The Nation’s ‘Party Venue’?

 

 

It’s getting silly now. There’s another ‘uproar’ about “A Party” at No 10, and there’s the situation in the Ukraine. Both these items demonstrate that our MSM editors all sing from the same hymn sheet. Moreover, they show that none of them look at their own archives.

It’s futile for me to point out yet again that they have no culture of doing research, never mind asking inconvenient questions. They seem to have forgotten how to do that during their fat days of providing only covid propaganda for the last two years. After all, with the cry of ‘fake news’ and ‘granny killer’, every critic had his mouth taped shut. And now, when we truly deserve clear reporting, when we need critical voices, they don’t know how to do their duty.

Let’s look at the ‘No 10 Home News’ first. Th is morning’s headlines shout that in June 2020 Johnson ‘had a birthday party in his honour’ in No 10. The DM has a breathless report, under a screaming headline asking if this is ’the killer blow’ (link). The DT writes:

“Carrie Johnson, the Prime Minister’s wife, and Lulu Lytle, the interior designer redecorating the Johnsons’ Downing Street flat, were both reportedly in attendance. A Number 10 spokesman confirmed that Mr Johnson had attended the event but insisted the Prime Minister was there for less than 10 minutes and that staff gathered “briefly” for the event” (paywalled link)

Thank you for digging this out, ITV! Wasn’t one of the TV presenters also ‘caught out’ and had to go into quarantine? The Times adds this helpful little snippet to their ‘Birthday Gate’ report:

“Rishi Sunak, the chancellor, who was arriving for the Covid meeting, is understood to have also briefly attended but sources stressed that he had “not been invited”.” (link, paywalled)

Dearie me – Sunak is a gate crasher! Never mind that he was arriving for that covid meeting. Did none of the other ministers attending that meeting say ‘Happy Birthday’ to Johnson on their way to yon meeting? One name especially is conspicuously absent in this ‘party saga’. Did a certain Mr Gove not wish ‘Happy Birthday’ to his PM? 

There are two other aspects to this scandal. One is: all those people, love them or loathe them, were working in No 10, to keep the lockdowned country running. Johnson actually lives above the shop, as does Sunak. Do the ‘get him’ crowd in the MSM believe this country should have been run by everybody WFH and those unfortunates who had to be present should have just done their work, muzzled up, sanitised to the hilt?

Presumably they themselves strictly observed every covid rule even though journalists were ‘exempt’ from lockdown restrictions. So were other ‘key workers’. Did none of them have a birthday celebration at work? Is every single one of those now screeching for Johnson’s head over that birthday party a firm believer in ‘quod licet Jovi (they themselves being a god, in their own minds, of course) non licet lock downed bovi’ – with us peasants being the cattle?

Here’s the other strange thing: does anyone really, truly believe that these parties were a state secret, that none of the baying hack pack knew anything about them at the time? If they knew – and I am sure they must have – why didn’t they write about it then? They did go to town about Cummings, after all. So: why now?

There’s another point agitating the hack pack: Ms Gray’s report will allegedly not be published in full: “Downing Street reiterated that it may be left to Boris Johnson to decide what is published from the report into the “partygate” scandal” (paywalled link). It’s quite delicious – let Johnson publish the rope with which he’ll be hanged. I only wonder if any of the Westminster writers have ever heard about ‘privacy laws’. Also, are they so very certain that names of their colleagues and ‘source’s won’t be mentioned?

Cummings meanwhile has told the MSM that he “has refused to meet Sue Gray in person as he feared Boris Johnson would “spin it to the media” (paywalled link), so let me give you the link to his blog which he updated on January 17th. He opened this entry to non-subscribers – those who want to read his stuff will have to shell out £100p.a. Enjoy!

And so to the ‘Ukraine crisis’ and the ongoing sabre rattling. I do wonder about the Ukrainian politicians, from their president down to ambassadors. For them, it’s not sufficient that Biden has now put 8,500 troops on standby (link). No, they are now screeching about the US and us repatriating embassy staff, being of one mind with the EU:

“Ukraine has attacked the UK and US over their embassy pullouts, as President Volodymyr Zelensky praised EU diplomats for remaining to do their jobs amid mounting fears of a Russian invasion. Both Kyiv and the EU on Monday said withdrawing diplomats from embassies in the country in preparation for a potential conflict was premature, casting doubts over how imminent any attack could be.” (paywalled link)  

I confess, I cannot make head nor tail of this astonishing accusation. Is an attack imminent or isn’t it? Are the Ukrainians not prepared? Do they believe it won’t happen? Didn’t they litter our papers with ‘rumours’ of Putin preparing a coup in December 2021 – which didn’t materialise? Wasn’t Putin supposed to have attacked Kiev a week ago, according to Ukrainian ‘predictions’?  

Are the Ukrainians not really expecting Putin to actually attack now? Are their sometimes very undiplomatic endeavours perhaps aimed at making the West give them armaments for free? I wrote yesterday that  this sabre-rattling is  a welcome distraction for our MSM, from reporting about the crumbling Covid edifice. Is that why some US string-pullers are apparently hell-bent on fuelling these flames now and not in winter 2020 and April 2021 when the same situation pertained? 

The BBC surely cannot be accused of providing fake news when they reported on 100,000 Russian troops at the Ukrainian border – in April 2021 (link)! I cannot recall any ‘diplomatic campaigns’ from the Ukraine at that time. Did they perhaps want Biden to settle into his new job as President? Perhaps they didn’t want to sully Ms Merkel’s last months in office as Chancellor, or they believed that a new German chancellor wouldn’t need to be given time to get his feet under the table.

Perhaps it’s about concerted efforts to damage even further the German economy by imposing sanctions on Putin. Such sanctions would hit Germany hardest – but then, who’d pay for all the lovely EU funds helping all and sundry?

Here’s another rather silly sanctions-threat by the USA: restricting Putin’s access to semiconductors so that Russians wouldn’t get new smartphones (link). Semiconductors are mostly made in Taiwan. Are some in the USA seriously thinking they can twist Taiwan’s arms, as quid-pro-quo for defending them against China? 

I’ll conclude with my usual accusation: the Westminster MSM are not doing their job properly. They must have been aware of all those ‘parties’ in 2020. Why didn’t they publish at that time? Are they writing only what their precious sources tell them to? At the time of the trougher scandal we learned that the lobby journalists knew but were scared of losing ‘access’ to Blair’s MPs, so they kept silent. Today’s lot must be as scared as their colleagues were then.

This time round however they don’t seem to notice that they’re being dragged through the streets by their own nose rings, by their ‘sources’  who want regime change. Note that we thick plebs are not expected to ask anything – we have been conditioned to do as we’re told.

These ‘sources’ and those who are abusing our formerly free press are in for a rude awakening. We’ve long stopped trusting a word they say and write. We’re getting our news elsewhere.