was reported in The Express that Prince Charles, with his long-held interest in all things environmental, ‘could visit China for the first time in a bid to persuade the world’s biggest polluter to help curb climate change’. Via a video link to the UN COP15 ‘biodiversity summit’ in the Chinese city of Kunming, he will say that ‘world polluters must pay for environmental destruction and the true cost reflected in the price of goods.’ The 72-year-old is understood to be ‘open to an invitation to visit the emerging superpower in the next couple of years’, and his speech will mark ‘a British diplomatic charm offensive using the Royal Family to bring Beijing and other rapidly developing economies on side for next month’s COP26 climate change conference in Glasgow.’ Apparently, his ‘intervention comes as the West fears Chinese goods are undercutting competitors and benefitting from an economy fuelled by coal power and other global warming causes’ (link).
We have certainly cut our own carbon emissions – but only because we have closed our own heavy industries and coal mines and refuse to take advantage of an abundance of shale gas, while outsourcing all our energy needs; although this approach does allow our green-obsessed politicians to lecture the rest of the world on their carbon emissions (link).
But China is far from an ‘emerging superpower’: having finally got its hands on Hong Kong, it is using its massive economic and military strength to bully Taiwan and other nations within its ambit – see e.g. here and here. However, its influence now goes worldwide, buying up poor countries via the ‘Belt and Road’ initiative, but also because the West has outsourced much of its manufacturing to Chinese factories. Meanwhile, China is buying influence in Western universities, making creative use of Western commercial ideas and also edging its way into our defence systems (link).
It is unlikely that the Chinese Communist Party, under President Xi Jinping, will be quaking in their boots at the prospect of a lecture on global warming from Prince Charles; their appalling human rights record (see here) shows they are no slouches when it comes to picking on those smaller than themselves. The plight of the Uighur Muslims has attracted Western attention in recent years, but millions of Chinese have perished under Communism, not only from starvation and cruelty, but also before birth in forced abortions, in a brutal attempt to cut their own population (link).
Indeed, it is likely that their population control programme explains the reluctance of Western environmentalists to draw attention to Chinese pollution, and now ‘green’ issues are being prioritised over human rights: John Kerry, U.S. special presidential envoy for climate, ignored China’s record of genocide in order to do a ‘climate’ deal with the regime, and when asked ‘“What is the process by which one trades off climate against human rights?”’, responded: ‘“Well, life is always full of tough choices in the relationship between nations” (link)’.
Thankfully, Prince Charles has bucked this trend, taking some ‘tough choices’ of his own: in 1999, he ‘boycotted a state banquet for the then visiting Chinese president over the country’s occupation of Tibet’, missing ‘a similar banquet in 2005 and another for President Xi in 2015.’ Sadly, it now seems that human rights come second to environmental concerns – and logically speaking, if human beings are killing the Planet, the more human beings killed the better. Perhaps China should be awarded a green medal after all.
The environmentalist anti-human stance is exemplified by Sir David Attenborough, who ‘calls the benefits of nature “indispensable” to human life in a new film about biodiversity’ (Daily Express, October 12, 2021). Unfortunately, despite the emphasis on helping humans, his concern does not seem to extend to human biodiversity, especially in the developing world. A long-time patron of population control focussed on Africa (e.g. here), Sir David has called humans a ‘plague’ on the Earth (link). Jetting around the world to lecture about the state of the environment (see here). Along with other high-profile environmentalist, he is heavily involved with population control (link), and has supported a drastic reduction in human population in order to make humanity ‘sustainable’.
With his keen interest in the built environment (source), Prince Charles has done much to encourage a more attractive world, and now says that ‘“regenerative agriculture, including practices such as organic and no-till farming to restore soil fertility, could enable agriculture to play a critical role in addressing climate change, revitalising rural communities and enhancing human health”’ – indeed, ‘“the transition to sustainable land use can help raise the next 1.5 billion people out of poverty and represents a significant global investment opportunity.”’ (link). Such heartening and hopeful statements may be taken with a shrug of disdain by Chinese Communists, but they are enough to make the ‘greenwashed’ population control movement give birth to countless kittens – in their view, vastly preferable to human beings.
However, their stated aim of reducing world population rather than raising billions of people ‘out of poverty’ should make Prince Charles cautious about being used to promote an essentially anti-human agenda. Far from rescuing people from poverty, the Malthusian lobby and its military wing the ‘family planning’ movement – more accurately, the family banning movement – know they can ply their trade most effectively against the voiceless poor. And now they are using the ‘threat’ of ‘climate change’ to demand even more money to fund abortions in poor countries – dressed up as ‘choice’, of course (see here and here).
Prince Charles should rethink his Chinese charm offensive which, if it fails to take into account China’s murderous human rights record, will be not so much a charm offensive as a smarm offensive, doing incalculable harm to humanity – and being much more offensive.
Photo by Carl Graph 
Nothing wrong with population control – it is one UN project that really makes sense.
Charlie is a complete idiot. We would be better off if he never took the throne. Let the Royal Family stick to what they are best at; a tourist attraction.
It is difficult to know Jack Thomas, who is the biggest idiot, Bojo or Charles.
Unfortunately we are stuck with Bojo, unless someone displaces him.
One of my friends suggested Charlie might step aside in favour of his eldest son, William. I suppose that is possible since Charles has married a divorced woman, like him, who would have been Edward 8th and instead married Mrs. Simpson.
Charles, who might become 3, also wanted to be ‘defender of the faithS’ instead of THE FAITH, i.e. Christianity. Still with the present woke archbishop standing by to crown him THAT would be no problem, would it !!
Added to which, someone who doesn’t realise by talking to plants, he is encouraging them to grow by breathing CO2 on them, then wants to tell the world to stop burning fossil fuel because it produces CO2 which is bad for the planet – well sounds like a candidate for the loony bin to me.
Is Charlie not aware that the biggest land owner in Scotland, being the Queen, obtained an exemption to the green energy bill for all of her land and properties?
Maybe Charlie will greet the Chinese leader with a special handshake as he does with all the world leaders and the idle rich. I will be watching the body language with interest.
The man who will push Britain into a Republic if He becomes King
Indeed. We don’t want him. We don’t need this decrepit old couple representing the nation around the Commonwealth, especially when there is a vibrant, attractive young family available just behind him. He’s a loony-tunes and will bring about the end of the monarchy.
And that makes two of us least. Prince Charles is a liability and a twerp who doesn’t engage brain before speaking and seems to think he speaks for the majority of people in this country. I am a monarchist at heart and would much prefer a monarch as head of state over above a politician any day, but with the continuing controversies perpetrated by Prince Harry and those of Prince Andrew, and the constant green claptrap coming out of Prince William’s mouth as well of late, will cause many to believe that the monarchy in this country is in its death throes and that it no longer has a long term future. When Prince Charles speaks on just about anything I just cringe as he is so out of touch with his subjects. Time for him to set an example to the others and keep quiet I feel.
Unfortunately, both William and the Horrendous Harry pace in their father’s footsteps when it comes to AGW.
Correct.
Ah so. I did wonder about that Sonya.
Still, it’s Bojo ‘in charge’ at the moment isn’t it. Heaven help us.
Harry has p***ed on his chips so thankfully is now a nonentity in the UK.
William should have a heart to heart with his wonderful Aunty Anne who seems to have her head screwed on. Sadly Grandpa is no longer with us, I think he saw the CO2 greenhouse gas scientifically illiterate BS for the scam that it is.
The reason Chinese goods are cheap is (near) slave labour and the theft of technology/designs from the West.
Didn’t we (the West) nick some technology from the Middle Kingdom two or three hundred years ago?
Nothing the Chinese can teach the West about nicking other peoples property.