Written by Phil O’Sophical 

 

 

I should begin by saying that I have no medical training, but am an engineer (ret.) so used to specifications and rigorous testing against all foreseeable environments and circumstances under many headings. One chooses the optimum horse for the course using all the years of accumulated empirical data, then bullet-proofs it, then tests it to pre-determined industry limits – and often beyond to discover the margins – just in case there is a flaw missed throughout history or you have made a mistake. Most engineers look for their potential mistakes and welcome discovery, rather than seek to hide them, partly because we are a pedantic and curious bunch but mainly because their consequences can be dire for others; oh, and you could be out of a job.

Which brings us to the experimental gene therapy. I have spent far too many hours online, learning, listening and checking and making up my own mind who and what is to be believed. I think most people would be dumbfounded at the vast panoply of expertise and information being totally hidden from them.

Massed ranks of independent doctors and scientists worldwide (I am sure Independence Daily commenters know many of them – conspiracy theorists all, apparently) have been warning of the risks associated with the mass human experimental trial now taking place. Mostly they concentrate on the What, the only too real consequences, rather than the Why, the myriad agendas that have coalesced to drive the project – for that is what it is. Here I shall stick to the What. And I must repeat, these are just my own observations.

The vast majority of the population is not at any risk whatsoever from what we can now see is a flu-variant. Unquestionably man-made, but that is another story. Outside of the now very well defined and understood ‘at risk’ groups, it manifests, as does flu, from no symptoms, through mild inconvenience to several days of discomfort, depending on age and general health. And there are perfectly good long approved drugs, if only our medics were allowed to prescribe them – but that’s yet another whole other story.

So we need to compare that with the risks from the brand new experimental treatment. Broadly there are three stages of risk.

The first is the immediate four days or so following the jab, during which anaphylactic reactions to constituent elements of the shots tend to occur. The majority are not susceptible and those who are are not all to the same things. But, as with, say, an unsuspected peanut allergy, reaction can range from mild and temporary to death or permanent disability.

This category is already widely visible for those who wish to see – which excludes the MSM health, science, opinion and editorial staff; virtually all politicians; the upper tiers of the medical establishment, the lower ones of whom all but a few very brave souls prefer to put their job before their conscience and calling; and of course the scientific disciplines, those scientists-in-name-only with fingers in Pharma’s pie or drunk on their own egos or with paid-for agendas to push.

The second is the next two to three weeks during which the toxic jab supresses the immune systems. Hence the clusters of ‘virus deaths’ following ‘immunisation’, especially in the weak and already immuno-compromised elderly, seen everywhere. We are supposed to put this down to coincidence. As someone said: ”We seem to have an epidemic of coincidences.”

The third stage, and the purpose of this essay, is the much longer term prognosis.

Potential catastrophe.

Certain ‘good folks’ have been trying for decades to crack mRNA treatment (Moderna = Mode RNA). The shot was not even called a vaccine until that became a regulatory convenience to avoid liability. Along the way they ran experimental trials of mRNA jabs on cats and then ferrets. Most of the animals were initially fine but when later encountering wild coronavirus many developed Antibody Dependant Enhancement, their immune systems went into overdrive attacking their own organs, and they died. This is why this treatment never got anywhere near potential use on humans… until now.

Many of those independent doctors and scientists, previously mentioned, have been warning of this possible outcome in the mass human trial now taking place.

But they are blanked from the public narrative and labelled, of course, conspiracy theorists and tarred with all sorts of ulterior motives for their beliefs.

But look here. This is not an independent scientist, but a government document. Para. 32 states:

“The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is [in these models] dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave respectively.”

The authors immediately caveat and misdirect by seeming to suggest that this is because those who have had two doses were more at risk in the first place.

Say what?

Para. 56 states:

“This shows that most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses, even without vaccine protection waning or a variant emerging that escapes vaccines. This is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups … This is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.”

Hang on. They now appear to be admitting the opposite, that the ‘vaccine’ will not protect the most vulnerable.

The small print has said all along that the ‘vaccines’ neither prevent infection nor inhibit transmission, just reduce severity of effects. Which provokes the big question of why such a fanatical obsession with jabbing everyone, including children who are at statistically zero risk from the virus, with something that does not do what it says on the tin. Sadly we know the answer to that, too – The Great Reset and population reduction; and the tin is Pandora’s Box; a present which seems valuable but which in reality is a curse.

Yes, we must remember this is modelling and we know how wrong they have been so far. But to me this sounds like it could be early cover for the ADE scenario – attributing to the virus (probably ‘a horrible new mutant strain’) what is an effect of the jab. Seriously well-informed people like Dr Judy Mikovitz, Dr Lee Merritt, Mike Yeadon, and many many more, have long said this is how it would be done.

Here is how another outlet interpreted that study:

“Third COVID Wave Will Kill Or Hospitalize 60 To 70% People Who Took Both The Vaccine Doses Says Official UK Govt Model”

As always, I can only say please read and make up your own mind.

And a final thought: There are dozens of studies showing cloth masks are useless for prevention of virus spread. So their purpose is clear: fear and suppression of thought. After all, compared with epidemics throughout history, who would even know there was a pandemic without the ubiquitous masks, and the malign media.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email