Needed no longer …

 

There are mornings when I think that the mighty chief editors of the Westminster MSM are unsure about which squirrel to show us, to keep us looking away from actual scandals boding ill to our country. Thus, on the print editions’ front pages, the Rwanda thing is still ‘in the news’: “Newspaper headlines: Rwanda policy unlawful and ‘radical’ NHS overhaul” (link). Looking at the online editions though it’s as if this is no longer an issue. Btw – if you want a dose of mawkish tear jerking, scroll down for the Mirror’s front page: a true weepy!

At the time of writing the online editions of the broadsheets present us with yet another government initiative to ‘Save the Sacred Cow’. I’m not even going there, it’s nought but yet another inept ‘jam tomorrow’ attempt to reform the unreformable.

Disregarding the paywalled pieces in the DT and The Times,  you can find some articles and opinion pieces regarding yon Rwanda thing in the non-paywalled DM, e.g. here, here and here. There’s also a report which illustrates the shameless hypocrisy of the Left, Labour included. It’s about ‘a watchdog’ criticising the Home Office for not deporting foreign criminals (link). You really couldn’t make it up! It’s as if the whole immigration kerfuffle is a giant work scheme for lefty lawyers .

There’s one news item which I found extremely concerning. It  has made it onto the online front pages, albeit not in a prominent place. It’s about the chief of the general Staff, Gen Sir Patrick Sanders, stepping down next year after having been in that job since 2022 only. This seems to coincide with a speech he gave on Tuesday, in which he criticised plans to reduce the number of troops even further (all emphases are mine):

“He has been publicly critical of planned cuts to troops which will see the British Army reduced to the smallest size for centuries. The news of his departure comes just three days after Sir Patrick used a speech at a Royal United Services Institute conference to call for the UK to increase the number of its troops and compared “outdated” tanks to “rotary dial telephones in an iPhone age”. Sir Patrick also warned that for UK deterrence to succeed, all three services needed to be “balanced” in terms of personnel and equipment.” (paywalled link)

The report in The Times comes with a nice little quote from the Defence Secretary, Ben Wallace, on this issue, who “dismissed “conspiracy” allegations that Sanders had been forced out for being outspoken on army cuts. He said Sanders was “outstanding” but that “generals come and go”.”(link, paywalled).

Interesting, isn’t it: there’s nothing to see here, yon general is just another one who had his turn in the sun and must now make place for someone else. Reducing the size of the Army is neither here nor there, you see – and anyway, Mr Wallace said, he’d been ‘given’  “£14 billion for his army modernisation programme, for his equipment.” (paywalled link), so he had no cause to moan.

Mr Wallace didn’t say if this generous gift includes the cost of replacing all the goodies Johnson, Sunak and Wallace have so generously sent to the Ukraine for destruction. Furthermore, it seems that there’s enmity between the current Chief of Defence, Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, and General Sanders, Radakin apparently having argued that: “the UK no longer needs to prioritise tanks given recent investments made by allies such as Poland. [Sanders] said it was wrong to “hide behind the armies of other Nato contributors”. “ (link, paywalled)

Apparently, Admiral Radakin wants to ‘pivot’ our Armed Forces to the Indo-Pacific – that means Taiwan and support for the USA – and thus wants more ships, like those always sitting in docks because something is always not functioning. Apparently, taking on Russia isn’t sufficient, “we” must also be the ankle-biter in the war with China which the USA are allegedly planning for.

Isn’t it interesting that Wallace and Radakin seem to assume that there will be yon fabulous EU ‘Army’, making our own obsolete. Clearly, if the EU builds tanks we don’t need to, nor do we need soldiers trained to operate them: savings all round, and never mind what’s happening in the Ukraine.

There is one other twist to this sorry tale. The DT and the DM (link) speculate about a possible successor, mentioning that Mr Wallace wants to select the next head of the Army before, they hint, he himself will step down:

“Friends questioned the decision to replace Sanders after two years given his three predecessors served four. A friend said: “Wallace and Radakin want him out because he is not prepared to toe the line. Patrick is the most talented service chief we have had for some time. It says much about our political class that he is taking an early bath.” Among those tipped to replace him are Lieutenant General Sharon Nesmith, 53, the deputy chief of the general staff, who would be the first woman to lead the army.” (link, paywalled)

Well, why not have a woman as Chief of the Army! Other EU countries even have wimmin Ministers of Defence, like Germany or Scandinavian countries. A female Chief of staff would fit nicely into the woke, feminist-driven EU armies! At least she looks competent, unlike the female CEO of Thames Water. Anyway, who needs functioning Armed Forces when we can show the world how incredibly woke and divers we are!

I leave you with the unsurprising ‘news’ that Nigel Farage having been cancelled by his and all other banks has only made it onto the DT online front page (paywalled link). I am disgusted that so many comment posters seem to think this is a good thing. Has our society sunk so deep into ‘woke’ that even ‘educated’ people don’t get what this means?

That’s all I have for today. From the destruction of our Armed Forces to the destruction of personal freedom, all in the name of ‘DEI’, we face a bleak future indeed. Have a good day.