Sherpa
Thanks to the G7 summit and the Bank Holiday there are scant Brexit news in our MSM this morning. There was only Johnson’s statements from the final press conference in Biarritz, so they report one, simply astonishing piece of ‘news’.
That piece of news is – do sit down! – the announcement that Johnson is sending his “Brexit Sherpa” to Brussels! Tomorrow! Now isn’t that amazing?
What, you might ask, is this ’sherpa’ thing about? After all, even though we all feel as if achieving Brexit has become worse that climbing Mount Everest, Johnson surely doesn’t need someone to carry his baggage to Brussels?
A ‘sherpa’, in modern diplomatic parlance, is a civil servant sent forth by one side to negotiate with the other. Olly Robbins was one … This label is now widespread.
I’ve also come across it in an article on the G7 in a German paper where the author describes how these sherpas congregate and prepare the ground for their leaders for summits such as the G7, the G20, or NATO. From events where leaders were able to exchange their personal views in private these summits have now become highly orchestrated.
Just as the images we’ve seen earlier this year of tourists literally lining up to get on top of Mount Everest, something they could not have achieved without their real-live sherpas, I submit that our dear leaders are made to look good at such summits only thanks to their civil servant ‘sherpas’.
We have learned from the WA disaster that this gives them enormous powers, not least because they are unelected and their work is done behind closed doors. Now Johnson’s ‘sherpa’ goes to Brussels …:
“David Frost, No 10’s Brexit “sherpa”, will meet European officials tomorrow in an effort to find an alternative to the Irish backstop and avoid a no-deal Brexit. Mr Frost held a first round of meetings at the start of this month and his second trip follows a series of bilateral talks between Boris Johnson and EU leaders, including Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, and President Macron of France” (link, paywalled)
I am always fascinated by the way Remain MSM spin a piece of news. The quote above is from RemainCentral and insinuates that Johnson’s ‘sherpa’ is going cap-in-hand to the mighty EU. Here’s a more detailed quote from the report in the DT:
“But behind the scenes Mr Frost and counterparts in Brussels are taking part in detailed exchanges about possible alternative arrangements to the “backstop” plan to avoid border checks between Ireland and Northern Ireland. Mr Frost was last known to have visited Brussels for talks at the start of August. On Wednesday Mr Frost is expected to meet members of the Brexit negotiations unit led by Michel Barnier, although the chief negotiator himself is in Copenhagen. Mr Frost is also expected to meet a senior official in the team of Donald Tusk, the president of the European Council, whom Mr Johnson met on Sunday. A senior British official said: “There have been a lot of discussions going on about [alternative arrangements to the backstop] at sherpa level, led by David Frost. I would expect there would be more conversations in the next few days.” (paywalled link)
I hope that this ‘senior British official’ won’t get into any trouble with No 10 and that special adviser … Will Mr Frost achieve anything? How would we know – ‘no leaks’, remember? More from the final G7 press conference:
“Mr Johnson said “I am marginally more optimistic” when asked about a possible Brexit deal. “But, remember that all statistical estimates that I give about the chances of a deal – whether they are expressed in odds of millions to one, or getting closer, or hotter or colder, or whatever – they all depend exclusively on the willingness of our friends and partners to compromise on that crucial point and to get rid of the backstop and the current withdrawal agreement”. Mr Johnson added that while he believed “our German friends and our French friends have certainly listened very carefully to what we have had to say” it was down to them whether or not a deal was done. “It all depends on how seriously they wish to get a deal,” he said.” (paywalled link)
Here is another quote from that press conference showing that Johnson is certainly putting the ball into the EU court:
“the Prime Minister, a former Brussels Correspondent for the Daily Telegraph, said that in his experience Brussels usually left striking deals to the last minute as he signaled his willingness to engage in a high stakes game of brinkmanship with the bloc. Mr Johnson suggested the UK would be able to leave things late because by the Halloween deadline ‘absolutely colossal and extensive’ No Deal preparations would be in place.” (link)
One other piece of ‘Brexit News’ attracted the ire of Brexit Tories: Archbishop Welby’s attempt to create a ‘citizens’ assembly’, as we reported yesterday. See this:
“The Archbishop of Canterbury has become embroiled in a fierce political row over plans for a citizens’ assembly aimed at averting a no-deal Brexit. […] Iain Duncan Smith, the former Conservative Party leader, said that the proposals were “deeply inappropriate”, adding: “I generally don’t criticise the archbishop but he shouldn’t allow himself to be tempted into what is essentially a very political issue right now. This assembly is designed to destabilise Boris Johnson’s position. As such I hope he will recognise the deeply political nature of this.” (link, paywalled)
Mr Mark François MP is apparently also back from his holidays:
“Mark Francois, vice-chairman of the European Research Group of Eurosceptic Tory MPs, said: “It is three years since the referendum result and I suspect the British people are sick and tired of being lectured by politicians about why we should overturn their democratic decision. I suspect they will not be overjoyed by having it rubbed in by the Archbishop of Canterbury to boot.” (link, paywalled)
There’s more, and it’s breathtaking. I understand we now live in a secular society, so why bishops of the Church of England, who at the very least have been keeping very quiet about other divisive, burning issues such as Rotherham or the current LGBTXYZ thingie now feel the urge to tell us what to think is surely a bit odd:
“Several senior clergymen said that the plan could bring “reconciliation at a time of national emergency”. The Bishop of Buckingham, the Right Rev Alan Wilson, said: “I wonder what Iain Duncan Smith is afraid of? It seems to me to be a helpful idea. In a mature democracy people would not be afraid of doing this, because it would show what people’s concerns and fears and hopes and aspirations around this subject were. An assembly could provide a firmer foundation for Brexit “than just telling everyone to shut up and keep their big noses out of it”, he added.” (link, paywalled)
Blimey – can they get more alarming that calling this a ‘national emergency’? Why don’t they hold such talks about that other ‘emergency’, the so-called climate one? Too hot?
One might also asks those bishops where they have been during these last three years – hiding in their cathedrals? Here’s another one:
“The Bishop of Burnley, the Right Rev Philip North, said: “I welcome the archbishop’s initiative and this attempt to bring reconciliation at a time of national emergency. While it would be wrong to undermine the result of the referendum, leaving the EU without a deal could be profoundly damaging, especially for more deprived communities across the north. There appears to be a new mood in global politics that delights in division, and the willingness of the archbishop to exercise his ministry as a bridge-builder and reconciler is a potent way of bearing witness to the Christ who prays that all might be one.” (link, paywalled)
Why is a simple prayer by Welby and his bishops, in their private chambers, not sufficient? Don’t they believe in prayers any longer?
This is how Welby and his bishops plan to achieve their ‘conciliation’ exercise:
“Based on the model used in Ireland in 2016 to debate abortion, the assembly would be made up of a representative group of 100 people. It would meet several times in Coventry Cathedral next month, before putting its proposals to parliament.” (link, paywalled)
One hundred people? Selected by whom? Welby? Will they all be Anglicans or will it be an ‘ecumenical’ group? You really couldn’t make it up! At least it got Welby into the headlines …
And finally: “Boris Johnson unveils plans to flood Lords with dozens of Leave heroes to secure Brexit” (link). Please let me know if your name is on that list! After all, the truly unsung ‘Leave Heroes’ – that’s us!
So, in the hope that you might end up in the HoL –
KBO!
Photo by jamehand 
Another great update! Thank you.
I have just looked at a copy of the DT, specifically an article by IDS. I will quote:-
“the deal Mrs May struck is a pig’s breakfast, under which the UK would surrender control to the EU far beyond the backstop.”
Can anyone here now tell me why this man, so full of virtue and wisdom now, could have voted for the very deal he tells us was so bad? It has to be remember that all but thirty odd Conservative MPs voted for that deal including almost all of the Cabinet and including our PM. So what does that tell us?
When all this is over they have to be reminded what a lot of hypocrites they are.
The status quo in British politics is not sustainable.
As for Welby, he is about as useless, stupid and detached from reality as his predecessor Williams. Sorry to be harsh. God help us all.
Interesting point there. Do Prime Ministers decide who should be Bishops/Archbishops? I think I shall have to look into that. Whatever, they should keep their noses out of politics. That was the trouble long before Henry V111.
The CofE provides the PM with a shortlist of three and the PM then decides … after consultations, IIRC …
David Frost’s wife was once asked if he was religious. ‘Yes,’ she replied. ‘He thinks he’s God.’
JF
The other David Frost.
Isn’t it Corbyn and crew who have stirred this particular re-maniac pot? Incredible since Marxists are atheists. But then of course, every part of our once proud constitutional monarchy now seems rotten to the core. Allow all the Muslims in to change our cities into their ways and do everything we can think of to stop the UK from breaking free from foreign rule.
Whoever controls the cities will eventually control the country.
I saw motor mouth Swinson on Sky going on about Boris not having a mandate for No Deal, it wasn`t discussed or mentioned prior to the referendum, she also says he has no democratic parliamentary mandate because he was only appointed by 0.00000000003% dicks of the electorate.
Why is she allowed to get away with this nonsense on the MSM without reply or even challenge from the Interviewer. I think Kate Burley allowed her to get away with it again
She quoted Grove as leader of the official LEAVE campaign confirming No Deal wasn`t mentioned.
If she wanted to take another look in her one sided cupboard she might recall that there was a LEAVE.eu campaign of which Nigel Leader of UKIP had a bit to do with and didn`t Batten produce a leaflet pointing out that article 50 shouldn`t be the vehicle for leaving and thus his suggestion would in fact have been a No Deal solution.
She cannot dismiss the LEAVE.eu campaign as being of no effect just because it wasn`t “official”, it`s only the result was official (and BINDING) and the question did not say anything about the method of leaving..
I will agree Mrs May never should have gone in the way she did, as Trump told her at Davos – not hard enough – But she`s gone now and her deal is dead..
Can`t somebody set that woman straight?
It is clearly time to hand the churches which Henry VIII stole back to Rome and disestablish the CoE. The CoE is an anachronism whose original justification was the issue of where Henry VIII should be permitted to put his dick. As Prime Ministers advise the Queen on appointments to the Anglican church, in future the advice could come from a Moslem, Jew, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Dervish, disciple of Moloch etc if no action is taken.
I attended a RC service recently and did not find it dissimilar to an Anglican service.
So the little matter of ‘salvation via good works’ and ‘salvation by grace alone’ can safely be swept under the carpet.I’m not saying you’re wrong, but there are those who would.
JF
““Based on the model used in Ireland in 2016 to debate abortion, the assembly would be made up of a representative group of 100 people…..”
Until i read this I was going to say that politicians are very cautious people and do not make decisions unless the outcome is guaranteed to be in their favour. And this proves it.
Under a 1983 provision in the Irish Constitution the State was obliged to provide truth, accountability, and justice in respect of the right to life of the child in the womb. But last year, after an over thirty year campaign this right was overturned on the “advice” of a citizens’ assembly. And this citizens’ assembly came up with a solution that delivered exactly what the government wanted, down to the last detail.
And the rest is history.
Worrying that the focus seems to be on the “backstop” when the whole of the Merkel/May WA is unacceptable. We can only hope that “no deal” (which we know it is not) is indeed the outcome.
the backstop was only ever meant to be a smoke screen, for the knife that destroys us
Mr Johnson said “… and to get rid of the backstop and the current withdrawal agreement”.
Better though I would have like the word “all” in there.
If the bishops are so concerned about the “poor” why have they been happy to see their living conditions and wages driven down by mass immigration since the 90’s?
and by the eu robbing our industries, to stop people earning a living. This could be the end of the CoE
And perhaps their own living conditions and wages rise?