Actions speak louder than words. Having last week seen Members of Parliament launch a war against the subjects of her Majesty the Queen, if the Royal Family is to have any relevance going forward and be the People’s Monarchy – as the Royal Family has been trying to position itself ever since the tragic death of Princess Diana – now is the moment for urgent decisive action. Her Majesty must urgently dissolve Parliament so that it cannot pass primary legislation to thwart the will of the people and the UK leaving the EU on 29th March.
Such a measure is entirely justified as the UK’s democracy is now in crisis and consequentially, the UK is an international laughing stock.
Although either through incompetence or deliberate slyness the legislation overwhelmingly passed by MP’s facilitating the Leave/Remain in the EU 2016 Referendum said it was only advisory, this was superseded by both sides agreeing that whatever the once-in-a-generation-Referendum result, it would be actioned by Parliament. While it is generally accepted that people voted both ways for a variety of reasons, the idea – especially with all the TV debates and discussions in the national media, including the two memorable debates between Messrs Clegg and Farage – that in this technological day and age of so much knowledge being literally at the end of our fingertips, that people didn’t have a clue about what they were voting about, is patent, patronising lunacy. The exceptionally high voter turnout – the highest turnout of any Election or Referendum vote in the UK’s history – shows that people had indeed finally realised the importance of EU membership on their daily lives with ex-EU Commissioner Vivienne Redding having said that 75% of EU member states’ laws and regulations originated in the EU.
After issuing the Article 50 Letter on 29th March 2017, Parliament agreed to a snap General Election for which both the Conservative and Labour Party Manifestos repeated the Referendum promise that Brexit would happen on 29th March 2019 with or without a Deal – as stated in both the EU Treaty and now UK legislation. Given it is generally accepted that there was, and is, little of substance to differentiate the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat Parties and the importance of Brexit, had people changed their mind they could have voted in a Liberal Democrat Government as their Manifesto pledged to reverse Brexit, but instead 85% voted for parties who pledged to action Brexit. Thus all but the most cussed Remainers now also wanted Brexit actioned to end the state of uncertainty.
Many appear to be overlooking the important background fact that a significant contributing factor to Leave edging the Referendum result was PM Cameron’s humiliating rebuff by intransigent EU leaders when prior to the 2016 Referendum he called for the EU to reform, to make itself fit for the 21st Century. This intransigence has continued, resulting in unwieldy Brexit In Name Only documents – the so-called Deal – of over 150 times the length of the USA 4-page Constitution. Thus Parliament was right to twice overwhelmingly vote to reject it.
However, as Parliament and the laws it passes only exist with the will of the people who elect it in the first place, Parliament was wrong last week to vote to declare war against the people by voting against a No Deal/WTO Brexit and to breach the promise to exit the EU on 29th March by voting to extend the remaining time, by as yet an unspecified duration. Parliament delegated its authority and thus, crucially, its responsibility for the consequences by agreeing to the 2016 EU Referendum, and having promised prior to it, and again, more specifically after issuing the Article 50 Letter that we would be leaving the EU on 29th March with or without a Deal, Members of Parliament have no democratic mandate, nor moral authority, to breach now this twice-made promise. But in nonetheless attempting to doing so, MP’s have thereby declared war on the people, and created a democratic crisis.
While last week’s Parliamentary motions do not in themselves change the law that the UK is leaving on 29 March 2019, they nonetheless potentially pave the way for doing so. First of course the EU would have to agree an extension which is likely to be short-term if MP’s who have hitherto rightly voted down the BINO Deal were to lose their nerve and inexplicably and illogically vote it through after all; or to give time for an orderly last-minute WTO Brexit. The EU have said that otherwise they would expect the extension to be much longer – possibly as they understandably wish to know a meaningful purpose of an extension, with the condition of a second referendum, which itself would exacerbate division and worsen the present democratic crisis, whatever the result, as well as crucially leaving the UK in a continued state of limbo it’s now been in for three years.
The four-month campaign of the Yellow Vest movement in France has already graphically shown what could happen if democracy is perceived by enough people to have broken down.
Thus if ever there was a time the Queen needs to take urgent action as Head of State, and as head of the People’s Royal Family, this is the moment. Her Majesty needs to protect the institution of Parliament from its present House of Fools and Ivory Tower Lords and be not only the Defender of Faith, but also Defender of Democracy and specifically of her subjects. By personally dissolving Parliament with immediate effect this would thwart any attempt to change the law and prevent us leaving the EU on 29th March. Such a Brexit would still be able to be managed by Ministers who would remain in office (or replaced with Brexiteer MP’s if they resigned) until the General Election, but unable to change Primary Law they would then be forced to do the people’s bidding – as they after all twice promised.
Thank you all for your thoughtful contributions to my article – which I only saw last night when having had no emails through as in the past, I thought I’d have a look and see whether I’d been completely overshadowed by the devastating advice from Martin Howe QC – which should be compulsory reading for all MP’s and those taking a close interest in Brexit.
Having slept on them, I’ve come to the conclusion that we’re not just in a huge democratic crisis, but also potentially a major constitutional one too.
The Queen has rightly remained above the day to day political arguments surrounding the governance of her United Kingdom and to give her the benefit of the doubt – as hindsight is always wise – perhaps she genuinely shared a hope that the European project could work and who was she to stand in the way of policies of elected politicians. The past anyway is the past.
However, because her elected politicians have now set themselves against the Queen’s subjects who elected them, she cannot remain neutral in today’s crisis. She has a clear choice: either in pretending to do nothing she thereby both supports her politicians and like them sets herself against her subjects and Democracy, or she stands up for Democracy by intervening as Head of State to dissolve Parliament to prevent primary legislation overturning the at least twice promised enactment of the Referendum & General Election votes for the UK to Leave on 29th March with or without a Deal. Only her politicians can release her from this petard by honouring the 29th March date. Otherwise Her Majesty has a choice which could significantly influence the long-term future or not of her family’s reign.
Just received a response to my letter to the Queen. Her Deputy Correspondence Coordinator wrote: “While careful note has been taken of the views you express, in matters such as this Her Majesty acts on the advice of Government.
“Nevertheless, it was interesting to know of your feelings at this time.”
That was nice of her!
If The Queen does nothing, what point is the monarchy?
None, and if the clown prince ascends the throne we will be moving deep into negative territory.
Simply a tourist attraction and not representing or supporting native Brits for many years.
Please don’t think the Queen is going to do us any favours.
Sandy Ramsey commented earlier: “It’s obvious she has broken the oath taken at her Coronation and is firmly in the grasp of The New World Order which is the EU’s ultimate aim.”
The Queen has always been part of “The New World Order”. Her family is one of the Elite Bloodlines, which can be traced back centuries. The royal families of Europe are all related, and other distant relatives have popped up in other positions of power, as monarchies have collapsed and countries became ‘democracies’ where ‘Presidents’ replaced kings and queens as heads of state. For example, did you know that the Bush family in the USA are distant blood relatives of the Queen?
For a detailed read into the history of the ‘Bloodlines’ that rule much of the world, as well as disturbing revelations about the evil our Royal Family are capable of – does anyone still think Princess Diana’s death was an ‘accident’, or a sinister planned assassination? – I recommend having a look at David Icke’s book “The Biggest Secret”. Although it was published in 1998, and much of the material has been revised in his later books, it is still – in my opinion – a good start for anyone trying to make sense of this crazy world, and to get some insight into the satanic background of our Establishment Elites, which includes our own Royal Family – this book also called out Edward Heath as a satanist paedophile.
Whether you call them ‘Bloodline Families’, ‘Establishment Elites’, ‘Globalists’ or whatever, it is important we all know who our ‘true enemy’ is. And it isn’t our fellow ‘ordinary’ human beings. We are all victims, being made to fight and squabble amongst ourselves, while our real enemy, the ‘Elite’, laugh at us as we allow them to advance their evil plans.
Oh dear me ! I feel so sorry for HRH, as when such problem as this comes into being, the cry goes forth for the Crown to take action, even though our history shows clearly that it is a requirement for Crown and State is to remain very separate.
I am also very guilty of doing this, but then History and Constitution raise their heads in my mind, and I realise how foolish it would be ! Any step into politics by the Crown could be seen by some as ‘Partiality’, and that has been utterly avoided by HRH to the immense credit of Queen Elizabeth !
The private audience given to our PM with HRH, is, and should remain just that, private ! However, I would imagine that as one of Her Majesty’s duties is to advise the PM, I can only trust that our Monarch does not hold back upon Her views to Mrs May. ….. It is a naughty thought of mine, but if continued rejection of HRH’s advice persists, then very privately, perhaps a Guards Sergeant could be given the job of giving Mrs May a good spanking on her backside. After all, that would be dealing with the ‘seat’ of power as well as where Mrs May’s ideas spring from ! ! !
I still cannot accept that the Queen has throughout the last 45 years gone along with a deceitful government in her state opening of parliament speeches which have never revealed the secret agenda of her governments to make the UK a vassal state of the EU. She surely had the right and the opportunity to tell her prime ministers ” I am NOT saying THAT”!
The civilian Government of Belgium temporarily suspended King Baudouin I from power for a day after he declared that he could not, in good conscience as a Roman Catholic, sign a new law permitting abortion.
https://www.nytimes.com/1990/04/05/world/belgian-king-unable-to-sign-abortion-law-takes-day-off.html
The Queen has undoubtedly and knowingly broken her Coronation Oath. Some may, rightly or wrongly consider
this to be a form of treason.
While I agree with the authors reasoning at creating the suggestion of proroguing parliament for ten days, and say that he is correct to be offended and enraged by the behavior of the Westminster Bubblestas, I cannot agree with the suggestion of approaching Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament at this time.
My reasoning at this time is the first duty of a subject who is loyal, is not to put Her Majesty The Queen at risk. The Royal Family has had a number of fatalities during my lifetime. Our democracy has been a DINO (Democracy In Name Only) since we joined the Common Market in 1972 and handed power to a foreign entity. It is therefore a bit rich to ask for help now, as most of the population has spent forty plus years, with their feet up watching the Telly. The irony being that the referendum 2016 started to get people to stand up..
If she does not do something as a loyal royalist I will be changing my allegiance
I called for this weeks ago, mostly ignored but seemingly gaining some traction now, although as David says the population put it’s collective feet up years ago, the monarchy had better do or indicate something very soon, as I fear you will not be alone, it’s obvious ( to some ) that the U.K will be anything but if the date is changed. May and her cabal it seems assume that they can do as they lwish banking on the population to get bored and put their feet up again as the summer approaches.
As far as the monarchy is concerned as they seem to have changed their allegiance ( the Queen dressed in e.u. blue at the state opening of parliament for example ) why then should I and others not change mine.
Many people want to get rid of the ‘ the Lords ‘ it’s a small step from there to something much more radical. The e.u does not do god or monarchy.
Doing nothing and saying less would not seem to be an option.
As I said in my earlier post I have already written to the Queen asking her to act on Gerard’s request that she prorogues parliament. I got the same response that Gerard did, i.e. that she leaves political decisions to her government. In other words she is ignoring the will of 17.4 million loyal and patriotic subjects, most of whom want to re-instate her as Head of State and letting the view of about 3 to 400 traitors in parliament who are arguably committing treason by trying to keep the UK in the EU, thereby destroying parliament and her authority in the process prevail. Both treasonable actions! It should also be said that the Queen has gone along with all her governments actions since 1973 to destroy the UK and make us a vassal state of the EU. The secret aim of the Conservative, Labour and Liberal/Lib dem parties for the last 50 years or so, as admitted by Ian Duncan Smith in his recent article. The Queen has apparently actively connived in this lie as she has never once in her Queens speeches on opening parliament said that that was what her parliament was aiming to do. I find it very hard to believe that she was not aware of this aim by her so-called governments. Booker and North have even written a book, The Great Deception”, on it published some years ago, so she must be aware of their intentions. Even now, her prime minister, Theresa May is actively lying to parliament and the people that her so called leaving agreement is good for the UK when it was written by the EU behind the backs of her own ministers working on the UK’s position. The lies, deceit and dishonesty of the Conservative, Labour and Liberal/Lib Dem parties which they have consistently and secretly maintained for well over 50 years beggars belief.
As does breaking many of the coronation oaths!
we voted out not half in out is out very simple to understand, I hope the government is never forgiven for the betrayal of the people who wanted out. they should all be removed from their jobs as the corrupt EU will do all the work they did. a lot of anger and trouble ahead.
If I am not mistaken, Gerard Batten has already sent a letter to HM asking her to parogue Parliament. Doubt that she will blink and eye but she still has time.
Gerard has indeed already sent a letter to HM asking her to prorogue Parliament.
The Cabinet Office has responded to a petition (https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/237487/signatures/new) which currently has almost 90,000 signatures, with the following:
One wonders why ‘no deal’ contingency plans are being prepared when it admits that Parliament is clear it does not wish to deliver ‘no deal’.
Lying toads (as you might guess I’m being polite).
What a well written explanation of how our politicians have failed us. However, I have to agree with Jake Bennett that the Queen simply will not listen. It’s obvious she has broken the oath taken at her Coronation and is firmly in the grasp of The New World Order which is the EU’s ultimate aim.
As the Queen is virtually nothing more than a subject of the EU since from what I understand sovereignty was given away at Maastricht does she even have the power to do anything.
When I was young – almost too long ago to remember – I was proud to be described in my passport as a “British Subject” and
“Citizen of the Commonwealth” . Now, I am only a “EU Citizen” (as is the Queen so it is useless appealing to Her, since She has forfeited Her right to rule as a result of the treasonous actions of successive governments, whom She is obliged to obey.
If we do get sold down the river, I shall relinquish my citizenship and become a freeman of the land.
Clearly the patriotic people in this country are at the bottom of the heap! There is no one speaking up for democracy in this country only UKIP. Never would I have believed it possible for me to loathe the British Establishment as I do.
Write to the Queen at: Her Majesty the Queen, Buckingham Palace, London, SW1A 1AA. Say you write to her ‘as a loyal subject of Your Majesty and as a citizen of the United Kingdom, and in accordance with my right to petition Your Majesty under the Bill of Rights 1689’. – it’s still in force!
Ask her to ‘prorogue Parliament’ – that means simply cancelling all sittings by MPs – until 30 March 2019. That’s only 10 days away – not much will be lost but of course the date is significant.
It is normal for the Prime Minister to advise the Queen to prorogue so in my letter to her I have said our PM is part of the problem, not part of the solution.
Your letter is unlikely to have any effect, but that shouldn’t stop you trying, and if she gets a few thousand letters ….. well, who knows?
I’ve just sent a message to her majesty. https://www.facebook.com/HMRoyalQueen/
Well I agree with your sentiment, but fear writing is a much of a waste of time as writing to M.P’s. If they ( the M.P’ s) live in a bubble, the monarchy must live on another planet. The example of George VI and the Queen during the war years has long been forgotten. There must come a time when some ‘ legislation’ could be signed off constitutional Monarch or not! So presumably their ‘position’ has been assured although I do wonder by whom, as these days it would appear anything is open to change.
I thought John Major, round about the Maastricht Treaty, time stopped all mail going to the Queen’s household. is it not taken care of by civil servants now.
You may be right Jake but I have done some research and have been unable to confirm your comment.
I don’t know about her mail but the queen never signs off legislation personally:
“The manner of signification 5.16 In the House of Commons, consent will be signified by a Privy Counsellor who is almost invariably a serving Minister.38 It is done formally (by nodding in response to a request from the Chair).
5.17 In the House of Lords consent will be signified by a Privy Counsellor who must be a serving Minister.40 It is done orally.”
This from the government document:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/742221/Queen_s_and_prince_s_consent_pamphlet__September_2018___accessible_.pdf
Personally I think she should do the job herself or get off the throne. I could say more about my opinion of her…
Jake Bennett; In the run- up to the subsequent Lisbon Treaty , a petition in form of
about 100,000 purple postcards were sent to the Queen pointing out that she would be breaking her coronation oath, and saying that it replaced English Common Law with all its protections checks and balances, by inquisitorial law which could more easily become a tool for tyranny. Were these intercepted? There was also a huge protest outside Westminster against Lisbon which got no mention at all on MSM. Instead there was a lot of publicity over someone climbing on the roof of Westminster, all the TV cameras were on that.
So none of recent events have surprised me. I was in Westminster last week and was disgusted the way the common purpose robot police were covertly filming protesters while pretending to be matey with them. Nasty little sneaks betraying their own kind.
The Queen knew exactly what she doing when she signed the 1972 European Communities Act into law and never batted an eyelid. She knew exactly what Maastricht, Amsterdam, Nice and Lisbon meant and again never batted an eyelid. .
We cannot look to the Queen for any help whatsoever she only takes advice from her first minister.
It is up to the people to take action against the political class at the ballot box.
Batten has rightly told us time and time again it is only rejection at the ballot box that our political class fear – it is their Achilles Heel.
My fear is that this might be the EU strategy to close down all democracy. They start with us, as the strongest democracy in Europe, and if they pull it off here, then it will be easy to subjugate other EU countries. May’s WA would turn us into a vassal country of the EU, with virtually no powers left to us. Elections here then become no longer meaningful, they might keep them “for show”, but they would cease to have any effect. They would tell us that we already have a very good Parliament in the EU.
Our country MUST leave the EU on March 29th to the WTO deal, or there will be all hell let loose, imo.
Agreed; the queen is one of the enemy within.
Has this been couriered to HM? I doubt that she reads ID.