Working hard on the Labour Manifesto …

 

Parliament will be back from their ever so well earned recess today. It’s not as if we missed having another set of theatre performers vying for our attention, but perhaps we’ll be spared the ongoing obsession in the MSM with yon ITV presenters. They’re still at it, as the obligatory glance at the print editions’ front pages shows: “Newspaper headlines: Mortgage rates ‘squeeze’ and ‘Phil won’t watch Holly’’ (link). 

Hidden away were two ‘stories’ I found interesting. One is about Starmer’s proposal to stop oil and gas production in the North Sea “because green!”, the other is about an episode shown on telly on Saturday. They are both indicative of the ‘culture’ preferred by the Westminster denizens.

Let’s firstly look at this delicious article in The Times: “Unions lambast Labour over ‘naive’ green energy plan” (link, paywalled). The labourite responsible for yon plan is none other than Ed Millipede, the one who gave us the green surcharge’. But rest assured: the Trade Unionists haven’t seen the light and condemn Net Zero – they solely want to preserve jobs in the oil  and gas industries:

“Gary Smith, general secretary of the GMB, joined Unite’s Sharon Graham yesterday in criticising the pledge to ban new licences for oil and gas extraction in the North Sea. He said the proposals were naive and displayed a “lack of intellectual rigour and thinking”. […] He said he thought that workers in the petrochemical industry “are going to be very worried about what Labour are saying and I think it is time for Labour to focus on the right thing rather than what they think is the popular thing”.” (link, paywalled)

Does Mr Smith believe that ‘Net Zero’ and everything pertaining to it is ‘the popular thing’? How … interesting. Ms Graham, Gen Sec of ‘Unite’, displayed the same attitude, saying that:

“Labour must now be very clear that they will not let workers pay the price for the transition to renewable energy. […] We cannot have a repeat of the devastation wrought on workers and their communities by the closure of the coalmines. It is reckless in the extreme to talk about halting this industry without offering a coherent, fully funded plan for jobs.” (link, paywalled)

Labour will keep the ‘Net Zero’ policies, disregarding the fact that the destruction of the basis of our economy will hit their clientele, the ‘workers and downtrodden’, more than the posh, red-tinged middle classes in the shires who appealed to Starmer:

“In a statement to The Guardian, groups including the Campaign to Protect Rural England and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds called on him to “stand firm on Labour’s policy of no new oil and gas developments and its significant investment in well-planned, nature-positive renewables and energy efficiency”. (link, paywalled)

Isn’t that a beautiful appeal: ‘nature-positive renewables’! ‘Farming’ solar and wind is so lovely and ‘nature-positive’ that we don’t need to worry about food security or the destruction of our land and shores by installing bird shredders. Better also not worry about where the material for those things is coming from and how it’s going to be manufactured. The cherry on top of the icing of that cake however is this:

“Before a visit to a nuclear power plant in Somerset today, [Starmer] said: “Nuclear is a critical part of the UK’s energy mix. It’s shambolic that after 13 years of Tory government, not one of the ten nuclear sites approved by the last Labour government has been built.” (link, paywalled)

Doesn’t Starmer know that his German colleagues, in coalition with the German Greens, have just shut down their last three nuclear power plants? Doesn’t he want Labour to be ‘green’? Shouldn’t he instead find it within himself to grudgingly applaud the Tories for being so ‘green’ as to refrain from building these things? 

Some weeks ago a German blogger pointed out that shutting down those nuclear power stations is a good thing because, given the state of the ‘education’ in schools and colleges, there are no engineers and workers who’d actually be capable of safely running said stations. That, I’m afraid, applies to us here in the UK – with knobs on.

And so to the second item which attracted my attention. The DT reported: “BBC criticised over non-binary Casualty character discussing top surgery” (paywalled link). This episode was broadcast before the watershed and 

“[…] includes a character discussing their “top surgery” and being presented with a surprise cake shaped like breasts. “Top surgery” commonly refers to a mastectomy carried out on transgender men to remove breast tissue.” (paywalled link)

Because nowadays those ‘playing’ characters must be ‘authentic’, the ‘actor’ of this scene was of course ‘transgender’ itself:

“Arin Smethurst, the non-binary trans actor who plays Sah, previously told Metro: “Sah is really interesting for me to play for a number of reasons. I think that I’ve figured out more about my queer identity than they have when you meet them in the show.” (paywalled link)

‘Acting’ is now also ‘therapy’? Who knew …! There were viewers – or rather: campaigners – who applauded this … thing as ‘joyful’. How tasteless is that when so many women have to undergo ‘top surgery’ because of cancer! How could the BBC do such thing? Easy: it’s ‘gay pride month’, which has become more like ‘gay trans month’. 

I leave you with a video where one such person talks about their experience, shattering that of yon BBC trans ‘actor’. Watch it here – it is truly sad. But then again, if the BBC and certain campaigners say that such utter destruction is ‘joyful’, who are we to argue …

Is it too much to hope that all those crying for ‘moar money’ for our Sacred Cow will demand that scarce resources will be saved to treat cancer? Is it too much to ask Labour and the other parts of the Uniparty, never mind the BBC and MSM, to save the lives of our children from such irreversible procedures based on nothing but trans propaganda? 

That’s all I have for today. I wonder when gays and lesbians will grasp the fact that this transgenderism is actually a crass case of homophobia because it eradicates lesbians and gays by surgical means. Have a good day.