Well, no-one is going to believe me but I was going to write a piece about renewable energy and its dangers. Honestly, I really was. But having recently written about a sensible response to the non-emergency uncrisis of climate change I left it on the back burner; recent events on the National Grid, that creaking remnant of the days when the UK had politicians who had at least a nodding acquaintance with physics and who heeded the warning of competent engineers, means I can put it off no longer.
By playing fast and loose with energy security, our politicians and civil servants are risking the lives of hundreds or, in the worst case, thousands of her Majesty’s subjects. This is not hyperbole, not doom-mongering. It is cold, hard fact.
There is a word which is going to be much in the news for the next few days – until Celebrity Bake-off Island starts at least – which describes the most desirable attribute of the systems that power our lights, our railways, our factories, our civilisation. That word is ‘despatchability’.
When you flick a light switch you expect a lot. You expect the demand for energy to be met cheaply, you expect the generating widgets to meet the demand and you expect civilisation to continue. It ain’t necessarily so, not anymore. You have decided, or other people have decided for you, that the energy must be clean of the taint of fossil fuel and will have been generated as far as is practical by hydro, solar or wind. Increasingly, that last demand is beyond the realms of practicability, but we’re not allowed to quibble, at least not until people start to die
Let’s look at hydro.
This is the UK. Hydro relies on rugged terrain, big drops down which the water from an elevated lake can pour into a turbine. Guess how many such places meet the configuration requirements for hydro. That’s right, damn few. Of course you could always build dams across upland valleys in the Lake District, Scotland and Wales. Good luck with that, and even then the energy delivered would be nowhere enough to satisfy a population of 65 million. Dinorwig, the pumped storage hydro plant in Wales, cost billions and would, if pressed into service, only keep the UK running for a few minutes. The risk of a cascade failure of the Grid means that Dinorwig has another role – it’s there to reboot the whole caboodle if the entire country goes dark.
OK, solar then.
This is the UK. It gets dark at night, it gets dark when it’s winter, it gets dark when it’s cloudy. A solar panel in our country has a capacity factor – that’s what percentage of its full rated value it could actually deliver in the real world – of 11%. Call it a tenth. A solar ‘farm’ rated as serving 100,000 dwellings will, on average, serve 10,000. On average. Sometimes more, sometimes less, sometimes none at all when the big shiny thing in the sky goes to bed. Then there’s the major difficulty that we need light when it’s dark, heat when it’s cold, power at any time of the day or night. Anyone with a curious mind and a sense of humour will find it instructive to work out how many rechargeable AA batteries it would take to store enough energy for 10,000 houses. The approved units are number of times round the equator or if the numbers get really enormous, what fraction of the distance to the moon they would reach when placed end to end.
So, that leaves wind.
Wind blows day and night most of the time, but when a continental high forms in the winter the wind drops and all of Europe sits under leaden skies with gentle freezing breezes barely stirring the subsidy-milkers’… sorry, wind turbines’ sails. The UK uses the most energy in the winter, energy in all its forms. Cars are driven more, central heating is on, lights are needed at four in the afternoon, everything conspires to drive up demand. And for weeks at a time, the proud offshore and onshore ranks of wind turbines provide four-fifths of five eights of very little. Never mind, feel the warmth of those carbon taxes as the fossil fuel plants which keep the UK working are flat out and never mind the CO2. The old, the poor and the sick will pay the Carbon Emissions Tax, they’ve no choice… OK, maybe one other choice. They say hypothermia is a painless way to go.
Which brings us back to the word ‘despatchable’. This is a silly word for something more understandable. The understandable word is ‘reliable’.
There will be an inquiry into the blackout which tripped thousands of people off the Grid and trapped them in trains when the door and windows didn’t open, caused chaos when traffic lights failed, when load-shedding revealed the weakness in our emergency provisions in hospitals. Let’s pretend this will be a genuine inquiry, not one of those ‘no-one to blame, lessons will be learned’ exercises in arse-covering so beloved by the civil service and their docile ministers. What should it say? Here’s one scenario, not the only possible one and maybe not the true one, but it’s plausible.
- The blackout was [allegedly] caused by ramping up wind energy and ramping down conventional generation in order to set new renewable energy records.
- By leaving the Grid exposed to in inherently frequency-aberrant wind power, its resilience was degraded to failure. [Allegedly] asynchronous input from the offshore wind farm meant it had to be closed down. The consequent surge in demand [allegedly] caused a conventional power station to trip offline. The conventional power stations remaining had enough inertia to take up the slack: without that inertia a major cascade failure would have resulted in even more widespread and longer-lasting power cuts. The alternative explanation seems less plausible – a gas plant went offline and tripped the wind farm – but what do I know, I’m not the Secretary of State.
- The engineers who designed the Grid deserve high praise. In particular, Dinorwig’s emergency backup generation saved the country from a major emergency.
- The plans to de-carbonise the UK power base is criminally reckless. Politicians have a duty of care and, if they’re not careful, they’ll find themselves up in front of the beak.
There is a simple solution.
- Tax the wind and solar farms at the same rate as the carbon tax faced by conventional generation. Gordon Brown’s tax raid on fossil fuel companies will lend this impost a fig-leaf of respectability.
- Renegotiate the contracts under which the renewable energy firms are allowed to export power to the Grid. At present they are privileged, given priority when the wind blows and the sun shines and with no responsibility beyond that. Make them guarantee supplies day and night, wind or calm, sun or cloud. Only grant them Grid access if they agree to provide ‘reliable’ energy.
- Frack. You’ll need the gas for when the “renewable” energy firms go bust.
Thank you. Attention must be brought again and again to what appears to be propaganda.
Renewables are a supplement they are not a replacement for a good diet of energy.
I would love to see coal mines opened using modern technology and robotics. Coal fired power stations filtering pollutants and replenishing CO2.
An island of coal surrounded by a sea of fish!
Perhaps the power cuts were orchestrated by someone who wanted to warn us of what is to come if we continue on this mad path.
Every week climate change is used to dispense guilt and fear. When they start farming Greenland again as the Vikings did just a thousand years ago, that will be good. Was the British Isles under water then, no! If one looks at East Anglia for example there are Saxon settlements on the east coast at the time of the medieval warm period. Norwich and the surrounding area is below 100ft above sea level. Does this make sense? Now look at this map and see this video
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record_of_the_past_1000_years#/media/File:2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=higXpFF79Hw
Which one is the most believable? Why aren’t these pieces of evidence discussed explained debated?
“Why aren’t these pieces of evidence discussed explained debated?”
Because they don’t suit the globalists’ agenda which our politicians, with few exceptions, comply with.
Excellent links Kim.
Lack of correlation disproves a hypothesis. The second link, in particular, clearly demonstrates this.
The global warming hypothesis is toast!
I agree, very good article. I wish the lesson would be learned but that seems unlikely.
well we all know where our coalfired power stations went including 1 or 2 never used, they went to germany where they are doing what they should be doing in the uk but the eu said we could not use them, funny that
This is an excellent article can I circulate it?
Help yourself.
JF
Drivel article.
At some point we will run out of fossil fuels, before that point it will become increasingly expensive.
It will take many decades to fix any alternative, we have to start now.
Plus nasty foreigners can interrupt our fossil fuel supply at will. (Why do you suppose we have to be so nice to Saudi Arabia in spite of their murderous activities?)
The pollution from burning fossil fuels is killing us all, everything from asthma to Alzheimers.
The primary energy source for renewable electricity comes for free, for ever and can’t be taken from us. There are big technical alterations yet to to come, smart meters is only the start.
Oh and you left out tidal energy which we have in abundance in the UK.
Harold the trouble with tidal is that there isn’t enough dispatchable energy in one location for it to be viable. The cost of collection and distribution would make it too expensive. (Like wind and solar.). There is a large coal-field under the North Sea adjoining our East coast which is almost certainly one of the things the EU has been eyeing out. We have oil in the South (near Gatwick). We won’t be running out of fossil fuels anytime soon!
Much needed article Julian, but it seem few people listen, the shambles last week should serve as a warning of the result of power outages, but I don’t think it will. Collective memory is short and the long term as far as politicians and the media is concerned would appear to be the length of their lunch hour.
The rest of the world has or is in the process of building coal fired power stations the e.u according to some reports has 468, building 27 more we have none. India has over a 1000, China is building them all the time. I’m not convinced that fracking is the answer though as there are plenty of concerns regarding water contamination and earth tremors and so on.
All true.A first rate article. The world watches with horror and disbelief.
The thing that terrifies me is that it’s not alone. We have apalling imminant crises covered up with sticking plaster. Everywhere there are sensible solutions ignored. . I reckon that the government has no money. None at all. They are a bankrupt company where everyone is bewildered, keeping their heads down and taking the money.The government has already in all but name become another failed scialist state . the signs are blatently obvious..Every pemnny dragged out of an unwilling company ( Note;; I say ” company,”! It is companies who pay tax not people.). Adds to the bankruptcy avalanche.
Our government is not clever or wise or even helpfull. It is merely blind grasping stupid preservation..
The government has to pay the vast armies of Civil Servants, Public servants Computer pushers. Benefits devourers, as well as the essential police armies and HS2. and the morass of NHS suffering from management failure.and socialist wet dreams.
It has the socialist problem. Pay the hangers on of all kinds OR face revolt. OR kick the can. ie. Kick the can. Which is what Mrs May knows,and was doing,.and the can is nearly done for…. OR sell assets. — We have done that or EU has stolen them ,..An ignorant BBC applauds.
Getting Out is only the first step. We cannot do anything untill we are out. Remainers think that the EU will save us. More Socialist dreams. .But that is it.. One simple easy fairey tale solution
Once out there are a myriad of treatments and a lot of cures. Hammond is getting his claims/excuses ready..
But right now we have NO MONEY. except what we are presently giving away Maniac Father Christmas.
Julian, thank you for writing your much-needed, excellent article to which I’d like to add a few thoughts.
Generating electricity from gas is probably cheap and efficient and a definite first-step that should be considered first in working towards achieving a robust electricity supply with short-term stability so yes, I strongly agree that we should get fracking.
However, for long-term stability there is nothing to beat six months of coal stored at or near existing large power stations. This should be possible almost immediately through a shift in policy. Obviously Drax should be reconfigured to run on coal (no more wood chips!) as soon as practically possible. (Not that it matters, but this would probably result in LESS human caused carbon dioxide entering Earth’s atmosphere!)
New nuclear should only be considered if it can deliver electrical energy cheaper than coal or gas. The cost of insurance against catastrophic failure and subsequent clean-up should be included in this evaluation. It would probably also be sensible to ensure that the Chinese Communist Party was not involved in any such a venture.
Imported gas supplies can be interrupted by accident or sabotage, or can be turned off by countries in the supply chain. Perhaps, paradoxically, reducing vulnerability to such supply interruption would make it less likely to occur.
Good article but we mustn’t expect the PTB, infected with the AGW virus and too thick to think for themselves, to take any notice.
Very good article. Informative and clear.