We’re not talking about this elephant, ok yah?

 

Oh dear – someone at Auntie Beeb can’t stand BJ, the erstwhile PM, or worse: doesn’t agree with his appeal for ‘poor Ukraine’! Not a good look, Auntie! I refer of course to the compilation of the printed front pages this morning, showing the ‘sack Zahawi’ outcries of the Westminster press – except for the DM. They’ve put yon erstwhile PM on their front page, promoting his ‘outcry’ after his visit to his friend in Kiev. You have to scroll all the way down to the bottom to see that unspeakable, tear-jerking thingie (link). Now ought that not have been given the top spot? 

Just to get this piece out of the way, I checked out the DM’s online edition where murder and stuff make up the leading articles. If you really want to have a look at BJ’s elaborate, you can go here. Words simply fail me … I will however quote one, the final paragraph (this and the other emphases are all mine):

“I am proud that it is the UK that is once again making the running. By sending 14 Challenger 2 tanks, our Defence Secretary Ben Wallace has set an example for other countries to emulate. Now is the time for others to follow our lead.” (link)

Blimey – fourteen tanks! Putin will be so scared! Of course, the ‘others’ which are meant to follow us are the Krauts who are being exhorted internationally to send their Leopard tanks. From what I can gather, both Poland, Spain and Turkey have as many Leopards as Germany – so why are they not told to hand them over? 

Anyway, we have problems other than ‘Tory Sleaze’ and Challenger Tanks. Yesterday, people were told they could ‘earn money’ by switching off appliances between 5 and 6pm. Of course, we’ve had no reports whatsoever about how this has worked. National Grid employees clearly didn’t have time yet to assess this. However, Ross Clark has written an opinion piece for the DT, under the ominous because true headline:

“The National Grid is falling apart thanks to net zero – We’re left with demand management to keep the lights on – rewarding the rich at the expense of the poor, and all using taxpayer funds” (paywalled link)

Ouch. We’ve always said that Net Zero is a scam, that only the rich can afford all this green crappery. Documenting his claim about ‘Teh Rich’ being rewarded by yesterday’s National Grid ‘flexibility’ scheme, Clark writes:

“It is not hard to spot a slight issue with this offer: the more electricity you use on a normal Monday, the easier it will be for you to cash in today. As with so many green subsidies, it perversely rewards the well-off at the expense of the poor. If you own an 18 bedroom mansion you can easily claim your fee by switching off the lights in the east wing and delaying recharging your Tesla until 7pm. If you normally use only one electric light, there will be no savings for you.” (paywalled link)

Just so! Now here’s a question for Starmer’s lot, always so keen to demand that ‘Teh Rich’ must pay: will Labour scrap Net Zero? Will Labour demand only ‘Teh Poor’ get to receive rewards from this flexibility scheme? And what about the acres of fertile agricultural land being turned into ‘solar farms’, the acres of bird shredders on private land, both filling the coffers of land owners?

Shouldn’t Labour demand this land be ‘nationalised’, that these landowners no longer receive ‘subsidies’ from ‘Teh Poor’, i.e. us tax-paying peasants, to reduce the price of electricity? Not that these renewables are actually capable of producing all electricity we need:

“Britain already has enough installed wind and solar capacity – 38 gigawatts of it – to theoretically meet 100 per cent of average electricity demand. On a good day, such as we had a fortnight ago, solar and wind generate more than 50 per cent of our energy needs. But this morning [23rd January] at 10 am it was down to 19 per cent, and at times in December it fell to less than two per cent. If you are going to try to build a grid based on wind and solar, and try to manage demand by paying people to switch their appliances off, you are going to have to chuck such enormous quantities of money at people that they are prepared to spend days on end shivering in the dark.” (paywalled link)

Cynical old me thinks that this is precisely what the Net Zero lot want because it’s what Whitehall and the Treasury want: press as much money out of the taxpaying serfs as possible and then hand a pittance back, with great fanfare, to show how generous and caring the government is!

There’s an opinion piece in the DM today which illustrates this same attitude by the Westminster lot. It’s by RIchar Littlejohn, observing that for far too many Brits ‘Money for nothing’, i.e. ‘income support’ by those idiots still paying tax has become a way of life (link). Well, who wouldn’t grab ‘free stuff’ without asking who paid for this in the first place!

However, instead of lambasting people no longer working perhaps Littlejohn and others ought to ask if people have simply calculated that their income, after working and commuting and the tax grab, is only marginally higher than not working at all. So why should people work their socks off in order to support all the non-workers, e.g. our beloved dinghy drivers? It doesn’t make sense. People are not as stupid as that lot in Westminster think they are.

I leave you with some non-news which are truly earth-shattering. The Times reproduced a warning from an US Think Tank:

“[…] small modules, known as cellular IoTs (Internet of Things), gather data and transmit it via the 5G network, which gives the Chinese authorities intelligence and the ability to track people and businesses. Among the devices containing the modules are laptops, voice-controlled smart speakers, smart watches, smart energy meters [sic] and fridges.” (link, paywalled)

Oh dear! So we need to fear the ‘yellow peril’, is it? See – I knew why I didn’t want ‘Alexa’ and ‘smart meters’ in my home: it’s because I’m doing my bit to defend us against yon yellow peril! Of course, we don’t need to worry about being tracked by the Big Tech firms or our own government, of course not!

And then there’s the DT which has dug out a scheme according to which Tory candidates are offered ‘schooling’, to avoid ‘white resentment’ because, allegedly, it is

“a “significant problem” for ethnic minorities and is defined as “when white employees suggest equality and diversity training is no longer required, as it provides ethnic minority employees with unfair advantages”.” (paywalled link)

Blimey. I had no idea that this was ‘a thing’! I learned something new today, hurrah! Any associations with Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’, of some animals being more equal than others, are of course heinous and need to be eradicated.

That’s all I’ve got for today. It’ll be interesting to see if ‘our glorious MSM will pick up the “fear the yellow peril”. After all, there must be something to keep us scared while being grateful to Big Government to hand us back a few crumbs from the money they’ve taken from us. Keep warm and have a nice day!