I think I’ve found an explanation for the continuing “Project Fear’ items our MSM keep reporting. We know that Remainers, especially in the the Cabinet and the HoC, are terrified of the WTO/No Deal Brexit – the one we voted for. So methinks we’re seeing a classic case of ‘projection’, as described in orthodox psychology: they are terrified, therefore we must all be afraid, very afraid. Their hope is that we will come running to Nanny State and cry to make them stop the Brexit pain.
However, there’s a ‘fear’ item which you all need to know. I am quoting at length from a report in The Times because it’s paywalled. It is very important, and frightening and infuriating at the same time:
“Whitehall officials have been gaming a state of emergency and even the introduction of martial law in the event of disorder after a no-deal Brexit, it has emerged. Mandarins are considering how to use the sweeping powers available under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 to stop any civil disobedience resulting from the nation leaving the EU on March 29.
Curfews, bans on travel, confiscation of property and, most drastic, the deployment of the armed forces to quell rioting are among the measures available to ministers under the legislation.They can also amend any act of parliament, except the Human Rights Act, for a maximum of 21 days.” (my bold)
Note: this is their preparation for a No-Deal-Brexit!
One wonders if this Act will be applied when we leave with the WTO/No Deal and Remainers start rioting …:
“The possibility of using the legislation, introduced to deal with national emergencies such as acts of war and terrorism, was raised for the first time last week as part of the final stages of contingency planning for Operation Yellowhammer, the battle plan for a no-deal Brexit.”
Unlike the generic ‘Project Fear’ utterances, this ‘preparation’ does frighten me. Read on:
“As no-deal preparations are accelerated and training is rolled out to civil servants, questions have been raised about the legislation and how it could be used in the event of a no-deal Brexit,” the source said. Powers that can be used under the legislation, which critics have described as “truly draconian”, include “any provision which the person making the regulations is satisfied is appropriate” to protect human life, health and safety, and to protect or restore property and supplies of money, food, water, energy or fuel.” (my bold)
Note well that it will be some unelected civil servant who will make the decisions! Also note this:
“The overriding theme in all the no-deal planning is civil disobedience and the fear that it will lead to death in the event of food and medical shortages,” another source told The Sunday Times last week.” (my bold)
It is inconceivable to me that Brexiteers should start acts of civil disobedience when we get the WTO/No Deal Brexit we voted for! Therefore, Remain Whitehall seems to expect severe Remain Rioting – which they would use to implement this act, unto amending the ‘offensive’ No-Deal act of Parliament … and that is what is truly frightening.
Stopping Brexit, no matter how the MPs and MSM try to obfuscate, is what it is all about. The way the HoC Remainers are proposing to do this is by getting an extension to Article 50. In this, they are ably assisted by the EU, see e.g. this:
“EU negotiators have spent the past week locked behind closed doors in Brussels trying to thrash out a way to get Mrs May’s deal ‘over the line’ – without compromising their dogged insistence on a Northern Ireland ‘backstop’. The Mail on Sunday understands that they have received detailed legal advice about the expected request from London to extend Article 50 beyond the planned Brexit Day on March 29 – including work on whether it is possible to circumvent the need for the UK to put MEPs up for election to the new European Parliament when it is formed on July 1.” (source).
The Times (paywalled) writes:
“EU diplomats believe a British request for a delay of the Brexit deadline is almost inevitable if the UK wants to avoid exiting without a deal. But leaders now question if there is any point in an extension that would merely put off the moment of reckoning, rather than produce a Commons majority for a deal.”
Well observed by EU ‘diplomats’! Don’t forget that the aim of the extension-loving Remainers is not to get a ‘better deal’, it is to create the conditions for a 2nd referendum. Just because that demand has been quietly taken off the table of amendments doesn’t mean they don’t aim to get it. After all, the noises from Brussels are encouraging:
“Liberal Democrat MEP Catherine Bearder stunned the BBC when she revealed that her colleagues in the European Parliament have offered her support to secure Britain’s place in Europe. [She] claimed that other MEPs in Strasbourg were “deeply sympathetic” and had offered “to do anything they can” to help Britain stay in the EU. […] “They say that if the UK gets a second referendum, we will come to help and do whatever we can to help and make sure you stay. They really don’t want us to leave.” (source)
How kind of them – of course they don’t! They need our money … and intervening in the internal affairs of a country is, after all, a tried and tested EU method – remember Greece, remember Italy?
In yesterday’s column, I observed that the ‘Brexit calm’ we saw in yesterday’s MSM veiled feverish activities behind closed doors. Today’s reports confirm this. The DT (paywalled) reports that:
“Ministers and MPs have told Downing Street that Brexiteers and the DUP will only help to keep her proposals alive this week if the Prime Minister commits to seeking specific changes from the EU to alleviate MPs’ concerns.The warnings came amid frantic talks between No 10, ministers and MPs aimed at averting a crisis if a majority of the Commons fails to rally around a solution to save Mrs May’s deal.”
Meanwhile, the SNP was working on yet another amendment:
“SNP MP Ian Blackford will table an amendment on Monday calling on the Prime Minister to take into account Scottish Parliament’s, the Welsh Assembly’s and Commons’ votes to “overwhelmingly” reject her deal.”(source)
If you need your blood pressure raised, do read the whole thing – it’s about the Scottish tail trying to wag the whole UK dog. The DM now envisages ‘The Battle of the Brexit blockers’ amid fears that the Speaker will do his best to help the Remainers. If you can, take Tuesday afternoon off to watch the spectacle in the HoC, starting at 11.30, with some other business coming first.
Should you be meeting Remainers today and tomorrow, you must first read today’s Diary entry by the indispensable Sir John Redwood. You won’t find better points to slap round Remainer blockheads!
I leave you with the prospect of an extension with which I heartily agree:
“As fears grow that time is running out to legislate, Downing Street is planning to extend the hours of Commons sittings and keep MPs in Westminster on Fridays as well as provide help with childcare to ensure laws can be passed.” (source)
Right on! Go for it! No more long weekends for Parliament!
Tick-tock-tick-tock …
All the sound and fury. All the millions of hours wasted. Nothing is going to happen. Has anything yet changed. The arguments are all about what MIGHT happen. CLASSIC.I am afraid the civil service knows nothing will change. Obviously there will be anger and Leavers will be blamed. Our PM has had a lovely time. WE ARE ON TRACK. 3 years and look hard nosed at what has actually happened.
Every leaver in the world has a sneaking hope ( About 3 %) that she will honour her words and leave. Her track record suggests Not.
Look closely there may just possibly be a pattern/opportunity. Macron yellow vests, Mrs May similar, Italy ditto,Any one of several other countries Waiting, Hungary, Greece, even Germany. Keep an eye out.. Calming civilian unrest is a powerful excuse. And the French response is indicative of a ramping up process.
Another fake illiterate article to discredit the Brexit cause …these people should be ashamed of themselves !!
Writing articles which are clearly pro-Brexit is ‘discrediting’ the Brexit cause?
Someone clearly has their wires crossed – and it certainly isn’t me.
Any move to to rescind the majority vote , will also negate any semblance of Law and Order in the UK . I believe that The Real British People , at the cost of lives on all sides,will not allow this to happen MAY do not push the people on this , because the inherent British love of fair play will rebound on the traitors and the retribution will astound all those that underestimate the real nature of the British
“NO DEAL REJECTION Theresa May ‘privately told Cabinet ministers she will rule out No Deal’”
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/8292363/theresa-may-rule-out-no-deal/
Do they intend for this “martial law” to be indigenous or from foreign elements ? it is as it stands a lose/lose issue as in when
we come out via the wto / no deal route this martial law brigade could easily turn into a punishment brigade.
Remainers can count currently on the fact that crime goes unpunished and in many respects, pays.
So basically if remainiac MPs can’t get their way, their remainiac street thug supporters will riot forcing martial law. This will confirm no deal is a disaster and The EU security forces will save us by enforcing law and order. A people’s vote will then win a huge mandate to join the EU?
These MPs and civil servants need to get their P45s and PDQ.
The Civil Contingencies Act 2004. If we accept that legislation (good or bad) isn’t made for no reason I am wondering why this one was back then
I don’t remember anything going on back then that would warrant this piece of legislation. There was no backlash following 9/11, the economy was doing as well as….. well, as well as. So why was this piece of draconian legislation deemed necessary and introduced without any attention being given to it, similar to the Global Compact etc?
All I can come up with was that it was another building block in the plan that Tony Bliar had in mind for us ( and of course he was/is not acting alone), along with the abolition of treason and various other seemingly unimportant (to a sleeping populous) matters.
So what exactly is this plan that has obviously had a spanner jammed in the works with the rise of UKIP and more importantly the outcome of the Referendum?
I have a feeling we are about to find out the hard way and that our democracy, already in tatters is about to be severely jeopardised.
That “sleeping populous” is their unknowing ally.
The CCA 2004 was a direct response to the 2000 Fuel Protests (interestingly spiralling fuel prices was the Gilet Jaune trigger last year in France) see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_protests_in_the_United_Kingdom
The Times is hysterical about Brexit most days, it is the Remainers favourite moanfest rag, nothing in it can be believed anymore, just like the Evening Standard or Independent (I have to laugh everytime I see that paper’s title) There should have been campaigns running for a long time making jokes about Times ‘reporting’, in the same way that the Left abused the Daily Mail and severely degraded it’s value. Mind you, the DM is now a Remain paper also.
R I Hicks Well said. They have no defence whatsoever against mockery – enormously successful tactic – let us use it to effect change.
Pete and Dud
! leave
2. carry on at work,
3 No problems,
4Continue trading
5 What was all the fuss about ?
6 Dunno.
7.. What about trading on WTO
8 Who ?
9 Us! What d’you mean who ? Not world health org ?
10 Gawd ‘elp us.!.No of course not.
Both, the EU and us, always traded with WTO all the time.
11..So what’s the fuss about?
12. Well they’ve invented lots of new rules.and we don’t like ’em.
13 Why/?
14 That Mrs Merkel was trying to get in my bedroom last night
15 What, Again. ?
Excellent script
We shall this Tuesday again be making our presence felt outside Parliament, reminding the wretched cowards, fools and traitors ensconced within of our resolve.
As I wrote last week to the wretched creature in bizarre shoes (to distinguish it from the motley collection of other wretched creatures there):
*”… we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills;
we shall never surrender”*
Don’t forget to wear your yellow vests.
Project Fear on Sly this morning, ” Marshall Law ‘ could be used in the event of a No Deal. According to them quoting The Times ministers could impose curfews, travel bans confiscate property and deploy armed forces on the streets.
Another source is quoted as saying ‘ although there is nothing which could replicate the chaos threatened by a no deal brexit , which will be about a thousand times worse than the volcanic ash crisis , this is the closest we have in modern British history, ” the only thing comparable would be something like a Europe wide war’
The lunatics have finally taken over the asylum words, fail me. And these people are not only reporting this but are working in government circles. The same people planning for contingencies who made such a success of emergency planning during the severe floods of half the country a few years back, when I had occasion to telephone the emergency planning department of my county council at the height of the crisis , the answer I got eventually from the security guard who answered the call, was ‘ emergency planning mate, the only emergency planning that is done here is between 9 to 5 Monday to Friday. That says it all .
Government hides under a blanket of incompetence to obscure its real intent.
“introduction of martial law in the event of disorder after a no-deal Brexit” : disorder by remainers helped along no doubt by antifa similar to what happened at Lewisham by election. BTW we’ve been warning about the Civil Contingencies Act for years but the public never wanted to get excited about it as they should.
Hello Viv
There has to be second set of negotiations, trade, with the EU. The Leaver voters know that France wishes to continue to fish in UK waters. You can guarantee that France will block any trade agreement if it is not allowed to fish in UK waters. The Ireland back stop is an insurance policy for the EU with the UK being the insurer and will pay the price of the back stop. Why do retainers ignore this point.
If the retainers what a second referendum they can have a referendum after the UK has left the EU. In the 2016 referendum they had project fear, in a re-joining the EU referendum they will need to state the advantages of being in the EU. Life will not be easy for them, they will need facts and figures to support their proposal. The status quo will be with the Leavers.
Regarding the SNP MPs, why do they need the Scottish Parliament to represent them as they have seats in the House of Commons. Double representation!! England has one parliamentary system and the Scots, Welsh and Northern Island have second system. Only the UK Parliament could produce such a system.
Regards
David T.
Trade negotiations must only proceed after we have left. The mess we are in is largely due to conflating such agreement with the process of our leaving.
We have to conclude that delay and betray will continue.
THE FIVE-HEADED HYDRA :
“The Day of the Jackal” author Frederick Forsyth gives a superb definition of the Establishment :
https://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/frederick-forsyth/1077570/brexit-news-leave-eu-general-election-politics-frederick-forsyth
“….a loose alliance of five communities who all worship the status quo because the status quo has treated them all extremely favourably with cushy billets, fat salaries and minimal criticism.
These are: the political world, in office, waited on and well rewarded. The much larger and more influential (powerful) civil service world which, behind the posturing politicos, really runs the country. Then there is Mega Money – the amalgam of The City, banks, finance giants, insurance, hedge funds, brokers, commerce and large-scale industry.
The professions headed up by academe and the legal eagles, massively rewarded and averse to any sort of contradiction. And the establishment media – radio, TV and most of the broadsheets……..add to that their spokespersons on every TV channel and radio frequency, with very few speaking for Leave. “
So Theresa May wants to use armed force to suppress Brexiteers now.
You can bet your life (literally) that the Common Purpose police chiefs will back her all the way (just as they collaborated in the Channel Islands in WWII)
This could never happen in the USA, as most civilians are armed, but arch Remainers John Major and Tony Blair very effectively disarmed the British after 1998.
Whether May can persuade the British Army to round up and shoot dissenters though is in some doubt as they have all sworn allegiance to the Crown, not to Parliament. However, she could pull in French and German troops to willingly do her bidding.
May’s Own Einsatzgruppen ….. Courtesy of Macron and Merkel.
Nowadays, our tragically subverted and politicised Police, led almost without exception by Common-Purpose enemies of the people, are no friends of UKIP.
The Armed Forces are another thing altogether, Treason May.
When, on the anniversary of Independence Day, I took part in the Central London march in a (retired) ARMY BOMB DISPOSAL VAN, loudspeaker-equipped, with an ex-Army driver, most of the pleece couldn’t believe what they were seeing.
I could see them, again and again as we crawled through London in the wake of the foot-soldiers, running its VRM through their system to see if it was legal!
More fool them.
According to fake news central https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46092838 the Army is already on route to being subverted by using the old Roman technique of stationing troops here who have no affinity with or knowledge of living with the local people.
Freddy,
I hope that you are right in respect of the ordinary guys in the military being “another thing altogether”. I have spent a good deal of time in a country where the population is/was divided by seriously polarised views and vote buying was the norm. The problem was solved by a military coup and, in my experience, the military government has done a good job.
However, on a per capita basis, the miltary is around six times the size of the UK military. Sure we had the odd tank on the street and a curfew for few weeks but all turned out well and a lot of serious corruption has been sorted out.
More or less said words to that effect when she was Home Secretary, just as she said she would welcome e.u military operating along side ours on the new carrier. And in any case eugenfor can be sent to any e.u state, by invitation or otherwise. People here are still in the main asleep, they need to wake up and fast.
So the SNP wants May to ‘take into account’ the fact that Scotland and Wales voted to leave the EU. What does this mean? Perhaps they want her to ignore the wishes of the majority of the English and British electorate, notwithstanding the Remain votes of our devolved nations, and cancel Brexit? Surely that would be prioritising the minority Remainers over the majority Leavers. That’s not very democratic.
I remember Nicola Sturgeon accusing the PM of ‘not listening’ to her when she demanded that we stay in the EU. Perhaps someone should tell her that yes, the PM is listening but is refusing to prioritise a minority vote over the majority Leavers.
SNP are wrong the Welsh people voted to Leave, the Welsh Assembly may be another matter.
Similar to what jane4brexit says, the Scottish people did not vote for Brexit, the Scottish parliament did. Approx. 42% of the
population did vote for remain, 25% for Brexit and 33% did not vote. It is only those that vote in a democracy that get a say, but it is grossly misleading to state that a whole population voted the same as the winners.
The 2016 Referendum: London, Scotland and N Ireland voted Remain. Take those out of the count, and the result for England less London, plus Wales was about 55/45 Leave/Remain. Just for interest, Rotherham was 67.8 Leave, if my memory is correct.
Perhaps we should give Sturgeon her second referendum on the Jocks leaving. The important difference being that only native English should be allowed to vote. They’d be gone…