NOT M Barnier who definitely is not a collie!
Three more days are left in the countdown to Brexit. However, there’s the Transition Period to follow, ending on the 31st of December 2020. Looking at today’s papers it struck me that the EU is already positioning their huge guns to force us to toe their EU line – more on that below.
Firstly though: our ‘top’ Remainers – the politicians and luvvies – have apparently lost the plot completely with their ‘campaign’ to reject or deface the commemorative 50p coin. Others are going to try their utmost to get the EU ‘anthem’ to the No 1 spot on the BBC Chart for Friday (link). (If you don’t yet know what to do about that, watch this video.)
While the EU in the form of the inevitable M Barnier and the equally inevitable Leo Varadkar were at it again, making their inevitably threatening sounds, the government talked about Huawei. I’ll not wade into that particular swamp but shall only remark in the margins that it’s strange that our ‘best and brightest’ are again overlooking something here. Instead of asking themselves ‘how did we get to this point’, they either regurgitate ‘UK government policy’ or are against it, for valid reasons.
They don’t ask why, remarkably, our – the UK’s – decline in things IT coincided with our EU membership. Why is it that we were not able to develop something equivalent to what Huawei is offering? It couldn’t be because Big Business, supporting Blair’s immigration policy so as to ‘save money’ and get higher profits, have relied on importing specialists rather than supporting the education of our own pupils and students, could it? Perish the thought!
Now to the three Brexit items which got into the MSM despite ‘Corona Virus’. Item #1 is M Barnier’s speech in Belfast yesterday. That speech can be described briefly as “we won’t punish you for Brexit until we do so”. Savour his words:
“Michel Barnier tore into British reasons for wanting to leave the EU tonight, warning that Brexit would be a ‘damage limitation exercise’. In a speech in Belfast tonight he gave a stark warning that there would be ‘negative consequences’ for Britain after it quits the trade bloc on Friday. The European Union’s chief Brexit negotiator insisted that Brussels sought no ‘punishment’ or ‘spirit of revenge’ on Britain, even while the Brexit debate raged in London. But in his lecture at Queen’s University, Belfast, he said: ‘People must be aware of the consequences, because it’s absolutely clear that there will be negative consequences. Whatever agreement we reach on our future relationship, Brexit will always be a matter of damage limitation, always. No one single person, no one, from the UK or elsewhere has ever convinced me of the added value of Brexit, no one.’ “ (link)
That last sentence is indicative of an attitude which, if Michel were a collie, I’d describe as being utterly pig-headed. M Barnier (not a collie!), despite being intelligent enough, refuses to even contemplate that Brexit provides possibilities for progress, even for the EU. His attitude, as we’ve learned during those long three years, is ‘No – Non – Nein’: resistant to learning something new.
Item #2 in today’s EU ‘collection’ comes as no surprise: Mr Varadkar, fighting an election in Ireland, is puffing himself up, again. It’s not just his obnoxious remarks about the UK now being ‘a small country’ after Brexit (here), or that the UK would ‘dictate’ what the smaller EU countries would have to do because we’d only talk to France and Germany (link), it’s his self-appointed role as interpreter of how the coming trade negotiations are going to unfold which is so grating. It is, of course, about Fisheries:
“An area where you’re in a very weak position is one of the most valuable parts of the British economy, which is financial services. It’s such a crucial part of the of the British economy. And areas like the entertainment industry,” he told the BBC. “If financial services and entertainment, audio visual are cut off from the single market, the European market, that will be a very severe blow to the British economy. So, you may have to make concessions in areas like fishing in order to get concessions from us in areas like financial services.”(link, paywalled)
Good gawd – does he really think that ‘British entertainment’ is dependent on the EU market? Does he think streaming videos will stop at the EU borders? And why is it that we must make concessions, never the EU? RemainCentral helpfully explains:
“Annual exports in financial services to the EU are worth more than £26 billion in trade. The British fishing sector is worth about £989 million a year. After Brexit, the EU has unilateral powers to block access to European financial markets and to put up barriers to data flows vital to British commerce. The leverage will be used to force concessions from Boris Johnson on European access to fishing waters, which is vital for the Irish, French, Dutch, Belgians, Spanish and Danes, as well as EU demands for “level playing field” regulatory alignment.” (link, paywalled)
To make quite certain that we understand what is at stake, RemainCentral informs us:
“Leaked Brussels negotiating documents reveal that the EU will make a “linkage between provisions on fisheries and the free trade agreement/broader economic partnership”. In demands that will trigger an early battle and outrage many British fishermen, the EU will insist on “existing reciprocal access to fishing waters and quota shares” and “current distribution keys for fishing opportunities”. (link, paywalled)
In my tiny, simple mind, uncluttered by Barnier-speak, it seems to me that it’s for the EU to make concessions to save those EU fishing industries, no? Johnson seems adamant that our stance on fishing won’t change (link). It’s Varadkar and by extension Barnier and the EU who appear to believe that concessions are only of the devil if the EU must make them.
So we come to item #3 which is properly outrageous, showing the EU-Barnier-Varadkar mindset at its appalling best:
“Brussels is demanding that European Union judges have the power to rule on any post-Brexit agreement with the United Kingdom. An internal Brussels diplomatic document, seen by The Times, reveals that the EU will insist that the European Court of Justice be able to enforce the terms of a trade, fishing and security deal.” (link, paywalled)
You can read a summary of this article here – not paywalled – but this vital paragraph has fallen by the wayside:
“European officials admit internally that their approach is unprecedented. The document notes that it goes beyond existing free trade agreements to “ensure consistent interpretation of the agreement and secure the role of the [ECJ] in this respect”.” (link, paywalled)
They know full well that this is unprecedented but will go for it anyway. It’s interesting that RemainCentral ties M Barnier’s speech (see above) into this truly shocking demand:
“Speaking in Belfast yesterday Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, said that it would make unprecedented demands during negotiations because of European fears that Britain would abandon “standards”. The UK cannot expect high-quality access to our single market if it insists on competing on state aid, social or environmental standards,” he said.” (link, paywalled)
Unprecedented it is indeed. I expect and hope that there will be more MPs like Iain Duncan Smith coming to the fore:
“Yesterday the former Brexiteer cabinet minister Sir Iain Duncan Smith said that the EU’s proposal must be dismissed by Mr Johnson. “We have simply got to say no,” he said. “Nobody in their right minds would accept this and if they continue to pursue this then we simply have to walk away.” […] Downing Street was also dismissive and pointed out that such provisions regarding the European Court of Justice did not feature in other trade deals signed by the EU.” (link, paywalled)
Just so! These three items show clearly that Brexit ain’t done by a long chalk. Yes, we’ll celebrate on Friday, but we won’t relent in showing up the EU for the frightened bullies they are. As for M Barnier-not-a-collie: I wish he was and I’d have had the training of him …!
I’m sure the coming eleven months will provide us with more material from the EU bullies. In that vein we will of course
KBO!
For some inexplicable reason, the utterances of Barnier and Varadkar make me think of Hitler and Goebbels. Well we only took a certain amount from them before we acted. Mike Maunder is right about purchasing a number of small fast navy ships. 2nd hand from U.S.A. would be most appropriate.
And that was BEFORE I read the link to Freenations.
BARMY BARMIER IS PEDALLING SOMETHING THAT WE DON’T WANT TO BUY ! ….. His EU were told this in 2016, and again in late 2019 ! ….. I think it’s time for an end to polite diplomacy and negotiation as we have better things to do, starting next week !
This Nation will be too busy now, and we don’t have time for this repeat drivel. – The EU know what we want and expect by mutual common sense and benefit, and they have the rest of this year to deal with it, or at the start of 2021 all connect with them will end !
They have tried our patience enough, and our Government should purchase a number of small, fast Navy ships, probably second-hand from the USA, as a clear indication of our intent for fisheries protection and boarder use ! – This beats drivelling talk always !
Negotiations are not foreign to me, as I was a Food Wholesaler for over 20 years, then a Shop Steward in a multi National Company for 15 years, and unless there is some benefit in the protraction of a deal, action is required by leadership to end the dither !
You shouldn’t blame the EU of the failings of our electronics industry; we had an excellent business called Plessey before the North London accountant who ran GEC took it over. It is a major failing in industrial policy that predators are allowed to buy our best businesses and thereby remove their potential to grow and prosper here under British management.
EU:
A good post from Freenations here:
http://freenations.net/successful-uk-proves-merkels-fears-companies-flock-to-uk-end-of-eus-nazi-arranged-anthem-avoiding-new-eu-censorship/
Maybe they will come to their senses as the “cliff edge” approaches in which case Boris must stand firm. Any agreement with them is bound to be a disaster for us.
Here we go again. Our friends and partners (or, more accurately, enemies and trade rivals) in Europe are talking tough again. Barnier, Varadkar, et al are making it quite clear that trade negotiations will not be conducted in good faith nor will best endeavours be used to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome. Their objective is simply to screw us over and humiliate us. Time to get real. The first thing Boris should do is make it quite clear that fishing is not on the table. If this is unacceptable to the EU so be it. Tell them the £39 Billion will not be paid due to failure to negotiate in good faith, we do not need a WA, and will progress on WTO terms.
Well said Ken, you have taken the words out of all our mouths
I do hope Boris gives formal notice of this dispute before 11 pm 31st January 2020, as I would not allow the EU crooks to be under impression that just because we are formally out they have expressly excluded any of our beefs.
Here Here!
I wonder if any luvvie shops in London Bristol, Oxbridge etc. will try to refuse to accept the Brexit 50p coins for purchases. I will be stockpiling them to yank their chains!
Barnier. “No one single person, no one, from the UK or elsewhere has ever convinced me of the added value of Brexit, no one.’ “
How can you expect any person to understand something when his career depends on that person not understanding.
The other side of the problem; he simply can’t see reality from his comfortable place in the Ivory Tower of the EU.
I’m old enough to remember when vat was called luxury tax.
I’ve been saying for a while now it should NOT be levied on domestic fuel. Hardly a ‘luxury’ is it.
This in the Telegraph from Nigel Farage, paywalled unfortunately.
“Of course Huawei is getting an easy ride. The British establishment has been bought up by China”
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/01/27/course-huawei-getting-easy-ride-british-establishment-has-bought/
This has been going on for so long, before China it was the European Union that bought our politicians and coerced them into treason. Edward Heath had an expensive taste in yachts and property, this had to be paid for somehow, not to mention his other vile activities, for this he was only too eager to sell us out.
We’ve seen from the expenses scandal just what our politicians really think of us, a bunch of greedy, very often perverts, that will always sell us down the river in pursuit of money and power: criminals nearly all of them.
We’ll never really improve our country and our lives until we can find politicians that really do represent us instead of their wallets, career prospects and revolting sexual preferences.
The establishment know what is good for the City of London and what is good for the City of London is good for the establishment