Yesterday afternoon, the knaves, the clowns, the fools went and did it: whipping the Cooper Bill through the HoL and HoC and gaining Royal Assent.
Yesterday morning was indeed the calm before the storm, as we suspected (here). We learned that Ms May, not content to phone the heads of the 27 EU member states, is today going to crawl to Madame Merkel and M Macron (paywalled, here), to plead her cause.
No surprise there: Ms Merkel, the originator of that WA as we now all understand, has of course a vital interest to see this corpse dragged across the line. Donât think though that this is a visit for Ms May to be petted after crying on Madame Mâs shoulder. This is about telling her the cost for agreeing to the delay sheâll beg for:
âBritain will lose its say in future EU budget talks and trade deals as the price of another Brexit delay […] European leaders have started to spell out the price for agreeing to the delay.â (paywalled link)
Here are more details:
âMark Rutte, the Dutch prime minister, said that agreement to another delay âhinges . . . on assurances from UK on sincere co-operationâ. That assurance is expected to take the form of a letter that, in effect, commits the government always to vote with the majority of other member states. EU leaders will also make clear that it will not reopen talks on the withdrawal agreement during any extension even if Mrs May is replaced with a hardline Brexiteer.â (paywalled link)
Let that sink in: Ms May, for her place âin historyâ (in infamy, more likely!) will acquiesce to the destruction of our centuries-old conventions, customs and precedents. ‘Mother of Parliamentsâ no longer. The EU bureaucrats know precisely what they want:
âIf there is a wild Brexiter as a new Tory PM, they would be able to do nothing until after March 31, 2020, unless they subscribe to the withdrawal agreement,â a senior EU official said. âWe will simply not hold talks. If a new British leader refuses these terms it will simply be âno dealâ on the date with plenty of time for us to prepare.â(paywalled link)
Thatâs what âsincere co-operationâ means, EU fashion: no talks. And thatâs not all:
âIf the UK does not hold European parliament elections because of a big defeat [in the local elections] Â then it is âno dealâ. Britain will be out either at the end of next month or at the end of June,â the source said. (paywalled link)
It looks as if the EU isnât even bothered by a  probably mostly anti-EU âpopulist EU Parliamentâ, and why should they. Worry about that UK âparish councilâ? Hah!
Ms May will also visit the modern wannabe Napoleon Mr Macron. Again no surprise there although this assessment in The Times today made me laugh bitterly – savour it:
âPresident Macron has played the bad cop throughout the Brexit negotiations, and is doing so again, making thinly veiled threats to veto Theresa Mayâs request for another extension to Article 50. Some commentators have suggested that he is wooing a strand of domestic opinion keen to see the French head of state stand up to Britain. The truth is more complex. Mr Macron believes the EU can only regain credibility if it demonstrates a capacity to improve living standards.â (paywalled link)
Why then are the Gilets Jaunes still demonstrating in France? Some economic improvement should have reached them by now, surely? The real reason, methinks, is this:
âMr Macron is already said to be fed up with European summits devoted to Brexit rather than to his own plans for EU reform.â (paywalled link)
Nobody is talking about his grandiose, nebulous EU projects – oh diddums! Not to be outdone, M Barnier, who was visiting Dublin yet again, urged May and Corbyn to come to an agreement (paywalled link):
âThe EUâs chief Brexit negotiator said that the political declaration, which sets out the terms for negotiations over the future relationship, could be reworked very quickly if cross-party talks between Tories and Labour were successful.â
Of course it can! Hasnât the Cooper Bill âprecedentâ shown clearly that, given enough EU stick, our supine Parliament can bulldoze through in record time whatever Brussels demands?
This, dear readers, is our future if we stay in: Brussels dictating to our political leaders and to our Parliament. We remember how that worked out in Italy – we salute you, Signor Salvini! – but letâs not forget that weâre not Italians …
When we read about the skulduggery afoot here at home, we know where the latest Labour demand is coming from:
âLabour will demand that Theresa May âBoris proofsâ any concessions made by the government to break the deadlock in cross-party Brexit talks.” (link, paywalled)
Well, why not! After all, precedent was broken already with that Cooper Bill, so why not break precedence by unconstitutionally binding a new government to the decisions by a former government? Itâs what the EU demands, after all!
Wrecking our Parliamentary customs doesnât matter any longer – theyâve tasted the blood of unconstitutionality. Now Labour are coyly dancing around the question of a âconfirmatory voteâ (?? no, me neither!) dangled in front of them by the Tory negotiators:
âHowever Mr Corbyn has said a second referendum should only be held to avoid a no deal or a “disastrous Tory Brexit”. (paywalled link)
Take note of that new expression: a âdisastrous Tory Brexitâ. This will soon swamp our MSM who have been so successful in ruling the debate by using âcrashing outâ and “falling over the cliff edge” that even presumably intelligent MPs believe it’s true.
The other successful meme is of course that of the âhardcore Brexiteersâ in the ERG. Incredibly, some ERG members themselves have swallowed this hook, line and sinker, and have resigned from the ERG:
â28 MPs split from ERG due to ‘unicorn hardline element endangering Brexit’ – The Eurosceptic European Research Group remains in chaos after 28 MPs broke away from the group on Monday.â (here)
In conclusion, we can state today that the EU, thanks to Ms May, has pulled the rug from under all the economic and legal experts whoâve warned here and on the continent that a No Deal will be no disaster. After all, what do experts know!
The rug has also been pulled out from under Mr Rees-Moggâs thought that âweâ can make life âbloody difficultâ for the EU if we have to stay: no chance! Mr Mark Francoisâ hope of keeping Brexit alive thanks to EU members (here): no chance!
Our supine political establishment, with the help of our enemies from across the Channel, are on the point of being victorious in slaughtering our centuries-old customs and conventions. Our MPs donât care because they are ignorant of what they are destroying. The French though might finally be able to avenge Waterloo while the Germans can triumph over us, the victors in WWI and WWII.
But what about âwe the peopleâ? Not French, not Italians, alas, but content to pay the Danegeld of which Rudyard Kipling warned?
Apologies for spoiling your day …
Brexit Betrayal + 3 = No Brexit
KBO regardless.
Where does all this leave us in the next few years? A few ideas. I think we can expect more of the same.
Massive disengagement in the political life of the country. Huge distrust of elected politicians. A disappointing return to two party panto politics-thanks to FPTP and manipulated elections. A political class increasingly prosperous and increasingly detached from a disenfranchised and insecure population. A government that more than ever will meekly administer the country according to EU and UN policies. No control of borders or free movement with existing demographic trends breaking new records. Expect both parties to ramp up their efforts to appeal for votes in new ‘British’ communities. A media that reproduces official narratives and allows no alternatives voices. A ruthlessly policed society according to political correctness and identity politics. The fishing industry will die competing for unaffordable quotas. A shrinking productive economy disguised by an expanding service sector and property bubble. Expect distorted spending priorities to continue. The government seems determined to be ready to print the money that will keep the EU in funds whatever emergency may arise. More money on foreign aid than the Police service despite rising crime. More welfare funded immigration and less funding for the NHS etc. England will get a good concreting again and again and again as new housing spreads onto farmland and green belt. Predicting the future is not easy but more of the same seems a safe bet. Doing nothing is not an option. We may as well fight. If we don’t we’ve lost anyway and if we do fight we may win.
Indeed Matt we have to fight to save our country, not just for ourselves but for our sons and daughters and those who will come after them. For now it seems that the writings of Orwell and Huxley are being treated as manuals for government.
I was heartened by the reponses to my question the other day about support from the ordinary guys in the military when it all kicks off, as it surely will unless there is a huge change in the attitude of government. Military coups are not a bad thing in my experience but they don’t really have the necessary numbers in the UK.
I don’t think you spoiled my day, Viv. I think it was spoiled several hours ago when I was doing the news review.
The Prime Minister is being held very firmly by the short and curlies by both Jeremy Corbyn and the EU. The only question is which will prevail, although there are some common components in their demands. She has been totally humiliated by both sides and yet she insists she’s in the right. Sometimes a hard attitude is good; at other times a lack of flexibility is a distinct disadvantage. We didn’t go through the last General Election to have Labour’s views imposed on us.
There is just one hope: ‘If the UK does not hold European parliament elections because of a big defeat [in the local elections] then it is âno dealâ.’ So we all know what to do – whoever is on our ballot papers on May 2, whatever you do, DON’T VOTE CONSERVATIVE. It may even mean some local councils are passed to Labour, but that is the price to pay if it results in our escape from the EU.
On another point, Mrs May said in her recent video that she would not bring her German Withdrawal Agreement back to the House of Commons. Was that another lie? If she is able to agree details with Jeremy Corbyn, surely the only way forward for her it to do just that after Corbyn had agreed to back it and instruct his MPs to comply.
I am preparing my slogans for ANY election. The banner will be
“THE CONSERVATIVES
ARE THE PARTY THAT
GAVE AWAY OUR COUNTRY”.
There are some good people among them. Those that are good should leave that dishonourable party or be tarred by the same brush. The only honest course of action is for patriotic and courageous individuals to leave that party as soon as possible. No other organisation will ever be so deeply despised for such disgraceful behaviour.
Corbyn? he will fall, along with the Labour Party, by the wayside. He is not liked, has a terrible track record and his party is truly loony.
What a disgrace! Our “un-representatives” in this Parliamentary Dictatorship, in collusion with the MSM and EU, will stop at nothing to subvert the instruction given to them by the people. Around 60% of Labour constituencies voted Leave yet party spokesmen are now advocating Revoking Article 50, how arrogant is that? Around 70% of Conservative constituencies voted Leave and what are they offering… a BINO deal, or worse, how pathetic is that? This country should be re-named after this fiasco. The epithet, “Great”, should be removed from Great Britain because now it has become a misnomer, as the country and people have been made a laughing stock on the world stage.
Rubber stamped by the monarch then, carry on Brenda, coronation oath, what were they then?
It is clear now, well has been for a long time, that the Monarchy has no function at all in the protection of our once great country, oaths mean nothing.
Brenda, a polite term (I have others), takes her ‘advice’ from her ministers ie the PM, but it matters not whether May is insane, possessed or colluding with foreign powers, she is by her inaction failing this country and has to go and so does the whole sorry state of them.
Funny how our constitution such as it is, can be trampled underfoot but she must uphold her committment to take the PM’s ‘advice’ despite the clear damage being caused to this country.
Spoling my day? Never mind Viv, usually it is already spolit by the time the UK wakens up. However one phrase did raise my hackles further:
“…gaining Royal Assent.” Presumably this was done by her delegate in the HoL as usual. Well, it is simply not good enough that the monarch does not deal personally with this, the most serious matter we have faced in her reign, and support “her” people.
If she can’t do that then she should step down and go live with her relatives on the continent rather than maintaining the pretence. We can do very well without the Royal Family which has become no more than a tourist attraction.
Totally agree, The whole house of cards has been shown to be a sham, HOC.HOL and the Monarchy, The monarchy would do well to remember the Dianna debacle and how that nearly brought them down, perhaps the lessons have been forgotten, or maybe they think they will continue as normal when they have capitulated to the e.u and the hue and cry has died down.
OK, you choose the style of government, I get to select the President.
Gina Miller, your country needs you.
JF