It’s again time to be afraid, very afraid …
Today people are going to the polls in the Tiverton and Wakefield by-elections whose outcome might damage the PM irretrievably. Since the MSM dutifully observe the political purdah on election days there is not one word in the papers. There’s the second rail strike today but references to that are oblique. ‘More pay for all’ is the cry and the proposal or ‘Sunak’s plan’ to remove the triple lock on pensions is the cudgel being used by the MSM. Well – by some of them. Others are screaming on their front pages that ‘polio is back’ and that parents must get their kids jabbed. You’ll find this morning’s collection of headlines at the usual place (link).
Starting with polio first: it is a devastating disease. Some of us can remember tragic images of people in iron lungs breathing for them. Then a vaccine was discovered which was taken on a cube of sugar. Now there’s a jab for it. Here’s the interesting bit about this return of polio (my emphasis):
“The virus was detected at the Beckton sewage treatment works, which covers a population of four million in north and east London. Signs of it were first found in February. Now an investigation is searching for the source of the outbreak, so the area can be targeted with a vaccination drive. Anyone found to be infected might be asked to isolate.”(link)
I’m actually outraged: this virus was found ‘in February’ and we only read about it now? How is that possible? Let’s draw our own conclusions as to why our MSM didn’t scream this discovery from the rooftops in February and why they weren’t interested in February, March, April … Methinks that another reason why we’re told only now is this one:
“The UK Health Security Agency believes a traveller, possibly from Pakistan, Afghanistan or Nigeria, shed the virus in their faeces after being given a live oral polio vaccine during an outbreak.It is likely they then infected relatives by failing to wash their hands properly and contaminating food and drink. Officials are looking at the possibility that just one family – or an extended family – may be affected.” (link)
That’s awkward, isn’t it, having to mention ‘travellers’ from Pakistan Nigeria and even Afghanistan as possible source! It would be racist, correct? At least the word ‘immigrant’ hasn’t been used, although I do wonder who those alleged Afghans are who can afford to travel to London. And then we get to the actual reason for those fear reports:
“However, the NHS is starting up a major drive to ensure routine vaccinations are being taken up after the Covid-19 pandemic caused a lull in appointments.” (link)
It’s outrageous that the NHS and by extension the MSM are surreptitiously blaming parents for this ‘lull in vaccination appointments’ caused by covid. Lockdowns, no GP appointments for no-one: for the NHS this isn’t a valid reason, nor is mentioning the possible source of this disease.
I’d be interested to know if the NHS is now checking all of the ‘arrivals’ coming across the Channel for polio. After all, do we natives not deserve to know if more such cases are spreading across the country when we do know that yon ‘arrivals’ are being distributed around our towns and cities?
Will the NHS vaccinate them, to make sure that all of us are protected? After all, we’ve ‘learned’ that vaccination helps against covid, haven’t we, and that everybody must have the jab. Polio is indisputably a far worse illness, so will we see another vaccination campaign, bridging the gap to autumn when we’ll have to get the next flu jab? Won’t that cost money?
And so to the rail strike, inflation and money. The Mirror is incandescent about the government’s remarks that pay rises ought to be kept below the rate of inflation, with a beautiful diatribe against ‘fat cat’ bosses (link). Someone tell them that they’re on the wrong train. The real enemy who must be kept down are the pensioners – not because they’ve been marching on Whitehall and Downing Street, Zimmer frames aloft, but because someone in the Treasury leaked a plan, a proposal, to remove the triple lock from state pensions.
When this plan was leaked on Tuesday, right on time for that first rail strike, we were told this hadn’t been decided and was going to be debated in cabinet. Of course, this was water on the mills of trade unions demanding pay rises, now! Sunak, quoted by the FT, explains why raising pensions isn’t inflationary:
“Sunak said paying pensioners an increase of about 10 per cent next April, after the government reinstated its triple-lock guarantee, was less inflationary than accepting such wage demands even though both add to demand and spending in the economy. “The slight difference with pensions is pensions are not an input cost into the cost of producing goods and services we all consume so they don’t add to inflation in the same way,” he said.” (link, paywalled)
That’s an interesting explanation. In the FT’s sister paper we read that the PM is making a stand, refusing to allow pay rises in the public sector above 3%, the sum budgeted for in last year’s Autumn Budget: “Downing Street argued yesterday that it would be “reckless” to raise public sector pay in line with inflation.”(link, paywalled). This is giving a hostage to the future because, as sure as God made little apples, BJ will cave in to the union’s demands, not least because the first of what will be many articles lashing out at pensioners has already appeared. It is unmitigated ‘bash the rich pensioners’ propaganda:
“Thanks to the triple-lock, they’re getting a raise. 10% or more, actually, in line with inflation. As always, the main thing to remember is that the purpose of a system is what it does: In Britain the system drains the young of time and money in order to fund a dominant pensioner voting bloc. So, faced with a crumbling economy, British politicians will turn the screws on workers to make sure that older voters don’t have to downsize their home.” (link)
It’s the old slogan of ‘up with the workers and down with the ‘rich’ in their own homes’ because those pensioners are all Tory voters and need to be squashed. There’s more – pure propaganda of envy, cloaked in ‘concern for the young’:
“It’s easy to become inured to just how much Britain hates its young people. Young graduates will face marginal tax rates of 50% from next year. Young people live in crowded houseshares while satisfied Boomers block the construction of new homes. Our birth rate remains chronically low because young people who want to start families can’t afford them. Now, after locking them in their homes for two years to halt the spread of a disease which barely affected them, British politicians are once again turning round to mug the young to pay the old.” (link)
I’m crying already … ‘Tis odd though, isn’t it, that so many of our ‘diverse’ people manage to have children galore. But when it’s about ‘cry for the poor yoof’ and bash the old, anything can be used. Isn’t ageism also a hate crime?
This same ‘poor yoof’ has sufficient funds to attend Glastonbury which opens ‘for the first time in three years’ (link, paywalled) as ‘thunderstorms and rain threaten’ (link): just in time for this festival where rain and mud galore are obligatory.
We’ll see if, as I read somewhere yesterday, Mr ‘e will make a ‘virtual appearance’. Will the crowd sing as they did for Corbyn three years ago? I’m sure ’reporters’ for the DT will let us know! After all, that paper has reverted to blatant warmongering, with five articles today on “that war”, not counting the opinion piece by Mr Coughlin who writes that “we” must be prepared to go to war with Russia (paywalled link, if you really must …).
And finally: Dominic Raab introduced his ‘Bill of Rights’ in the HoC yesterday. The Times sniffs that this Bill ‘will cost the taxpayer more’ (link, paywalled). I suspect that this ‘argument’ will have more power to defeat yon Bill than any considerations about getting out from under decisions in the European Court of Human Rights.
‘Tis the age-old story we remember from the Bible, of Esau selling his rights for a bowl of potage. Plus ça change, isn’t it …
I have just read on Devon News Live, that the Conservative Party by election campaign has been more or less non-existent in Tiverton and Honiton where they are defending a 24,000 majority. Their candidate did not agree to interviews and was never seen out and about doing canvassing as one would expect a candidate to do, and there is apparently a distinct lack of Vote Conservative boards up in the constituency. The site itself might be just anti-Conservative, and it wouldn’t be the first time that a supposed news site takes an anti party view, I mean we saw this time again when I and others stood as election candidates for UKIP in my home town. Obviously it isn’t the fault of the local Conservative candidate that their campaign has apparently been so lacklustre, but the fault of whoever runs campaigns at at the national level, and er, also perhaps the fault of the man at the very top who has made a pigs ear of running this country over the past 2 1/2 years. Apparently sensing that his party might lose this seat which would undoubtedly be an unmitigated disaster if it did, has said that he will not consider resigning as prime minister because of blah and blah and blah. We all know the prepared Conservative script for failures off by heart now……..
Looks like the corrupt, rotten party was beaten in two elections and the corrupt rotten party won two seats.
Best political analysis of the by-elections!
Or
Princess nut-nuts
Or
The USA, we seem to be dancing to their tune
GB News today:
“https://www.gbnews.uk/news/man-and-woman-charged-over-conspiring-to-bring-child-into-uk-to-harvest-organs/323474”
I cannot believe that this is the only such instance. Yet another reason for proper border control. If only the perpetrators could be hanged; the only sure way to stop them doing it again.
The Times link conclusion:
“The new Bill of Rights will lead to an increase in UK cases being heard by European judges”
Why the hell is “our” government still allowing foreign courts to interfere in our business? Yet another Boris cock-up! I wonder how many more are yet to appear.
We already have a Bill of Rights dating from 1689. We don’t need a new one, but we do need to ditch the ECHR which is clearly unfit for purpose for the UK. The ECHR allows anyone to come here, by any means, but does not allow anyone to be sent back. It’s one way traffic, which allows the illegal proxy invasion from France to continue unabated. All designed to humiliate and degrade the UK.
SHOCK HORROR! eh? Polio virus found in SEWAGE!
So what? It was in London so probably brought in by an immigrant, I’d say.
But who is going to drink sewage water to catch that virus?
Far more dangerous to squirt the chemicals that are in vaccines, up a baby’s nose I’d say.
At least when I was a child polio vaccines were given later in life when the innate immune system had matured.
And Viv. It has taken a few hours thinking about it but I’ve finally understood your reference to Jacob and Esau. (I think.)
It is just possible that Esau may not be so impulsive and stupid this time.
Apparently there are 3 Bills that the Lords will seek to destroy. They are being introduced now, to make sure they get through in time to force them through the Lords before the expected G.E. date.
Mind you, you’re right in one way. We have waited far too long already, to get a meaningful Brexit, from our wonderful ‘Get Brexit Done’ P.M..
Meanwhile . . . . The Telegraph Editor is shouting that Britain must prepare for War with Russia!
After processing, sewage water is dumped in rivers. Lower down, that same water may be extracted for domestic use after processing.
So Londoners get water used three times over.
The excitement is that now we know there are people about with polio who can infect others.
Tracking them down will be the trick.
And we have the anti-vaxers to contend with.
Any bets they won’t be members of our multicultural community?
Labour will re-take Wakefield and the Liberal Democrats will take Tiverton and Honiton. UKIP will accrue more votes than the other smaller centre right parties in both seats in the by elections today. Johnson will be irreversibly damaged as a result, but how many times have we heard that before but he seems immune to it. It won’t the right time to get rid of him for whatever reason, and of course there will never be a right time to get rid, because no-one else is capable blah blah blah…..The script has probably already been written in advance.
Sadly, UKIP split into a multitude of minor parallel parties — Reform, Heritage, For Britain et al. Catherine Blaiklock went to the English Dems. I wonder — could Nigel reunite them all again into a potent fighting force?
George….you are right there are too many right of centre political parties, but many were borne out of the split of UKIP post Bolton and later post Batten, and whilst many of their policies are similar, some other policies of one or two of those parties might be too extreme to those of others to form a broad coalition. Catherine Blaiklock formed The Brexit Party which was taken over by Nigel Farage when she stepped down. Farage is by far and away the most important and influential politician of the centre right, and is the ONLY one who has the ability to pull together a broad coalition of those parties. I have said this time and again, but he has said pretty recently that he has retired from front line politics, but if he decided upon a return to the front line and headed up another party or a coalition, I think there would massive support for this bearing in mind how the Conservative Party has moved to the left wing of politics leaving a vacuum waiting to be filled. Reform UK doesn’t stand an earthly without Farage at the helm, and this stands out like a sore thumb. However that party needs root and branch reform of itself insofar as it is administered and organised. I could envisage a future coalition of Reform UK, Reclaim and UKIP perhaps brought about by electoral necessity, but none of the others who are all inflexible and inward looking.
Nigel is all about Nigel.
Harold Armitage….oh whatever. The important thing is that we need someone of his calibre. Its a no brainer, whether you like it or not…
WE certainly need him to.
“could Nigel reunite them all again..?” I hope not as it was his (Mr F Mirage’s) actions at the last election that got de Pfiffer in with such a large majority!
As a result of Mirage’s ‘dropping out’ we, more than likely, are here where we are, in the DooDah.
Monkeypox, Polio, WWIII.
A real chance for change was lost on the ” Get Brexit Done” proposition which Mirage hung his hat on as Quislings are likely to do, using an excuse for the bail out and remain a ‘legend’.
Two reads I recommend. (possibly OT)
https://off-guardian.org/2022/06/24/polio-outbreak-the-who-bill-gates-emergency-vaccines-more-of-the-same/ de Pfiffer backs this Org to the hilt
http://thesaker.is/a-quick-update-from-andrei-with-a-few-notes/
and watch the UK Column as often as you can.
Just in case readers wonder why coal fired energy plants seem to be springing up everywhere this presentation is worth a watch (1.2 hrs).
Professor Ian Plimer April 2022 (cancelled by two venues so must be hitting the eye)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txQcX0fm5bs
Viv was right, its raining and it is Glastonbury!
Colin at 11.55am. I hope you are wrong. Particularly re Honiton.
I think Boris is a very bad P.M., but at the moment I don’t want him toppled.
So far as I can see the possible alternatives would be worse.
I do see some signs that his more sensible back benchers are pushing him to get his finger out on some issues.
There is little anyone can do to remove his globalist carbon neutral fixation or the globalist WHO threat, so far.
It is rather difficult sometimes to know who exactly DOES rule us. The government? The Civil Service? Or the M.S.M?
Talking of fairness when using percentages, especially when comparing low fixed income pensioners with earners, is wholly disingenuous. Cynical divide and conquer; demonise; play-off one deserving causes against another rather than address the route causes.
This year’s state pension increase was a paltry 3.1%. I say paltry because in actual cash it is negligible, white noise, in the blizzard of price rises. Yet even 10% would still have been be less than £1000 a year. My domestic fuel bill alone went up over £1200 in one go, with more to come as Autumn sets in, and let’s not forget filling the car which for folk living in a village such as mine is an essential.
10% for a rail worker on £70K, say, would be £7000. Yet their absolute costs are the same: a tank of fuel costs me the same as it costs them, but is a much greater percentage of my income. And the nasty mean spirited meme that selfish pensioners are hurting the young and should downsize, is disgraceful. Whilst raising my family I was never able to UPSIZE, we made do, and the house is now too small when their families come over. The supreme irony is to be lectured on selfishness by the permanently offended, me, me, me, woke generation.
Automation would be good. I believe the DLR is already automated but still has a “driver” on board to satisfy the rail unions.
The Victoria Line was fully automatic from the day it was opened in 1968. Back then the unions insisted on a driver — for back in emergencies. I am not aware of any such emergency since.
Jack….the DLR maximum speed is something like 30 mph and the one or two times I have been on it, it rarely even reached that speed. Slow is not the word, but ok if there isn’t a driver at the front and relying on somebody controlling the train remotely. However would you really want to be travelling on an Intercity train travelling in excess of 130 mph without a human driver in the front cab. There is a limit to automation and safety on trains should not be decided on the grounds of cost.
Yeah, I feel a bit the same Phil O’S.
I wondered how I was supposed to down size from my one bedroom council owned bungalow. I do have a tent and a back garden. I suppose I could live in that!
As for those poor University graduates forced to live in multiple occupied rented property instead of earning enough to start their own families – well what useful, productive, jobs has it taken them 3 years of study at Uni, to train for?
How sad that if they ever get a decent wage they would lose the benefit of it, by having to pay back their loan!
Is there anywhere in this country nowadays, that old fashioned INTEGRITY we used to have?
You are absolutely right Phil O.
And still not a word on the Commonwealth Conference which I consider is one of the most dangerous (to the existence of the commonwealth and it’s very survival)
Prince Charles of GW and WEF fame is there to give his vision of what the Commonwealth is for and how it will operate when his mother pops her clogs.
I’m even more worried that Boris is there not only to back up his treacherous ideas but to see to their introduction and prosecution now.
Oh and I haven’t forgotten this hitherto “undeclared” WAR in the Ukraine
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/world-leaders-all-but-admit-major-who-empowerment-is-imminent
This is a clear and present danger to us all, yet too many are ignorant of it and other globalist policies such as the UN intent, openly stated, for population reduction, i.e., killing most of us. Boris & Co, rather than acting in our interests and they were elected to do, are fully supportive of the globalists, whether that be the UN, WHO, WEF and possibly other gatherings operating unseen.
They are truly our enemy within, unfortunately tacitly supported by the unseeing masses who elect them time and again. Given the lack of opposition voiced in the HoC and HoL, I can only conclude that the “opposition” parties are fully supportive. We need to act now to open the eyes and minds of those unseeing masses. That has to start with our own families.
WEF: https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2022
WHO: https://www.who.int/about/
UN: https://globalpossibilities.org/what-is-agenda-21-depopulation-of-95-of-the-world-by-2030/
Of course their own websites promote a vision of their being benign organisations working on our behalf… Let’s also remember that they are supported by many governments including our own with Boris in particular being an enthusiast.
So, in response to your picture caption Viv, we should be very afraid…
Asylum seekers, refugees, illegal immigrants. Campaigners say, let them all in …BUT…Not In My Backyard.
This short video reveals the hypocrisy:
https://youtu.be/yh9XEJHOrV4
Clearly they are not prepared to even consider or accept the consequences. NIMBYs the lot of them wanting to screw up our country without a thought for the obvious and ongoing damage.
Ken P what a bunch of hypocrites those people were on that video. I cant put them up for whatever reason, but everyone welcome to the UK and offering no solution as to where they are housed. And these people are supposedly intelligent and able to vote. Very worrying indeed……
An English nursery rhyme from 1794.
The law locks up the man or woman
Who steals the goose from off the common
But leaves the greater villain loose
Who steals the common from off the goose.
The law demands that we atone
When we take things we do not own
But leaves the lords and ladies fine
Who take things that are yours and mine.
The poor and wretched don’t escape
If they conspire the law to break;
This must be so but they endure
Those who conspire to make the law.
The law locks up the man or woman
Who steals the goose from off the common
And geese will still a common lack
Till they go and steal it back.
Chris
Hits the nail on the head
one for Eurovision.
Can we include overlarge and dangerous ( in a thousand ways ) Ltd companies ( Global )
Perhaps a new category Utdg.. :- Unlimited Global Liability. ( with tax perks. ? )
How dare anyone or thing limit their liability. Also the employees etc.
TG Spokes…….how about Trans-Dimensional Engineering Ltd. Surely you must have heard of that concern in your travels…