Our Ministry of Defence: part of the Ukrainian war effort?

 

 

Something isn’t quite right. Our beloved MSM seem to have relegated the war in Ukraine to ‘also ran’, as the compilation of headlines in this morning’s paper editions (link) shows. It’s not as if there weren’t anything to report about that war, especially not since we know that our MSM have access to Russian news agencies.

It looks as if The Times has become the official government propaganda paper. They pridefully splashed a report across their front page, about ‘one of ours’ having shot down a Russian helicopter:

“Britain’s most advanced portable missile system is thought to have shot down a Russian helicopter in its first use on the Ukrainian battlefield. Starstreak, a high-velocity projectile that destroys targets with three kinetic darts, was filmed cutting the aircraft in two over the Luhansk region in the east of the country. Footage of the attack shows the tungsten spears breaking the tail off the Mi-28N, after Ukrainians using British techniques opened fire.” (link, paywalled)

So ‘it is thought’ that this happened, is it? Allegedly there’s ‘verified footage’ of this, but we plebs are of course not shown that footage. There’s more – read this carefully:

“A Ministry of Defence source believed that the video showed Starstreak in action over Ukraine. The source added that the anti-aircraft system had been deployed in the country for almost a week. Senior defence industry sources who examined the film also believe it to be the weapon.” (link, paywalled)

Alright then: if a MoD ‘source’, anonymous as always, ‘believes’ this has happened then we have to accept it as truth. I find it somewhat suspicious though that the MoD ‘source’ alleged that this system had been deployed there for ‘almost a week’. How, one might ask, did it get there?

Moreover, were the Ukrainian soldiers trained in how to use this here in the UK or were British Army specialists in the Ukraine to train them? That would make us participants in this war, not just benevolent bystanders and would explain the belligerent statements coming from Messrs Johnson and Wallace and Miz Truss.

Given that there are rumours in the twittersphere about French, US and UK ‘military advisers’ actually having been embedded with the Azov brigade in Mariupol, that this was the reason for the suicidal attempts to evacuate them via helicopters which were shot down, it makes me wonder what else we are being kept ignorant about. There is for example a report in RT, on the ‘aid’ bill signed by Biden in March:

“[…] almost half the headline $13.6 billion wellspring ($6.5 billion) has already been allocated – to cover the cost of weapons shipments to Ukraine and the buildup of NATO forces in January and February this year. In other words, before the war had even formally begun.” (link)

Perhaps our ‘most advanced portable missile system’ was shipped to the Ukraine at that time rather than sometime last week? Perhaps that’s when some training was given – before the outbreak? Perhaps this was meant to support the Ukrainian aggression against the Donbas regions?

Didn’t the report in The Times mention that this helicopter was shot down over Luhansk? Wouldn’t it have been somewhat difficult to transport this system from the Polish border to the Donbas ‘sometime this week’ without the Russians noticing?

Moreover, RT quotes a paper published by the OCSE, on how they observed a build-up of armaments in that region – before the outbreak of war:

“The same report noted that, “in violation of withdrawal lines,” OSCE observers identified placement of surface-to-air-missile systems, howitzers, anti-tank guns and multiple-launch rocket systems in government-controlled areas of Donetsk. Neither this blatantly belligerent activity, nor the Organization recording how the overwhelming majority of missile and rocket attacks carried out in the days leading up to Russia’s military attack were targeted at breakaway areas by government forces, has ever been mentioned by a Western news outlet.” (link)

Of course it hasn’t. Why provide even the shimmer of a reason for Putin’s intervention! There’s more. It goes towards supporting the suspicions voiced in some alt media comments that the Ukraine, goaded by the USA and the rest of the west, was planning for a Russian intervention in the Donbas region:

“This may be partially explained by the US, UK and Canada pulling out of the OSCE mission in Ukraine in mid-February, allegedly due to fears of an impending Russian assault – another rationale for the English-speaking trio’s withdrawal could be that revealing the reality of egregious government abuses in Eastern Ukraine was problematic, and politically unpopular at home.” (link)

Well, things evolved differently, as we now know. It is becoming more obvious that the Ukraine is fighting a proxy war, supported by NATO and the Western Nations, cheered on by the concentrated propaganda in the western MSM. The report on the ‘success’ of one of our most advanced portable missile systems demonstrates that our Armed Forces must be involved, even if it’s just to test if ‘our systems’ work. 

Meanwhile, the Ukraine’s ‘International Legion’ has stopped recruiting because, they say, they’ve run out of weapons – huh? Isn’t it Russia which is running out of everything, according to our MSM who always tell the truth? The other reason is “that untrained westerners have been more of a hindrance than a help” (link). Oh dear! So training is important, thus begging the question who trained those Ukrainian soldiers in the use of our ‘most advanced portable missile system, where and when.

I leave you with a stunning and horrifying report. TASS has published a press release by the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service. I am quoting at length in case you cannot access that site:

“MOSCOW, April 1. /TASS/. The Kiev leadership informed the British Foreign office that it did not intend to comply with the Geneva Convention when dealing with Russian prisoners of war. This is stated in a statement distributed on Friday by the press bureau of the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) of the Russian Federation. […] “The Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation receives reliable data that after the publication of shocking videos of torture of captured Russian servicemen in Ukraine, the nationalist Kiev regime is making efforts to prevent further disclosure of such facts,” the message reads.” (link, in Russian, machine translated)

It gets worse. See this quote next, my emphasis:

There is specific information that the Ukrainian authorities are persuading Western patrons to encourage the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and various international humanitarian NGOs to refuse to attempt to gain access to Russian prisoners of war,” the text says. Western countries are not only aware of Kiev’s gross violations of international humanitarian law against Russian prisoners of war, but are also trying to help the Ukrainian authorities avoid responsibility, the press bureau of the SVR added.”  (link, in Russian, machine translated)

That in itself is horrible enough to make one ask why our MSM and indeed our government isn’t refuting these allegations. After all, it should be easy enough. They only have to say that ‘Russia bad’ and ‘its all propaganda’. But there’s not even the hint of a denial. However, there’s this final quote which perhaps explains why our lot are so quiet (my emphasis):

“In particular, as indicated in the press bureau, the British Foreign Ministry recommended that Kiev take action to whitewash the image of the Ukrainian authorities and smooth out the negative consequences of “disclosure of torture of captured servicemen”.” (link, in Russian, machine translated)

Given the report yesterday about Johnson egging on Mr ‘e, to keep fighting, given the statements by Ben Wallace and Miz Truss, given the inadvertent evidence that the UK is more of a military participant and not quite the innocent bystander, I for one am inclined to believe this press release by the Russian equivalent of MI6.

Makes one proud to be British, doesn’t it … not!