Cummings sez: raze this to the ground – metaphorically, of course …
Now then – as promised, here’s my ‘take’ on Dominic Cummings’ latest ‘project’. The fact that yesterday facebook and accretions went down, worldwide (link), provides a hugely ironic, unexpected perspective. I was quite eager to see what Cummings had been working on, out of the public glare. Disclaimer: since I’m not on Twitter I have no idea if and when he tweeted about whatever occupied his mind. Also, I’m a lowly, non-paying subscriber to his ‘substack’ site which he now uses instead of his blog. I do get ‘announcements’ now and then but it’s a ‘pay to play’ setup, and without shelling out a cool £100 you don’t get to engage with the man, e.g. in the form of comments.
Firstly and briefly, let’s recollect past events. Having left or been kicked out of Johnson’s government last year Cummings dropped quite a few bombshells in the process. We mentioned some of them here and here, as well as those relating to his hearing of the HoC Joint Select Committees, pre-chewed over by the MSM before the hearing, here and here. The hearing itself took place on the 26th of May. 2021. I duly did a write-up the following day – here – without recourse to whatever spin the MSM gave the hearing.
So imagine my amazement when Cummings posted the link to his latest work in an email, making it accessible to non-payers! I was looking forward to some brilliant new ideas – but the title alone made me gulp, twice:
“Regime Change #2: A plea to Silicon Valley – start a project NOW to write the plan for the next GOP candidate – The goal is not ‘reform’ but *a government that actually controls the government* (link)
What the fluff? Hasn’t ‘Silicon Valley’ already done sufficient damage by pushing Biden into the White House? His ‘project’, at first glance, is about ‘preventing Trump’ from running again. Well, each to his own and if Cummings has it in for Johnson and Trump – fair enough, it’s still a free country. However, when he writes that a Trump run in 2024 would be ‘a disaster’ because it could lead to another four years of Biden/Harris I wonder if he has the faintest clue about US politics.
Things became clear(er) when I delved deeper into his script. Cummings’ proposals are not about politics, muddy, bloody and disgusting as they are. They are not about politics as they affect us dumb plebs in the real, non-Cummings world. Even the ‘prevent Trump’ argument is a bit of a straw man. Cummings’ project is about building a government run by technocrats, IT technocrats at that.
Cummings, convinced of the power of IT intellects, proposes that ‘Silicon Valley’, that some IT entrepreneurs, band together to create a group of ‘the like minded’, to select a suitable GOP candidate who then would scrap Washington institutions and rebuild them from scratch. Why he thinks a steering group of IT technocrats can do this, via a suitable GOP sock puppet – and that’s what his proposal implies – is beyond me.
He then explains what he has in mind and why. Under the segment title “America needs ‘a government that controls the government’: close & replace with startups, don’t ‘reform’” he writes that:
“America, like the rest of the West, is mostly run by permanent bureaucracies. Elections are to a large extent bad showbiz. The noise is high but the stakes often amazingly low. The parties scream about each other but generally whether X or Y wins changes an amazingly small fraction of policy, money, or real power — and has little effect on the permanent bureaucracies.” (link)
Who’d argue with that – but then he uses the EU referendum as example. According to Cummings he won that by himself … well, ok, with the help of some focus groups, ‘Vote Leave’ and that Johnson person. All the rest of us who remember the EU Referendum campaign very well indeed might remember ‘a different reality’.
I’m sorry but he sounds like a little boy who, having lost a game once – i.e. been kicked out of No 10 – insists that the whole playing board be trashed. In order to get rid of those permanent bureaucracies the must all be scrapped, razed to the ground, giving a somewhat facile reason with a sting in the tail:
“When nobody is in charge, you have chaos. Nobody is in charge of western governments. We see chaos everywhere. We see a chronic inability to think about hard problems under extreme uncertainty, decide and act at speed and scale.” (link)
For ‘a chronic inability to think’ read: they’re too stupid. Neither the President nor the PM are ‘in charge’ – because, he insinuates, they’re too thick. His solution? To let clever IT minds from Silicon Valley take on ‘governing the government’, scrapping e.g. the Pentagon, root and branch, and by extension the MoD and Whitehall and then rebuild them from scratch, like an IT Start-Up. I note in the margin that clever Cummings doesn’t mention with one word Our Sacred Cow. Strange, that – I’d have thought this would’ve been an ideal candidate!
The question of how to maintain national security doesn’t arise, as far as Cummings is concerned. One comment poster pointed out that start-ups often fail, it’s in the nature of things. So what would happen if a start-up Pentagon, a start-up MoD failed? Silence …! It is certainly ironic that the eponymous ‘tech giant’, facebook and its accretions, just happened to go down yesterday – across the world, allegedly due to a server update having been bungled (link). Has Cummings never heard of ‘Murphy’s Law’? Does he think that something similar could never happen in a MoD or Pentagon razed and rebuilt from scratch because those ‘great IT intellects’ would prevent this?
Moving on, Cummings deservedly disses the MSM here and in the USA as well as party politicians in the USA and here. He then gives the details of his ‘project’, proposing that a group of ten or so like-minded IT people should get together, now, each putting about $200,000 into a kitty. That group should select a compliant GOP candidate who would win and then proceed to scrap e.g. the Pentagon. After reiterating that ‘start-up’ is better than reform, after relating again his experiences both as “Brexit winner” and in Johnson’s cabinet (lots of hurty-feelz!) he lists how to spend this money. It’s both illuminating and worrying:
“250-500k buys you a lot of focus groups. — If you hire the right people, ~500-750k (depending on data costs) will buy you the best predictive model of the electorate. — <10 salaries until ~Christmas 2022, by which time the project is morphing into a campaign or folding. — Some data costs — I don’t know how to estimate these for the US but say 500k. — Some cash for specific people to do specific work. — Throw in ~200k for some expenses and logistics. — So ~$2-3 million for a tight focused project. Ten people could chuck in 200k each after dinner and fund most of it. And in practice if someone serious decides to do this and gets a few other serious people involved, money will not be a limiting factor.” (link)
Have you noticed what vital ‘ingredient’ is missing here? Yes, it’s us, the stupid people! Apparently, we’re only good for being herded like sheep by the likes of people as clever as Cummings. The mental arrogance on display here is worse than that of any Whitehall Mandarin. And then there’s his chilling vision of such ‘government governing government’, run by IT technocrats who’ll scrap every ministry to set up ‘re-starts’. Reform, it seems, is too tedious a concept for Cummings who only believes in the alleged purity and power of IT intellects. He finally lets the cat out of the bag, describing what his project really is about:
“So there must be a clear mandate for controlling and closing parts of the government when the candidate wins, but this agenda must not be confused with a winning campaign message as it will interest only a few, and that’s fine.” (link)
In other words: drive the sheep to vote as desired by clever campaign strategists but keep the goal of that campaign hidden from view, so as not to confuse the stupid, dumb idiots. It’s astounding that clever Cummings seems to believe that this ‘project’, with a suitable sock-puppet at the top, will survive the first contact with harsh reality. I don’t mean the reality of that permanent bureaucracy over there or here in Whitehall which he wants to demolish. I mean the every-day reality of our lives, from getting petrol to getting food to getting paid, never mind safeguarding our national security. Yesterday’s downing of facebook and consorts is a stark reminder of what can happen in this, the real life.
Cummings’ proposal is so chilling because he is advocating a ‘government by intellect’, based on a very small selection of ‘Cummings approved’ intellectuals. It’s so chilling because he denigrates all of us as being too stupid to be permitted to have an input into this future – except via ‘selected focus groups’. Elections, Parliament – they’ll become superfluous in Cumming’s brave new IT technocracy.
I don’t need to emphasise how deeply I loathe the intellectual arrogance Cummings displays. I wonder if Cummings, drifting on the heights of ‘pure thought’, has lost all touch with reality – the reality of the life we all have to live through. He should reflect on the fact that normal, ‘stupid’ people who haven’t read his esoteric literature usually know more about the facts of life than he ever will.
KBO!
Photo by gregwest98 
After I read your article Viv the first thing I thought of was to scream “Nurse”. A padded room is the best place for Cummings.
Viv wonders whether Cummings has lost all touch with reality.
I’ve a feeling that might be a good old fashioned definition of INSANITY.
It is – but I was being polite …
🙂
Not long finished reading:-
Franklin Foer – World Without Mind-The Existential Threat Of Big Tech
If you are worried about one of two govmt remainers (other is Frost), I shudder to think what you would make of this book.
In short the takeover by Big Tech is already done.
Whatever Cummings is or was, I believe he was the catalyst (perhaps the instrument) of getting rid of the odious Call me Matt Hancock, remember him the man that facilitated the death of circa 20,000 additional old folk emptied out of NHS hospitals and foisted on care homes without providing them with protection and he lied and lied and lied.
Now I know this all formed part of evidence Cummings gave to a select committee and when it came to Hancock’s appearance, “evidence promised and not provided ” by Cummings allowed his exoneration.
I seem to remember before his appearance Cummings had complained that he had been denied access to his digital records impounded by the government.
When it came to Hancock’s appearance, I don’t believe the government could allow it to be seen that Hancock had committed crime while in his official position, but actually knew that Cumming’s evidence was kosher.
I haven’t heard since that they have found who planted the camera that cooked Hancock’s goose –
perhaps for a good reason ??
I seem to remember sometime early in Covid Hancock loudly complaining “somebody was hanging him out to dry”
Hancock is not worth shedding tears over is he Roger.
Why did Cummings want permanent lock downs, if not to completely trash the economy?
Sounds like a quick way to achieve the New World Order of Technocratic World Dictatorship.
Personally I do believe he had his uses.
Not only do I think he did the country a service by identifying and getting rid of a rogue, but he also rattled the Civil Serpents hen coup.i cheered when he marched out Patel’s lot and eliminated Javed and his lot.
Not very much use, but a start had to be made somewhere.
Pity he turned out to be like the rest of the elite, thinking the rules only applied to the peasants, very revealing
I think Cummings is playing with his audience. Yes Much of what he says is accurate but its also a carot or a snare. Cleverness is not a rare commodity. If you are one of the top 1% There’s a lot of say 700,000.. Say200,000 in the west.. Many have found their niche and are content as Farmers, Chemists Teachers etcThat leaves 100,000.A large proportion are not really clever but ..have exceptional memories, Down to 50.000.A large proportion will have retired early. so40,000. Doctors Down to 39000,. successful businesses are usually seriously focussed on pure money. and rarely money Silicon became what was. A leaming stampede of greed for a slice and money grew on trees So my conclusion is :–…
He’s takig the proveriable. Look at your local MP and Ave a laff.. All that pomp and circumstance.
I should have mentioned that out of the 200,000 at least 10 % is demented and restrained in some wayAnd another 10% S that leaves 19,000. Another 10% is already engaged in Politics and may include those similarly occupied . Any suggestions for the remaining minus 1000.
Sleeping rough ? On a beach ? Lost in Russia ?
Poor Dom. He’s not only jumped the shark, it swallowed him on the way. The white coats cannot be far away. In any case, he is too late and aiming too small. Others ‘have been there, done that,’ and are well on their way to realising their project.
There are two main agendas running that are, for now at least, mutually supporting each other, but which can be lumped together as drivers of the New World Order,* or more correctly the new world DISorder.
One is the psyco- socio-paths who want to reduce the world population and rule the remaining flock of tagged sheep, as the Gods on Mount Olympus, the WEF and certain billionaire geeks.
The other, often overlapping, is the digital-financial complex. World asset managers need to crash the world economy and abolish cash for a digital currency, thus wiping away all trace of the astronomical sums they have stolen from national governments, now that the latter are reaching their debt ceilings and bankruptcy can no longer be hidden by printing money and letting inflation rip. Indirectly the digital currency is essential to group one for monitoring and control of the citizenry.
The other players in this group are the largest IT concerns including Apple, the Google parent company Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and Facebook, insatiably drunk on money and the unfettered power it feeds their egos. Their profits have sky-rocketed (Bezos’s literally) whilst the rest of the world disintegrates into misery under ‘Covid’ measures. The market capitalisation of these five companies is greater than the gross GDP of Germany, France and Italy combined. The large asset managers, namely BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and Fidelity, are significantly involved in all IT companies. These four companies manage fourteen-times the GDP of all 27 EU countries plus Britain.
I posted this a few weeks ago, but in this context it is worth repeating.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-master-plan-behind-the-covid-crisis/
*Puppet governments don’t bother to hide it. Whilst Labour dredged up the appropriately meaningless and tired old “Stronger together” slogan for their Preen-fest, then looked at no one but themselves, the Consocialists brazenly went for the globalists’ mantra: “build back better.” The Left and faux-right are past masters at labels meaning the opposite of the truth. More honestly, it should to read: “Build dystopia together”.
The White coats not far away, Phil? sounds like my reaction, he’s insane.
The only bit of sense in that tirade is where he has a go at Party politicians and the M.S.M.
Than you Viv.
Cummings is now an insignificant has-been, aomething he clearly struggles to accept. Grandiosity is often a defence against feelings of insiginficance. Like Frederica, I too unsubscribed from Cummings, some time ago in fact. Fortunately, as with other areas, we have Viv reading him so we don’t have to!
Well Viv I have looked forward to reading your piece and I have not been disappointed.
I now know that I was right to unsubscribe from DCs sub stack. On the basis that you cannot reason with a mad person, I do not need to read his outpourings to know that he is irrevocably insane. As insane as any of the ‘Bond Baddies’ that have ever been portrayed on celluloid. In essence Cummings believes that his is the “brain” that should be at the top of this particular tree. He is obviously eaten up with resentment and vitriol against all those who have failed to recognise his ‘greatness’!
To follow his line of thought would result in the destruction of everything that now does not work properly and replace it with darkness and anarchy – in essence ‘The Nothing” (with apologies to the Neverending Story!). This would surely come to pass when those who have ‘donated’ their cash to the ’project’ found that Cummings’s real vision is that they should contribute their brains and money while he provides the ‘leadership brawn’! Imagine the resulting power struggle that would be enacted with each of those ‘full of hubris’ technocrats started vying for complete control!
So what we may deduce from all his witterings is that he actually sees himself as the real ‘King of the World’ – not Boris. So when he was denied the place as the ‘power-behind-the-Johnson-throne’ that he saw as his right and due he went into ‘full mental’ mode! A straitjacket job if ever there was one! Broadmoor is the place for him without question! Under the Cummings administration, serfdom would seem like paradise!
So far. Evidence shows that given the amount of money spent by the reformers, And giving that amount to start ups, Evidence shows Start Ups will outperform the reformerd by several hundred percent.. All other factors being equal. Which of course they never are. The primary differences being experience and baggage versus energy and opportunity.
So, in my humble opinion , His initial assumption is suspect.
To be continued.
So Banks and Farage were right again. After trying in all honesty to broker a joint Brexit campaign with the Great I Am, Farage concluded Cummings was quite a nasty little fellow. It has taken some time, but it seems he is a globalist technocrat who thinks an algorithm can master the populace and the world. Wrong!
That’s interesting Tony Woodcock. I did not know N.F. had ‘seen through’ Cummings early on.
so did Peter Hitchens.
Cummings is a cast iron nutter. Is this the same Cummings that was going to reform the Civil Service? Yes reform, actual achievment – zero. Is this the same Cummings who failed to stop Johnson implementing the WA? The stories in my 6 year old granddaughter’s school reading books are closer to reality involving as they often do talking animals and unicorns, than this “plan”.
$2 – 3 m in an American presidential election? Abbott’s policing cost estimate was much more realistic than this.
viv,
That’s a lot of work you’ve done. I think I need more time for all the links. Which must not be dismissed, as this will be an important insight into the Civil Servicemen both individually and as a herd mentality.
Agreed. Many thanks for all the work you’ve done Viv
I always found Cummings a puzzle: why he was pro- Brexit yet he is a technocrat and globalist (and incidentally eugenicist as well I seem to remember reading somewhere) ; these 2 things don’t seem to go together, to my mind. A very unsavoury character with a big financial stake in the lockdowns I believe? Whatever’s his game, does he just enjoy teasing people with smoke and mirrors?
Cummings is a spad (special adviser) and like anyone in the advisory business they are not necessarily ideologically attached to the advice they give. Bit like scientists today who simply produce data to suit the clients desired outcome.
In July 2017, the lawyer and political commentator David Allen Green asked Cummings via Twitter, “Is there anything which could now happen (or not happen) which would make you now wish Leave had not won the referendum result?” Cummings replied, “Lots! I said before REF was dumb idea, other things should have been tried 1st.”
Cummings has to pay his bills like anyone else and it appears he may be no different to the modus operandi of the career politicos – ‘Where would you like me’?
Government by intellect???
I’ve often thought our MPs should be at least forty years old and have had a proper job.
Also maybe some qualification to vote. Maybe have a job even.
(The scroungers are always going to vote for anyone who gives then other people’s money.)
that’s quite a reasonable reply from you Harold. Have the 77th changed tactics and made you follow a good cop bad cop scenario?
DieCast – certainly someone has (unfortuneately) ‘activated’ HArm in the recent past.
I sort of agree Harold, But I would say 30; and 29 for girls, if they’ve had a baby,or who have been in the srevices but below the rank of corporal, and who is not considered a ********by their sergeant.
Harryyetagain I can see where you are going with your “proper job” suggestion, but I’ve heard that so many times before that I began to think it had become a bit trite and wonder shouldn’t we also look at what might qualify as a proper job suitable for an MP to use practically, hands on at the same time needing it to finance his day to day board, shelter and welfare, you know should the minister of health be a qualified doctor sort of thing or the chancellor an accountancy degree.
I began to think of the “bobbies job” would journalism serve the purpose, was the present incumbent even a journalist??
So I consulted the Internet, found an interesting heading
“…………was a terrible journalist, he’s a politician the media deserves”
By Jasper Jackson Politics 5th June 2019 updated 02 Sep 2021 4.53pm
Well worth a read full of delicious quotes:-
“……… has a rather ignominious career as a journalist fired from the Times in 1988 having joined as a graduate trainee”
” A lax approach to facts and language”
“Predictably late copy”
“His regular pronouncements in the DT sometimes resemble a daily newsletter promoting him”
“Impressive track record of misspelling, misleading and simply messing up”
“His buffoonery………………………gaffes………….tousled hair and dishevelled appearance……..”
Oh! and there’s’ more and more and more, do read it you may see why I wonder not only is there a need for a proper job, but it must come with other qualities, not least of which is a decent performance in his chosen job.
We go round and around in circles Roger Turner. How can we select candidates from those with a decent performance in a proper job while candidates are selected for us by the main Parties?
Good question Pauline, and obviously there is no answer while we have the present “loaded” system and that circle isn’t going to be broken
Good points Harry.