“If it’s not on the BBC or in The Times, it didn’t happen”. This is no longer hyperbole, it’s the plain truth. Let me ask you this: before this morning, did you know about the devastating floods in Pakistan? If you did then you must have been listening to al Jazeera which reported on this catastrophe on August 25th (link). This report was followed by on in The Times of India on August 27th (link). There were reports in the WaPo (paywalled) on the 26th of August (here and here). It took the BBC two more days to slot in a report (link), picked up by the Guardian, reporting yesterday (link), and finally The Times, observing that ‘relief is arriving’ (link, paywalled). 

I would hope that the other UK papers have now found space for their own little report, hidden somewhere in the bowels of their online editions, but the news aggregator run by the BigTech company we love to hate only shows that yes, this morning, the BBC and SKY are reporting on this flood catastrophe but the rest of our MSM aren’t mentioned. Frankly, I’m not going to waste more time on searching the interwebz in order to be fair to our esteemed MSM. If it’s not on their front pages, it cannot matter to them and is therefore unimportant to us, correct? This morning’s compilation of the print edition’s front pages shows that only the Guardian has this flood on theirs (link, scroll down a bit). 

One would have thought that a flood covering 1/3rd of a country (link), an area as big as the UK, might have been somewhat important, especially for the ‘climate extreme’ warriors – but no. It has apparently not even occurred to our MSM that the huge number of nearly 2 million people of Pakistani origin might have been interested. It’s all so very far away, innit, and “we”  have our own concerns, such as inflation, energy price rises, Truss or Sunak, and yon war in the Ukraine. Well, our intrepid TV reporters are now, finally, ‘on the case’, swamping the airwaves. 

I’ve not watched those Telly News, but am certain that they will explain this flood with ‘climate change’. The reason for my assessment is that, unsurprisingly, the Guardian, having had a bit of a head start, has already decided that it must have been ‘climate change’ which caused this disaster:

“The climate crisis is the prime suspect for the devastating scale of flooding in Pakistan, which has killed more than 1,000 people and affected 30 million. But the catastrophe, still unfolding, is most likely the result of a lethal combination of factors including the vulnerability of poor citizens, steep mountainous slopes in some regions, the unexpected destruction of embankments and dams, and some natural climate variation.” (link)

‘Some natural climate variations’ refers to the monsoon rainfalls which apparently were stronger this year than in the preceding years. I’ve not seen reports of similar floods in India, which is not exempt from those monsoons. Left out of the picture is the political situation in Pakistan where shortly after the SMO in the Ukraine Mr Imran Khan was ‘deposed’ with the help of the USA because he wasn’t going to toe the line of ‘we hate Russia’. Their current PM is full on Washington’s line. Unless Biden is prepared to hand over a lot of $$$ to help out, this attitude may well shift against both the USA and the current PM. 

Back here in Blighty, I expect that the green lobby and the still sitting Net Zero PM will utilise this catastrophe to exhort us further to accept those obscene energy prices because they are now double-good: freeze to stand against Putin and freeze to prevent  such devastating floods from occurring! I wonder how much money La Truss will promise to hand out. Will it be more than that already spent on the ukrainian war? 

I leave you with a rather devastating economic analysis regarding the energy crisis If you thought that pubs going to the wall, having to close, was not sufficiently bad, read this article: Will Europe Go Down to Defeat Before Ukraine?”. They document  details of factory closures thanks to sanctions. Don’t sit back because this is about Europe, i.e. the EU, not about us. We are even more affected because we rely on imports for all those things.

Don’t expect our politicians, our Mandarins, our industry bosses and MSM editors to come up with a solution. Yes, they are now talking about fracking, about more nuclear power stations, more offshore bird shredders. This is all very well  but won’t affect the energy situation this winter nor next winter nor in 2024 or 2025 because those things must be built. That will take time, resources and building material. It does make those politicians look good though when they suddenly talk approvingly about such projects. That, after all, is all that matters.

Finally, here are a couple of bonus questions: how many of those flooded-out Pakistanis will end up here in the UK, expecting more handouts? How are we going to pay for them? Answers on a postcard …