Written by J. Butties
Prophylactic and early onset treatment without Gene Therapy Treatment:
Ivermectin:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of Ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of Ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of Ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified. Ref: American Journal of Therapeutics, direct link to the paper here.
And:
Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that Ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no Ivermectin: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using Ivermectin. Using Ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that Ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally. Ref American Journal of Therapeutics, direct link to the paper here.
These Ivermectin trials are not lab experiments.
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ):
Lest we forget here in the UK, the HCQ+Zinz+Azithromycin used as a prophylactic and early onset treatment has and is being used worldwide quite successfully. Hydroxychloroquine had repeatedly been found to be an effective treatment for Covid19. Didier Raoult was one of the earliest to discover its usefulness. He treated over 1000 patients with Azithromycin and Hydroxychloroquine and almost 99% recovered. Other studies found its efficacy was increased when Zinc was added into the protocol; there were fewer fatalities and patients were discharged home earlier. Harvey Risch, a Yale professor conducted a meta-analysis showing the key role it could play in an outpatient setting. This was subsequently confirmed by Peter McCullough MD who showed how when started earlier this treatment would reduce the progression of disease, prevent hospitalization, and is associated with reduced mortality
Well heck – why not use it here in the UK? But first we must undertake a Trial. Why not ignore all previous work and just trial HCQ alone, on serious, later-stage afflicted ill people?
What do we get? The Oxford RECOVERY Trial:
“The “Recovery” trial into Hydroxychloroquine ((sponsored by the Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust and others with a conflict of interests)) was set up to fail. The unsuspecting patients were overdosed with four times the appropriate amount. I suspect those behind this demonisation of a life-saver wanted to destroy it’s reputation so that the profiteering, experimental, no-liability vaccine agenda could be rolled out. Thousands of people lost their lives because HCQ was not used thanks to Medical Terrorists disguised as “health” bureaucrats.”
The same applies to the WHO, who followed suit with their SOLIDARITY trial.
“But the WHO appeared determined to control the narrative and set up a $108 million dollar study with 12,000 patients at 500 hospital sites across 30 countries. They trialled Hydroxychloroquine on 954 late stage patients. 64% of these were already on oxygen or ventilation. Using this study they were able to achieve very different results.
To understand how, you need to know SARS2 has three stages: viral replication which can develop into florid pneumonia and then multi-organ attack. Hydroxychloroquine tackles early-stage viral replication rather than late stage inflammation which requires a different approach. It is most valuable as an outpatient treatment preventing SARS2 developing to a later stage.
By giving Hydroxychloroquine to late-stage patients the WHO SOLIDARITY trial was setting up a trial which would be bound to have negative results.”
Cui bono? Not us plebs.
And now it is the turn for the UK to undertake the PRINCIPLE Trial for Ivermectin.
Dr. Pierre Kory, of FLCCC Alliance and Dr. Tess Lawrie, of The BiRD Group write to the PRINCIPLE Trial leaders (Oxford again), expressing their concerns;
“Dear Professors,
We write to you today with serious and urgent concerns about the randomized
controlled trial of Ivermectin which you are about to begin in the UK…..At the outset, it is puzzling to understand why a trial of Ivermectin would even be necessary, given the preponderance of peer-reviewed scientific evidence that has been published across the globe. This unassailable evidence includes dozens of randomized controlled trials, and a systematic review and meta analysis (using the rigorous Cochrane methods) that all show large magnitude improvements in case counts, hospitalizations and deaths using Ivermectin……
In conclusion, it is our strong belief that The PRINCIPLE Trial is a non-essential, poorly
designed study that will lead to a harvest of unreliable data concerning the utility of
Ivermectin in COVID-19. Any further delays in getting safe, effective, early treatments
to patients will result in additional needless illness and death….”
Any bets on the PRINCIPLE Trial outcome?
Gene Therapy:
None of the Treatments have been approved as claimed by many but are being injected under emergency use criteria on the basis that there is no alternative treatment. Try and get a scrip off your GP for Ivermectin, HCQ+Zinc etc,. You cannot even get VitC+Zinc or VitD prescribed, notwithstanding this advice. Billions for Test & Trace though.
What is absolutely clear is that these Gene Therapy Treatments are maiming and killing people on a scale that has never been experienced or tolerated in the past for any ‘vaccines’ even the real ones.
There is no justification for Emergency Use of Gene Therapy injections if dirt cheap tried and tested alternatives can be used ( it would be illegal to do so in the USA under FDA rules, I understand) so there is every reason for these cheap tried and tested drugs to be blackballed to keep the experiments and mind blowing BigPharma profits going. Compulsory Gene Therapy Treatment has been announced in France (13/7/21) and was approved by the UK Parliament on the same day. In the UK this will apply to healthcare workers, tradesmen, hairdressers and others who need to enter a care home! Australia announced the same proposals on a similar dateline (but faced a pushback before the event unlike anything our legal people here in the UK have produced to my knowledge)
Global co-ordination or conspiracy theory?
Anyone for a Booster Stab? A Monthly event even? The current guidance for us plebs, if you wont take the stab, is “stay home and open the windows”!
You must wear a yellow star.
What can we expect with big government, big pharma, big MSM and big academia running the show? Throw in a squillionaire or two and the perpetual credulity of the electorate and you have a dogs’ dinner of lies and deceit.
When are people going to wise up and get rid of Johnson and Starmer two of the worst individuals to enter the political scene the United Kingdom deserves better than this we need normality not lockdowns and restrictions
I have reservations about ivermectin, but only because I used it to treat cattle for internal and external parasites. It was an injection. It worked by making the body toxic to said paracites. There is a long withdrawal period during which the animal canot be sent for slaughter.
Zinc is another matter entirely. One winter evening my neighbour and I had a discussion about footrot in our sheep ( naturally a glass or two were involved) By a long process of elimination he had decided that a Zinc sulphate foot-bath was the best remedy,though he still needed to treat his shepp on a regular basis.
I wondered if it would work internally. I had spent a day or two checking and treating every foot in the flock, so on my next trip to town I asked my agricultural supplier if he stocked Zinc “Licks” (solid blocks containing trace element of choice; Trade name “Rockies”) Yes he did.
I put them out in the fields. The sheep were desperate. They did not just lick them, they gnawed the edges off the blocks. Result footrot was almost eliminated.
I mentioned it to my vet. He laughed. He told me that it was so old-fashioned that most people had forgotten about it. The zinc does not CURE the footrot. it boosts the body’s immune system so it can cure itself.
Early last year I started taking zinc citrate tablets (cheap, over the counter from my local pharmacy) I have had the covid. I recovered, and that despite the fact that I am in the age bracket that is “most at risk”.
Richard Mawdsley. That is very interesting. You have a good vet I think, if he can remember ‘old fashioned cures’ without flogging you some new wonder treatment instead!
I believe Ivermectin is recommended for suppressing the cough in treating Covid19. That is what horrifies me. WHY does anyone want to suppress the cough? Surely if a patient is coughing it is because the immune system is trying to get rid of something bad in the breathing apparatus.
I cough up phlegm and spit it out because I have chronic bronchitis. If I was stopped from doing that I’d probably drown.
—-good way of getting rid of large numbers of the vast and exponentially increasing world population, especially the old, disabled etc. Just like the Nazis.
I do not understand any of this.
And I am supposed to be clever.
I Certainly do not trust odd scientists::- eg MMR scandal
I certainly do not trust bureaucrats as a tribe.. :– eg 70 years experience.
As a committee.:-never
As individuals:- Far cleverer than me, Often.
The general Public :–No.
Big Business. ( The Treat never cure brigade ) Rarely
The above letters ?:– Sorry
So what do I do. ?
I have no idea.
And can therefore be relied upon.
So Far.
And Meta- analasis ?
As a statistical tool . OK but only with big disclaimers.
For Life or death; ? ??????????????
Who is watching the watchers.?
The civil service:-I thought I had dealt with that .
.The Internet ,?????.. That way lies madness
So Right J. Butties.
Which is worse, I ask myself. The fact that alternative treatments were ruthlessly suppressed to maintain the ‘legality’ of the untested, so called, vaccines. Or the continuous shock horror propaganda, about the unnecessary high morbidity and mortality figures, in order to impose a totalitarian regime.