I recently heard globalisation described as an attempt to impose global Communism on the world. The difference between today’s globalisation and traditional Communism is the fact that today it is backed up by advances in technology. I won’t take credit for this observation so I’ll provide a link to the channel of the Youtuber who provided me with this insight.
So, it seems that we’re back to systems again and I’m very well qualified to talk about this subject. The blueprint for globalisation is Agenda 21/2030, see my article here.
The different threads that have been coordinated by Agenda 21/2030 are mainly political, propaganda (mainstream media, Hollywood etc), technology, financial and economic. Today we’ll focus on technology because it’s important to understand how these systems have been foisted on us. Just how did we end up in this mess?
A big but not often discussed problem with systems development is getting users to adopt said system and it’s this in particular that is the subject of this article. In days gone by we used to use highly structured methods to gather user requirements to then define and ultimately implement these requirements; it still happens to a lesser extent.
Then along came Enterprise Resource Planning systems (ERP), prepackaged, off the shelf (almost) systems, designed to fit highly refined processes of best practice. The onus was now on the organisation and its employees adapting to fit the system rather than the other way around: Business Process Re-Engineering was the order of the day.
I was present at the roll out of just such an ERP system in a large business many years ago now. I remember listening to the conversations of employees and one often recurring conversation was this:
“I’m not sure how I’m going to do my job with this new system”
I dared not say anything, it would have been political dynamite at the time but the truth was that for many they wouldn’t have a job. Some of the employees would retrain, but many others faced redundancy, one of the main reasons for improving efficiency. The truth is though I hated being part of the secrecy, the smiling reassurances and the downright lies, the way the management behaved reminded me of our politicians today and for at least the past fifty years.
It seem that the main job of our politicians and government generally for many decades now has been to cajole us, simply by stealth, secrecy and dishonesty, into accepting systems that they know full well that we’d never want or accept, systems that just aren’t in our best interests. So much for representative democracy. In fact the actions of successive governments have made a mockery of democracy.
Let’s look at a timeline. In the early days of the Internet, it was crude by today’s standards, the preserve of academic, nerds and geeks. I was an early adopter of the Internet and was there almost from the beginning.
It was the World Wide Web developed at CERN by Tim Berners-Lee that really made the Internet take off. It provided a much prettier and easier to use interface and the now famous Hypertext Linking of information.
Suddenly the Internet was not just for nerds and geeks, it was the first time that the population had the means of direct communication without government oversight. We’d come close in the past with pirate radio but governments had gone to enormous lengths to close them down.
There was an air of rebellion, technology became cool. Along came alternative media, we felt that we were getting one over on our governments and their systems. Not only governments, but business: we could buy cheap overseas products, download movies and music: a revolution.
As time went on, increased bandwidth enabled the introduction of Cloud Computing: very convenient – but we lost control of our data. Mobile phones became Smart phones, we could connect to the Internet with 3G then 4G, our phones became GPS enabled, we became tracked all of the time but we still have the option to turn them off. By now we had become besotted with technology and then the trap was sprung.
We’ve been aware for a long time of the threat of RFID chips – subdermal implants that we can’t turn off. RFID chips though don’t send out a signal as strong as a Smartphone. They need very local sensors with which to interact: enter 5G and the Internet of Things. With its almost limitless available IP addresses 5G is the enabler of RFID tracking – the Mark of the Beast as it is known.
The above technology combined with Artificial Intelligence to process the resulting vast amounts of data will mean that our every move will be tracked whether we like it or not. We will have been fooled into embracing systems and technology that will be the means of our enslavement. All the time we have been lead to believe that we are winning, our rebellious instincts fed and nurtured. Already the propaganda extolling the virtues and benefits of 5G has started, everything from remote control of your home to driverless cars.
We should be able to see the pattern now, the same thing has happened with Brexit: we were lead to believe that we’d won a great victory when in reality there never was any intention of leaving the European Union. The plan all along was to make us more subservient and enslaved to the EU via a very evil withdrawal agreement: a vassal state.
We have in spite of all of the above made progress but we need to raise our game, challenge these narratives and simply refuse to accept our fate.
I have heard many people use that old saying: “you can’t beat the system.”
The good news is though, I know a lot about systems and I can assure you that you certainly can beat the system. It isn’t easy most of the time but with determination and perseverance we can certainly do it.
The most important thing is that we open our eyes.
What, in my humble opinion, is often missed is that technology can work in two ways with regard to one perspective. That perspective, which appears to be one of technologies most worrying aspects, is that of control. In the criminal world an industry is fueled by beating the system. Being ‘connected’ is a choice, where being unconnected has definite advantages with regard security, privacy and ownership. Surely innovation involves developing alternatives either to a method of doing something or a method of thinking of something.
Technology is a facilitator and can be used to advance innovation who said being connected was necessary?
My own want is to see Localism where manufacturing, energy, communication planning, finance and politics are in the hands of local groups. This to me will be the only way forward in the 21st century.
5G and any other form of enslavement can be beaten by Localism. Big business can be beaten by Localism. Redundancy (lack of ‘usefulness’) can be beaten by Localism. Crime can be beaten by Localism, and Localism can produce many other solutions.
We are fearful of technology and can see it as a threat because we believe we are losing control or have no control.
Create intranets and take back ownership. Use technology to make things possible within a defined and controllable environment. Use the internet to communicate and access knowledge banks.
My take on a thought provoking article.
Great article. I’m particularly glad to note your mention of Agenda 21.
If something is ever sold to the public as being ‘convenient’ for them, there’s usually a more sinister downside somewhere.
The latest one is obviously the 5G rollout – this is being sold to the public as convenient, “being able to download massive amounts of data quickly, wow, now I can watch HD quality movies on my phone with no buffering, excellent stuff!”
From what I gather, 5G is miltary-grade weapons technology, or at least at an extreme that is what it can be used for. We are already being bombarded with various other forms of electromagnetic radiation all around us, and now we are being asked to live in a soup of high frequency microwave radiation? “But I can download stuff really quickly now, isn’t it convenient?”
My husband attended an IT conference pertaining his very sensitive work systems where the Cloud was being promoted but none of the experts could actually explain it or clarify it’s security. Crazy stuff
Bit like this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vywf48Dhyns
😀
Lisa – the world is full of supposed IT experts in expensive suits, throwing around buzzwords, without any idea of what they’re talking about.
Cloud computing is nothing new, it’s simply back end computing and data storage, Hotmail was an early example bur how many people know where in the world and on what servers their Hotmail’s are being stored?
Back end just means that instead of storing data and even some of the associated processing on your local device, PC, Tablet, smartphone or whatever, it is stored on servers now usually accessed via the Internet.
Two things have made this kind of architecture take of: massively increased bandwidth in recent years, ie Broadband, fiber and 128 bit encryption that has been around for a while but is still vital.
Without the above we wouldn’t be able to run business systems from the back end, the trouble is you have to have a lot of faith in your service provider as security is often dodgy, like with Hotmail much of the time you have no idea where your data is stored, this is why it’s called The Cloud. You’ll also have no idea who has access to your data en coullise, although nobody will admit this. Often the opportunity to outsource an organisation’s IT infrastructure is just too tempting and it is increasingly considered that the cost savings and flexibility offered by The Cloud outweigh the risks.
Time will tell.
All political systems are based on human rights (or more often these days the denial of human rights). And as most people now live in cities without the wherewithal of self-sufficiency and therefore entirely dependent on the State for all their needs “rights” have taken centre stage.
For this reason there is now all-out war between Globalist Capitalists and Socialist Nationalists. And the battleground is in what wealth and power is promoting as human rights ……….. based on atheism/evolution/science taking the place of God as the maker of human life, the truth being replaced by opinion, the State as the owner of human life, the natural family replaced by the individual, the fruits of our labour in the hands of investoers/markets, and human life being treated as another form of animal life to be exploited.
What’s wrong with local capitalists Vs ( UKIP ) Parish committee..I do enjoy reading Randy Anne
Great article congratulation, to stay on with your parallel the global production system will need an underlying operating system. Looks like at the moment Islam was championed to prepare hardware (people of the world) to accept NWO system. Why Islam of all other possibilities: there are two main reasons:
1. Islam is a religion of obedience and not questioning the authorities. Mostly because it is unhealthy for disobedient.
2. Islam in his fundamentalist version is not afraid to get “hands dirty” and enforce its blessing on infidels (for their own good).
An interesting question for me is will the NWO puppeteers be able to control their own operating system?
Either way, we must challenge and win against these changes or our children and grandchildren will suffer the consequences of our failure.
I found ERp a serious laugh. It basically tried to make people into what they could never be even if they had their brains rewired. However I also found that fighting ( OR ignoring ) it resulted in surprising beneficial results. There are actually dozens of alternatives to globalisation. But there is also now a built in refusal to deny.. Quite hilarious. and just human political animal.
Good lad flyer, keep going. I’m a fan.
Perhaps I should givean example. It’s my belief The chines e are changing peoples to fit the system ? now consider.
Another sort of example was in my efforts to make a factory profitable, systems etc had to change with impact on people and ameliaration of the effects. This was usually beneficial in odd directions which however usually resulted in discovering some wierd and wonderful options ( The sufferers remorselessly inventuve under pressure ) prove to be good, working with not against, the unions, banks, etc.
The obvious problem today is the grovelling excessive subserviance to computers.