I recently read an article by Janice North, entitled: “Tilbrook speaks” . I enjoyed the article and particularly the part in the attached video entitled: “Robin Tilbrook talks about his court case claiming that we left the EU 29/3/19” where he talks about High Court Judges and political judgements.
What I found extremely disturbing was Robin Tilbrook’s statement that it is extremely hard to get a judgement based on law from a High Court judge, they are more likely to be politically driven. Robin further states:
“to become a judge these days, you have to satisfy the Judicial Appointments Commission, that you have a lifetime’s commitment to equality and diversity.”
This seems to me to be a complete conflict of interest on the part of these lofty individuals that we rely on to dispense justice on our behalf and I’m sure it would have grated with many of you who have also watched this video. Perhaps we’d better take a closer look at this diversity thing.
As I’ve often written in my previous articles, I’ve spent a lot of time travelling in my life. As far as I can tell, the world always has been a culturally diverse place. Indeed, cultural diversity is something that I too have always cherished: when in Rome I do as the Romans and then I go home.
There is much published research about human genetics and cultural diversity, much of it we never get to hear about. You can do your own research but for the purposes of this article, I’m going to refer to a piece from Time: “What Science Says About Race and Genetics” .
To quote from the article:
“New analyses of the human genome have established that human evolution has been recent, copious, and regional.”
Despite official statements to the contrary, it seems that there is a biological basis for race. Another quote:
“Human social structures change so slowly and with such difficulty as to suggest an evolutionary influence at work.”
We’re talking here about changes that have occurred over the last thirty five thousand years or so. This makes a mockery of attempts by the Liberal Left, NGOs, the European Union, United Nations and globalists generally, through Political Correctness and other totalitarian propaganda, to convince us that race is something that can be abolished in less than a human lifetime.
Today, globalists talk about cultural diversity as if it was something newly discovered but their version of it means something else. Behind it is a very sinister agenda. We’ve heard it all before though, most recently from Theresa May and her: “leave means leave”. She certainly had a hidden agenda, didn’t she!
Another very worrying quote from the above article:
“Tribalism seems to be the default mode of human political organization. It can be highly effective: The world’s largest land empire, that of the Mongols, was a tribal organization. But tribalism is hard to abandon, again suggesting that an evolutionary change may be required.”
That quote above should set alarm bells ringing because no matter what we’re told by globalist politicians, every race needs its own space, mixing of races has always had disastrous consequences as events in Israel and other places around the world have proven time and time again.
Multiculturalism is a lie and it will prove to be a disaster for our country. Let’s face it, we’ve already seen this starting to occur as I’m sure I don’t have to tell you.
Here’s a quote from Infowars but similar information is available from many sources: “Germany Welcomes 9,000 Family Members of ‘Refugees’ Amid Soaring Homeless Crisis”
Throughout the Western world, immigrants are being housed, clothed and fed in preference to and at the expense of the indigenous citizens of these countries. The strain on housing, health, education, welfare and just about everything else has been at an enormous cost to ourselves and as a result many of our citizens will end up on the street.
All of the above is happening at a time when Western governments have been printing mind-bogglingly vast amounts of money to make ends meet, yet behind the propaganda the world economy is in dire straits.
Total world debt now stands at around two hundred and fifty four trillion dollars. It would take the entire gross domestic product of the entire world for one hundred years to pay back this debt and that’s just to break even. This debt will never be repaid.
The days of us being able to print money to pay for an ever expanding population are coming to an end and I’ll have to write about this another time. The point is this though: when we have to fight in our own country for disappearing resources, then we’ll see tribalism. As society divides along ethnic lines as it is only natural for people to do, then we’ll enter one of the most violent times in human history.
Just about any globalist agenda is a practical failure. The Euro currency for example was always a political rather than a sound economic construct. It has polarised Europe and already caused untold misery. All of these agendas are the same, they are not for the benefit of we the people, they’re there to facilitate the globalist dream. We the people just don’t matter.
When you therefore hear a politician,a civil servant, a celebrity or judge talk about diversity, remember it means something else: it means tyranny, equality means poverty, the agenda is the United Nations Agenda 2030 and it is an inhuman agenda.
This agenda has infested our government, judiciary, police, media and so many other aspects of our lives. Brexit is just one battle. The next will be against the United Nations, our own government and its institutions. I’ve for a longtime realised that we are in more danger now than we were in either of the last two world wars, and so we must first accept that we are indeed at war.
When people talk about mixing the races together, versus apartheid, I am always reminded of an interview I saw many years ago with Roddy McDowell.
In the original 1968 film Planet of the Apes, McDowell played one of the apes. He said that during the making of the film, applying the make up, prosthetics etc was such a huge task every morning, that there was no way the actors would have enough time to change back into their own clothes for lunch, and they were obliged to keep the ape costume on for the whole day.
McDowell said that one day, when he and the rest of the cast and all the extras were having lunch together, he looked across the room absent mindedly, and suddenly realised that all the gorillas were sitting together, all the orangutans were sitting together, and all the chimpanzees were sitting together, in costume.
In large populations, people or animals will always instinctively sort themselves into sub groups with other beings who look just like themselves.
from PMB My immediate reaction to the article was ‘Obviously there is a genetic basis to racial differences. O.K. maybe skin colour is just from living under hot sun and cloudless skies for generations, but what about skin folds around the eyes, different shaped eyes if you like.’ Then I began to query what do people mean when they use this word diversity? Yes there is diversity amongst people. But what we are being told is – we must live all mixed up and crowded together. What’s more OUR JUDGES WILL FORCE THIS ON US!!! Thank you for opening my eyes and increasing my understanding. Personally I’m happy to live with Jews, Chinese, Negroes, Indians – all in moderation and so far as I have experienced them they have adapted to our customs. But some Moslems, from what I have heard want the British to adopt their customs and laws in Britain. Apparently that is the hidden agenda behind ‘Diversity’
Pauline – see my comment below to mrpaul.
Hmm, i buried my son yesterday, stabbed to death by a gang of blacks.
If thats diversity i would prefer to live without it.
“London sees a huge rise in violent crime” I wonder why that is?
https://katehon.com/article/london-sees-huge-rise-violent-crime?fbclid=IwAR20D3D6ZYbTj2mge-ua-RJlJER1McEFe2UtdJPXSLWhJBhjo8mGr-tju5I
Rabbit just picturing the scene as described in my minds-eye did make me chuckle, because it’s so true. It also highly relevant because it highlights how powerful uniforms are and perhaps explains why, since Muslims can be any race, they find it necessary to differentiate themselves by having their women wear their religious uniform which covers the hair and often most of the face. In so doing it could be argued that by hiding many of their racial characteristics they present not just as a religion but also as a different race.
It also got me to thinking more generally about race. We are all humans made up of different races. (If we were dogs it would be breeds.) Same basic design but with different attributes which go well beyond those that we can see, such as skin colour, hair, flat or pronounced nose etc. to encompass abilities as well. Just look at the Olympic finalists for the 100m sprint (running) and 100 m freestyle swimming, for example.
More controversial and difficult to pin down but I think fair to say, those groups that developed in tropical rainforests with their huge range of plants, many poisonous, and creatures, some extremely dangerous, would, over time, have developed inherent abilities and ways of thinking that differed, on average, to those adapted for survival in the far North where winters were long and brutal.
Finally, having spent much of my life in South Africa with 11 languages, many races and the biggest Indian population outside India, my experience is that a tendency towards racism, in other words a tendency to bully those who look different, appears to be one of those characteristics that is universal across the human spectrum. (It’s not unique to white Caucasian males).
So when a particular group is singled out for bullying by all the other groups, as were the Jews in Germany before and during the 2nd world war, we know that a group of politicians are weaponizing (using) this tendency to achieve their objectives (and of course to steal property and possessions).
Bullies need to be countered not cow-towed too. Doing the latter guarantees their success (and invites more bullying).
The attack itself must be called out for what it is in a way that gets people on the side of those being bullied.
(The bullies typically hide behind a Gordian knot conspiracy.)
The trouble is we don’t know who’s driving and we don’t know where we’re being driven too. But one thing we do know. We are going somewhere and have been for a long time. Think Kenya, Tanganyika … S. Ireland, Great Britain?? (Work in progress). The Pound was the currency when I was in primary school in South Africa. I still remember when the Rand was introduced. Everyone blamed the S. African government.
That’s only one aspect of what I call ‘the plan’. There are others. Behavioural sciences were developed largely to achieve political ends. For example, we now have a slew of new pronouns. (As for me I’m sticking with ‘he’, she’ and ‘it’. They can stick the rest.) These things didn’t fall out of a tree. Someone dreamed up this garbage. For a purpose. Err perhaps that should be ‘common purpose’.
I recently dipped into the UKIP EFD Booklet. I can’t find any reference to it on line so I will quote verbatim (but with some bits left out) from the beginning of page 1.
Part 1 Bad Intentions.
The Proper goal.
We want the United Kingdom to be…
Prosperous, Happy and at Peace with itself.
Skip a few lines and then:
So who are these people who do not want what to us is obviously good and right?
Well, let’s start on the other side of the world with the Chinese.
I’ll stop there but it then goes into how different Chinese objectives are to ours.
Also, I can attest that when I was at School in Bulawayo, (then Rhodesia) my friend and I used to listen to Radio Peking for amusement. (It’s not so funny now.) Zimbabwe and S. Africa are now starting to look like Chinese colonies. The point is the Chinese were there, taking over, at the beginning. And, at the very least, the British Government didn’t stop it.
So there’s ONE of their objectives confirmed.
If anyone knows how to get hold of a pdf of the booklet it would be helpful. I haven’t finished it yet, but I think it’s well worth a read. From what I’ve seen so far it explains a lot. I’d really like to spread it far and wide.
So maybe we do know who’s driving the car.
Thanks for the comment Michael.
Who is driving the car? I did write about this:
“Weltanschauung and the System”
https://independencedaily.co.uk/weltanschauung-and-the-system/
I’m getting closer to understanding just who is driving the car, the level of intellect that has been driving this globalist project is quite amazing, it’s certainly well above the head of any of our politicians.
I’ll write more about this in due course.
I would feel rather more re-assured if “flyer” could bring himself to come home instead of pontificating, admittedly perfectly well and accurately from abroad, having declined to get in touch when I offered to do so.
Interesting that the word Commission for Judicial Appointments is not very far removed from the word “Commissar” and that we have Ministers for Suicide Prevention and Ministers for Ethnic Minorities and Ministers for Children and Families and a Commissioner for Children, confirming that, as I say in “How the Party System Corrupts our Constitution”
there is not a n aspect of our lives over which they do not seek control and it is in their manifestos!!!. And, you know what,] Every time we vote for a political party we give it to them, voluntarily, because we have been hoodwinked into believing that the party system is “democracy” rather than “elective dictatorship”.. It is called “consent” and to get our consent they hoodwink us.
As my friend Michael wrote in his intro to my article “we keep doing the same thing and expect different results”.
So, I am afraid flyer isn’t quite as sharp as he makes out because a) he would vote for a party and one which prohibits discrimination. See UKIP Constitution para 2.4 and para 2.5. so on the one hand he is rightly alarmed by what the judicial appointments (diversity and equality) Commissars are doing but not alarmed by their UKIP bedfellows for whom he would vote,
So, what we need to do en masse is ditch voting for any party. The editors have very kindly allowed my weblink to be published in their text several times, with zero response, so I will try once more. http://www.cravenfreedom.com, because. the way the party system operates is contrary to our lawful constitution and the separation of powers.. Indeed, doesn’t the fact that we have an ELECTORAL COMMISSION ring any alarm bells?
It is when you translate “equality and diversity” into human rights that you see what is being foisted on an unsuspecting public.
Human rights today are based on:
– science being the maker of human life and the State being the owner of human life.
– opinion replacing truth.
– the individual replacing the family.
– the markets/investors replacing the worker as the owner of property.
Society is being torn apart and destroyed by organised chaos and exploitation.
I thoroughly enjoyed and learned from the most excellent article by ‘flyer’. ‘Unsuspecting public’ you say, maybe – but you will no doubt notice what ‘flyer’ ended the article with….UKIP would have been the Party of choice; strange how this clearly ‘learned’ person would have voted exactly how the majority of Brits did and that ‘the powers that be’ have tried for some three years, to thwart the result and decision by the people to leave the EU. Maybe they were not so dim as the ‘intelligencia within BOTH Parties considered them to be! Unless of course all those voters were University lecturers or political commentators? I have related to many friends, whilst engaged in the subject of race and racial attitudes, of my experience many years ago, while waiting for a flight from Ghana at Heathrow, when a Ghanaian engaged me in conversation on the subject of Ghana and Flt.Lt. Rawlings. My Ghanaian told me something which I never forgot, he said “My friend, you can take an African, educate him at any University; award him cap and gown; dress him in pin-stripes, bowler umbrella and all the other accoutrements – but you will never change ten thousand years of tribalism. Ayeoko! (Spelling questionable!).
misterpaul – we’re all tribal,not just the Africans, we humans are tribal by nature, all of us. We don’t have to be hostile towards other races though, we just need to recognise that cultural diversity is a natural part of who we are.
This is why UN agendas and globalism generally are such inhuman concepts, they are atempting to force us to live in a way that is not natural for us humans. Like all of these globalist agendas, they were designed to suit the ambitions and aspirations of the very few, they will end yet again in disaster and it will not be the fault of the Africans, Muslims or any other race.
Edward Leane – an excellent comment and qualification. Thanks.
Quite so, Mr Leane. The thought occurs to me that if we are born into a lie and raised within a lie, our children will know nothing different and will, inevitably, build further upon the lie, changing it and bending it to comply with the order of the day . . . and so on ad finitum. On that basis, we are far from living in the truth even though all of us strut around claiming ‘I’m right, you are wrong’.
“Society is being torn apart and destroyed by organised chaos and exploitation.” Quite so, again. But WHO is the organiser of chaos? Who or what is exploiting us?
“…….that you see what is being foisted on an unsuspecting public” Are they really ‘unsuspecting’? My experience of a great deal of my fellow Brits is that they really do know what is unfolding but they think that if they sit on the sidelines long enough someone else will engage their energies, time and money to address the issue.