Written by J. Butties
The UN vote for the Resolution on the fight against the glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism, xenophobia and intolerance in 2022 threw up some interesting results.
This resolution comes up every year since 2012 and the USA, Canada and the Ukraine regularly voted against it. In the most recent vote held on the 4th November 2022, over 50 countries voted against the resolution.
These were 52 ‘No’ votes: Albania, Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kiribati, Latvia, Liberia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Moldova, Romania, San Marino, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States.
This is a major jump from the previous highs of 4 ‘No’ votes in the preceding years:
2013 — Canada, Kiribati, Palau, United States;
2014 — Canada, Palau, Ukraine, United States;
2015 — Canada, Palau, Ukraine, United States.
The United States is the only country that has consistently voted ‘No’ in every year since 2012. The Ukraine has consistently voted ‘No’ since 2014. Funny that – when was the Maidan coup?
Most of the other countries that voted ‘No’ this year consistently abstained in previous years.
The current PM, Mr. R.S., continues the Nazi support previously espoused by de Pfeffel Johnson who only recently admitted, on camera, that he could not allow a quick resolution of the UkroNazi Russia conflict as was the preferred position of Germany.
“The German view was at one stage that if it were going to happen, which would be a disaster, then it would be better for the whole thing to be over quickly, and for Ukraine to fold,” Johnson claimed, citing “all sorts of sound economic reasons” for that approach. The full denouement of the de Pfeffel position is published on video somewhere. I have watched it, sickening though it was.
Here is a link to what the actualité looks like, the reality of what de Pfeffel and crew prefer, of what the over 50 UN members are content with.
But what of previous UN resolutions?
The UN Security Council and the Things we are not Told:
In 2015 The UN voted unanimously for:
“Adopting Resolution 2202 (2015), Security Council Calls on Parties to Implement Accords Aimed at Peaceful Settlement in Eastern Ukraine Expressing the Security Council’s grave concern at the tragic events and violence in eastern regions of Ukraine, the 15-member body today unanimously adopted a resolution endorsing last week’s ceasefire agreement.”
By resolution 2202 (2015), the Council called on all parties to fully implement the “Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements”, adopted on 12 February 2015 in Minsk, Belarus. Firmly convinced that the resolution of the situation in eastern regions of Ukraine could only be achieved through a peaceful settlement to the current crisis, the Council welcomed the declaration by the Heads of State of the Russian Federation, Ukraine, France and Germany in support of the “package of measures” and their continuing commitment to implement the agreements.
In response to this 2015 UN Resolution, NATO (i.e. mainly the USA and the UK) armed and trained a Nazi-controlled army of 300k Ukrainians that established themselves in fortified positions around the Donbas. From 2015-2022 this Nazi Army regularly shelled Donbas Civilian
The water supply to many areas was cut off, infrastructure was destroyed, civilians were shelled and bombarded. The Ukrainians did this because the residents of the Donbas refused to accept the coup that deposed the democratically elected Government and replaced it with the unelected Nazi controlled regime which forbade, as one measure, the use of the Russian language, the native language of people living in the Donbas. The latest Ukrainian government is headed by a piano playing comedian who achieved his name recognition by using his dick to play the piano.
No attempt was made by the UkroNazis to implement the Minsk I and Minsk II agreements. No pressure was put on the UkroNazis to do so by the USA, UK, EU, NATO or indeed anyone other than Ukrainians living in the Donbas. Even the Russian Federation kept schtum and did not intervene. As noted, NATO armed, trained and supported the Nazi build-up of forces alignedagainst the Donbass Region.
In the run up to February 24th 2022 the UkroNazis started bombing the Donbas on a huge scale. The Donbas citizens declared, by way of Self Determination, their Independence. This is a legitimate process, recognised by the UN. Only then did they ask Russia for help.
What happened next is exactly what happened in Serbia/Kosovo.
Do you remember that?
Explain the difference to the current PM, Mr R.S, to Ms vdL, Mr Scholtz, de Pfeffel, the UK Government and UK Opposition and the rest in the peacock palace, etc, in any way you can! If you find any effective way of doing so please let me and the wider world know.
Meanwhile recognise that our government and opposition and indeed all parties in the HoC are a Nazi/Fascism supporting cult.
Just to put things into a little more focus.
Yesterday V de L said on video live that 100K Ukrainians had been KIA. She then tried to scrub those FACTS from the internet, a foolish thing to attempt. Add in those MIA and Injured and you are looking at circa 400K Ukrainians immobilized.
If you would like to know of one person who can claim to have played a big part on this please watch this https://youtu.be/HCPWOZ3gVLM?t=34 . A quick ending to the carnage in the Donbass? to quote de Pfiffer ” I could not support that..”
This creature has just announced that he will stand again for a Peacock position in our Parliament!
Reply to HA 806am
A phrase I learned on GB to the other night – via Mark Steyn.
So What. ??
We are talking about the present and starting off with the perfidious over the Minsk agreements, by the Ukraine and the West
Too many people are unwilling to consider reality and view the UN and other globalist organisations as benign. I also recall seeing the UN useless “white helmets” standing around in their pristine uniforms whilst thousands were massacred in the Balkans. Maybe they should also consider that the EU had its roots in Nazism…
Jack T at 9.21am. That’s right. I was shocked when I realised that the UN was the seat of the evil Agenda21 plan for global control. Since then my searches have produced more and more evidence that it is so now. Probably was not when first established end WW2. Though how much did Churchill foresee? He was right about the iron curtain.
Didn’t Trump want the USA to leave the UN? I think you said we should and I disagreed at the time. But now I wish we would. Staying in is a bit like Camaron thinking we could influence the EU by staying in it.
Is there an equivalent UN resolution against the glorification of Marxism? Of course not. A democratic country could veto the UN proposition on these grounds alone.
The entire problem arises because the native Ukrainians have been mass deported to Siberia and elsewhere by various Russian Tsars and most recently Stalin.
They were replaced with ethnic Russians (which is why you have Russian speakers in Ukraine.)
Not surprisingly, Ukrainians want rid of these pro Moscow interlopers, especially if they are going to try to betray the country to Moscow.
HA…………and the answer to the problem that you’ve raised is what?
Harold Armitage……so obviously you are not intending to answer the question I asked of you. Yes, you may be right about what happened during the reign of the Tsars and Stalin, but that was years ago, and a lot of water had passed under the bridge since then. However, the current cause of the problem between Russia and Ukraine can be basically put down to two factors, the first being the eastward expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). When the USSR broke up and all the constituent parts of what was then, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics went their own way and became independent, it was agreed that as part of the deal that Ukraine would give up its Nuclear deterrent and that NATO would not expand eastwards into Russia’s backyard. That, I am afraid has occurred. Those states should have remained neutral and acted as a buffer zone between the existing area of NATO influence and the Russian Federation. Secondly, the European Union has continually looked at ways of expanding their area of influence towards the east as well, and of course now they want their own Armed Forces, and of course as we know Poland, East Germany, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, and Hungary have all joined the European Union, all of which were once part of the Warsaw Pact. So, in the eyes of Russia, both NATO and the EU pose a threat to them politically and militarily. Cast your mind back to Cuba in 1962, when the Russians placed Nuclear missiles in Cuba and therefore on the doorstep of the USA which they considered a direct threat to them. The eastward expansion of NATO and the EU is that situation but in reverse. The western powers cannot have their cake and eat it, and the present situation in Ukraine could have been avoided. What part of this do you not understand?
Completely agree Colin Hussey. The Donbass region has been targeted relentlessly for nearly ten years and for what? This is all about money laundering and bio-weapons. The Bidens are up to their necks in manure.
I agree Colin Hussey. 4.45pm 01/12.
** TROLL ALERT ** DON’T FEED THE TROLL **
[The wikiplonker strikes again]
Arry Again F Armitrage- First out of the bolocks again with pre-prepared junk.