Gossip: ‘Have you heard…? Everybody knows! It’s a fact!
Another romp through the news this morning (link), another morning where the ‘news’ demonstrate that we’ve elected untrustworthy, stupid seekers of personal attention to the HoC rather than the competent, experienced people as which they’ve tried to portrait themselves. In times of turbulence like these, their character flaws come out like pimples on a face.
I’ll be generous though: it’s not just MPs who suffer from this weakness of “#MeFirstNow”. Our MSM writers suffer as well, and thanks to social media we find that so do the ‘politicians-in-waiting’, the various SpAds and research assistants. I am of course referring to that scandal of the porn-watching – allegedly – MP. More on that below.
I make no excuse for not not writing about the ongoing SMO in the Ukraine. I am no military expert and am as wary of the reports in the few Russian MSM outlets we can still access as I am of ours. If you want concise reports of what the Russian military did, then the site of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation is accessible here – in English.
It ought to be clear by now that we, the various western media types included, cannot know what really goes on, nor can the various excellent commentators and bloggers. Neither can we and they know what Messrs Putin and Shoigu are planning. There are various Russian journalists embedded with the Russian and LDPR troops publish their videos on social media, mostly on ‘telegram’ but also on Twitter. These are not ‘official’, but they are informative. “We” must of course disregard those because: “propaganda!”
However, here’s a strange thing: The Times – yes, that august paper! – has published a report today under the headline “Bloodied Briton is paraded on Moscow TV” (link, paywalled). That evokes that image of a poor, hapless Brit sitting under glaring studio lights, with military handlers at each side, handcuffed. In reality The Times showed a video clearly made in the battle zone, clearly made by one of those journalists but not by a production team, clearly made to be published on social media.
Was it really shown on ‘Moscow TV’? How should I, how should anyone know not living in Moscow! However, the fact that this video clip graced The Times and not a clip of the actual TV production tells me that our MS correspondents are obviously watching the relevant social media channels. They must therefore have the same information all others have who blog or comment about the SMO.
That none of this information, documenting the collapse of Ukrainian troops who’ve either died or surrendered, is making it into our MSM ‘reports’, demonstrates like nothing else their bias and that they are indeed just propaganda instruments of this government. That’s why none of them dares to ask why “we” are supporting this war, with money, weapons and indeed men. That is the true scandal. No amount of fabricated ‘outrage’ about some British mercenary having been wounded and taken POW in this fight can hide that.
Instead, our MSM are tickling our prurience with reports of that ‘porn MP’ scandal. He was named and shamed yesterday evening. He’s now forever “‘Porn MP’ Neil Parish” and the DT for example tells us in their headline that he ”refuses to quit as he loses whip – MP for Tiverton and Honiton says he will continue to carry out duties as wife says: ‘It’s so stupid. He’s such a good person” (paywalled link). The DT also informs us that “He later suggested to reporters that he had opened pornographic material “in error” and apologised, saying he understood the upset caused.” (paywalled link).
What struck me is that the DT is working hard to portrait themselves as indefatigable investigative hacks who ‘got’ their man and forced the hands of the Tory whips, albeit with a bit of blackmail:
“It was only after being told of an imminent report by The Telegraph that the Tories removed the whip from Mr Parish, meaning he now sits as an independent MP in the Commons. Mr Parish was elected in 2010 and is the chairman of the environment, food and rural affairs committee – a position that means he is regarded as a “senior MP”.” (paywalled link)
Interesting, isn’t it, that he is being removed just at a time when food and food shortages are threatening. We’re of course not told who his ‘accusers’ are. Instead, our marvellous coterie of hen peacocks is on again about sexism and misogyny. The Speccie’s report last evening is indicative of this fake outrage:
“Women in parliament seem to be increasingly frustrated and prepared to speak out about their own experiences, including Anne-Marie Trevelyan. The International Trade Secretary today said that most of her female colleagues had been subjected to ‘wandering hands’, and that she herself had been pinned up against the wall by a male MP who is no longer in the House. This evening Procedure Committee chair Karen Bradley told Radio 4 that this could have an impact as big as the expenses scandal, arguing that ‘total disinfectant’ was needed to deal with it.” (Speccie email newsletter)
Oh dear. At a time when we’re sliding into war, at a time when our economy is driven hard against the wall, at a time when inflation is rampant, our female MPs would rather waste time on this stuff than on the issues which surely concern their constituents.
There’s also that Labour MP, Mr Liam Bryne, who has been accused of bullying and is being investigated by the Parliamentary ‘independent complaints and grievance scheme’. The accuser told ‘i news’ that this system doesn’t work because it didn’t protect his anonymity (link). I leave it to you to ask how come we need a system which permits accusers to remain anonymous. What are they scared of?
What does this tell us about the mental attitude prevailing in the Westminster swamp when ‘grievances’ and another “#MeToAsWellLikewiseAlso” campaign are deemed to outweigh the serious issues which face our nation! What does it tell us about those who’d rather waste time and money on issues which are utterly irrelevant to us!
I thought that normal people know by now that human beings, MPs included, have feet of clay. But wait: apparently we’re back to the times where MPs must have a shiny public image to maintain and are thus open to blackmail, from whips and colleagues to MSM hacks. I learned one other expression yesterday – thank you, Speccie (my emphasis):
“It’s also worth pointing out that the name circulating Westminster for most of yesterday was not Parish, meaning a lot of people have been pronouncing very confidently – and wrongly – on the identity of someone. It’s an example of what is known in the SW1 village as a ‘Westminster Fact’, where allegations are treated as being proven merely because ‘everyone knows about it’.” (Speccie email newsletter)
Let’s ask ourselves: how many gossipy ‘news’ from ‘sources’ have we been treated to by our MSM which turned out to be nought but ‘Westminster Facts’? Too many, I’d say! But that’s how we are governed in these dangerous times. And that’s why we, with the help of the incompetent MSM, are sliding into the abyss of inflation and possibly war.
At midnight today one third of 2022 are gone. Doesn’t time fly … So celebrate May Day tomorrow – the weather will be nice and we must store up lovely memories against the hard times to come.
I was interested in the reaction of some totally unimpressive and obviously incompetent MP, when interviewed. The question .. “why in these days of possibly being unable to afford the basics, why not cut a tax.” Our representative was shocked and horrified. Stunned and terrified by the this mutinous idea
And that is the problem. The millions ( And have no fear it is multiple millions )who get paid from tax. Lets divide them by category:–
Low paid but essential :–Everyone
Low paid but essential manual :- Everyone
Low paid but unsung:–Everyone.
Not paid enough but with bulging brains and responsibilities and the trappings of royalty or mega-millionairs.
Barely paid enough for the rigours of WFH :- All of em.
Lets list some of these people paid out of tax:- armed forces, civil servants, Directors and staff of institutions, local councils ( used to be respected, but now indistinguishable from Whitehall.), Education, most Quangos , and millions of computers and committees, To name but a few.
One cannot deny the value of these people. Nor their voting power. And if these millions realised how important they were. And if they all joined a union. Or if a soldier asked ” How much do I cost the state and why , what etc.
I sympathise and halve the cost.
All of this porn stuff is fairly normal in Westminster I’d say. I once listened to an interview with a very high class prostitute that used to see her clients on TV in Parliament; she used to look out for the dimples on their trousers that showed her that they were wearing suspender belts under their smart suits.
As I’ve always said: Just about all politicians are perverts, watching a bit of porn in Parliament is a relatively minor offense and just the tip of the iceberg.
https://twitter.com/cartlanddr1982/status/1520418024045662209?s=21&t=XVmCDaU6YSUbg3ZYELf0pg This may be a better link to an article I posted earlier.
Slightly off topic but an ongoing relevance, this was recently posted on twatter by a Dr. David Cartland but I don’t know is provenance other than that. Maybe somebody could look into it. Apologies for the long link.
https://apis.mail.yahoo.com/ws/v3/mailboxes/@.id==VjN-V0380FUAttnkNtVEGYpxnUpeWp4VOhLCj0euMM0HzPh90j0kf_XkUVxbWqSulkbvAm9leSnacDH4J9qI9xACdA/messages/@.id==AEqCaZ0b5LsdYm1UlQiLgB3hC9k/content/parts/@.id==2/refresh?appid=YMailNorrin&ymreqid=e6f0348e-a6dc-c593-1c82-4b000601a100
Link is not working, probably because he appears to be a GP, a member of HART and NHS whistleblower.
But this works:
https://podcasts.apple.com/ro/podcast/the-laurence-fox-show-nhs-whistleblower-dr-david-cartland/id1508215295?i=1000551279219
How can one open up any site on the internet whether it be a pornography site or a shopping site by mistake. I assume that this MP typed in what he wanted to access and then clicked on that link. Hey presto, its as simple as that. Was it the Amazon market place advertising ladies swimming costumes, or was it another site where those ladies were displaying something more. OK, I get the point that some fraudulent sites can look like the real thing and that a click on a link and buy something as I did pretty recently and got fleeced in the process. Apart from anything else why aren’t our supposed elected representatives concentrating on the proceedings in hand the House of Commons rather than using their mobile phones and doing whatever. Surely there must be a rule that those members within the chamber must switch off their mobiles, like there is in theatres etc. This incident like Johnson and his attendance at numerous drinks parties whilst Covid regulations were in place to prevent such gatherings are probably just the tip of the iceberg as to why our supposed elected representatives hold the electorate at large in contempt and believe that rules are there to be broken at their whim. We need a mass clear out of Parliament as none of it seems fit for purpose, and that the majority of the incumbents are only there to get as much out of the antiquated system for themselves as possible, and to hell with the consequences. Time for Boris Johnson and Co to brush up their CV’s and look for another job. Whoever holds their P45’s get them out of the drawer now……..
“Opening it by mistake” is the smartphone/internet equivalent to the wails we know from kids: “But I didn’t mean to …!” when caught out having done something unacceptable.
Viv…….at least today that particular idiot has now resigned as an MP. Can we now expect his leader and our supposed prime minister to do what is right and resign as well. No, not just the leader of what was once the Conservative Party (now the New Green Party) and prime minister of this country, but resign as an MP period. The MP for Tiverton and Honiton has done something incredibly stupid and not befitting the status of his position, but Johnson has broken the law and been fined. What could be worse. The party is over for that party, as they are going to get a hiding next week. As one Conservative constituency chairman told me last week, they have resigned themselves to a total wipe out in the local elections, after which Johnson will be forced out. Perhaps every cloud does have a silvery lining after all.
He said he was looking at tractors. We’ve all done it. Gone on line to look at farm machinery and inadvertently landed on a porn site. How do people come up with such crass and implausible explanations? Cummings drove 30 miles to ‘test his eyesight’ with family in the car. (if his eyesight was in doubt then driving at all was a hazard.) Angela Rayner “made a mistake” but in “good faith”. (A mistake in bad faith is not actually a mistake.) A politician who just said “I thought I could get away with it” would, for the rarity of being honest, potentially get my vote.
A Lord was recently berated for nodding off during a debate, thus not paying attention as was his duty. Nodding off is not always voluntary, as I know only too well, whereas phone use, for whatever reason, is deliberate and will always be a temptation during boring matters. Whoever thought allowing phones in the chamber was a good idea, deserves a large part of the blame.
Due to an aversion to self-inflicted illness I have avoided pretty much all pearl-clutching comment on the porn-watcher, although some has been impossible to avoid, but since so many films these days would have qualified as porn only a few years ago, perhaps he was just watching a recent movie and whoever sneaked a glimpse got a different impression. Who knows? Who cares? Of course it was inappropriate. But harmless, except that he wasn’t doing his job. That’s the scandal. Grow up. End of.
What is not harmless is sexually assaulting small boys. Labour Lord Ahmed has had to resign after being convicted of such. But where was the condemnation and moralising about that? I remember a story from long ago first made me realise that it’s always sleaze when Tories do it, but Labour gets a free pass: Labour MP caught in police raid on Thai massage parlour.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/mar/16/michaelwhite
Final sentence: “Neither Labour party HQ, nor Downing Street wished to get involved yesterday in the latest tabloid expose. Constituency officials expressed surprise and support for their MP.” It’s nothing; just a tabloid expose.
Media is also obsessing over a slutty MP indignantly claiming victim status, after boasting and laughing about what she does like some precocious schoolgirl and being found out. End of the world apparently.
Meanwhile the Online Safety Bill, Von De Lying’s Covid Green Pass, a Digital ID, the WHO’s nascent Global Pandemic Treaty, the engineering of food and energy shortages and collapse of US dollar, all go unreported, all quietly gathering unstoppable momentum towards tyranny.
I don’t know anything about the workings of the swamp, most appear corruptible, but here’s what could have happened. Someone wanted an MP removed/disgraced, an insider techie with access to everyone’s mobile number sends an anonymous message that is opened in haste or stupidity and inappropriate images appear at just the right time. I am not saying this is what happened but there are all sorts of scenarios here including guilty as charged. The mess we are in right now it matters not what these over privileged swamp dwellers are doing on their phones, they are all a disgrace.
Presumably, the ‘porn MP’ who voted for the Online Safety Bill doesn’t think porn harmful, to viewers or participants, and certainly not to himself. In the patronising view of our elite, speech is more harmful to us easily manipulated plebs and we must be protected from ideas and ‘fake news’, but not from the fake sex education that is pornography. I read somewhere that the average age at which children first encounter the fake sex education that is pornography is around 10 years old.
I rely on the internet for news and news of events that I attend, but I increasingly feel that the interent is overall something negative for profoundly altering what sociologists call reflexive consciousness. Our points of reference and comparison are no longer local but global. Discontent and envy are now international problems stoking BLM etc. On the one hand China, Iran and the like are desperate to filter the interent and awareness while other are dertermined to use it as a tool of penetration and manipulation. I do not think we understand the effects of the internet and mobile phones. One aspect that concerns me greatly is how the internet and mobile smartphones permit the Chinese social credit system – coming soon to a government near you – as the WHO recently announced appointing a German company, T-systems, to develop a global vaccine passport system. The internet allows HMRC to access, and even raid, bank accounts. Digital IDs are coming. The temptation to link goverment databases will win out I am sure. The establishment already thinks it is morally superior to us, as illustrated by the remainer civil service’s conscience free participation in trying to thwart a democratic vote and how its sense of entitlement to a better ‘work life balance’ trumps service and civic duty. Being able to monitor all of the population will be far too tempting for them. It will be but a small step, a very small step, to using it to control us. All this is enabled by the internet. One MP getting caught viewing porn – not the same as the only MP who views porn – is a secondary phenomenon that is almost trivial.
But, on the plus side, the internet allows me to have a rant from time to time on Independence Daily. That nearly stopped last time I was in Marseille. I was drooling over some yachts for sale in the old port and suggested to Mrs Yeoman that wafting around the mediterranean might be a good next step. Alas, she explained that I would be putting to sea alone and thus it is – for now – that I remain land locked with interent access. Notwithstanding my belief that the internet will ultimately prove pernicious I shall use it to continue ranting.
Meanwhile,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbYDaP_zqHU
As Daniel Hannan pointed out, the tune is familiar.
The WHO has a constitution apparently. Just like a state or, say, a world government. Why? These wholly undemocratic supra-national bodies are aggregating powers to themselves, unelected and unremovable, without an eyebrow raised. It’s taken as read. If our government signs up to the Global Pandemic Treaty the WHO will have absolute power to dictate protocols, from lockdowns, to mandatory jabs to mandatory digital IDs. And you can bet your life (and that is exactly what we are doing) they will not ask Parliament, let alone the electorate. The hidden small print says governments have 6 months to respond; this expires June 1st.
Everyone should watch this:
W.H.O. PLANDEMIC TREATY [A SYSTEM FOR GLOBAL TYRANNY] (Dr. Astrid Stuckleberger)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/grPnnG9gQGuL/
Excellent presentation. Tip-toeing to tyranny indeed!
How any sane person could even consider voting for an establishment political party on May 5th I do not know.
Jake are you standing as a UKIP candidate in the local elections. If not why not? Come on, we’ve all been there, or at least some of us have……..Even TG Spokes has…
That was before they became a Conservative party satellite and blocked all non Tory ideas.
Colin. Although still a member and former branch officer for nigh on 20 years (Referendum Party before that) I am not a candidate in my council ward but I am doing some campaigning for an aquaintance in the next ward who is standing as an independent candidate. Regretfully, I was left with the task of closing our UKIP branch being the last member willing to hold officer status. As you know you must have at least two officers to constitute a branch and open a ‘community’ bank account. Most of our members and officers were closet Tories living in a prosperous rural blue ribbon Tory constituency and they couldn’t wait to throw in the towel after the referendum like Farage himself. This time I am happy to vote NOTA on my paper having only the option of a Tory and a Green candidate. Would happily help to establish a new UKIP branch but honestly, not one of our former members (mostly getting on a bit), appears interested in doing so……..yet!!!
Is there an equivelant to freespeach for sex practioners. ? or vice versa. ?
Jake……..So we have both been in the same position insofar as UKIP then. Stepping down as chairman along with other members of the committee, advertising the positions to all members in a letter hand delivered to their addresses to which none showed any interest, then held an EGM to potentially elect replacements, to which hardly any members turned up, followed by formally dissolving the branch altogether and closing the bank account. The sad fact of the matter was that the majority of members thought by paying the £30.00 annual membership subscription was sufficient in their eyes, and did nothing to help the branch put up sufficient candidates at elections and declined to offer any help to deliver candidate leaflets, or assist with canvassing at the doorstep or man polling stations.
On a different note I have spent some time trawling through various local authorities websites both in England, Wales and in London who are holding elections this May and could find very few candidates standing for UKIP, Reform UK, Heritage Party or SDP, and it was very much the case of the same suspects staanding ie Conservative Party, Labour Party, Liberal Democrats, and the Green Party. What an appalling choice the majority of the electorate have to vote for I did find two Reform UK candidates in Surrey and a few UKIP candidates standing in Kent, but that was about it. Insofar as Reform UK are concerned so much for all their meaningless talk of standing candidates in every parliamentary seat come the next general election, they can’t even manage to stand more than a handful of candidates at the local elections, so it does not bade well for the future. If these parties want to change the face of British politics, they’ve got to start pulling their finger out. I just cannot see how any of the existing right of centre parties including the present UKIP rump are ever going to be able to replicate the electoral success of UKIP prior to the 2016 EU referendum. All very depressing. Nevertheless I stand by what I have said in the past, that if Nigel Farage were to set up a new political party and put together a workable set of policies I genuinely think a lot of former UKIP voters and the like will come flooding back to the fold, but it will not happen under the auspices of Reform UK.
Colin Your recollections will ring true with committed former branch officers all over the country. At least we won our sovereignty back in the end. We may need a new approach for the battles we now face.
Jake, all we need is someone at the top with providing us with a bit of inspired leadership, but I cannot see where its going to come from at the moment.