The weekend papers: nudging us while admonishing us

 

This morning the weekend papers have plastered the image of ‘the princes’ vigil’ over their front pages (link), with one exception: the ever campaigning Guardian. They lead with a report titled “Saudi Prince’s visit is a stain on the Queen’s memory”. You’ll try in vain to find this article in the online front page of that paper (link).

So, nosy old cow that I am, I delved deeply into the bowels of that particular beast, and lo and behold, what I found is staggering. This piece was written by someone in Washington and refers to a complaint by a human rights group based in the USA (link). This is ‘news’ worthy of the lead in the print edition? Words fail me!

It is however an excellent example of the lefty attitude that anything and anybody must listen to their complaints, regardless of the circumstances. It is similar to the posturing of the Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle. He banned the Chinese delegation from ‘attending the lying-in-state of the Queen because China had banned five MPs from visiting their country (link), though graciously permitting them to attend the funeral service.

Does this mean that diplomats are given some sort of special entry to Westminster Hall rather than having to queue with the British plebs who are still coming to pay their respect?  I’m asking for a friend … We also learn from that helpful BBC report that:

“A Downing Street spokesman said it was a convention that countries with which the UK has diplomatic relations should be invited to state funerals. Syria, Venezuela, Afghanistan, Myanmar, Russia and Belarus have not been invited – whilst Iran, North Korea and Nicaragua have been asked to only send a senior diplomat. China’s President Xi Jinping is on the guest list but is not thought likely to attend.” (link)

No, I’m sure Mr Xi won’t attend now, even if he had planned to do so. I wonder though if or indeed when we’ll see some Guardian article screaming that North Korea ought not to be allowed to attend the Queen’s funeral ‘because: human rights!’. 

One other report caught my attention. It’s another example for the attitude of the MSM which now see their task as ‘guiding’ and nudging us rather than giving us the news, unvarnished. In a nutshell, a man from the queue passing by the Queen’s coffin was trying to get to the coffin and was detained. This is the relevant quote: “The live video feed of the Queen lying in state cut away for a brief period during the incident.” (link).

Why did the live feed editors do that? Were the ‘authorities’ afraid that people out in the country might get ideas? Or were they afraid that showing this incident live would breach the man’s human rights of privacy?

It’s well known that people trust more that which they see than what they read. We’ve already lost trust in the ‘official’ print MSM and the selective propaganda output of the TV stations masquerading as ‘news’. Now we have proof that even live feeds are manipulated – for our own good, of course. Now even ‘live feeds’ have become untrustworthy.

I leave you with a few quotes from The Times’ ‘weekend essay’. It has the enticing title “It’s too much to hope the King can save us from ourselves” (link, paywalled). Yes, I gagged when I read this because I cannot recall ‘us’ asking Queen, King or indeed some politicians to ‘save us from ourselves’, even though the combined watermelons are pretending we do.

However, the first few paragraphs cheered me up even if it might not have been quite what the author intended. I ‘ll quote them at length in the hope they’ll make you smile as well:

“Cynicism, or at the very least, irony, is the British default mode. Radio audiences were sustained by it during the Second World War — “It’s being so cheerful as keeps me going.” (This from a leading character in Tommy Handley’s ITMA and said with a miserable voice. “Good thing abaht the Blitz — it takes yer mind off the war.”)

It is a cheering fact of national history that whenever Sir Oswald Mosley or one of his blackshirts stood for parliament they lost their deposit. This was not because the public were bleeding-heart liberals: it was because most British people, when at their best, are unserious. Their creed was that of Bertie in The Code of the Woosters, who says to the fictional version of Mosley, Roderick Spode: “You hear them shouting ‘Heil, Spode!’ and you imagine it is the Voice of the People. That is where you make your bloomer. What the Voice of the People is saying is: ‘Look at that frightful ass Spode swanking about in footer bags! Did you ever in your puff see such a perfect perisher?’ ” (link, paywalled)

A bit further down, there’s a reference in this paragraph which truly delighted me:

“The British way of having a monarchy, and with the monarchy all that goes with it, fits in with this perfectly. We scarcely needed Gilbert and Sullivan to remind us what is semi-absurd about the Yeomen of the Guard, dressing like characters in the reign of Henry VIII, or about the House of Lords in their ermine and coronets: “The House of Peers, throughout the war,/ Did nothing in particular/ And did it very well.” G and S were not revolutionaries, they were not trying to undermine the system, they were understanding that ceremony contains within it a dash of absurdity. That is not to say we wish to abolish ceremony, but that it carries within it a playfulness that does not really need to be satirised.” (link, paywalled)

Sadly, in the ensuing lengthy essay the author admonishes us, to better not indulge in ‘royal sentimentality’ when there are so many difficult problems looming on the horizon. 

Well, it’s not us but the Westminster MSM which have done nothing but indulge in ‘royal sentimentality’! It’s organisations like the NHS, cancelling appointments because of the Queen’s funeral and then moaning about ‘moar backlogs. It’s the politicians, the MPs, who are hiding behind the Queen’s death, excusing their inexcusable inactions with ‘the nation grieves’. 

What happened to ‘life goes on’? Apparently, that applies only to us peasants, not to those ‘elites’, ‘governing’ us, nudging us even while they swan around, displaying their own ‘royal sentimentality’!

Meanwhile, don’t get nudged and enjoy the weekend anyway. Listening to a bit of Gilbert and Sulivan will certainly help.