If ‘water’ is traumatising, surely rain is as well?

 

It’s raining, again. Also: I’m ‘traumatised’. It’s irrational, I know, – but not as irrational as the MSM news editors who must at least believe their own headlines, mustn’t they. Else they’d be uber-cynical, and that can’t be the case. Here’s the compilation: “Newspaper headlines: ‘Immigration chaos’ and ‘Tory fury’” (link).

So today we’re meant to talk of ‘immigration’ and some Tories being furious’ about ‘immigration lawyers’. It’s not as if this can have been utterly unknown. There are two articles in The Times about the RAF not going to fly “immigrants” to Ascension Island, a barren piece of real estate in the Atlantic where water for the few who live there has been important. I wonder which fertile mandarin brain concocted this idea. 

There’s one piece in the DT which exemplifies the cleverness of these ‘crooked’ immigration lawyers as well as the stunning, utter helplessness displayed by out ‘law abiding’ civil serpents who seem to kowtow peremptorily to any lawyerly argument because – as the Mirror showed in the headline gracing their print front page – the usual suspects would be ‘offended’ and might ‘protest’, from the HoC all the way down.

You just have to see the headline of yon DT report to ask if this is simply Silly Season idiocy or if the adults have really and finally left the building: “Migrants avoid move to Bibby Stockholm over ‘severe fear of water’” (paywalled link). It’s their lawyers who block this transfer, with the help of an NGO (emphases are all mine):

As many as 20 migrants blocked their transfer from taxpayer-funded hotels to the Bibby Stockholm barge after lawyers backed by the Care4Calais charity said they were too traumatised to be moved.  The first 15 boarded the barge in Portland, Dorset, on Monday. Care4Calais chief executive Steve Smith told The Telegraph: “They range from people with disabilities and survivors of torture to people who have been beaten, shot at, some arrested, some traumatised by seeing their friends drown at sea and who therefore have a severe fear of water. “There are therefore mental health concerns and a very worried and very traumatised community.” (paywalled link)

I am only surprised that these ‘traumatised’ people didn’t mention their dinghy journey as ‘trauma’! I also wonder how they came to arrive here if water has traumatised them so much: hidden on lorries? I’ll quote the final paragraphs of this article, to show the brazen demands by NGOs and lawyers on behalf of their ‘clients’. Mr Smith, the director of yon ‘refugee” NGO, ‘Care4Calais’, said:

“[…] the barge – which is surrounded by 20ft-high metal fences and where migrants are escorted or bussed through two sets of security gates – was more like a “prison ship”. He said: “We were talking to an Iranian human rights lawyer who had been in prison. The prospect of going into a barge with narrow corridors, limited ability to go into town using shuttle buses that go through two security checkpoints is, in a way, a bit like being back in prison. Where is the access to fresh air, being able to walk around, being able to integrate with the community? To house any human being in a floating prison’ like the Bibby Stockholm is inhumane. To try and do so with this group of people is unbelievably cruel. Even just receiving the notices is causing them a great deal of anxiety.” (paywalled link)

I am in awe of the dexterity with which a luxury barge – we’ve all seen the descriptions of the accommodation – is labelled ‘a prison ship’ because there are fences around the dock and thus becomes immediately ‘inhumane’. After all, an Iranian human rights lawyer said so … 

Then there’s the demand that the poor things should be ‘able to integrate with the community’. Said ‘community’ must not be asked if they want hundreds of young men from different cultures swamping their own villages and towns. Said communities must accept that young men will be young men and harass their women and girls: that’s diversity, and complaining makes you a racist. And all that in the name of ‘humanity’.

I’m not even going to touch the wrangle about ‘screening’ processes which allegedly is too short, and I do have my doubts that Ms Braverman will be able to “withdraw the asylum seekers’ right to state-funded accommodation if they continue to refuse to take their places on the barge,” (paywalled link). I’m sure ‘immigration lawyers’ will make the HO pay …

I’ve reached the point where I think getting Starmer into No 10 and letting Labour deal with this mess, created by their own erstwhile PM, Mr TB, will be rough but suitable justice. I would like to hear some Labourites, ‘defenders of the workers’, explain to their downtrodden clientele that they must accept inflation and ever higher taxes to support those ‘poor refugees’ living in luxurious circumstances they can only dream of. 

I am still puzzled why such luxury accommodation is worse than having to live in tents or cockroach-riddled former army barracks. I am also puzzled why rain isn’t ‘traumatising’ these poor things: it’s water, after all, no? but that’s just me. I’m no lawyer, after all.

That’s all I have for today. I wish I had a human rights lawyer telling HMRC that I’m too traumatised to be able to pay my taxes. Have a good day.