Green isn’t working: voters and the economy say ‘no’ 

 

And so, right for the weekend, Westminster denizens have now ‘analysed’ the by-election results and are coming up with a ‘recipe’ on how to do better next time. Strangely enough, both Labour and Tories have found the same culprit for their ‘loss’ – yes, Starmer expected to win Uxbrudge as well. After all, it’s what the papers predicted. This unifying reason is: Net Zero! It’s even stranger because the MSM have been full of climate fear porn these past days, with headlines and photos of the hot ‘killer’ summer in Mediterranean countries. Does ‘death by climate’ not count any longer?

Mind you, good old Auntie B is still working hard at not mentioning this surprising acknowledgement by covering it up in their headline for today’s print editions’ front pages: “Newspaper headlines: By-election fallout and Lionesses roaring to go” (link). Just in case you wonder: no, that second part isn’t about more lionesses roaming the suburbs of Berlin, it’s about wimmins footie. And so to the ever so profound analyses of yon by-election results. The DT reports:

“The Tories defied expectations to hold Boris Johnson’s former Uxbridge and South Ruislip seat amid a row over Sadiq Khan’s expansion of London’s ultra-low emission zone (Ulez). […] On Friday, the Labour leadership were forced to distance themselves from Ulez, a flagship policy of the capital’s Labour mayor, after admitting that the voter backlash appeared to hand the Conservatives victory in Uxbridge.” (paywalled link)

Who saw this coming! Who predicted that Starmer and his deputy, Ms Rayner, would blame their crony’s Ulez policy for robbing them of their expected Uxbridge win! Apparently, “Sir Keir said he would “reflect” on the message from voters.” (paywalled link). Politicians ‘reflecting’ on voters’ wishes? Now that would be novel! Mind you, ‘reflecting’ doesn’t mean ‘changing’, so I expect many weasel words in the forthcoming Labour election manifesto but o change. As for the Tories: will they listen to this:

“Lord Frost, the former Brexit secretary, said: “The lesson is surely that green policies are very unpopular when there’s a direct cost to people, as indeed all the polling says. This time, that hit Labour, but soon it could be us unless we rethink heat pumps and the 2030 electric car deadline.” (paywalled link)

Indeed so, but it’s going to be so hard to stand against the eco-loons in their own party! Meanwhile, the FT report, headlined “Tories urge Sunak to water down green pledges after by-election carnage”, observes:

“Sunak’s allies insisted the prime minister would not renege on green commitments and would continue to do “the right thing”, but that families were rightly concerned about the cost of living.” (link, paywalled)

Oh dear. While Starmer ‘reflects’ as some Tories are still keen to keep doing ‘the right green thing’, I don’t expect Net Zero policies to change at all. I do expect the next government, regardless of who captures No 10, to increase taxes in the name of Ecolunacy because ‘teh rich’ must protect the poor, hard-working people from the costs of that lunacy.

Perhaps they ought to take a very close look at the ever increasing devastation such green policies are wreaking in Germany where the Green Party, part of the governing coalition, sinking ever deeper in the polls while the despised ‘hard extreme far right’ AfD is rising and rising, despite the unanimous attitude of politicians and MSM to make even thinking of the AfD a crime, labelling any who do so as ‘nazis’. 

There’s a very interesting development however which ought to make the Net-Zero-fanatics ponder their idiocy. We were promised that ‘wind’ will deliver all this fabulous ‘green electricity’, were we not! There was going to be another huge offshore ‘array’ in the North Sea. However, this ain’t gonna happen now. The sad – for Net Zeroists – thing is that economic reality has bitten hard. Under the headline “Costs topple huge Vattenfall wind farm project”  The Times had to report (all emphases are mine)::

Sweden’s state energy company has abandoned work on a multibillion-pound wind farm off the coast of Norfolk because of soaring costs in a blow to Britain’s clean energy ambitions. Vattenfall said it was stopping development of the 1.4 gigawatt Norfolk Boreas wind farm, which could have powered about 1.5 million homes, after supply chain problems and inflation increased its costs by up to 40 per cent.” (link, paywalled)

Who could have predicted last year, when this Swedish Company won the auction to build these birdshredders, that the obscene energy prices would have an effect on industries in their building supply chain! Worse: the German paper ‘Die Welt’ has taken a closer look – after all, Germany was planning to build these things as well – reporting that:

Vattenfall […] has rather trivialized the cost problem – the prices for steel and special metals have not increased by 40, but rather by 80 percent. The internationally coveted special ships, with which the huge towers are rammed into the seabed, now charge 60 percent more than three years ago. Internationally, a price-driving competition has developed for the production capacities for turbines, rotor blades and towers.” (link, paywalled, in German)

‘Supply chain problems’ are being blamed because other companies in yon ‘chain’ are “withdrawing from binding agreements”, and on the ‘geopolitical situation’, the novel way of mentioning the war in the Ukraine:

“Anna Borg, Vattenfall’s chief executive, said: “Higher inflation and capital costs are affecting the entire energy sector but the geopolitical situation has made offshore wind and its supply chain particularly vulnerable.” (link, paywalled)

As financial and economic reality bites, as the windfarm projects disintegrate, our Net Zero acolytes in Whitehall had this to say: “An energy department spokesman said: “We are listening to companies’ concerns.” (link, paywalled). Isn’t that lovely and caring of them! The ‘reflecting’ Labour chief will feel right at home among the ‘listening’ Whitehall mandarins!

I am intrigued to see how this government and the ‘opposition’ will try to square the circle of losing votes when adhering to green crappery while economic reality is pulling the rug from under their feet, when wind farms cannot be built because of inflation. Raising taxes for green crap will not be popular, not in the shires and not amongst the working population.

I wonder when the Net Zero fanatics in Whitehall and the Westminster MSM will recognise that even they won’t be able to afford their cushy lives should ‘more green taxes’ hit them. I wonder when ‘economists’ in the MSM, when the Treasury mandarins realise that Net Zero policies will drive even more SME into bankruptcy, crumbling the tax income and leading to more tax outgoings to pay for more jobless. 

That’s all I have for today. We live indeed in interesting times, and the future has become even more ‘interesting’. Have a good weekend.