Be alert: there’s something new to be watched

 

There’s a strange phenomenon which has our esteemed MSM in its grip: reporting on events which will take place in the future, i.e. reporting on what politicians and other important figures will say in a speech to be held in a day or two. Why is that – and why do these prominent figures release their speeches days in advance? I have my suspicions … see below.

So, unsurprisingly, the MSM report on another Labour ‘Plan’ which they aim to include in their not-yet-written manifesto. It’s a ‘housing plan’, according to the guardian as documented in our favourite ‘news’ compilation (link). The Times, copying from the FT, reports that “Labour wants to force landowners to sell plots at below market value to boost housebuilding” (link, paywalled). It’s only a ‘plan’, so hold yer horses. However, I found this snippet in yon article (my emphasis):

“[…] if Labour won the election, “hope” value would be scrapped. Analysis by the Centre for Progressive Policy think tank found that land worth £22,520 per hectare as agricultural land could be worth £6.2 million per hectare with permission: 275 times more.” (link, paywalled)

This ‘hope value’ refers to the hope that a planning permission would be granted. However – just look at the land value! Even half of that ‘hope value’ should be sufficient to allow farmers to sell out and stop producing food, thus saving the planet and contributing to Net Zero. After all, what could be better to farm ‘wind’, ‘solar’ and ‘housing’ than mere food. Who needs food security when we can import all we need, correct?

The cost and availability of food isn’t something the Westminster class needs to worry about, or rather: the MSM don’t mention it, just as Starmer’s fabulous Net Zero ‘energy’ plan has sunk below their horizon. They don’t even mention the reaction by one of Labour’s Big Trade Union Donors to rethink this plan and not strangle the industry, not least because of ‘national security’ implications (link). Actually, “we” won’t need to worry about energy ‘security’ that anyway because the CEO of National Grid told the DT that

“British households will be asked to voluntarily cut their electricity usage again as Europe faces up to another winter without Russian gas supplies. […] It comes as National Grid is preparing to publish its winter outlook report next month, which will set out how prepared Britain’s electricity system is for next winter.” (paywalled link)

‘Tis another ‘plan’ to be presented sometime next month … In case you wonder why we have to plan for electricity shortages should we get a harsh winter ‘without Russian gas’, it’s because our power plants run on gas to produce electricity, and sadly we still don’t have “long-term gas storage facilities, [relying]  on piping gas from Europe in the winter, particularly when demand is high.” (paywalled link)

So what the fluffing fluff have government and energy companies been doing since last year? Will we need to pay even more for our energy bills? And where is the input of all those fabulous wind~ and solar farms? Aren’t they supposed to replace all those dirty coal and gas power stations? 

There’s another news snippet indicating that summer is just around the corner, the Silly Season now being upon us. According to the DT, grocery supermarkets have now taken to put ‘dummy jars’ of coffee on their shelves, with M & S only displaying one pack of steaks on their shelves. No – there’s no food shortage. This is to stymy shoplifters which have taken to stealing food even in shops outside London (paywalled link)

The ‘excuse’ for this behaviour? The ‘cost-of-living crisis’! One would have thought that some intrepid investigative reporter might have tried to find out who those thieves are. It’s hard to believe that they’re Audi Avenue dwellers. Being a raycissst, I of course suspect that certain guests which have been spread around the country might have sticky fingers … but we won’t know, nor would we be told.

Oddly enough, there doesn’t seem to be any Labour ‘programme’ about either inflation or this outbreak of shoplifting. One would have thought that the Trade Unions, if not the Labour Party leaders, would have made some noise about this. Perhaps there’s no mileage in it – ‘mileage’ in the sense of concocting ‘a plan’ which someone might present to the public in a week or so but is willing to let us know beforehand.

The reason for this ploy is obvious to me: ‘creating’ a headline and thus public interest in order to elicit comments or outcries before the event. These can then be picked up and addressed in the forthcoming speech or paper. It’s as if the reading and commenting public has become a cheap ‘focus group’ for politicians, adjusting their plans in order to win votes. Addressing the reality people have to face – that is not on the agenda. 

I leave you with a sweet little piece of news, from the USA. No, not about the state of California where more and more shops and big chain stores are closing because of unmitigated theft. It’s from New York where a lawyer used a ChatBot to do legal research for a case. Alas, he had to apologise to the judge because yon ChatBot had made up all the presented case laws and even lied to the lawyer (link, paywalled).

How do we know those lovely speeches, these ‘manifesto plans’, reported well beforehand in the MSM, haven’t been made up by ChatBots? Moreover, how do we know if the public comments and outcries elicited by these planned speeches and presentations aren’t created by ChatBots, to govern our, the plebs, attitudes? After all, if ChatBots say so, who are we to disagree, if even a lawyer trusted his ChatBot?

That’s all I have for today. Let me reassure you: I’m not a ChatBot. Have a good day.